User talk:KH-1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:C759)
Jump to: navigation, search

For more information on counter-spam activities, see WikiSpamWatch


Hello, C759, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!  Flat Out let's discuss it 07:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

C759, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi C759! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Abigail Valte) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Abigail Valte, C759!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi C759. I like your stub on A Valte, but it is still very short. Could you expand it a bit, please?

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

About Empowr[edit]

Hello C759 I just noticed your edit on the Empowr page. Please leave a reason also, in the Talk area of the page. Further let me know your views if you can help. Thanks

  1. SatyamSatsContactMe11:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

All Is Well (film)[edit]

You removed a source from the page All Is Well (film). Please explain your edits in the edit summary if you remove content or sources from a page. Otherwise it would be considered as vandalism. Thanks!Rameshnta909 (talk) 14:59, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

A brownie for you[edit]

Brownie transparent.png Great work reverting vandalism! Romtamtalk 14:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Reverting edit[edit]

So so sorry! It was an accident!

Best regards, Romtamtalk 05:33, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Durgapur may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For the swift reversal of a rather misplaced redirection on my talk page Amortias (T)(C) 16:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Gwar discography and other[edit]

why you undo my edits on those articles:

  • 1 at this moment charts, and certifications are not true, you removed sources and correct chart position that i add
  • 2 i did update discography and certifications
  • 3 in this article alredy have been written discography, i did use wikitable to sort all informations and add more sources
  • 4 as i have notify on edit summary timline and videography have been integrated with Gwar discography
  • 5 as i notify on edit summary article was integrated with List of Gwar members
  • i realize that there was war with some other user, but that was not me, what is the point to spend hours on rewriting and adding sources and go to edit war (talk) 10:04, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm BethNaught. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, OneWorld Foundation India, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 15:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

I tagged it with db-spam, so I'm not sure what the issue is.... -C759 (talk) 00:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Not sure if I understand why tracking down dead links and mirroring their content is considering "spamming"[edit]

Especially since Wikipedia has a NOFOLLOW policy on links to begin with. All these edits were made to the ref section, only to restore original citations lost to 404s and only mirrored when the original could not be tracked down... Wikipedia would rather have dead links I guess? Also several edits that had been up and considered good for months were reverted too. Seems a bit spiteful.

No good deed goes unpunished I guess. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 14:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

You're not the first to try this. Don't pretend that you have pure motives - it's not remotely convincing. -C759 (talk) 00:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)


He is clearly not notable. Why not nominate it for speedy deletion??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 03:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


Perhaps my added content, pending agreeable references, could be reincorporated by other means? Lack of internet censorship and the moral implications of said phenomenon being the culprit. I would like to describe how this enhanced availability of suicide literature may be linked to recent deaths in the media. Eg Grant Li, Matthew Sattherthwaite and Kevin Boyle all used the internet as a means to acquiring either their method and/or the equipment it involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redzimus (talkcontribs) 10:08, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Window film, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Homes and Ceramics. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Kicks from spurious deletion - Promotion/advertising?![edit]

Dear C759 I am at a loss to understand why you have sought fit to remove all my content - it all objectively links to third party websites proving that what I am stating is true, in summary based on the few contributions made this morning:

  • There is an additional 'Invictus' inspired song in the public domain to those listed on the Invictus page - so I simply stated that and linked to it, objectively with no promotional language etc etc;
  • There is an additional repository of photographic information on Cane Hill asylum, and I've linked to it, again with no promotional language etc;
  • There is an additional angle to anti-drug education, which I've linked to and provided simply as fact without any sort of promotion, citing third party media reports that verify what I have said...

...Having read the Wikipedia treatise on objectivity of content, what exactly is it that makes the many previous entries on Invictus, Cane Hill, Drug Education etc neutral where they refer to other people's creative works, yet my edits promotional, even though they do no more than simply objectively stating and linking as the other entries do?

I must say my confidence and motivation to now add anything at all to Wikipedia has now been singlehandedly destroyed, and even my inclination to use Wikipedia as a basic reference source has been severely altered - I now realize that users can spuriously remove content simply by alleging it is advertising, and that a time-apartheid approach to content entry only allows those with the most time to read unwieldly treaties and extensively argue out minutiae ad absurdium to create any bias of their intent under the banner of 'neutrality'. Ajs uk2 (talk) 09:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Looks like nothing more than name-dropping to me. What is your relation to the Thieving Names and the musical comedy? -C759 (talk) 10:35, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Karva Chauth may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ला इस दिन कुछ अलग दिखना चाहती है। आइए हम देते हैं कुछ टिप्स इस करवा चौथ पर ताकि आप दिखें सबसे खास। (Beautiful and attractive jewelry and clothes, along with make-up, are so enjoyable on festivals. On

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

iPhone 6 in China information[edit]

Hi C759 - you had removed a comment I made on iPhone 6 about its nickname in China. I'm an American living in China so I've heard this firsthand. I felt it was an unusual enough nickname that it merited citing a source, which was in fact a blog entry I had helped publish. This wasn't meant as self-promotion, but it was hard to find other English-language sources that describe this phenomenon. Can I re-add the comment and the attributed source?EmceeInPRC (talk) 03:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Blogs are not considered reliable sources. Also repeatedly citing sources that you are closely associated is seen as spamming and conflict of interest. -C759 (talk) 04:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Okay, understood. Good to know. Will refrain from re-adding.EmceeInPRC (talk) 04:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Relevant photos links from Scientific source[edit]

These days you're removing relevant, unique photos links from a science source. For example true, adequate photos of typhoon area (typhoons Rammasun and Kalmaegi 2014) or of a new soft drink (Mirinda Watermelon). Why you do this? Сароман (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

See WP:REFSPAM and WP:RS. Spamming will not be tolerated. -C759 (talk) 13:57, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
I know Wikipedia from its beginning. I'm almost 40 years old scientist. Why do you think that links to relevant, unique, true photos is "spam"? If you continue to think so, I'll report this issue to the higher community level. I know you became a respectful editor here, but I think you're wrong in this case. Linking to relevant photos isn't spam. Сароман (talk) 14:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Did you read WP:REFSPAM and WP:RS?-C759 (talk) 14:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
I think our debate here is no longer productive and because I'm a very busy family person, I informed about this issue already the higher Wikipedian level (i.e. here: I hope they (the admins) will create the right decision and we, both, can save our time for more constructive online or/and offline activities, dear C759. Have a nice day! Сароман (talk) 14:33, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Good one - WP:BOOMERANG. I'm not even going to bother. -C759 (talk) 14:34, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Electronic Cigarette RFC[edit]

Since you have edited the article reciently you may want to comment on the current request for comment on the talk page. AlbinoFerret (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Speedy Nomination[edit]

Hi, You just nominated the page I just created Splash math for speedy nomination. I was editing the page as a third party and have no affiliation whatsoever with the company. I am a teacher & use it in my classroom. Can you tell me how do I modify the page so that it doesn't look like a promotion. I Google-searched & tried to present as many facts as I can and also researched on few other pages of similar companies/products — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arpitjain11 (talkcontribs) 10:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Gaurav. Please let me know why you have removed the external link I have added in the page of SEO, as it was following all Wikipedia guidelines. The page I tried to link was informational based on actual facts and information from other authoritative resources.[edit]

FYI: User, Inc.. JohnCD (talk) 13:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Jason Tom[edit]

Hello C759, we have a team of editors working on the Jason Tom article and we are working on building content for it and would appreciate that you do not remove content as we are consistently building the article with reliable resources that back up the content that is provided and presented. We appreciate your interest in the topic and article. Thank you for your contributions. We do appreciate you and your time involved in the article. If you have any specific feedback and suggestions that would assist us we would appreciate it. Please respond here and we look forward in hearing from you. Thank you. Keep in mind we are working on it. Thank you again C759. Angel Light17 (talk) 00:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Who exactly is "we" and what is your relation to Jason Tom? -C759 (talk) 00:21, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

No relation. "We" includes you and I and editors from the Wikipedia community. Will turn to Teahouse for assistance. Thank you for your contribution. -Angel Light17 (talk) 00:56, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Regarding spamming[edit]

Hey, I see your message regarding me "spamming" with links. I knew that wikipedia puts rel="nofollow" on external links. That was the very reason I placed my website since I had no intent to boost my search rankings but rather people have better experience getting appropriate list. Those list are primarily constructed using Wikipedia and other reliable public data sources like Freebase. I am not even monetizing my site with ads. If still it is against some wikipedia policy then I won't post links. But my motive wasn't that of a "spammer". I only wanted to build something which can help. Sushant gupta (talk) 15:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)