User talk:Calidum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Your edit[edit]

Not for anything, but before you change the positions of anymore quotation marks, as you did in the Ben Franklin article, please read this section of the Manual of Style. Joys! – Paine EllsworthCLIMAX! 03:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. That's a dumb rule. -- Calidum 04:03, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown[edit]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Shooting of Michael Brown. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Tom Brady[edit]

Come on, reverting someone's comment with the summary "shit", then replying to their earlier -- it really doesn't look too good. Especially since, after asking for help, the other editor specifically noted they weren't accusing YOU of breaching NPOV, but was expressing an opinion that the article's content may not respect NPOV. Removing their comments serve no useful purpose, so just leave them be, and continue discussing,, mk? I know you're trying to defend WP:BLP and commend your intentions, but getting into a pissing match over some maybe-not-too-relevant-but-harmless comment isn't helping. :) ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  21:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I guess I was a little perturbed by his comment, especially when he decided to title "full disclosure" like I'm being paid to whitewash the article or something. Anyway, it's not worth fighting over. -- Calidum 21:21, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2015[edit]