User talk:Cnbrb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Cnbrb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Dr Debug (Talk) 23:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

year links: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)[edit]

If the date does not contain both a month and a day, date preferences do not apply: linking or not linking the date will make no difference to the text that the reader sees. So when considering whether such a date should be linked or not, editors should take into account the usual considerations about links, including the recommendations of Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context .

There is consensus among editors that bare month and day names should not be linked unless there is a specific reason that the link will help the reader to understand the article. There is less agreement about links to years. Some editors believe that links to years are generally useful to establish context for the article. Others believe that links to years are rarely useful to the reader and reduce the readability of the text.

That is the usual reason I unlink years, unless the event was major, year links generally provide little context to the articles they are linked from. Full dates with month and day I always link (unless it's part of a title or something such), because otherwise date preferences don't apply. Circeus 14:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

There was a time when year links were considered normal, but nowadays they are not. Of course, the considerable variation in date linking isn't helping. Circeus 15:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Azione_Capital[edit]

Ncknight 14:10, 21 October 2007 (UTC) Hello there,

I was notified that the abovementioned page is written like an advertisement. The article has made multiple clear references to news articles on its existence and its importance in the Interactive Digital Media community in Singapore. If there are any "advertising" trigger words on this article, it would be appreciated if you can edit them out accordingly. The user Accounting4Taste has also reviewed the content and is ok with it. Please review and revert.

Ncknight 15:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC) Hello there,

Thank you for your response. I will do what needs to be done to clean up the article and would appreciate more observations from you so as to better write future articles; I am writing up another few more pages and will be uploading them in the coming weeks and would appreciate guidance.

I've given this Azione Capital article an edit and tried to make it more impersonal, and taken out quite a bit of what I felt was unnecessary detail. My feeling is that someone would come to this article looking to find out what Azione Capital did in a general sense, that most of the fine detail and history was not necessary and, if the reader wanted to know more, they could go to the website which is listed as an external link. I'm not sure precisely what the author meant when he said I was "ok with it" -- I originally tagged it as non-notable, based on a less fleshed-out version, and removed my own tag when notability was demonstrated to my satisfaction. I've tried to work with this author to make a Wikipedia-style article. If you still have concerns about this being spammy, please bring them to me and I'll work with you until you're satisfied. Accounting4Taste 05:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Ncknight 07:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC) Hi there,

I have to admit, short is good; I certainly have a lot to learn from you on the area of writing! I will be upping a few more articles in the coming weeks that are in reference to the original article (particularly on the project senso non-profit piece) and I would love to have your input on them to making them clean and concise. Much appreciated!

St John the Divine, Kennington[edit]

Updated DYK query On 9 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article St John the Divine, Kennington, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo (t)(c) • 15:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Updated DYK query On July 16, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles Sargeant Jagger, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Architecture[edit]

Hello and welcome to the wikiproject - here's the bulletin - if you don't like it just delete it from your talk page, otherwise, it automatically updates. Please give me or one of the other project members a shout if you need any help. Kind regards --Joopercoopers 14:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Architecture Bulletin  
England1 144.jpg

A new Historic houses taskforce has been created.

Please join if your are interested!

Announcements - please add your Project announcements  


Articles at Peer Review - edit list
Taliesin (studio)
New article announcements - add new architecture article to list


DYK announcements - add new architecture article to list


New participants (add me)
Jim Derby, Aleesha C, RichardMcCoy, Erik den yngre, Horst-schlaemma
This template will be updated regularly. If you would rather not receive this bulletin, just delete it from your talk page.

London Overground[edit]

The map linked was the one TfL released to accompany the launch of the Overground brand last year - something put together to inform journos what the Overground and East London Line look like - and not necessarily indicative of other changes. Linking it so prominently in the way it was didn't make sense. --82.45.163.4 15:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Category redirect[edit]

I see that Category:Kilburn is a redirect to the Category:Brent. The problem with this is that the district of Kilburn in London is actually split between two London boroughs, London Borough of Brent and the London Borough of Camden. Is it acceptable to put two redirects into a category, or is this good grounds to start Category:Kilburn as a cat in its own right?

--Cnbrb 23:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Be bold and start the category! It's either that, or listing all articles about Kilburn in both categories. Bjelleklang - talk Bug Me 23:27, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Category on British Waterways[edit]

I've reverted your change to British Waterways to remove Category:Transport authorities in London, as the organisation covers the whole UK, not just London, and this would just end up with it being categorised as a Transport authority for every large town in the UK! I notice that another editor removed Category:Water transport in London yesterday.

Categorising a national organisation with London cats doesn't seem to be a good idea to at least two of us. If you disagree, could you discuss on Talk:British Waterways rather than just adding the categories?

Many thanks

Mayalld 11:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Surf Art[edit]

Nuvola apps important yellow.svg

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Surf Art, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Islam and the arts[edit]

I see you have a history of working on the article Islam and the arts. I am looking at it from the project Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles where it is one of the longest {{unreferenced}} tagged articles that does not meet at least the barest minimum of verifiability. It has been tagged and completely without references since June 2006. It would be extremely helpful if you had some references you could add to the article to help support its verifiability and notability. Thanks for any help you can give. BirgitteSB 21:32, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Airport stations in London[edit]

I have suggested renaming Category:Airport railway stations in London to Category:Airport railway stations serving London. See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 March 22. Simply south (talk) 22:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

This months Metro[edit]

The next months metro will be delivered on the 1st of May 2008 Unisouth (talk)

This months Metro[edit]

The next months metro will be delivered on the 1st of June 2008 BG7 19:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

The latest Metro![edit]

The next Metro wil be delivered on the 1st July! UNI|SOUTH 17:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

The latest Metro![edit]

Delivered by UNI|SOUTH 09:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

August Metro[edit]

Simply south (talk) 19:22, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:Overground network.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Overground network.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Non-free audio samples[edit]

{{helpme}} I've added some short musical samples on the article Three Shakespeare Songs. As this is my first foray into adding non-free music, I'd like to check if I am doing all the right things - I've tried to follow the advice in Wikipedia:Music samples and hope I got it all right. The files I have uploaded are

Is all my fair use rationale info and source info OK? Or do I need to add more? Cnbrb (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

All looks fine to me :-) GDonato (talk) 15:49, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
OK thanks! Might as well get it right from the start rather than have my uploads deleted becuase I missed off some rights info, which would be a pity! :-) Cnbrb (talk) 16:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

September\October Metro[edit]

Simply south (talk) 13:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Shakespeare[edit]

Thanks for your message. I'm sorry that you were so aggressively attacked for adding perfectly good material to the article. Tom Reedy is not normally so pugnacious, so I really don't know what got into him. I will try to add more material as I find it. Best Wishes. Paul B (talk) 12:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

He's still at it for some reason. Ho hum. If you find any information on other Shakespeare monuments or wish to flesh out what's curerently there just add them to the new article. Paul B (talk) 17:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Oh no, is he really? *Groan* This is the kind of experience that sucks all the joy out of Wikipedia and puts me right off contributing anything at all. He is well out of order in my view, but I am walking away from this - to continue attempting discussion will just make him worse. Thanks for the invitation to contribute, but it looks like anything on this subject is a lightning rod for the wrath of territorial editors who want to stick a big "keep out" sign on anything they feel they own. Unbelievable really, but there's plenty more to life than this website. Thanks for being good about it anyway. Happy editing. 23:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Gibraltar Pound[edit]

Hi - I saw you made an edit about the BOT currencies. Would you be able to provide any expertise on the Gibraltar Pound vs the British Pound at Talk:Gibraltar? Thanks The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick t 03:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I don't think I really have the expertise to contribute to that discussion. Looks interesting though. My edits were just adding some basic knowledge but that's as far as I can go. Hope you find the answers. :-) Cnbrb (talk) 09:26, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Cnbrb. You have new messages at Sintaku's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New Year Met[edit]

. Simply south not SS, sorry 17:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Feb metro![edit]

Simply south not SS, sorry 14:39, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Westfield development.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Westfield development.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

April Metro[edit]

Simply south (talk) 11:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Great Britain picture[edit]

Apologies for writing on your talk page Cnbrb if that's not the correct way to contact you but I don't know how else to do it without setting up an account. I was looking at the article on British Isles Terminology and noticed that your picture illustrating Great Britain incorrectly highlights the Orkneys, Shetlands and Hebrides as well as the island of Great Britain itself. Just thought I'd let you know in case you still have the file and can easily edit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.253.87.139 (talk) 17:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

May Metro[edit]

As Simply South is busy, I've stepped in for this one; this is my first time, so feel free to fix any mistakes or let me know of anything I've missed. – iridescent 18:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

June Metro[edit]

I've decided to fill in the empty job vacancy for the Metro for this month, feel free to correct any mistakes or add any missing information. Cheers! Crest of London (T|C|A) 22:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

July Metro[edit]

Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 21:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

The Metropolitan - Issue 16[edit]

--DavidCane (talk) 00:47, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

September Metro[edit]

Simply south (talk) 20:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

October Metro - better late than never[edit]

Simply south (talk) 21:42, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Directly Operated Railways[edit]

I would welcome your thoughts regarding my comments on the talk page. Adambro (talk) 13:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Don't feel strongly either way - have put some thoughts down. I tend to favour giving the article a go for a few months to see if it is viable, before merging.
On a related issue, do we have anything to confirm that DOR is a DfT executive agency? Adambro (talk) 13:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Umm... not sure, perhaps you can correct if you have better knowledge.Cnbrb (talk) 13:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Nov Metro[edit]

Simply south (talk) 00:43, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Metro[edit]

Simply south (talk) 20:57, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

New Year Metro[edit]

. Simply south (talk) 01:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Linking question[edit]

Hi, can you direct me to the discussion from 18 months ago which you mentioned about linking in railway template headers? It'd be useful for future reference. Thanks! Cnbrb (talk) 23:37, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

No problem - I did a prelimary search last night but could not find it. I have been linking as you had been and I think it was User:AlisonW who started taking them off as the same time the v.d.e legend appeared at the top. I started adding the main article tag to the templatees at the same time. will get back to you once I have completed reviewing the relevant talk pages. ~~----
That's be good, thanks. I'd rather know what has been discussed so I don't introduce other things that have been decided on. I just worked on the basis of the guidelines here but obviously I've missed something. 10:00, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
PS please forge ahead with the ESSJR articles - I just went around the line bringing the articles up to a basic stub standard as there was very little in them, but I don't have much more to add.Cnbrb (talk) 10:00, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Metro[edit]

Another issue to be adressed is, please could people indicate in the next month at the feedback page or on my talk page whether they still want to recieve issues of the metro. A lot of newsletters seem to be going to redundant pages. Simply south (talk) 20:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Oystercard liverpool st map.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oystercard liverpool st map.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:58, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Future metros[edit]

You have been removed form the subscrition list as no response was given in the past month. If you want to readd yourself, please drop a note or go ahead. Simply south (talk) 23:52, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ico logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ico logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

International ease[edit]

Cnbrb, You rewrote the beginning of West Hampstead stations rephasing "intro para for international audience". I do not understand how international readers' ease of understanding is a criterion for what is written in WP. There are many articles (eg about mathematics) which a reasonably educated native speaker of English would not understand. Though if we allow that the foreigners' comprehension is to be a factor, to what do you object? Is it the word "proximate"? Should all editing be in Basic English? There already is a Simple English Wikipedia.
Perhaps I drew a false conclusion from the articles I have seen that the Title of an Article should be, in bold, at the at the very beginning of the text as its subject.
Title: "Hebbel Hebbel".
Article: "Hebbel Hebbel was [whatever he was]....."
By the way "West Hampstead, a suburb of Camden.." in no way matches the article West Hampstead.--SilasW (talk) 14:08, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry if I wasn't clear - it wasn't the language, it was just that your edit didn't place WH in geographical context (i.e. what country it's in). You can put the word proximate back if you like, that was just my personal choice of words. My only real concern was that it didn't say where WH was from a global perspective. Feel free to change the wording if you prefer.Cnbrb (talk) 15:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

East London line[edit]

Hello,

Are you sure about that? I always dewikilink world cities, in the spirit of wp:overlink; if people don't know what country London is in (or Paris, New York, etc.) I hardly think they are going to be reading an article as specialised as this.

Even if you disagree about that, we surely ought not to wikilink UK. WP:overlink specifically says don't wikilink United States and I think that is meant to apply to all major countries by analogy.

Just trying to avoid needless clutter. Alarics (talk) 10:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi, yes I do agree about clutter! However, I do think that these three short words achieve a key benefit without causing any disruption to the article. I tend to always put articles, very briefly, in a geographical context, with some very short in the intro (especially if it lacks an infobox). I think this is better than requiring the reader to click through to another article to get the context. In this case, if a user in some random part of the world were to read this, would they know it was London in the UK, London in Canada, East London, South Africa, or any of the other Londons? Maybe by reading on, or clicking the links, but I rather like the idea of making it clear simply at the start. It looks weird to a British reader, but quite useful to someone in Bangkok or Lagos.
I know it's just a small picky point but I often find myself reading articles which take a couple of minutes to deduce that they are actually talking about something the USA. There's even a cleanup message template that sometimes gets stuck on articles.
But that was all - I didn't disagree with the rest of your edit, just like to keep things in a global context. I'll read up on your point about over-linking. Happy editing, Cnbrb (talk) 10:59, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
I completely agree with you about the plethora of articles that don't think to mention that the subject referred to is entirely within the United States, and whenever I find such an article I add it in. In fact this "American cultural imperialism" tendency is a bit of a hobbyhorse of mine. (However, when I do so I do not wikilink United States.)
Also I am aware of London in Ontario and East London in South Africa, but those are far smaller cities, and in particular they are not "world cities"; nobody would, I hope, dream of writing just "London" if they meant the one in Canada, and conversely I think the general convention is that "London" without qualification always means the UK capital. In the same way, "Paris" unqualified means the capital of France and not Paris, Texas.
Wikilinking is a slightly separate issue. There is room for debate about how major a city or country has to be to not need wikilinking, but the Wikipedia editing tool for, among other things, "delinking common terms" certainly includes London in the words that it automatically delinks. Alarics (talk) 07:34, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Well maybe so. I just take the view that a consistent (but simple) approach makes for a more consistently understandable Wikipedia overall, rather than making choices about what is or is not a world city. I understand your point about convention, but there are bound to be all sorts of controversial grey areas; a consistent approach gets around that. I don't really think an article suffers in any way by mentioning briefly the name of the country in the lead section, but gains in clarity without assuming the significance (or not) of the city mentioned. But that's my thinking and there may be other guidelines which contradict it. Thanks, nevertheless for the pointers on the other stuff about linking. 18:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Map Drawing[edit]

Hello there, I appreciate the job you have done on ---> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UK_high_speed_rail_map.png .Can you please update/redraw this file the same way, too ? --> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:High_speed_rail_turkey.jpg thanks a lot. :)--Camoka4 (talk) 21:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Getty images logo.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Getty images logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kungfu2187 (talk) 23:07, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

This image was replaced by File:Getty Images Logo.svg. Thank you. --Kungfu2187 (talk) 23:09, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BBC news 170805.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BBC news 170805.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Auntie Beeb (talk) 21:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Getty images website 2009.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Getty images website 2009.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Christopher Wren GA Nomination[edit]

I have nominated Christopher Wren for GA status. As you're one of the main editors, would you be willing to help improve the article to meet GA requirements? Thanks, GoldRock23(talk - my page - contribs) 15:40, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited High Speed 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Emirates air line logo.png)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Emirates air line logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Rorate.ogg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Rorate.ogg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Well, where is this free media? You tell me where it is and I'll go and get it.Cnbrb (talk) 19:18, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transport in London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Northern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Dawkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Mundo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Racial profiling[edit]

Do you think the recent Mo Farah border problems should be added to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection criticism section? Pass a Method talk 12:43, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Ohhh I don't know. I just dropped it in as it's quite interesting - perhaps it will cause controversy if it's included in the customs article. I really don't see why not, as he's internationally known and the events are widely covered in the media. Cnbrb (talk) 12:57, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
We will have to decide whether to attribute it to racial profiling or islamophobia. Pass a Method talk 18:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
That would really depend on how Mo Farah sees it - it's not up to us to attribute it to anything. Probably best leave anything like that and let the reader make their own deductions from the cited press reports. Cnbrb (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BBC news 110901.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BBC news 110901.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Born to Be King (Blackadder), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Selkirk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited High Speed 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

High Speed 2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to M42
The Foretelling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Lloyd

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Black Seal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nemesis, The Young Ones and Cameo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Merge proposal for Black Adder template[edit]

Cnbrb,

I started a discussion of your template merge proposal at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 March 3. Template merges should not use the merge tags, but instead should be discussion at templates for discussion. Please comment at the link to explain why you feel these templates should be merged. Thank you, Ego White Tray (talk) 04:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi - thanks. sorry for using the wrong merge tag, wasn't obvious to me what was the correct procedure. Anyway I have commented. How long roughly should I leave it before it can be deemed consensus? I don't imagine it will be contentious but you know.... Cnbrb (talk) 13:17, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Welfare reforms, etc.[edit]

Hi, just to let you know, I've reverted your edits to Welfare Reform Act 2012 and Welfare state in the United Kingdom. I think there must have been a mistake in your figures. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:50, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Source of the figures was here. I went through it and didn't spot any mistakes - why are they a "nonsense"? Did something not concur? Cnbrb (talk) 12:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
PS if you think it's the Guardian's reckoning that is problematic (there is some rounding of figures) then the DWP figures might be a better source? Most of the corresponding items are approximately right, but I'd be happy for the figures to be adjusted - there's a spreadsheet that covers it in more detail Cnbrb (talk) 12:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
I can't access the Guardian figures (at work - no valid plugin), but maybe you were a factor of 1000 out? Million vs. billion? --Rob Sinden (talk) 12:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Oh crap, that is a bit wide of the mark isn't it!! I must try harder. ;-) I'll not put anything back into the article just now, but here's a table below with a few corrections. If you'd like to see the data, there's a PDF version of the graphic too. There is some rounding up/down, which introduces some inaccuracy but I'm sure that could be corrected with a bit more research. Cnbrb (talk) 12:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Benefits for people on low incomes 2011–12[1]
Benefit Expenditure (£bn)
State pension £74.2
Housing Benefit £16.9
Disability Living Allowance £12.6
Pension Credit £8.1
Income Support £6.9
Rent rebates £5.5
Attendance allowance £5.3
Jobseeker's allowance £4.9
Incapacity Benefit £4.9
Council Tax Benefit £4.8
Others £4.7
Employment and Support Allowance £3.6
Statutory Sick/Maternity pay £2.5
Social Fund £2.4
Carer's Allowance £1.7
Financial Assistance Scheme £1.2
TOTAL £160.2
If the error was simply the million/billion slip, I'd add it back in. We can all go numberblind sometimes! --Rob Sinden (talk) 12:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Banknotes of the pound sterling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

TemplateData is here[edit]

Hey Cnbrb

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:08, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll give it a go! I'm just writing some experiemtal stuff at the moment but this may help. Cnbrb (talk) 09:46, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chelsea, London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circle line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:06, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (Watford Central tube station) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Watford Central tube station, Cnbrb!

Wikipedia editor Mike1901 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Interesting read! Am a bit of a Tube fan myself so will try and contribute where I can :-)

To reply, leave a comment on Mike1901's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thank you for the thanks! It's refreshing to receive a message of gratitude! :-) Do please contribute - it's not widely covered but an interesting little niche. Cnbrb (talk) 14:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
This is great. Thank you!  –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard|— 18:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm thinking of sending this off for DYK but there is a couple of things that concern me that you need to add references to. The first is basically everything in the early history of the site and secondly the past and present location. Simply south...... fighting ovens for just 7 years 19:20, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh OK, thanks for letting me know. Maybe I need to dig around a bit more then, if I get time.... not to worry if it's not up to the mark though, I just thought it was an interesting subject. Cheers! 09:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Watford Central tube station[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Watford Central tube station at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Miyagawa (talk) 18:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Chelsea and Fulham[edit]

No worries. Simply south...... fighting ovens for just 7 years 21:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Watford Central tube station[edit]

Alex ShihTalk 12:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Woo yeah!! Thank you! :-) Cnbrb (talk) 12:27, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Edinburgh trams logo.png)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Edinburgh trams logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 12:58, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samuel Cleland Davidson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ulster Scots (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 12 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Renaming of Proposed rail infrastructure in the United Kingdom subcategories[edit]

Please see my proposal to rename Category:Proposed rail transport in England, Category:Proposed rail transport in Scotland, Category:Proposed rail transport in Wales, Category:Proposed rail transport in Northern Ireland, Category:Rail Infrastructure projects in the United Kingdom Category:Transport projects in London & Category:Proposed transport projects in London; all subcategories of Category:Proposed rail infrastructure in the United Kingdom Hugo999 (talk) 13:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for drawing this to my attention. I'm fine with this if you want to go ahead with the renaming. Cnbrb (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dutchflyer may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The Dutchflyer service is a successor to former boat trains such as the [[LNER]'s [[Hook Continental]] service, which operated between London and the Netherlands from 1927-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:06, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Oban railway station may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Caledonian MacBrayne]] ferries sail daily to the islands of [[Lismore, Scotland|Lismore]], [[Colonsay]], [[Islay]], [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:48, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 20 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.

Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference guardian-interactive11-12 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).