Bobvancleef38, you are invited to the Teahouse
Your edits on "love-shyness", 3RR note 3
Please review WP:MEDRS on the sourcing required in medical articles, and also please review WP:EDITWAR and WP:3RR. You have continued to insert text about "love-shyness" after others have removed it; you could be blocked if you continue to do so. Please discuss your edits on article talk pages. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- You are continuing to editwar. Not "yet" is the same as "not" (redundant), and there is pretty much no possibility that love shyness will be recognized as a diagnosis any time soon, considering the DSM5 was just published. Please review WP:BRD, and discuss your edits on article talk. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Echoing Ohnoitsjamie's post, you have been warned above about editwarring and WP:3RR, and you continue to insert an Undue (and probably non-notable, since only one author has promoted the concept of "love shyness") unsourced concept into articles. If you continue, you can be blocked. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:56, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Love-shyness for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love-shyness (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Spamming love-shyness all over the place
Bob I have blocked your account temporarily for repeated violations of the Wikipedia policy regarding verifiability despite multiple warnings. Challenged content must be supported with reliable sourcing before it may be re-added; you have repeatedly failed to support your content changes with reliable sourcing. Please use this time to review the Wikipedia content policies. Thank you...
Zad68 16:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)