I do not understand why you have twice now deleted a sourced footnote I added -not even in the text body! - provideing a needed caveat to a disputed "fact" of history. Please discuss on the article talk page Solicitr (talk) 03:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
- The problem is that it is not in the text body. References are not footnotes, you can not add personal commentary as a reference. If you feel confident enough about your addition you should find a way to integrate it into the text instead of trying to hide it a place it doesn't belong. Carewolf (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Qt (software), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NFC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Scandinavia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 14:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
I reverted YOUR deletion of content and templates, which you did to reignite an issue already debated on talk pages. Something YOU did without getting a new concent.Carewolf (talk) 18:24, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Scandinavia. Jeppiz (talk) 20:50, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
DSA, Mantle, and citations
I would like to discuss your claims surrounding the text I deleted which you reinstated. I have started a discussion on the Mantle talk page, and I would like to hear your side of this. Thank you. Korval (talk) 15:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC)