User talk:Carsten R D
A barnstar for you!
|The Writer's Barnstar|
|Dear Carsten R D, in recognition of recently making your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia, and for all your great work expanding and improving Norway-related content in the encyclopedia, please accept this barnstar and my thanks :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)|
TemplateData is here
Hey Carsten R D
I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).
So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.
What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.
The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
- You do a fine job, so please don't be discouraged. There are however very many rules on Wikipedia, especialy regarding living people. LinkedIn does not count as a published, reliable source. In addition, many users tag articles they think can be improved, not just for outright policy violations. Opinions on whether that's a good idea differ. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 23:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
A page you started (Akershus (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Akershus (disambiguation), Carsten R D!
Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category:Roman Catholic Churches in Norway to Category:Roman Catholic churches in Norway & Category:Roman Catholic Cathedrals in Norway to Category:Roman Catholic cathedrals in Norway (per C2C, see Category:Roman Catholic churches in Europe) Hugo999 (talk) 10:23, 11 December 2014 (UTC)