User talk:Bosnian Control

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello - please be careful[edit]

Hello Bosnian Control. I see no one has welcomed you to Wikipedia yet. I welcome you. I hear good things about the Teahouse as a "friendly place to help new editors become accustomed to Wikipedia culture, ask questions, and develop community relationships."

I have reverted a number of your edits ([1] [2] [3]) to the article Bosnia and Herzegovina where you have changed small things without any explanation or source. I see that you have done that in a number of articles. If you have new knowledge from reliable sources to update those numbers, updating them would be a valuable service to Wikipedia. It is important to post references to those reliable sources so that other people can confirm that they are correct. If you don't provide those references, you can expect to have your edits reverted.

Please don't make changes unless you have a good reason. Thank you. (You can respond here on this page.) SchreiberBike (talk) 23:12, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Bosnian Control. You have new messages at SchreiberBike's talk page.
Message added 18:57, 25 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Bobrayner. Your recent edit to the page Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. bobrayner (talk) 05:59, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Juniki San. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Preceding undated comment added 16:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to AT4, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W (talk) 13:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thomas.W (talk) 13:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a fan forum, so ALL edits of the type you just made MUST be accompanied by proper reliable references/sources. Thomas.W (talk) 13:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bosnia and Herzegovina. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bobrayner (talk) 16:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Did you previously edit as BosniaMain (talk · contribs)? bobrayner (talk) 17:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina, you may be blocked from editing. Thomas.W talk to me 16:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 5 May[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Air Force and Anti-Aircraft Defence of Bosnia and Herzegovina. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for unsourced inflation of numbers. Thomas.W talk 10:19, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Air Force and Anti-Aircraft Defence of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Final warning for repeated unsourced inflation of numbers. You can NOT increase the numbers without also providing reliable sources that support the changes you make! Thomas.W talk 13:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Buba Corelli[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Buba Corelli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talk) 00:27, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RedEye Vision[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on RedEye Vision requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. STATic message me! 22:37, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Final warning for repeated unsourced inflation of numbers. See the multiple previous warnings for the same behaviour that have been given to the user, including a final warning on 21 May 2014. Thomas.W talk 12:41, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

August 2014[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Bosnia and Herzegovina has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The image of a Bosnian soldier that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons as "own work", and then added to the article here, is obviously a clear copyright violation (see note on image on Commons). Copyright violations like that are quickly and easily detected, both on Commons and here, so don't even try doing things like that again. Thomas.W talk 17:09, 12 August 2014 (UTC)