- 1 Editor Review
- 2 Comments on my talk page
- 3 message to attackers
- 4 removing speedy tags
- 5 Electrical, Electronic, Telecommunications and Plumbing Union at AfD
- 6 Criticism article
- 7 DRN
- 8 The Daily Express "incident"
- 9 A cup of coffee for you!
- 10 Redcar (UK Constituency)
- 11 Sign your postings please
Comments on my talk page
- I have done nothing wrong. Pointing out that you were violating Wikipedia policy is not unconstructive and you should not have deleted my warning message, this is a big Wikipedia No-No. Coming on my talk page and attacking me calling me a "racist" was out of order and I have made a formal complaint. Christian1985 (talk) 18:49, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
message to attackers
- Thank you, very well said. There are lots of good honest IP users who do Wikipedia a service but these vandals spoil it for everyone by harassing and bullying people who dare to challenge them. Christian1985 (talk) 18:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
I know, and it makes me mad. i've been reading an/i sinse 2005 or something like that, and have seen a plethora of IPs on both sides of the scale. by the way, i like your name, my name is Christian too. 126.96.36.199 (talk) 18:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, I know what you mean, I used to post as an IP for quite a while myself but as I have become more involved I have created an account. Like I say it is small handful of troublemakers who spoil it for the rest of you. Keep up the good work. Christian1985 (talk) 20:23, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Any editor other that the original contributor can remove a speedy tag, and after they have done so, it can not be replaced. See WP:CSD for our policy; WP policy is sometimes confusing, but this is clear and unambiguous. DGG ( talk ) 02:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
I noticed that you tried to add Electrical, Electronic, Telecommunications and Plumbing Union to the log, but failed to do so properly. I started the discussion for you (as per your request in your edit summary): Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electrical, Electronic, Telecommunications and Plumbing Union. Please state your reason for deletion there.
Hey, i don't know how much attention you were paying on Talk:Mail Online, but i've started up User:Jenova20/Criticism of the Daily Mail and Mail Online. It would be useful if you wanted to lend a hand there at all. Currently i just intent to grab some resources to see what i have and what the sources support. There's gonna be lots of work to go around if you're bored and want to chip in. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 15:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
The Daily Express "incident"
I have made no accusations. When someone says that a monkey runs a newspaper it is obviously intended as a joke, not fact or lie. Nobody is stupid enough to believe that the Daily Express is run by racist monkeys. After a series of highly offensive, totally untrue "stories" about Romanian immigrants in the UK I decided to make fun of the newspaper, since it obviously has lost its journalistic rigour some time ago. Being a Romanian national, I noticed that these so-called articles about Romanians in the Daily Express were based on dubious statistics (big surprise there!), questionable interviews with police officers low enough in their ranks not to have any idea of the overall picture. It is absolutely NOT ETHICAL when you put the equal sign between your 50 member Romanian gang and the remaining 60K honest Romanians living and working legally in the UK, calling us the main perpetrators of recent crime waves. Not only is this untrue, but it is offensive to a proud 22 million nation. The paper tarnishes our reputation so I decided to make a little fun on their Wiki page :) P.S. Why don't you check whydontyoucomeover.gandul.info? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rotterdamian (talk • contribs) 13:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but yes you did make accusations that are not supported by a reference. All the racist monkey nonsense is not only offensive and potentially libellous it is not appropriate for an encyclopedic website. It doesn't matter if it is a "joke", this is not a joke website. All these statements you make here are simply your opinions they are not facts and as such have no place in Wikipedia articles. Christian1985 (talk) 14:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
|It looks like you need lots of these. Have one on me. Enjoy! ツ Jenova20 (email) 15:29, 4 March 2013 (UTC)|
- No problem. I'm glad we're on speaking terms. It looked touch and go for a bit the first few times we bumped into each other. Enjoy the coffee ツ Jenova20 (email) 15:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Re: your comment that "DM is a perfectly reliable source just as any other newspaper", No. It isn't. It is marginal at best. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 106#Time to axe the Daily Mail --Guy Macon (talk) 23:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Talk page stalker - I'm glad i stopped reading the Mail Online...I can get my immigration rants and anti-gay news from elsewhere and have more time for the BBC =P ツ Jenova20 (email) 09:17, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Redcar (UK Constituency)
Re:Trolling from 188.8.131.52.Hi again. I know your feelings but just ignore these trolls after some unnecessary personal abuse regarding your edit on the Redcar (UK Constituency) page. They just wanted a reaction and they got it,though it may have been wiser to just let it pass,you are just encouraging them to do more of this to others,too.
Interestingly,I did edit this page myself a while ago,explaining how Labour managed to conspire to lose one of their safest seats to the Lib Dems in the 2010 General Election's biggest swing (21.8%)! However,this was a rather zany one-off result and didn't happen elsewhere. Perhaps it would be better if there are any comments of this sort abusing you in future to ignore it and report it the admin;for the record, an IP address finder thinks this maybe located in deepest Bedfordshire, if this helps. Thanks, JFBridge, 01:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)