User talk:Booyabazooka
|
|---|
[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Totally-disputed-section
Template:Totally-disputed-section has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Rogerb67 (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit]
Could you please license Feather.svg also with Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5? There is currently a problem with a derivative work of the file, Stop bad orthography nuvola.svg. In that derivative work I merged your image and Stop hand nuvola.svg, which is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5. But your image, Feather.svg, is licensed only with GNU Free Documentation License, which is a ShareAlike-license. --Joku Janne (talk) 11:56, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- I hate this licensing nonsense. Seeing as this issue isn't actually the least bit important, and will never matter outside of Wikipedia (Since no one else actually looks at the license anyway), I just switched it to public domain. Enjoy. ~ Booya Bazooka 19:27, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
-
- Actually... crap, I can't even do that, because it's a derivative of File:Feather.jpg, which is GFDL. Can you further explain why this is necessary or possible? If it's a problem for you that my image doesn't have a CC license, that how can I add it, since the image I derived from doesn't have it either? ~ Booya Bazooka 19:39, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- D'oh! I did not notice the source of the SVG. Now I have to ask the author of the JPG image to license the JPG image with CC-BY-SA 2.5. And when he/she have changed the license, you can change the license for the SVG image, and when you have changed the license for the SVG image, Father.svg becomes legal. Now it is a copyright violation. --Joku Janne (talk) 21:42, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- And the author of the JPG image is inactive ([1]). He has made his last edit in August 2006. And he has not given his e-mail adress. The only choice is to license Stop2.png with GFDL and then license Stop hand nuvola.svg with GFDL. --Joku Janne (talk) 21:58, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Your userpage
Hi, you have very nice userpage, can i take some parts of it to use in my talkpage in Finnish wikipedia? --Olliii (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Of course, use what you want. This is Wikipedia, so it's all open-licensed, right? :) ~ Booya Bazooka 20:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File:P blank.svg
Hi, it would be really helpful if you released File:P blank.svg under PD-self. I'm having trouble because I can't combine the template with LGPL images for example. This template is so widely derivatived, so it would really help. --Beao 13:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
[edit] image: rubik's cube.svg
Well, i did not understand whether this image is property of Rubik's Cube company or whether you made it from A to Z. Anyway, i wanted to notice you that a little french clothes company is making money with printing this image on tshirts. www.myspace.com/abclife shirt 79.86.55.136 (talk) 11:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC) Julien
[edit] VP Promotion
|
|
[edit] Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 17:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC).
[edit]
Category:Chat-related websites, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC)