User talk:CherryX

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Aww thanks[edit]

Aww thanks for the comment how you get the CherryX thing to show up? Tulisa Marshall — Preceding unsigned comment added by TulisaMarshall (talkcontribs) 16:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey, it's not a big deal. Above the text field, when you write a post is the symbol of a pen. Use it and you'll see, that it will add the ~~~~ (= creating your user name) automatically. Greets --CherryX (talk) 16:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
See also here: Signatures --CherryX (talk) 16:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you![edit]

Export hell seidel steiner.png Thank you! That's very helpful. Renovator qq (talk) 15:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

My first article[edit]

Thanks for writing on my talk page. I have written my first article [Young (industrial designer)]and want to ask you for some help. The article is referenced with sources from books and articles that I have read. All of the information is from research but i can't seem to get my article published. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks very very much! --Sara007 (talk) 02:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey, I corrected some mistakes you did and moved your article: Michael Young (industrial designer). You're welcome. ;-) --CherryX (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your help! It is very kind of you. May I ask what should be my next step to make this live so that it comes up when people search in wikipedia? Many thanks for this!!! ;) --Sara007 (talk) 09:51, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

 :-) You don't have to do anything, that's gonna be done by itself in a little while. --CherryX (talk) 09:56, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanksss so much for your kind help! ;)-- (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

No worries. ;-) --CherryX (talk) 14:28, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi its me again! ;) I am new to this so sorry for all the questions... how long does this process usually take? i just checked and it is still not up, is that normal? Thanks a million --Sara007 (talk) 10:14, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm fine with it. ;-) Well I checked it again and I was able to get there. What are you searching for? Is it the general search at the top on the right or were you looking at the disambiguation page? If it was the disambiguation I reported in addition just now. --CherryX (talk) 10:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Just checked, everything is ok now! thanks again and have a good day! ;-) --Sara007 (talk) 03:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

You too. ;-) --CherryX (talk) 13:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

(Marly Fortes (talk) 20:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC))== AFCH ==

Willkommen auf der enwp. ;-) oi

File:European Court of Human Rights.jpg[edit]

Hi, I added a {{FoP-USonly}} to your image - it may not be one you have come across - it's used where an image of a building would be OK if taken in the US, but Freedom of Panorama is not given in the country it was taken in (in this case France).  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:04, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Hey Ronhjones, thanks for the supplement. Regards --CherryX (talk) 20:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Alternate Versions of Wolverine[edit]

Hi! I got your message. What did you mean by "not constructive?" I have source links if you wish to view where I got the information from. (talk) 21:09, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, that's what I meant. Pleace cite your source. Regards --CherryX (talk) 21:11, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Chingford Mount[edit]

Please explain why you felt my removal of the final paragraph "not constructive". The date of the incident quoted in that paragraph is incorrect - I provided a reference to the correct date in February 1944 from the book "Chingford at War" (1946). The paragraph also misplaces the strike at the top of the hill, however the actual reference to the strike and the supporting map in the book, clearly shows this was north of Chingford Mount between Chingford Avenue (then called The Avenue) and Wellington Avenue. The paragraph is therefore wrong both in terms of the details it provides (date) and also assigning this to the Chingford Mount area. Can you explain more why you think despite these errors it should still stand. CSetch — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 00:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

There is no cite for the new information. Please add one like <ref>Book..</ref>. Thanks and regards, CherryX (talk) 00:11, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry I don't understand how you reference something that has been removed. Surely I can only reference something that has been added. Where would the reference number be placed to refer to the footnote? The paragraph is wrong, I have referenced the book "Chingford at War" in the history section of the page. CSetch

Well, in this case it's my bad 'n I'm sorry for this! --CherryX (talk) 00:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

That's ok - is it ok for me to Undo your re-inclusion of the paragraph? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CSetch (talkcontribs) 00:31, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Sure, if my rev. was unfounded I'm fine with your undo. ;-) --CherryX (talk) 00:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

This shows some wit[edit]

Hey there CherryX, you have to admit some of tonight's vandalism etc shows some wit, I enjoyed "He was once suspended from his high school for using the Althagorean theorem ...". --Zymurgy (talk) 00:20, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Well it seems so. ;-) --CherryX (talk) 00:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
That's lovely! Almost too good to revert... Happy new year! --Zymurgy (talk) 00:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
The same to you! :-) --CherryX (talk) 00:29, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Changing Voices of Italian films[edit]

Hello I am making some changes to various items of Italian film further develops the plot. Maybe I'm wrong a few words because I am Italian not the master of the English language, but you can correct me if I commit any offense you, deleting my contribution. Thanks.-- (talk) 14:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi, there's no problem with your contribs; I just mistyped, but corrected it a few seconds later (Diff-Link). Regards, CherryX (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Australian Open[edit]

Hi, I see now that you have reverted my recent edit on the 2013 Australian Open page. I think that it is a wrong correction, because Marcos Baghdatis passed the first round against Ramos and now in the second round he will match against japanese Tatsuma Ito, as i wrote. The source is the page of the men's singles where the matches are already signed. I'll wait for your answer. Best wishes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 14:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

I reverted it, 'cuz there wasn't any cited source. If u'd add it, there won't be a problem anymore. Regards, CherryX (talk) 14:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Adding an external link[edit]

Hi CherryX,

Thanks for your message. My, that was fast! :- ) I’ve just been browsing Wikipedia’s notes on publication of links to see why you deleted the external link I’d just inserted.

North London LETS is one of the oldest and largest LETS groups based in the UK (by membership numbers). This is why someone had previously cited it as an example on Wikipedia. As such, the North London LETS website provides a good example of what a typical LETS organisation offers, works, and how new people can become involved, if they wish.

As it is already acceptably mentioned on Wikipedia, inserting a link to the North London LETS official website seems appropriate, as very informative to the general public.

I authored the content and designed the website on behalf of North London LETS, so hold copyright on the contents, layout etc. Thus, it’s no problem to link to from Wikipedia, as no one else’s work is infringed.

Including a link to seems like ‘including a link to one major fansite’ which Wikipedia itself says ‘may be appropriate.’

North London LETS would appreciate if you could reconsider your opinion, and allow me to insert a link to our organisation behind our name, which Wikipedia has already accepted is relevant.

Many thanks in advance,

Irene — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

C&C Railway[edit]

I've added a source to their website, the site seems down right now, probably used up all its bandwidth, you can go to the internet archives and look it up to verify it's legitimacy if you want, thanks for patrolling Wikipedia so well. The gus14 (talk) 10:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


Sorry that I was unable to find a reference to link to the page (I did look), but I referenced my 30+ years of professional culinary experience and knowledge/interest in South Louisiana cookery. Cajun cooking incorporates a great deal more use of classic French techniques and ingredients, where as Creole is an amalgamation of French and African techniques as well as 'newer' ingredients such as certain spices and more use of tomatoes. I have also spoken with many a Cajun cook about their recipes for Étouffée and they adamantly claim there must be cream (and lots of it) in order for them to even accept that it is Étouffée! Where as most recipes in NOLA are generally devoid of cream and quite often use an addition to the stock base, tomatoes. I felt this was a very important point as they are virtually two different dishes, like New England and Manhattan style clam chowders, and this factual generality should be added to the Wiki definition for proper cultural and historical accuracy. =D

cemott3rd -- (talk) 02:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Further research would bring me to say: Generally Cajun versions are made with a blonde roux and tomatoes are most often NOT added to the recipe, instead whole butter or even milk or cream is added to give it a creamy consistency. On the other hand Creole versions seem to lean to a darker sauce, with a red/brown roux, and more often than not they incorporate tomatoes into the recipe. Also in New Orleans they generally omit milk, cream or even large amounts of butter in their versions. -- (talk) 02:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

No worries! :-) Looks delicious… mh… maybe you could add a {{cn}}-tag on your information. Regards, CherryX (talk) 00:19, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


Hi - I don't understand your objection to the additional references on the Arbirlot article - could you expand a bit? Thanks Dorset100 (talk) 19:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

That's not the problem; but this your NOTOC-Tag is: 1, 2, 3, 4; could you explain this? --CherryX (talk) 19:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Sure - as I explained (it may depend on screen size) but the the TOC positions itself so as to push the actual content off the screen, it would all fit it the TOC wasn't there, and therefore not be necessary. Also the TOC ignores the main text of the article and just lists the subsidiary items (Notable Natives etc ) - if you know a way of making it more useful then feel free to restructure things. As it stands the TOC box detracts from rather than enhances the article. Dorset100 (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

What about this (Diff-Link)? --CherryX (talk) 20:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Just noticed your change - yes, that looks a lot better - thanks! Dorset100 (talk) 17:55, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Plastic Surgury note[edit]

Hi! Thanks for the note. I added this US News and World Report Citation to the Gerald Imber page: (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. :-) --CherryX (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Shaggy Rogers [citation needed][edit]

Can you add this citation to the article, there are hundreds more if needed. (talk) 21:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Also next time you may consider adding [citation needed] or doing a little research before/instead of immediately reverting someone else s work.

K thx bye (talk) 21:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


Thank you for your welcome message. I'm from Potugal Face-grin.svg. I hope to enjoy en:WP. My English is not excellent but if I pay attention I think I will be able to do some little articles. Nini 21:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi again CherryX. I have a question and may be you can help me. I would like to create an article about a special and hard examination in Medicine: is the "Venous echo-doppler (ultrasonography may be) of lower limbs" but this is the translation from the Portuguese name or French name I don't know what will be the correct name in English or if you have a page with a special name (sonography?) but I don't find it. Can you help me?. To see what is the examen you can check at [1]. I think the best title will be "Venous ultrasonography or lower limbs" Is the last article I did at pt:WP ... thank you very much Nini 04:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nini00 (talkcontribs)
sorry to bother you all the time but I have another question: On pt:WP we have a category to class our subpages Category:!subpages... do you have the equivalent? thank you Nini 05:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nini00 (talkcontribs)

Undoing edit for lack of citation[edit]

I just received your January message undoing my edit to the page on Hugo Adam Bedau. My edit was clearly non-malicious, and merely needed a citation. I am not a regular Wiki editor/contributor, although I have made perhaps a dozen corrections and clarifications over the last few years, never controversially. I agree with several of your correspondents on this page that adding a "citation needed" would be more constructive than reverting an edit that raises no red flags. I will try now to restore my edit and add a citation to a book that supports it, but I'm sure the format will be wrong. Perhaps you'd be willing to fix the format, then, rather than delete again. (talk) 00:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC) Peter G

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
This star is for your extraordinary work on the German-speaking Wikipedia, especially for your great work as my adopter! Thank you! :-) Yours, Turnstange (talk) 18:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you so much! --CherryX (talk) 20:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

& n b s p ;[edit]

Greetings, CherryX! You recently removed 3 instances of & n b s p ; from Highway 75 (Israel) but left 3 other instances untouched. I restored the 3 missing non-breaking spaces. It is my understanding that according to Manual_of_Style#Non-breaking_spaces, & n b s p ; should be used ... in expressions in which figures and their related units ... are separated by a space... I hope I am correct. Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 13:15, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Efrat and sorry for my delayed answer – yes, you're right and thanks for your correction. Regards CherryX (talk) 00:05, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
 :-) Berdy Layer (talk) 13:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)