User talk:CodeCat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


An Administrative Discussion Involving You[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Altaic_languages_Warring

— Preceding unsigned comment added by AltaicNPOV (talkcontribs) 01:12, 6 April 2013‎ (UTC)

Balto-Slavic Note[edit]

Would anyone be so kind and explain to me why my Balto-Slavic Note is removed two minutes after I post it? So far it hasn't been done even once. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drozofilos (talkcontribs) 10:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Desert etymology[edit]

Hi, I see you've removed a paragraph based on your personal knowledge and experience. Let me say at once that you may very well be right - I express no opinion on the matter - but you are in effect stating that the cited source is unreliable on your own authority. Given, however, that we do have a published source, we are quite justified in stating that a suggestion has been made, whether we believe it or not: this is indeed the usual way to deal with properly published but questionable suggestions. I look forward to hearing from you on the matter. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Revert talk (Glagolithic)[edit]

Hello, please bear in mind that this:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glagolitic_alphabet&oldid=650600745 is the original text that was changed by ip user 114.76.36.69 here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glagolitic_alphabet&diff=637449731&oldid=637449460 and here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glagolitic_alphabet&diff=637449460&oldid=635483154 for no reason, despite it being sourced. (agenda editing)

Thank you for understanding.