User talk:Chcoc

March 2009[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring on Suryoyo Sat. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety ^talk 23:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chcoc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello, can you at least remove the dead links from those pages? Thank you.

Decline reason:

This template is for requesting unblocking only. If you need assistance with something else, use {{helpme}} and be a little more specific. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:25, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ok, I see.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chcoc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was reverting vandalism to the article in which a user continued to add dead links and remove other references that were provided. Thank you.

Decline reason:

The edits you reverted were not vandalism. Sandstein 06:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Year linking/formatting[edit]

I have reverted your edit at Veneta, Oregon per WP:MOSDATE. Linking years is not particularly useful and does not provide any formatting. Your other recent edits appear to stray into overlinking territory. Read that link for guidance. Thanks for your contributions! —EncMstr (talk) 06:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UK and US spelling[edit]

Someone who claims to be a member of the Wikipedia Typo Team really ought to know the Wikipedia policies on UK and US spelling and that of the Typo Team itself: "Note that the English form of Wikipedia has no preference for American, British, or other forms of English as long as usage is consistent throughout the page". Basically, the spelling code adopted in an article must be consistent and is always in the version used by the original or main editor. In addition, articles about UK issues, such as ASLEF v United Kingdom should generally use English spelling. Please desist from random changes to US spelling. Emeraude (talk) 11:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]