User talk:Citedcover

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Are you okay[edit]

What's up with this edit? [1] I have blocked you for a week until we can understand what's going on here. Jehochman Talk 13:08, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Piss off. Citedcover (talk) 13:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
I've restored this thread so we can clearly see what's going on here. Also, this edit should be noted - it probably explains the edit for which this editor was blocked, though this diff in itself is reason enough for blocking. I can't see any glaring issues in this editor's logs - compromised account? TalkIslander 15:11, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Citedcover (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

Please unblock this account. If you don't, I'll just create another.

Decline reason:

This unblock request does not offer persuasive evidence that unblocking would be likely to result in a better encyclopedia. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

It wasn't meant to, it was meant to state, that either you unblock me, or I create a new account rendering your block useless. Simple. Citedcover (talk) 13:53, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Block increased[edit]

Per Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Citedcover this account does not appear to have been compromised. Therefore, I am increasing the block to indefinite for the egregious personal attacks that occurred before my original block. (I don't mind a blocked user telling me to "piss off". That sort of thing is not important.) Jehochman Talk 17:31, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Per checkuser case, endorse indef block. TalkIslander 17:37, 18 October 2008 (UTC)