User talk:Bobvancleef38

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Bobvancleef38, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Bobvancleef38! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your edits on "love-shyness", 3RR note 3[edit]

Please review WP:MEDRS on the sourcing required in medical articles, and also please review WP:EDITWAR and WP:3RR. You have continued to insert text about "love-shyness" after others have removed it; you could be blocked if you continue to do so. Please discuss your edits on article talk pages. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:53, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

You are continuing to editwar. Not "yet" is the same as "not" (redundant), and there is pretty much no possibility that love shyness will be recognized as a diagnosis any time soon, considering the DSM5 was just published. Please review WP:BRD, and discuss your edits on article talk. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Unsourced edits[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Echoing Ohnoitsjamie's post, you have been warned above about editwarring and WP:3RR, and you continue to insert an Undue (and probably non-notable, since only one author has promoted the concept of "love shyness") unsourced concept into articles. If you continue, you can be blocked. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:56, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Love-shyness for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love-shyness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love-shyness (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Spamming love-shyness all over the place[edit]

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Bob I have blocked your account temporarily for repeated violations of the Wikipedia policy regarding verifiability despite multiple warnings. Challenged content must be supported with reliable sourcing before it may be re-added; you have repeatedly failed to support your content changes with reliable sourcing. Please use this time to review the Wikipedia content policies. Thank you... Zad68 16:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)