User talk:Bryanrutherford0

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Bryanrutherford0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Feedthepope (talk) 23:33, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Bryanrutherford0, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Bryanrutherford0! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Telepharmacy[edit]

Very nice new article, was a delight to read! ChessFiends (talk) 19:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Apps of the in Arrivo Suite[edit]

I received no message about your actions and only found the pages disappered and even the link in the Uber page to the Taxi professional one substituted with a reference to low quality apps in order to better promote a new feature of the Uber app! Perhaps my descriptions were considered promotional while the Uber action informative, I do not know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fbartolom (talkcontribs) 11:48, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Tagging pages for deletion[edit]

Please be more careful when tagging pages for deletion. Evixion does provide enough context to identify that it is about a film, La mule et les émeraudes is not nonsense it is also clearly about a film, and Alexander Gilkes and Aditya Julka both provide references so BLP-Prod does not apply. BLP Prod is only if its about a living person and there are no reliable references at all. Speedy deletion is only for a small number of specific circumstances. I suggest you read the guidelines for article deletion before you tag any more and if you come across any that you think should be deleted but don't fit any speedy criteria or BLP Prod, you can nominate them for deletion at AFD instead. Don't be discouraged though speedy deletion criteria can be confusing when your first learning, just make sure you read and understand them. Sarahj2107 (talk) 16:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Hmm, okay. I posted explanations in the talk pages for those, but I'll have a go at clarifying here. Evixion has enough context to identify that it is about a film, but not which film, since the only link is to the wrong film; that seems to put it exactly in line with the example in CSD ("He is a funny man; he rides in a red car." Which man? Which car?). La mule et les émeraudes is clearly about a film, but all text in the article refers to a completely different film, making its contents "nonsense" insofar as they are supposed to say something about "La mule et les émeraudes." Alexander Gilkes and Aditya Julka both provide references to articles about their company, but not to any sources about the men themselves. Sorry if I was too hasty! -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 16:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
...and Lidiya Fedoseyeva-Shukshina very clearly has a reference, so is ineligible for the WP:BLPPROD procedure. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:36, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
So it's okay for the only source for an English-namespace article to be in another language? -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 16:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Yes, provided it is reliable. If you have difficulties to determine whather a source is reliable, you can always ask a speaker of the corresponding language. In particular, I will be happy to help with Russian, if you need.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:56, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Fair enough, and thanks! -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 21:36, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Evixion may have a link to the wrong film but even if it had no link at all it still is clear enough that speedy deletion doesn't apply. You are right that the text at La mule et les émeraudes is about a different film but in that case A10 "Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic" should be used as it duplicates Julia Has Two Lovers. The references at Alexander Gilkes and Aditya Julka may be about their companies but they do mention them as which to make BLP Prod not apply even if it isn't enough to prove notability. In reference to your reply to Phil Bridger above, yes it is ok for the references to be in another language. Sarahj2107 (talk) 16:51, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Alright, well, sorry for the mess, and thanks for the clarifications! -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 16:56, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Evixion[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Evixion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:MOVIE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ModelUN (talk) 02:14, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Evixion for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evixion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evixion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ModelUN (talk) 22:17, 30 July 2013 (UTC)


DYK nomination of Telepharmacy[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Telepharmacy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jezhotwells (talk) 09:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

  • There has been a subsequent post to the nomination page; please respond there. Many thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
  • And another one. Hope to see your response soon. Thanks again. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Telepharmacy[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited State space (physics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Texas Annexation[edit]

My thanks for your designation of Texas Annexation as a good article. Your edits have nicely streamlined the presentation.

Question: What happened to my article Bank War, listed for several weeks on GAR. Why was it removed? 36hourblock (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating the article! It was a pleasure to work on. Er, I still see Bank War on WP:GAN#HIST, near the top of the list now because of the increasing age of the nomination. Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 12:35, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Dear Bryan - The Bank War article is languishing on the GAR site. Can you encourage any of your associates at Wiki to take a look at it. Another of my nominations, Election of 1844 has come under attack by a clique of editors and was summarily disqualified.

Moreover, my posts on talk pages are being monitored and harassed by the same individuals. Do you know of any competent administrators who would be willing to evaluate this activity? 36hourblock (talk) 23:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Manual of Style[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Toccata quarta (talk) 17:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, Toccata quarta. Is this notification in regard to anything in particular? Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
I think I've inferred what you meant to refer to. Thank you for adjusting my formatting to concord with style guidelines; I'm sorry you find Big-endian dating so shocking. Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 19:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)