User talk:Battlesnake1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Speedy deletion nomination of Beatboxing dog[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Beatboxing dog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ttonyb (talk) 23:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aunt jennifer[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Aunt jennifer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acroterion (talk) 05:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Klagenfurt[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Battle of Klagenfurt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hoax. At Klagenfurt the only mention of Napoleon is in 1809 and not 1797. In 1797 he was in Italy, see War of the First Coalition. At the time this battle was supposed to have taken place the Treaty of Campo Formio was almost completed after five months negotiations. Based on the edit summary for the creation of this I think this may also be from a game. Google scholar has no hits whatsoever.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 05:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Luna the Leaping cow[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Luna the Leaping cow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. hang on If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. –Dream out loud (talk) 21:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Luna the Leaping cow[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Luna the Leaping cow, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hang on}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aunt Jennifer[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Aunt Jennifer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Buggie111 (talk) 21:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011[edit]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alexf(talk) 00:00, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Blackhorse riders a desperate last stand,an extraordinary rescue mission,and the Vietnam battle America forgot[edit]

Hello Battlesnake1,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Blackhorse riders a desperate last stand,an extraordinary rescue mission,and the Vietnam battle America forgot, may be copied from http://us.macmillan.com/blackhorseriders/PhilipKeith. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 00:29, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Homeland Security Market Research, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Times Square bomb attack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DeCavalcante crime family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sicillian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albanian Rebellion of 1997, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rentier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Homeland Security Market Research[edit]

Dear Battlesnake1,

In November 2013 you created the page Homeland Security Market Research, which claims that its subject is a part of the US Department of Homeland Security. However, you left no source that corroborates this claim. Could you please join the discussion at Talk:Homeland Security Market Research regarding this issue? QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating nonsense pages. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dougweller (talk) 14:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
This was after I read the discussion at [1] about the Homeland Research article you created and seeing the number of hoax or other unsatisfactory articles you have created. You can be unblocked if you can explain why you created them and what you will do in the future to make sure this doesn't happen again. An agreement not to create new articles or only to do them in your user space and then ask for review would help. Dougweller (talk) 14:52, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Battlesnake1 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

Acknowledgement and apology for misinformation Battlesnake1 (talk) 20:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No. The conditions for unblock were set out in the previous declined request; adequate answers are required. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:25, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Battlesnake1 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

Agreement to the conditions in the Block explanation

Accept reason:

This block is due to the EXTENSIVE creation of inappropriate articles on Wikipedia. User has agreed to the following restrictions:
  • they will not create any live articles in articlespace, or move articles into articlespace
  • they may draft articles in their userspace, but they must be reviewed using the WP:AFC process
  • they will not create any hoax article, even in userspace
Violation of any of these conditions of unblock will result in immediate indefinite reblock the panda ₯’ 00:19, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

This is about the "Homeland Security Market Research" page that had me blocked; the reason I created that page was that on the article about Improvised explosive devices, the HSMR was mentioned but the page did not exist so I decided to create it. While creating it, there was not much information available except for the website and an online article. As for the reason it was removed because of false information, I looked at the aforementioned official website and found out they were involved in the Homeland Security industry, they were actually not involved with the actual Department of Homeland Security. I am terribly sorry for this and I agree to the condition to never create new articles unless I create them on my user space first for review.


The "About us" section of the website. The section in the Improvised Explosive Device Wikipedia page that mentions the HSMR. The online magazine article.

December 2014[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Woodroar (talk) 04:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Edit Summaries on Talk Page[edit]

Hi there, when editing the Talk page on the Gamergate controversy it would be helpful if you put a comment in saying which section you are editing. If you click the 'Edit' link next to the section header the edit form will pre-populate the edit summary for you. As it's a busy page it helps other editors to know which discussion is being updated so that they can ignore updates to discussions they're not following or a part of. Thanks! — Strongjam (talk) 15:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Compromised account?[edit]

I'm confused. Were you aware that your edit, which you described as "Included a citation linking to a New York Times "Bits" article covering Intel pulling ads from Gamasutra," also "removed the description of the allegations against Zoe Quinn as being false, and ... inserted a claim that the controversy involves 'corruption in journalism?'" I am concerned your account or computer are compromised. Please respond to this post haste. Thanks! Hipocrite (talk) 15:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

What gives you the idea my account is compromised? Please clarify for me. Thank you. Battlesnake1 (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

You don't recall the contents of edits you made. Hipocrite (talk) 15:34, 22 December 2014 (UTC)