User talk:Callanecc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Notice If you wish to discuss or inform me of a sensitive or private matter please see User:Callanecc/Emailnotice before emailing me.

AC Noticeboard formatting mess[edit]

Hi. Could you take a look at the "Waldorf education" and "Banning Policy closed" sections of WP:AC/N? The quotebox from the "Waldorf education" section has been pushed down into the "Banning Policy closed" section — and if viewed using Firefox, the quoteboxes in the two sections are superimposed one on top of the other, making the text unreadable.

This happened right after the latest archival action by "Lowercase sigmabot III", and I reported it on Sigma's talk page (User talk:Σ/Archive/2014/November#Lowercase sigmabot III mangled a page, but the bot people are insisting it's not their fault or responsibility. Since you are one of the arb clerks (and the one who posted the "Waldorf education" notice), I thought I should bring it up with you and see if you have any ideas on how to fix the problem so that all the text on the noticeboard page can be read. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 02:04, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Since I just saw your note about having limited Internet access for the time being, I'll also bring this up at some other clerk's talk page. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 02:06, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Rich, I happened to see your note. Can you look again at WP:AC/N? I may have fixed it. I added two carriage returns and removed a "nowiki /nowiki" bracket. EdJohnston (talk) 02:42, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Ed. The problem appears to have been fixed now. Thanks. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 17:42, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Sinhalese people[edit]

Extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 04:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:35, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


A new sock has appeared. Take a look?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 01:48, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Make that two.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 02:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

It keeps happening. Need a sleeper check as he used an account registered in August 2014.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 03:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Another August account.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:53, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Collapsed section display issues[edit]

On the Arbcom GGTF proposed decision Talk page: in mobile view, the sections after the section you collapsed are displaying as subsections instead of standing on their own. I suspect that the reason for the messed up display is that the section was closed with {{hab}} instead of {{cob}} but I'm not sure about that. I'm reluctant to change this on the page myself so I thought I'd bring it to your attention. Thanks. Ca2james (talk) 17:06, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Fixed, thank you. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 10:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Civility[edit]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Civility. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[edit]

I had blocked this range as part of the Macy VG IP vandal, specifically as anon-only, and you reblocked earlier this week with {{checkuserblock-wide}} and also acc-create disabled. has requested an unblock saying that they can't edit, "even when logged in", which shouldn't be the case; they would, however, be unable to create a new account with your new block parameters. For some reason, the system detects ME as the blocking admin instead of you, but I'd still like to defer to you in this case (if there is anything to even be done). ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  10:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Salv, I disallowed account creation due to socking which was going on with an unrelated (to Macy VG, I'm fairly sure) sockmaster. Only reason I can think of that they wouldn't be able to edit even logged in on that range is an autoblock. In any case probably best to direct them to the instructions on the block template, which suggest using WP:ACC. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:27, 27 November 2014 (UTC)