User talk:BlueGold73

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

QEBH[edit]

Thanks for your efforts to clean up QEBH. The article previously sucked. You've really improved it. I wish they were were a little more forthright in members. Right now it looks very provincial. Thanks again! Americasroof 04:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Mizzou[edit]

Jesse through quad.jpg
Hello, I noticed you've made edits to University of Missouri articles or that you are in some way connected to the University of Missouri. I thought you might want to become a member of the Mizzou WikiProject. We've recently built the project page and started a drive to improve Mizzou related articles. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. Once an article's status has been agreed upon, feel free to stop by and lend a hand in getting it to featured article status. Hope you can participate!



Theta Nu Epsilon Vandalism[edit]

Hi there, I noticed you have an interst in TNE. Watch out for the agenda taking place right now by the Alpha chapter to remove cited and verifiable info. They tend not to like Purdue- which has cited info that you can check for yourself- and they also do not like the whole TNE today section which they are desperately trying to remove- especially the sourced article about them being less like a secret society on campus. No one should allow sourced info to be removed on account that it does not suit the agenda or taste of a certain group. The current Alpha is a bully! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.141.156.118 (talk) 04:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I might suggest that the bad blood you are seeing on the TNE article is being generated primarily by an unreg. user sniping from several IP's into articles about Wesleyan University, TNE, and Middletown, Connecticut who has been previously blocked for similar disruptive behavior (see the IP talk page history [1] as they deleted the block message from the IP talk page). You may wish to report them if it continues and suggest blocks to their primary IP sockpuppets of abuse, 129.133.124.199 and 159.247.3.210 ; see also the talk pages of the articles mentioned above. I already went a round with this person at Middletown, Connecticut, so I'll be staying out of this one. Whew. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 16:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Blue Gold, this is Purdue and we have made our final statements for our case. We just wanted to be recognized under our proper name of Indiana Alpha, our proper founding date of 1882, and our connection to Purdue's own society Skull and Crescent. We don't care where we are recognized as such within the article- and we fully support your interests in adding as much verifiable and cited points as possible. We also appreciate your efforts to make the article more objective and not simply in the interst of the current Alpha group. We believe the TNE section today is a relevant section since there clearly are many issues surround chapters (either alive, sub rosa, or defunct) that are still relevant issues to the nature of TNE as a historical entity. Best Wishes, Purdue

TNE PAGE We are curious? Why was TNE's page altered to even remove your citations when there was no concensus by anyone from our side to do so? What is the block for if Wes Alpha will just revert. Look at their IP' talk pages- they have been running a muck with other Wesleyan related articles- that group is very controlling and problematic across the board. Best wishes, from Purdue people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.141.157.129 (talk) 03:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Good question. I would like to know the answer myself. That sort of behavior is ridiculous, especially from someone with administrative responsibilities. Keep fighting the good fight to get some balance in this article instead of Alpha's one-sided slant. BlueGold73 (talk) 03:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

For your work[edit]

BoNM - Missouri.PNG The Missouri Barnstar National of Merit -
For all your work on Mizzou, Missouri and Education related articles.-Grey Wanderer | Talk 19:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:BannisterComplex.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important blue.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:BannisterComplex.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECUtalk 12:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

North-American Interfraternity Conference[edit]

BlueGold73, I appreciate your edits, however, I have made a few modifications to them. Please refer to the discussion page and post a response if you disagree with my edits. LittleAlien¹8² --talk trash-- 20:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Theta Nu Epsilon Founding Date[edit]

It's from the original documents. One suspects that the other date is from confusion with a different society.129.133.124.194 (talk) 02:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


Image source problem with Image:Sandstone logo.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Sandstone logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 16:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Title IX[edit]

Hello BlueGold73. I see that you have a vast interest in Title IX issues. I too have an interest in them. I have been in contact with the Dept. of ED and the Office of Civil Rights to understand more clearly about how Title IX relates to professional fraternities and sororities. Would you be open and interested in sharing information? Also, are you (personally) a member of the PFA? I believe that you have edited the PFA page as well and figured you might be in that organization. Much thanks. IlliniFlag (talk) 13:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

January 2010[edit]

Information.svg If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Alpha Kappa Psi, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. I know you've been here for a while, but, given your username and the nature of your edits, I feel this is necessary. 132 06:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm aware of the policy, and my actions are not in conflict with the policy. My username is also not a reference to this organization. BlueGold73 (talk) 00:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
All right. Thanks for letting me know. I wasn't completely sure, but just in case, I wanted to let you know. --132 01:08, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm back again. I know you've done quite a bit of positive work on the Alpha Kappa Psi article, but adding in copyrighted information, almost verbatim, is not acceptable. Please re-write the information in your own words. Thank you. --132 14:49, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
To clarify, I removed the word-for-word information, but left the rest. That said, I'm leaning toward removing the information you also added directly under the "history" section as it heavily echoes the official site as well. For now, I'll leave it since there is variation here and there, but I would really encourage you to go back through and edit it to make it wholly your own. --132 15:06, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
I actually wasn't using the website to write any of that. Nearly all of the information relating to the early history is from sources that are in the public domain. In fact much of the early history portions on the official website were lifted verbatim from material that was published prior to 1923. As such, copyright does not apply to large portions of that information. That said, I am making an effort to state the information in my own words, as well as bring in additional outside sources. I appreciate your input, and I just wanted to make you aware of the fact that a very significant portion of the material on the official website has been lifted from documents that are now in the public domain...much of which is accumulated in the 1917 handbook that I cited. BlueGold73 (talk) 02:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:AZCoatofArms.png[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg

Thank you for uploading File:AZCoatofArms.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 03:33, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Need a free image for Mainstreet Theater[edit]

I saw you have uploaded File:MainstreetTheaterPromo.jpg but the theater has now since open so the unfree image needs to go. I am wondering if you happen to have a free image of that please upload it for the article. Sawblade5 (talk to me | my wiki life) 22:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:MainstreetTheaterPromo.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:MainstreetTheaterPromo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sawblade5 (talk to me | my wiki life) 22:19, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Fridovich-david.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Fridovich-david.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bradley M. Scott[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bradley M. Scott requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Toddst1 (talk) 05:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Bradley M. Scott for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bradley M. Scott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley M. Scott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 22:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Jason Klumb[edit]

I just wanted to let you know that I took a look at your recently created article Jason Klumb-- The headings and sections seem appropriate.Amy Z (talk) 14:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:SnoqualmieFallsLodge.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:SnoqualmieFallsLodge.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 07:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

What's wrong with the public domain status? It was published no later than 1946. This is known because of the postmark date on the postcard. It was published without a copyright notice, which was required of works prior to 1977. See http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm BlueGold73 (talk) 13:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

National Archives meetup[edit]

US-NARA-Seal.svg

Hi BlueGold73! Thank you expressing interest in the National Archives Meetup and Scanathon in Kansas City. I just want to remind you that this is taking place this Saturday, two days from now, starting at 9 a.m. We hope to see you there! Please let me know if you have any questions. Dominic·t 13:59, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

I also just want to note that a scanner is not required, though useful. If you have a scanner with you (or if someone else brings one and you can share), it just means you'll get to spend your time scanning the historical documents. As long as you have a computer, though, you can edit articles related to the theme of the event. The idea here is just to have a fun time while sharing knowledge. :-) Judging from the e-mailed RSVPs, there may be several other people coming who have little to no Wikipedia experience at all, so you might get a chance to do some teaching, too. Dominic·t 20:21, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Come to the First Topeka Meetup![edit]

Wikipedia Day 2013 Topeka.png

Come celebrate Wikipedia Day with other Kansas Wikipedians sponsored by Wikimedians Active in Local Regions in the United States and hosted by the Topeka and Shawnee Public Library. Come chat, hang out and enjoy good company while find out more about Wikipedia in our regional community! RSVP at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Wikipedia_Day.

If you can't come, but still want to find out about events in the greater Topeka region sign up for future notifications at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Invite list.

Hope to see you there Sadads (talk) 19:59, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

List of notable Kentucky colonels[edit]

Hello. I hope you will respond to the questions I posted at Talk:Kentucky colonel on the question of whether (and how) the article benefits from including a list of notable KCs. —BarrelProof (talk) 02:17, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

February 2013[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Philippine Basketball Association. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. FYI, the PBA is founded in 1975, not 1973 as you claimed it. -WayKurat (talk) 01:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

I didn't add any commentary. I have no idea what you're talking about. Get your facts straight before making accusations on my talk page. The user that made the changes you're accusing me of was Braveheart73, which is not my username. BlueGold73 (talk) 02:08, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
I apologize, you and Braveheart73 had almost the same username. There's have been confusion since you both edited PBA related articles at the same time. -WayKurat (talk) 04:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Non-free file File:MurrayStateRacers.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:MurrayStateRacers.png. The file is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:MurrayStateRacers.png. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 14:16, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jess & Jim's Steakhouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kansas City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle[edit]

Hello,
I wanted to discuss an issue with you regarding WP:BRD. When editing an article, if information you have added is challenged (e.g. deleted) it is your responsibility to address the concerns of the editor on the talk page. Contrary to your comments in you edit summary here, it is not the editor who challenges your additions responsibility to justify the deletion. Please do not restore the challenged information until such time as proper discussion is completed and the concerns of the other editors have been addressed. --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 16:25, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Please read this policy before you restore anything else to the page. Restoring the information without discussion constitutes edit warring. Also, please comment on the discussion, not the editor. You also might consider reading up on WP:Civil, WP:Assume good faith, and WP:Tendentious before commenting any more. --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 05:08, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kern Alexander, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marrowbone, Kentucky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Files missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:21, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of LSV Society[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on LSV Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. War (talk) 07:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


Lindenwood Lions[edit]

Hi BlueGold73,
First, I don't want an edit war and generally agree with the organizational improvements done to Lindenwood Lions. On the subject of club vs. student life: LU doesn't fit the typical club sport model, since they are univ.-supported varsity sports competing in non-NCAA orgs i.e. http://www.teamusa.org/USA-Synchronized-Swimming/Collegiate/Programs-Teams, along with numerous other sources, some refed in the article. Although "club sports" is a generic term, Lindenwood, as well as a growing number of other universities using similar models, tend to use "student life sports". Since Wikipedia is for learning, I'd rather use a name that reflects the distinct univ.-supported model rather than "club sports" which generally reflects the traditional model where the teams are student-run organizations and the students pay-to-play. Bhockey10 (talk) 14:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm curious about your reference mentioning a "growing number of other universities using similar models, tend to use "student life sports"". I've been searching for them, and I'm not having much luck finding more than a couple other examples. I've also worked in higher education and athletics at several universities, and the "student life sports" terminology is not commonly used or understood in the industry. If there really are a substantial number of institutions using a "student life sports" model and terminology, then I would understand using the terminology and linking to an article that explains the concept; however, at this point I still strongly believe that "club sports" is the correct terminology for the article. I haven't found enough information regarding other universities using similar models to make me comfortable believing that the "student life sports" terminology isn't just marketing speak used at Lindenwood to refer to their club sports programs that don't compete at the NCAA level and are not subject to NCAA policies and regulations. BlueGold73 (talk) 06:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (R. C. Williams) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating R. C. Williams, BlueGold73!

Wikipedia editor Dolive21 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great article, you obviously know your stuff.

To reply, leave a comment on Dolive21's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Avila scoreboard.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:41, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kappa Sigma Kappa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Concord College and Armstrong College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Outing[edit]

Please refrain from posting personal information about another editor. Per policy, I had to suppress a recent edit of yours. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

I understand. It must have been a misinterpretation of the outing policy on my part. Since the editor identified his organization and stated that the user name he was requesting was his real name, I was under the impression that such information could be used for discussions relating to conflicts of interest. I must have misread the outing policy. I apologize. BlueGold73 (talk) 20:27, 12 August 2014 (UTC)