User talk:Centrum99

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Centrum99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - UtherSRG (talk) 16:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:J1-JM267.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:J1-JM267.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:E1-EM33.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:E1-EM33.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Hhaplogroup.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hhaplogroup.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:I1aHAPLOGROUP.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:I1aHAPLOGROUP.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:I1b1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:I1b1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Lhaplogroup.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lhaplogroup.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:I1b2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:I1b2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:BoobooTop30Graph.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BoobooTop30Graph.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Copyright policy[edit]

I noticed that you have uploaded a number of figures from copyright sources. You should not be uploading copyright material to Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Thanks. Guettarda 21:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Even if I list the source and the author? Then I don't undestand, why the studies are made. It is natural to ask for allowance in the case of some demanding, sophisticated works, but if I contacted every author with a request for allowance of some triviality , I couldn't have time to do anything else. The articles about Y-haplogroups would look much worse without the maps. If you want, I can contact the authors and ask them for allowance. But how to contact John M Tanner, if I doesn't know, if he is still alive? Authors of old anthropological books from which I plan to take maps - like Coon, Biasutti or Lundman - are certainly dead already. Centrum99 20:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Some pointers that you may need to understand Wkipedia better[edit]

Hello Centrum99! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! ≈ jossi ≈ t@
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical
Wikimedia.png

≈ jossi ≈ t@ 23:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)


Personal Attacks - Warning[edit]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Strothra 01:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. --Strothra 02:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)


Stop hand.svg
This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. Shell babelfish 12:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Black versus white.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Black versus white.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Strothra 05:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Black versus white.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Black versus white.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Strothra 06:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Please note that while you did provide the source of the image you did NOT comply with the NLD tag. You must provide liscencing information in addition to source information. You must also put a copyright tag on the image so that copyright may be easily determined. Further removal of the tags without compliance will be considered vadalism. --Strothra 06:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for making repeated personal attacks[edit]

Octagon-warning.svg

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Gwernol 13:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Since you've edited anonymously to avoid your block, the block has been reset. Further attempts to evade the block will result in lengthening the block. Shell babelfish 16:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

I didn't edit anonymously. I edited from a different setting of my computer. Hence my nickname didn't appear in the discussion. Centrum99 20:14, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:E2-EM75.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:E2-EM75.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

On wars[edit]

Dealing with antropology and anything related to human races is hard to impossible due to sensitivity of the topic in the US and abundance of warriors here. I saw several absurd wars taking months and unless one is prepared to invest _lot of_ time it is futile to get involved in them.

It may be possible to cover these topics oneday when (if) mechanisms for atracting and identifying experts will be implemented.

Zdravim, Pavel Vozenilek 23:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


Talk:Black people[edit]

If you care to make a comment, please make it useful. Picaroon (t) 01:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:World-Old Worldmag.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:World-Old Worldmag.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

User talk:82.100.61.114[edit]

You have new messages. Savignac 12:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:World-Old Worldmag.jpg)[edit]

Nuvola apps important blue.svg Thanks for uploading Image:World-Old Worldmag.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WorldHaplogroupsMapskopie.jpg)[edit]

Nuvola apps important blue.svg Thanks for uploading Image:WorldHaplogroupsMapskopie.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:World-Old World1-migrations.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:World-Old World1-migrations.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Talk page comments[edit]

Stop hand nuvola.svg

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Talk:Race (classification of human beings), you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You have repeatedly been warned about making personal attacks against me and other users. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Alun (talk) 07:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


Also you should not use offensive language on talk pages, especially racist language.[7] These comments can be removed from talk pages and you can be banned for making such comments repeatedly. Please also take some time to read our core policies no original research, neutral point of view and verifiability. You chould probably also read about civility, etiquette and Don't be a dick. Thanks. Alun (talk) 07:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Ty nedáš pokoj, ty rasistickej zmetku? Budeme si muset na ten Moravskej Krumlov posvítit.--Zylbrsztajn (talk) 14:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, pane Silbrštajn. Jsou tu osoby, které mají zjevně problémy odlišit svět iluzí od reality. Tak jim v rámci dobrovolné lékařské péče pomáhám se do té reality vrátit. Centrum99 (talk) 23:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Pokud máte vážný problém, můžete mě samozřejmě navštívit přímo v místě mého bydliště, kde se vám budu speciálně věnovat. Ale bude to drahé; léčba multikulti pošuků je totiž značně náročná. Pokud jsem svými příspěvky náhodou destabilizoval váš duševní stav, dejte si prozatím jointa nebo ještě lépe něco tvrdšího. Tím se alespoň nakrátko vrátíte do bezpečí rajského světa iluzí a multikulturních pohádek. Centrum99 (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


Image copyright problem with Image:Lunix IX 0.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Lunix IX 0.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:46, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


Rosenberg 2002[edit]

Hi, recently you expressed surprise that the 2002 Rosenberg paper showed much smaller levels of between group variation than many other genetic analyses. There is a good reason for this, STRs are rapidly mutating, but also mutate stepwise. This is because an STR locus is defined by the number of repeats of the repetative sequence, but when a mutation occurs in an STR locus it can mutate in either direction. For example if the number of repeats of the original STR is, say 10, and a new mutation arises, giving a repeat of say 11, any future mutation in this STR could go either way, the mutation in the STR could produce an allele with 12 repeats, or it could produce an allele of 10 repeats. A new allele with 10 repeats is indistinguishable from the original allele, even though it has been through two additional mutation events. The stepwise mutational model for STRs can therefore mask a great deal of variation. One the other hand STRs mutate much more rapidly than SNPs, but SNPs are extremely unlikely to mutate back to the parental form because they are so rare and are sometimes called UEPs (unique event polymorphisms). There was some comment on this in Science shortly after Rosenberg published their paper, see Comment on "Genetic Structure of Human Populations" and the Rosenberg et al. response to the comment Response to Comment on "Genetic Structure of Human Populations". All the best. Alun (talk) 09:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I didn't express surprise. I knew it. [8] [9] What you don't know is that so far I have looked only at haplogroups, because I needed it for the purpose of my book. I haven't read virtually anything substantial about human or animal diversity until ca. 3 months ago and I was actually forced to study it, because I couldn't stand the crappy style of the Wikipedia article about race. Since I still have a lot of work with final editing the book, I don't have much time to occupy myself with it. Although I have collected about 100 articles about this topic during the last weeks, I have read only about half of them, mostly briefly. Hopefully next week, when everything will be eventually finished, I will start to read them in detail, one after another. So don't worry that I wouldn't catch up with you. Centrum99 (talk) 16:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

No personal attacks[edit]

I am noting that you have breached policy on several occasions, in regards to personal attacks and incivility, and have been blocked for such infractions in the past. Comments such as this and this are never warranted. seicer | talk | contribs 23:00, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Survey request[edit]

Hi,
I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.

Thank You, BCeagle0312 (talk) 18:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:KlastrBastosRodriguezBarvySmall.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:KlastrBastosRodriguezBarvySmall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:06, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:KlastrBastosRodriguezBarvySmall.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:KlastrBastosRodriguezBarvySmall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Notice of editing restrictions[edit]

Yellow traffic warning.png

Notice: Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren, "any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict (defined as articles which relate to Eastern Europe, broadly interpreted) if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.

Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision by an uninvolved administrator; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines."

Note: This notice is not effective unless given by an administrator and logged here.

Courcelles 19:39, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Human height[edit]

Please stop amending the average height of Dinarian people on Human height. There is a reference to substantiate the listed heights and your original research is not sufficient to change information. If you have a source that confirms the heights at 1cm less then please produce it, otherwise leave it. Evlekis (Евлекис) 07:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I appreciate the information on your post but you need to make that kind of documentation available in the article. It is no good adding a footnote when people such as I cannot gain access to that text. Even so, if an cm has been added then it has done for a reason; suffice it to say that early studies found a certain height whilst the additional count is based on an estimate. The source in this case is still listing 1.856. I'm not going to revert you on this occasion but I'm not walking away from this either, I'm hoping you address this matter and not just for me but on the talk where everyone can examine your version of events. Evlekis (Евлекис) 16:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Yes Centrum, I most definitely agree to your proposal - 1.846 for measurement of 17, 1.856 for estimate of young adult. Presenting it may be a little difficult, it would need to present Dinaric Alps with two entires and both leading to the same source. As the second figure is also an estimate, the final section will have to be declared self-reported as opposed to measured. This was what I had intended to do myself and I wanted to discuss it with you but I realise you don't edit Wikipedia every single day - which is your personal affair, I don't interfere! When you return however, you have my 100% support on your future handling of this issue. Evlekis (Евлекис) 07:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

If you'd rather display the whole article, feel free to post it to: evlekis@hotmail.co.uk
--Evlekis (Евлекис) 11:35, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Hingis and hostility[edit]

In response to the comments you posted in the article on Martina Hingis, I have both edited the article and posted on the talk page. I ask that you read my comment on the talk page and respond as soon as you are able. DS (talk) 01:51, 9 August 2013 (UTC)