User talk:Bumblebritches57

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

July 2013[edit]

You're right, facts are facts, and the fact of the matter is, Misandry has been around since the early 1800s, where it came from the German word Misandrie, Source: http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/search/label/Misandry%20-%20The%20Word Bumblebritches57 (talk) 13:20, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Google Chrome may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:04, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Men's rights movement, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.--Cailil talk 20:13, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Does this mean I can't comment on the talk pages? Bumblebritches57 (talk) 21:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

  • No, but it means that there are certain restrictions on editing, which are explained in the detailed description. The above notification is just that, a notification. Drmies (talk) 16:27, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: High Fidelity Pure Audio (October 1)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

  • I looked at the submission as well. It's not written in a very encyclopedic way and the references aren't reliable. I found one or two somewhat reliable sources on the internet, one in English--this editorial, which is really interesting and useful (and true: see the comment on the writer's lack of high-quality audio equipment and the reason why), but suggests HFPA is a losing proposition. For what it's worth, it may be, as yet, that this is too new to be included as an encyclopedic article; the matter can be revisited in a while, when more coverage is available. Drmies (talk) 16:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I didn't write it originally, I was going to write an article on it and found that that one had been declined, so I edited it slightly, and had forgotten to include new references, I agree that it wasn't very encyclopedic in format, but I do think it's important to have a page about HFPA. Bumblebritches57 (talk) 16:48, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:BlackBerry 10 are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. OhanaUnitedTalk page 04:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DTS Multi-Dimensional Audio (October 15)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Bumblebritches57, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DTS Multi-Dimensional Audio concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DTS Multi-Dimensional Audio, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Your post on Talk: Jessica Chobot ('anything about damaged goods' section)[edit]

That post was made by an anonymous IP back in 2008 - I doubt that the person who posted it is around for a reply at that particular IP 6 years later. I did some digging and the sentence is a quote from a possible Chobot account (or an Internet doppleganger) made in an IGN.Com thread/article [1]. I am clearing the article's talk page of stale posts and am including the 2008 post (+ your reply) since the initial quote does not seem to be directly about improving the article and the quote itself cannot be clearly attributed to Chobot herself. Shearonink (talk) 17:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)


Oh, yeah I should've paid attention to that, thanks for the heads up, and thanks for the lead, I couldn't find anything but dead links. :D Bumblebritches57 (talk) 17:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DTS Multi-Dimensional Audio[edit]

Hello Bumblebritches57. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "DTS Multi-Dimensional Audio".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DTS Multi-Dimensional Audio}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dermoid. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Clyde Lewis because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dermoid (talk) 19:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, my question is why specifically? the house of representatives made that edit, and it arguably doesn't fit WP:NPOV, because the language is more incriminatory over a TV show appearance, there was no official criminal or civil prosecution, it's just entertainment, therefore I feel that the new language is inappropriate. Bumblebritches57 (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Content removal on Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture[edit]

Hi, I noticed you made a revert to a rev that's about a week old. Just wondering if that was intentional since it seemed like it was a mistake. Thanks. --RAN1 (talk) 10:08, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, it was a mistake, I wrote about the mistake on the talk page, sorry for the confusion and trouble. here's a link to my post on the talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Senate_Intelligence_Committee_report_on_CIA_torture#CongressEdits Bumblebritches57 (talk) 10:10, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
No worries. Replied on the talk page. --RAN1 (talk) 10:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Regarding this comment, you can "revert your revert" by going to the page history, clicking "undo" next to the revert that you believe was erroneous, and then clicking "Save page." --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 18:11, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014[edit]

Information icon Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Also, I gave you that warning because you edit Pearl's user page, not their talk page. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 23:23, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

I'm not attacking other editors, I removed your vandalistic edit from my talk page, If you fraudulently comment on my talk page one more time, I'm reporting you for harassment. Bumblebritches57 (talk) 00:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

FYI Gender related controvery and disputes are under discretionary sanctions[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

FYI Bumblebritches57 gender related controversies are under discretionary sanctions since a recent ArbCom ruling. Behaviour is monitored in related topics, you've been making comments at two articles Talk:National Organization for Women and Talk:Men's rights movement in relation to a controversy about the SCUM Manifesto. Your comment here[2] makes your action look WP:POINTY--Cailil talk 16:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I made two comments on talk pages, so now I'm in trouble for proposing changes? what exactly are you trying to say that it looks pointy? The S.C.U.M. Manifesto was widely supported by feminists in the past at the very least, and to try to brush it under the rug violates WP:NPOV pretty severely.
If you don't like that we can always call in @Jimmy_Wales and see what he thinks? Bumblebritches57 (talk) 19:55, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
If you haven't responded within 24 hours, I'm going to have to make the edit myself. Cailil

So what you're saying is that I violated some rule by bringing up Wikipedia's complete lack of extremely relevant content due to a recent shitstorm feminism has faced, so instead of the people covering up past controversies getting in trouble for trying to sweep shit under the rug, I'm in trouble for trying to fulfill WP:NPOV? plus, you're an admin. I have no recourse but to contact Jimbo himself... well I don't want to just call him in without you at least responding to my possible misunderstandings, but I'm not going to wait forever. Bumblebritches57 (talk) Cailil

I'm saying "FYI (for your information) gender related conflicts are under discretionary sanctions". If you want to make a dramahz out of it that's your problem. And no, me being an admin makes no difference your "I have no recourse but to contact Jimbo himself" is neither accurate nor logical. You've received an informational alert that these topics are under scrutiny. There's a line in the message that says "This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct". If you want to make a fuss, well then that's your prerogative--Cailil talk 12:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Is that not supposed to sound like a threat? because that's precisely what it sounds like... I don't even know what the hell this "warning" is even about if it's not a threat tbh... Bumblebritches57 (talk) 14:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Notification of request[edit]

You are notified of Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Bumblebritches57. Hipocrite (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions topic ban[edit]

Hello Bumblebritches57. Based on your recent behavior, particularly this edit (oversighter access only), and your history of being warned for similar behavior, I am placing you under a topic ban from a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, and (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. This topic ban will run for a duration of one year. For details on how to appeal this sanction if you wish to, please see here; note that since this sanction is placed partially on the basis of information that has been oversighted, you will need your appeal to be evaluated by arbitrators or other functionaries, rather than just by administrators, in order for all evidence to be examined. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

So now it's illegal to comment in the TALK SECTION ABOUT A BIASED ARTICLE? jesus fuck wikipedia what the hell is wrong with you? This site is a mockery of an encyclopedia, and freedom of speech. You people disgust me.
you're literally censoring the facts in order to promote an ideology, and since you've got admin powers nobody can shit to stop the corruption. time to talk to @Jimmy_Wales, huh? Bumblebritches57 (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
If you are trying to ping Jimmy Wales you're doing it incorrectly. You're meant to use the {{Ping}} template. If you are trying to appeal your ban to Jimmy Wales, a better way to do so would be to post on Talk:Jimmy Wales, however I would strongly recommend against this because (as someone who's seen a lot of people be topic banned in this area) I do not believe there is any chance whatsoever of him reversing your topic ban. I just wanted to make sure you knew all the avenues available to you, to alleviate any possible complaints of being overwhelmed by bureaucracy. With that in mind, it would probably be better for you to do something else like help with the massive dead link backlog. Bosstopher (talk) 19:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

I just wanted to make sure you knew all the avenues available to you

You forgot his right to appeal at WP:ACDS Besides giving Ryulong the boot, a year is the worst anyone has been give under these sanctions... it does seem excessive. Marteau (talk) 21:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Actually, I messaged him on twitter, but yeah pinging him here is a way better idea. Anyway, as a result of this general fuckery, I've given up on Wikipedia entirely. Bumblebritches57 (talk) 07:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Also, I think you're misinterpreting what I was saying, I don't give a shit about My personal ban, I think it's just disgusting how far you admins are going to keep your feminist echo chamber alive, and was commenting on the state of corruption on Wikipedia in general. as the owner of the site, I'm sure he'd be intrested to hear about curruption, regardless of if you feel that's overboard or not, and it may be. but that's for him to decide. Bumblebritches57 (talk) 07:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)