User talk:Black Kite

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
User talk:Black Kite
   
User:Black Kite/Archives
   
User:Black Kite/Articles
   
User:Black Kite/Working
   
User:Black Kite/Toolbox
Talk
   
Archives
   
Articles
   
Working On
   
Toolbox
   


Maybe you could lend me a hand[edit]

Hi, perhaps you don't remember me but im an editor that has already been involved with you, [1] i contact you because I am having problems again with a editor called AbelM7 that was involved with you aswell (already reported his behavoir before [2]) again, he is editing military related articles in a biased manner again and keeps removing completely valid information again, when i explain on his talk page [3] and on the edit summaries [4] why that information must be included and inclusive is more valid than information already there he ignores it and keeps removing it. He shows no signs of going to stop by himself (it always takes to drag administrators and a big number of editors to make him drop an issue) and I don't want to get in a edit war with him again (both have been blocked before for doing it), you can scroll through the history and diffs of his talk page and he is always fighting with other editors because he keeps removing or adding information just because he wants it regardless of what sources say [5] (and he was blocked just two weeks ago for edit warring [6]). Can you lend me a hand here? What do you think must be done to make him stop behaving that way once for all? HMWD (talk) 19:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Lend us both a hand[edit]

Hello. You've already been made aware of what is going on and we both could use your helping hand. I'm having problems with the editor HMWD. Of course HMWD is going to make it look it its my fault and that I've been ignoring (which I haven't) but what he forgot to mention is that I've already explained to him why they don't belong there. It all started when HMWD added an expedition and a massacre to the list of wars involving Mexico. I explained to him in the edit summaries that an expedition and a massacre are not wars and don't belong to the list. I'm sure you understand why a expedition and a massacre doesn't belong. This would be the equivalent of adding the Lewis and Clark Expedition and the Boston Massacre to the list of wars involving the United States. I don't want to edit war with him. We've already had an edit war before on the Border War because he insisted that Mexico and the German Empire defeated the United States in that war and kept changing it. It took us a while to resolve that and I guess ever since then he's had a personal vendetta against me because he won't listen. He seems to have created his profile just for editing on the Border War and List of wars involving Mexico with his own biased editing and doesn't show any signs of stopping. I was wondering if you could help and explain to him why a expedition and a massacre doesn't belong in the list of wars and end his behavior. He claims I've been ignoring him but we've been discussing the matter in my talk page. AbelM7 (talk) 00:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

The incidents i want to add are more relevant and fit better the criteria than many incidents already there. Why do you have a problem with the ones i want to add but not with the ones that are already there? HMWD (talk) 01:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
And im not "making it look as if it was your fault" because actually is your fault. Everywhere you go you have problems with other wikipedians for the way you act. HMWD (talk) 01:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Because they're not wars. And no, it actually is your fault. You're the one who added an expedition and a massacre to the list of wars. If you hadn't did that in the first place, this wouldn't be going on. No I don't have problems with other Wikipedians "everywhere" I go. Disagreements come up with a few but you're not always going to agree with everybody, whether in Wikipedia or in real life (you cannot say that you have never had disagreements with anyone in real life). I'm sure most Wikipedians have had someone they disagree with so I'm not a unique story. AbelM7 (talk) 11:15, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Stop saying that they aren't wars, half of the entries in the article aren't proper wars, and everybody has problems for the way you edit, that's unique to you, you are almost trolling now. HMWD (talk) 19:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
They're not wars. They're an expedition and a massacre. It even say so in their title. No, not everybody "has problems for the way" I edit. That's a lie and you know it. Having disputes is not unique to me. I'm not a troll. I could say the same thing about you almost trolling since you seem to have created your page just to edit war with me on the List of wars involving Mexico article. AbelM7 (talk) 21:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Several entries in the article are not wars either, just minor conflicts and don't involve the government at all. And you started the edit war. HMWD (talk) 02:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Andyvphil topic ban discussion[edit]

Hi, I think you may have inadvertently edited out my comment on the noticeboard discussion. Dyrnych (talk) 20:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Oh damn, sorry, that often happens on ANI when lots of people are trying to edit at the same time. Black Kite (talk) 20:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Fixed now. Black Kite (talk) 20:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
No worries. I've done the same thing. Thanks! Dyrnych (talk) 20:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)