User talk:Bookeaters
November 2008[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Sir Bourgian Defense Forces has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Keilana|Parlez ici 02:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Sir Bourgian Defense Forces[edit]
I have nominated Sir Bourgian Defense Forces, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Bourgian Defense Forces. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. the skomorokh 19:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Blocked for creating a hoax[edit]
Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did in the article Sir Bourgian Defense Forces. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you. Your block will expire in one week Nick-D (talk) 01:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Make it two weeks this time:
--PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:17, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Holy Roman Army[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Holy Roman Army, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- factually incorrect, OR
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 21:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 36 Canadian Brigade Group, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.army.dnd.ca/36CBG_HQ/PAGES/history.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)