User talk:Big iron

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Archived talk pages
Archive 1 to October 2005
Archive 2 to November 2008
Archive 3 to June 2011
Archive 4

DYK for Ruth Budd[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for William Kuinka[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Dirk Keetbaas[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:09, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ian Rusted[edit]

Hello Big iron,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ian Rusted for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Shiprabaxi1112 (talk) 12:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion was speedily removed by an admin. --Big_iron (talk) 13:23, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Copyright verification on IIFL Private Wealth[edit]

The content has no copyright infringement. India Infoline is the parent group of IIFL Private Wealth. The content provided for the article is by the group itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiprabaxi1112 (talkcontribs) 05:00, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

That is not the problem. The problem is that neither of those groups have given Wikipedia permission to use that material. --Big_iron (talk) 11:12, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nathan Lloyd Smith[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Nathan Lloyd Smith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:SOLDIER, also WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Should be adequately covered by the article on the friendly fire incident.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 00:10, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Nathan Lloyd Smith for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Lloyd Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Lloyd Smith (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 01:03, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Russell Wilson (politician)[edit]

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:27, 1 September 2014 (UTC) 12:04, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Robert Pow[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Robert Pow at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Edwardx (talk) 09:51, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Robert Pow[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:49, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

The Red Maple Leaf Award[edit]

A Barnstar!
The Red Maple Leaf Award

This award is being given to you in recognition of your hard work in Canada related articles.--Skr15081997 (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Prix Victor-Rossel[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Prix Victor-Rossel, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.comoria.com/16182/Prix_Victor_Rossel.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Left note on article talk page. --Big_iron (talk) 13:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

15th General Assembly of Newfoundland[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 15th General Assembly of Newfoundland, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 14th General Assembly of Newfoundland. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Removed tag; left note on talk page. --Big_iron (talk) 23:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)