User talk:BrownHairedGirl

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

click here to leave a new
message for BrownHairedGirl
BrownHairedGirl's archives
If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.

WikiProject Women writers Invitation[edit]


Hello BrownHairedGirl! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women writers. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women writers, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women writers on Wikipedia.

If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women writers page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

Happy New Year![edit]

Fuochi d'artificio.gif

Dear BrownHairedGirl,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").


I think this may interest you. EEng (talk) 22:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the pointer, EEng.
I see that there was a substantive discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 January 27, which led to the previous AfD being overturned. At first glance, he does now seem to be covered in reliable sources. I haven't checked to see how substantively those articles covered Young, but I hope that at least some of those who participated in the DRV did the necessary scrutiny. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Given the weird, weird history of spamming in this topic area, I'm not as sanguine as you. Look closely at the four new "sources" in the DRV discussion! Beyond that, the coverage in the article is so thin that the article is unable to say almost anything at all about the subject -- even his birth is given as "1974 or 1975". Present-tense statements like "He lectures at X" and "He is a graduate assistant at Y" are a decade out of date, cited to a 10-y.o. conference program and so on. Almost the entirety of the rest is "he verified Old Person P/debunked Not-Old Person Q", citing to his own organization. Take a look. EEng (talk) 13:51, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
You make a good case.
I don't have time to do the checking myself, but if you want to pursue it, you can open an WP:AFD. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
<EEng takes a deep breath, lets out a long sigh. Contemplates the stars and the meaning of life.> Sure, tempt me into making myself the target of the crazypeople, why don't you? EEng (talk) 17:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
EEng, you wanted me to be their target, didn't you? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Let's flip a coin when the time comes. In the meantime, see here. There's also an interesting suggestion here [1]. EEng (talk) 17:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Just so you know I'm on the up-and-up, I've now notified everyone who participated in the prior AfD. EEng (talk) 16:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Edit Count[edit]

It appears your link for viewing the percentage of edits with summaries is no longer valid? I found the information using X!'s tools. Thanks for 99.9%? :p @NDKilla^^^ 12:22, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia classification templates[edit]

Category:Wikipedia classification templates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 18:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)