User talk:Caleb Murdock

This is Caleb Murdock's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 10 days

Topic ban discussion at WP:AN[edit]

I've closed the edit-warring case with a topic ban, subject to review at WP:AN#Topic ban for your review. You may add your own comment there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 16:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Banned from my talk page[edit]

Caleb, I will repeat something. I'm not an admin. I have put a hat on the thread on my talk page and done something very radical for me....I have banned you from my talk page. You are welcome to read the thread, since there is a closing message for you, but don't edit my talk page. If you do so, I will report you for harassment. You are already skating on very thin ice, so you'd probably get blocked or banned if you did so. Consider yourself fairly warned. -- Brangifer (talk) 17:24, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your topic ban from Seth Material is now in effect[edit]

Please see the result of this discussion. You may not edit Seth Material, though you may still comment on the article's talk page. If you read the full thread at WP:AN, you will see that some editors believe you should be indefinitely blocked. Under these conditions, your use of an IP sock, 72.82.20.134, to edit Seth Material looks like flirting with trouble. I hope you will be able to find other ways to contribute to Wikipedia. If you ignore the ban and proceed to edit Seth Material, any admin may block you from editing. If you continue using socks, an indef block becomes more likely. The ban has been entered here at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions. EdJohnston (talk) 02:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - 2/0 (cont.) 18:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please try to avoid attacking other editors, as here? You have valuable insight on the topic, but it is wasted if you expend your energies in harassment and abuse. Thanks, - 2/0 (cont.) 02:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

S-H-U-T U-P.--Caleb Murdock (talk) 04:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked 96 hours for restoring a personal attack on Brangifer at Talk:Seth Material after 2over0 had removed it. Use {{unblock|Your reason here}} if you think the block was undeserved. If you are hoping to provoke people into blocking you indefinitely, I'm sorry to say that you may succeed. It's easier to prove you don't belong here than to demonstrate that you can be productive on Wikipedia. Some people still hope that you will try the latter. EdJohnston (talk) 04:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why should I pay any attention to anything you say? Besides Verbal, you are more responsible for creating this situation than anyone else. Though Verbal was clearly doing as much warring as I was, you sided with him and blocked me from the only article I care to edit. You are an administrator who enables the bad behavior of other editors -- Wikipedia addicts like Verbal who have no contribution to make except to attack articles they don't like and make trouble for other editors. You are part of the problem. I've looked at your talk page, and your decisions are entirely capricious, and without a doubt biased in favor of certain editors. You'll make one argument to one editor and then make the opposite argument to another editor. Verbal and Brangifer and the other so-called "skeptics" are really just trouble-makers, and you enable their trouble-making. Wikipedia is a totally fucked up place, and it's people like you who are keeping it fucked up.--Caleb Murdock (talk) 05:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block proposal[edit]

Hello Caleb Murdock. I've proposed at User talk:2over0#Seth Material that you be indefinitely blocked. (For whatever reason, you and Wikipedia are not working well together). Any promise of improvement by you might be enough to avoid this result. For instance, you could agree to stop posting at Talk:Seth Material and start doing something useful. EdJohnston (talk) 12:42, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of topic ban[edit]

Caleb, you have violated your topic ban. I have removed your edit. -- Brangifer (talk) 03:06, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Violating your page ban. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Per WP:RESTRICT, you are not allowed to edit Seth Material, as you did here on 23 April. More background on this case can be seen in the discussion above. EdJohnston (talk) 03:22, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]