User talk:Benjwong

Home	Talk	List of Contributions	Recent Contributions	Userboxes	Awards

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Anti-Cantonese campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

I was doing alot of edits, and overlooked the disembig. Benjwong (talk) 02:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Snow Kid

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Snow Kid. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Snowkid. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Snowkid - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SnowKid.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SnowKid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:41, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Translation request: Startling by Each Step to 步步驚心 (電視劇)

Hi, I'm NeoBatfreak. The reason I'm writing is that I am requesting translation of the plot summary of Startling by Each Step to 步步驚心 (電視劇). If possible, please tranlate the summary and paste the translated text on my talk page. PLEASE? Thank you very much.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. It is best that I not translate this. I have not seen this drama. I don't even know if the description in zh.wiki is right. Please talk to other editors like User:Lonelydarksky, User:Darkreason, User:Stormedelf, User:Ricky@36. Maybe they have seen it. It definitely has some well known HK actors in there. Benjwong (talk) 03:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

I guess I'll try User:Ricky@36--NeoBatfreak (talk) 04:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Hong Kong Anti-mainlander conflicts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mandarin and Bastard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of 2012 Hong Kong Anti-mainlander conflicts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012 Hong Kong Anti-mainlander conflicts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Hong Kong Anti-mainlander conflicts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ZZArch ^{talk to me} 01:35, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Early 2012 Hong Kong protests

Please see Talk:Early 2012 Hong Kong protests for discussion. ZZArch ^{talk to me} 07:16, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MortalKombatAnnihilationOSTCD.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MortalKombatAnnihilationOSTCD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MortalKombatOSTCD.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MortalKombatOSTCD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Just delete. Other users have uploaded better pics. Benjwong (talk) 02:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Categorisation of Hong Kong and Macau

Can you help look into the following problem? From what I observed, many Hong Kong and Macau categories are subcats of the corresponding by-country parent categories (by their status of dependencies), and are subcats of the corresponding China or PRC categories with a <spacebar>Macau or <spacebar>Hong Kong catsort (in some cases an asterisk is used instead in place of the <spacebar> tho). But when I apply it to other categories, SchmuckyTheCat (talk · contribs) undid them en masse. Please response at WP talk:Categorisation. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I'll leave a comment. Benjwong (talk) 02:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Driving side

• [1]

I just want to comment that this edit is both wrong and irrelevant. The edit gave the incorrect implication that all vehicles from mainland China will be able to enter Hong Kong freely, and is a mis-representation of the cited source. Hong Kong mainland China driving scheme is irrelevant to the article anyway, because it has nothing to do with the driving side: Hong Kong continues to drive on the left, and the mainland on the right. Deryck C. 21:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

But according to that edit I did not reference it for the sentence about driving on the left/right? I referenced it for letting mainland citizens in. Benjwong (talk) 02:22, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes that's what I mean - the scheme you referenced has absolutely nothing to do with driving side. Deryck C. 10:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok. I know what you mean now. You are saying the sides are not changed. That is still true. Sorry for confusion. Feel free to change as you need. Benjwong (talk) 12:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WongJim.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WongJim.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Chief executive election

I would like to ask what topic area this edit concerns. I wasn't following it in the press, but now looking at the article, it seems utterly unclear. Can you help clarify? --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 02:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Let me reply on the page. Benjwong (talk) 05:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Actually let me reply here. That section explains a mix of indecisions of the candidates. It summarizes a number of topics regarding whether candidates want to continue or drop out of the election. For example it explains why Rita Fan is no longer in the race. Or how Tang's affairs affected the election. If it is unclear I am open to splitting it up or moving the section around. I am even open to adding a section to the indecisiveness of Beijing, for putting candidates like Jasper Tsang into the race with 1 month left without a campaign. Benjwong (talk) 05:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

• You seem very insistent on keeping text concerning Yu Wing-yin, having reinserted it at least twice. In edit summaries, you have questioned fellow editors of acting in bad faith with accusations of "censorship" and "vandalism". After having allowed the said text to remain for some time to judge the relevance, I can only concur with the said two editors that it is extremely marginal; those facts you highlight seem distinctly as if you are seeking to score political points. I have thus removed it. Kindly take it up on the talk page of you wish to restore it, and do not engage in further edit warring. Cheers, --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 16:48, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop

Your recent editing history at Hong Kong Chief Executive election, 2012 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Proposed deletion of 2011 Anshun incident

The article 2011 Anshun incident has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The incident doesn't have lasting notability - and appears to be result of routine news reporting

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Russavia ^{ლ(ಠ益ಠლ)} 00:40, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Henry Tang illegal basement controversy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Tien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

John Liu

I just took a look at the John Liu page after seeing the news that another one of his campaign staffers was arrested on wire fraud charges. The section on controversies needed work, so I expanded it drawing mainly on the series of articles published in the New York Times last fall. Now the page is sort of off-balance, however. If you have some time, maybe you can take a look. I'm thinking more details should be added on other sections. Homunculus (duihua) 20:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Greencatanime.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Greencatanime.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of 2011 Anshun incident for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011 Anshun incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Anshun incident (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 01:38, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Let's not get personal

Please could I ask you to keep it civil; address the issues and not attack others' motivations? The comment about me at the AfD is borderline, but the edits I pointed out above are over the line, IMHO. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 02:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Believe me, I am not getting personal. I was just pointing out what appears to be yielding to the trend. And is not a good trend to begin with. 90,000 disturbances should probably come out to 10,000 articles. Obviously we don't have that many editors. Benjwong (talk) 02:37, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

You're doing it again, please stop

Your recent editing history at Lai Changxing‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 03:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. When you recently edited Jasper Tsang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiananmen Square protests (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)