User talk:Ekips39

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Cathfolant)
Jump to: navigation, search
  • Please leave new messages by clicking here.
  • If not directed otherwise I will respond to you wherever you have left your comment. If you want me to always respond on your talk page and not mine, please say so. If I have left a message on your talk page I'll keep an eye on it to see if you reply there.

Smile :D[edit]

PHANTOMTECH (talk) 04:01, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

 :) ekips39talk 20:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Let me keep piggywinkle![edit]

You have basically ruined my dream by speedy deleting piggywinkle. Please reconsider. Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please, Please! Writer freak (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Thx for pointing out my error...[edit]

...at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Advocacy_ducks#Wikipedia:Advocacy_ducks. I would not have minded if you had fixed the Wikilink but either way, it's fixed now. Happy editing! Atsme☎️📧 12:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

No problem :) ekips39 (talk) 13:28, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Response[edit]

I totally would (it's a good idea and a nice thought) but, as I mentioned, it's not possible to do so because of the block placed on editing the page by Wikipedia. Therefore, the closest we can get to actually getting this issue noticed is to go to the page of the parent company. Of course, that is not the place to mention the irresponsibility of the daughter company, because it is largely irrelevant due to the independence of the daughter company and the fact that the oil spill was the responsibility of the daughter company. If the daughter company's page is made editable again, then edits to the parent company's page will not longer occur and information about the oil spill will be added in a neutral and factually supported fashion onto the daughter company's page (seriously, I promise references). As long as this is not possible, there is nothing else for us to do. Thank you and have a smile :) Ioanna.hearts.you (talk) 21:08, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

@Ioanna.hearts.you: I see -- but you can go to Talk:Shell Oil Company and propose a change there, and you should also be able to edit Shell Oil Company yourself because it's only semi-protected and you meet the requirements for being autoconfirmed (though you didn't until today). I see you're now blocked, which is unfortunate, but when it expires feel free to try these suggestions. ekips39 (talk) 21:24, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Quixotic plea[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 05:15, 23 May 2015 (UTC)