User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry
   
User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry
   
User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry/Awards
   
User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry/Archive
 
Main
   
Talk
   
Awards
   
Archives

Yo Ho Ho[edit]

Gob Lofa[edit]

Hi there. You blocked User:Gob Lofa for block evasion, including disabling email but not the talk page. Gob Lofa began to misuse the unblock template, so I reblocked without talk page access. But your subsequent message on their talk page suggests an interest in further discussion.

In your view, should the email at least be re-enabled so the user can reply? Alternatively I am happy if you wish to revert my talkpage block in order to revive conversation, provided the wikilawyer unblock requests do not also resume. Euryalus (talk) 11:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm considering unblocking this user, but will not do so if either of you have objections. Obviously, any resumption of the past behavior (carelessly leaving a trail of disambigs) would result in an immediate reblock. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
No objections to either of the above :-) Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 22:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Not only do I have no objection, but before reading this thread I beat you to it and unblocked Gob Lofa. Sorry to cut across your consideration, I didn't realise it was still under review from your end. Euryalus (talk) 00:23, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
No worries. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 10:08, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: March 2014[edit]

This month in GLAM logo.png




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 20:15, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Unblock on hold[edit]

Hello, Chase me ladies. I have placed an unblock request at User talk:Gdv777 on hold. The editor admits to having two accounts, but denies having abused them. I can't see any reason to contradict what the editor says, especially in light of your comment at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gdv777/Archive, but of course as a CheckUser you may know more than you said there. Can you have a look at it? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi James - Just to apologise for not replying sooner. I often don't have time to check my talk page messages (much though I should find time...), but I have no problems with unblocking him. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 13:16, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

SPI followup request[edit]

Can Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ilovepitts be given a closer look? ilovepitts has acknowledged editing from IP 166.170.21.193 [1], which geolocates to Philadelphia, PA, and from IP 173.168.180.131, which geolocates to St. Petersburg, FL. The behavioral evidence is strong, and one of the accounts involved has identified themself as a commercial webmaster with considerable technical resources. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Sure, hold on... Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 13:16, 20 April 2014 (UTC)