User talk:Brewcrewer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Brewcrewer.

Nomination of Definitions of pogrom for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Definitions of pogrom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Definitions_of_pogrom_(2nd_nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of List of events named pogrom for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of events named pogrom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of events named pogrom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

About Palestine events[edit]

Trophy.png Important
Thank very much i dont know very well how to use wikipedia editing so i make a lot of mistakes i wanted to say to you that in international reactions you missed a lot of countries like Portugal who decided to boycott israeli settlements and that saied that this crime is a barbaric act ..... again thank very much for your message Kanaanpal99 (talk) 00:08, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Having problems with an editor you may have come across[edit]

I attempted to describe the Philistines as an Aegean people in accordance with the vast majority of all other encyclopedia and scholarship. I ran into an editor who reverted the edit and gave one reference that is not connected. This is the user who seems to have a very strong agenda User:Oncenawhile and here is the debate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Philistines#Majority_of_encyclopedias_open_with_the_Philistines_being_Aegean.2FCretan.2C_why_not_Wiki.3F_What.27s_the_agenda_here.3F Can you give me any advice on how to deal with this member as I can see he has had problems with many other editors including yourself? Thanks in advance. Reaper7 (talk) 13:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. Oncenawhile's edits typically further an agenda with respect to the creation of an historic Palestine and/or Palestinian people. If the pov pushing gets out of hand you may want to file a report at WP:AE.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 15:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Brewcrewer. Yes I can see where his agenda is now in respect to Palestinian history and it is quite revolting. I have looked at his contributions and history and it is an absolute disaster for Wikipedia. I can't control him and he just does what he wants, sadly I don't have the time to take him to task. Seems many have, but he lurks around same pages waiting for people to give up. Thanks for the advice nonetheless and pointing out his agenda. Reaper7 (talk) 01:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Yup, that's the downside of having a job. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 03:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Reaper7, my advice on dealing with me is: WP:AGF. You will find that I am always happy to be proven wrong, have no pride of authorship, and believe in compromise. To prove your viewpoint or prove mine wrong, you (and I) will need to identify the best sources and read them carefully. I look forward to collaborating with you. Oncenawhile (talk) 16:48, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Benjamin Netanyahu[edit]

How did you revert the vandalism so quickly? I wasn't able to undo it because it said it was only possible manually. It took me 5 minutes just to do it. LOL Khazar (talk) 18:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Twinkle.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)