User talk:CMC++

Welcome![edit]

Welcome, CMC++!

I'm Tiggerjay, and I noticed that you haven't been welcomed yet, so I thought I'd drop you a note. We do have a lot of users, and are currently working on 6,815,892 articles, so things can be a little intimidating... but don't worry! We love to help out, and we'll try our best to make your stay here as comfortable as possible.
Here are a few links I found useful when I first arrived here:-

Be Bold!
Don't let grumpy users scare you off
Policies, guidelines, and rules
How to create a page, edit a page and write a great article
Who, what, why?
A handy tutorial, and a picture tutorial

You should sign your name on talk pages, discussions and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. Also, if you don't want to jump right into editing articles right now, why not check out the sandbox? Feel free to make test edits there.

I know it's a lot of information, but there are two more things I recommend you take note of while editing Wikipedia - cite references wherever possible, and avoid allowing personal biases interfere with your editing.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian - I definitely do. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or problems, leave me a message on my talk page, and I'll try my best to help. Otherwise, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We hope you stick around, and make sure you enjoy yourself! Cheers, --Tiggerjay (talk) 20:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chong Mun Chung[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tentinator 20:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gigi Chao[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gigi Chao requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AngelOfSadness talk 20:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Bbb23, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ES &L 20:13, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Kelly Zong has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dawn Bard (talk) 20:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand, copyright is a very serious issue. You cannot just take images from other places on the internet and add them to Wikipedia (or Wikimedia Commons). If you repeat this behavior after your block expires, you will be reblocked, probably indefinitely. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:49, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chong Mun Chung (2)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chong Mun Chung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jarkeld (talk) 16:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GigiChao[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on GigiChao requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. VQuakr (talk) 07:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mùn Chung[edit]

If you want to create an article at an existing title, do not just destroy the existing article. Create the new article with a title like Mùn Chung (businessman). I have reverted your edits which damaged the encyclopedia. PamD 08:05, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mùn Chung. Stop trying to hijack the article! Favonian (talk) 10:34, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cecil Chao may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

by three of them: actresses [[Wai Yiu|Kelly Yao Wei]] (mother of [[Gigi Chao|GigiChao]]) <ref> [https://www.facebook.com/ggchao Gigi's FB </ref> and Ying Ying, and model Terri Holladay.<ref>[http:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cecil Chao may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:39, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chongmunchung may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Rewrite [[Twitter] programming language to break through 100 words limit by using Emoji vertical expression

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:33, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chong Mun Chung[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chong Mun Chung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 10:42, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cheuk Nang Holdings Ltd[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cheuk Nang Holdings Ltd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. BiH (talk) 13:47, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia.

CMC++: You need to stop and explain what you are trying to do. I think you are misunderstanding because of problems with English. At Gigi Leung, you changed the infobox from a person to a place. At Cecil Chao, you have done that, introduced factual errors and misspellings, and also put a "village stocks" template into the article. Both of these are articles about living people, so it is particularly important for them to be correct. You started a new article, IT Consultant - we already have IT consultant, which redirects to Information technology consulting. You have several times tried to change Mùn Chung from an article about a place into an article about a person, and you have also several times tried to write what seems to be an autobiography, Chong Mun Chung. But autobiography or not, the article does not indicate why this person is notable enough to have an article here: please see this page for the requirements. Please consider editing the Wikipedia in your native language, rather than this one. Alternatively, can you explain why you are making these changes to Gigi Leung, Cecil Chao, and Mùn Chung? If you continue to damage articles the way you have been doing, you will have to be blocked. Can you explain, so that we can perhaps offer some advice and help? Yngvadottir (talk) 15:27, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Munchung[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Munchung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mat ty.007 11:07, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CMC++, is this about you? If so, it should not be in article space - please move it to User:CMC++. You should see a button labeled "move" at the top of your screen. Also note: you are again using Infobox:Settlement. That infobox is for places, not people. Put all the info into Infobox:person. Yngvadottir (talk) 11:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chongmunchung[edit]

Hello CMC++,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chongmunchung for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jayakumar RG (talk) 12:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Munchung[edit]

Hello CMC++,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Munchung for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jayakumar RG (talk) 12:01, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance...[edit]

Before I block you for creating bad pages and for your continuing problems with the wiki-syntax that are producing things you probably do not want, such as the Asia template at the bottom of the page about a person.

CMC++, Wikipedia is not the place to post your résumé. For you to merit an article, you have to have distinguished yourself by for example winning a major international prize or holding a top professorship at a university, or you have to have been written about or featured on TV at length multiple times - and not in blogs. Chong Mun Chung has been locked because you kept recreating it. This is not a bug; it is to protect the encyclopedia. The only place your autobiography belongs here is on your user page: User:CMC++. Please move one version of it there if you want to keep it. It can then be fixed so it displays correctly. People will happily help you with that. But otherwise, all the versions need to be deleted, and you need to read the links you have been given about what we do here and what rules we have.

So what is your choice? Move it to the user page, or keep on trying to make an article about yourself without any evidence of notability as we define it here? Please respond. --Yngvadottir (talk) 12:41, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please cross reference before do any speedy deletion as the contribution on all networking platform was undinable. Do considerate other people afford before any deletion. Where is the guild line for black mail or blocking a true person with real fact across all search enginee. Please rectify and justify. Revert and let's the true personnel review to other Wikipedia community. Cheers✌️ — Preceding unsigned comment added by CMC++ (talk • contribs) 12:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding, but as you see, they have already been deleted by one or more other administrators. Multiple people have tagged your articles as unsuitable for Wikipedia; I have referred you to the requirements to have an article here - once more, they are here. No one is saying that you do not exist ("true person with real fact") or that you have not done useful things ("contribution on all networking platform"). However, where have you received distinctions or been the subject of multiple newspaper/magazine articles or TV coverage to demonstrate notability as we define it? This is an encyclopedia, not a directory. We cannot include everyone. Also, I repeat: your English is weak, you may well have a better experience editing the Wikipedia in your native language.

I do recommend you create your user page: that is an appropriate location to describe yourself to the Wikipedia community. But if you continue to create autobiographical articles without references indicating notability, you will have to be blocked to protect the encyclopedia. No blackmail involved, and feel free to ask other administrators for their opinions. Yngvadottir (talk) 13:11, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Perak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kampar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Chartered[edit]

I noticed your revert of my last edit on Standard Chartered. I would like to know why you removed a perfectly sound reference which included an archive url used to guard against link rot. I have reverted your edit as vandalism, which I note you have been accused of before. Please do not revert my edit again. Jodosma (talk) 11:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chong(surname)[edit]

Hello CMC++,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chong(surname) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Chong (surname).

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 08:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Laurinda Ho"[edit]

Laurinda Ho, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David.moreno72 12:49, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm E0steven. I noticed that in this edit to Laurinda Ho, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. e0steven(☎Talk|✍Contrib) 14:21, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 郭燕光[edit]

Hello CMC++,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 郭燕光 for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Laurinda Ho[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Laurinda Ho, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (^Complaints|_Mistakes) 20:54, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Oldtown Singapore Pte Ltd[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oldtown Singapore Pte Ltd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -=# Amos E Wolfe ^talk #=- 06:36, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kelantan FA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DSV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Availability of 5G by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M1. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nasdaq whale[edit]

Hello, CMC++,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Nasdaq whale, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Onelab moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Onelab, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 08:12, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature[edit]

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion[edit]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:01, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]