Why do you refuse to give an edit summary? I know you're reading my explanation, I've tried to be reasonable; just give a reason why you are removing Serb. I've looked through the edit history, and you've done this before where you keep removing it without an explanation. I'm not going to edit war with you, I'm going to be the better person here. DaHuzyBru (talk) 01:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Because Ognjen never publicly declared himself as "Bosnian Serb" (as many Westerners conclude -- "Hey he's Ognjen, he must be a Serb"). When you find a direct quote of him declaring himself as a Bosnian Serb, I will agree with you. And you might say "He's not a Bosnian then either!!". Well, he was born in Bosnia & H. and that makes him Bosnian. I also decided not to edit the national team choice of Ognjen, even though the site that published the interview in which he allegedly said "I can't wait to play for Serbia" is a Serbian tabloid and I don't believe he ever said anything like that. He did publicly say in a FIBA interview (the interview can be found on FIBA website) that he'll play for Bosnia in Slovenia (which he didn't), and that Bosnia is his choice, but until he plays for either team, I don't think there is any point in editing his national team choice. Bihseth (talk) 13:50, 16 October 2013 (CET)
- Listen, I don't care about Kuzmić to be perfectly honest, and/or know anything about him. I just saw you remove Serb without any reasoning and then undo my edit without any reasoning either. I have no idea if he is dual nationality, I don't care if he's dual nationality, and I'm certainly not going to "find a quote" for you. It's you who has to give reasoning for removal of content. Someone has added that he is Serb, so you can't just remove it like that, it looks like vandalism (hence my revert in the first place). DaHuzyBru (talk) 12:29, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Ognjen Kuzmić shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 00:18, 6 November 2013 (UTC)