User talk:Biosthmors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Nomination of Mark Tuan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Tuan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Tuan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 06:49, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Shrooms[edit]

RE this, you may prefer that layout but you won't find many, if any, article like that at all. HalfGig talk 18:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I know. And I think it's a shame, HalfGig. Best. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 18:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
I think the current Marasmius siccus layout is easy on the eyes, FWIW. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 19:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
I disagree, it is not easy on the eyes and I'm pretty sure most of the community would agree with me. This is an encyclopedia, none flickr. Look at all the FAs on shrooms, not look like that. I also see no reason to get into a royal boil over it. HalfGig talk 19:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

salt and ice photos[edit]

did you/someone you know try the challenge to get those photos? (since you say own work) Gaijin42 (talk) 15:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

yes. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 18:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Amanda Anka for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amanda Anka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Anka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:17, 8 April 2015 (UTC)