User talk:Coekon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (HM Government).svg


December 2009[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 08:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

March 2010[edit]

Please don't move highly visible pages, such as Guangzhou, to new titles before getting consensus for the move on the article's talk page. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010[edit]

Information.svg Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Guangzhou. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. HkCaGu (talk) 11:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

July 2010[edit]

Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Cantonese Citizens Defend Cantonese Language Activity. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 21:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

September 2010[edit]

Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Oreo. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 08:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Always use Edit Summaries[edit]

You were asked back in July always to provide an Edit Summary, but have not generally been doing so. Always providing an ES is Wikipedia consensus, as per wp:ES#Always provide an edit summary. And it shouldn't be hard for a user with

en-3 This user can contribute with an advanced level of English.

.


Please provide ESs, or say why the consensus doesn't apply in your case. Trafford09 (talk) 08:36, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your positive response, and for now supplying ESs.
By the way, in case you were unaware, to avoid accidentally leaving edit summaries blank, you can select "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" on the Editing tab of your user preferences.
Regards, Trafford09 (talk) 12:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Ditto, this is apparently the seconbd time youve been asked next time you revert content without explanation or discussion it will be considered vandalismLihaas (talk) 09:40, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
no probs, but fo r future reference you should give a reason following the text athat automatically comes upLihaas (talk) 11:33, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Muhandes (talk) 18:54, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

about "中国第五次战役"[edit]

Appleman, Roy (1990), Ridgway Duels for Korea, College Station, TX: Texas A and M University Military History Series, 18, ISBN 0890964327 : "The Chinese 5th Phase Offensive, 1st Impulse", page 449. "The Chinese 5th Phase Offensive, 2nd Impulse", page 509. Jim101 (talk) 23:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Co-op Bookshop[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Co-op Bookshop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 00:10, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BiBi Jones[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article BiBi Jones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

complete failure to satisfy WP:PORNBIO and the GNG. Has apparently appeared in 2 different porn videos under 2 different names.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:01, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Re:[edit]

You're most welcome! *I don't usually reply on another user's page when the conversation starts on my page, but I have a couple of things to point out to you:*

Thanks :) - Yk3 talk · contrib 23:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Miss You (M-flo song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss You (M-flo song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss You (M-flo song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 01:36, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Spam to Supercharger[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Supercharger do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

This isn't just spam to a poor site that fails WP:EL, it's five linkfuls of it. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:58, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

re: Now 79![edit]

Instead of just reverting it, why don't you look at what was deleted. If I removed something that said "Nintendo 3DS was made by Sony", would you revert it and accuse me of deleting it without a reason? The part I deleted (and deleted again, WITH a reason) was NOT even announced, let alone confirmed. There is NOTHING, literally NOTHING that proves how many number ones, or double appearances are on the album. I'm not the one vandalising. I'm deleting unsourced and unconfirmed material. Again, instead of just going "OMG he reverted it without a reason" and reverting, try thinking "OMG he reverted unsourced and unconfirmed material" and just accepting it?--The Ultimate Koopa (talk) 09:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Coekon needs to read WP:TEMPLAR but you need to be WP:CALM when making your point. This edit summary is way over the top considering Coekon explained his revert and assumed good faith on your part. - Yk3 talk ~ contrib 10:42, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

turkish national football team[edit]

i wanted to improve the page. the results like (usa-2 turkey-4) are not true. (the real score was 2-1 usa won) and these scores and matches is too old.--178.233.5.15 (talk) 23:41, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg

Hi Coekon. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my [[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|talk page]] if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~~~~


Thanks for the warm welcome![edit]

I sure appreciate it! Cheers! :-)

-Windrays (talk) 07:00, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello![edit]

Would you like the IP edit to your talk page and user page rev del'd?--5 albert square (talk) 23:20, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

definitly. please help me to delete it. thank you--Coekon (talk) 23:23, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done--5 albert square (talk) 23:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Oh Sorry Thank You For Telling Me. I'm actually new on Wikipedia. See You Later. Rb360 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:54, 2 October 2011 (UTC).

Sydney meetup[edit]

Hi, I got your name from this list, and thought you might be interested in a meetup in Sydney at the Alexandria Hotel tomorrow. I hope you can join us. Sorry for the late notice. --99of9 (talk) 12:17, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Requesting translation: Startling by Each Step to 步步驚心 (電視劇)[edit]

Hi, I'm NeoBatfreak. The reason I'm writing is that I am requesting translation of the plot summary of Startling by Each Step to 步步驚心 (電視劇). If possible, please tranlate the summary and paste the translated text on my talk page. Thank you very much.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited AV-Comparatives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Austrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Exile on Main St. (Supernatural)[edit]

Yes, it does need a redirect, because when you created the page you did not put a space between "St." and "(Supernatural)" There always needs to be a space between the title and the parenthetical disambiguation. Rreagan007 (talk) 01:25, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

That's reasonable. I've reversed my edits and put a requested move tag on the redirect page. An admin will come along eventually and make the move. I should have actually done it this way in the first place, but since it was a newly created page I just moved it manually myself. I apologize for doing that. Good luck on the new articles. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Supernatural articles[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you have added some Supernatural episode articles. If you plan on expanding them, I wish you luck. However, if you intend to leave them in their current format with just plot (lacking reviews and episode-specific production info), it will eventually have to be redirected to the season page due to a lack of notability. Ωphois 05:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited The Girl with the Dungeons and Dragons Tattoo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John MacCarthy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Supernatural (season 8)[edit]

Hello, Coekon. You might be right, when you say that more infomation will be released soon, but yet there is no content that we can add there, except the announced of the renewal. When there is more content, it will be created then. So keep this article until then as only a redirect. -- Serienfan2010 (talk) 23:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Supernatural Season 4 Episode 1.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Supernatural Season 4 Episode 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Supernatural Season 6 Episode 1.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Supernatural Season 6 Episode 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:25, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:3-07 Fresh Blood.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:3-07 Fresh Blood.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Chinese translation[edit]

Hello. I was on Wikipedia:Translators available and notice that you were on the list for Chinese to English translators and wondered if you could translate some of the stub articles for the King of Eastern Zhou at Template:Kings of Zhou? Thanks.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 16:53, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:We Run The Night single cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:We Run The Night single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Ways to improve Second Rudd Government[edit]

Hi, I'm I dream of horses. Coekon, thanks for creating Second Rudd Government!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I've added a tag to the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Becketts Forest, New South Wales[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Becketts Forest, New South Wales has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not a suburb - see ww.ga.gov.au

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:47, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Becketts Forest, New South Wales for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Becketts Forest, New South Wales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Becketts Forest, New South Wales until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Crusoe8181 (talk) 07:07, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Abbott Ministry[edit]

Howdy- We seem to both be working on the same article at the same time, but with different names. I have the article First Abbott Ministry while you have the Abbott Ministry. You're title is the better one, but I feel mine (without your major edit) is the more developed of the two. PrairieKid (talk) 23:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

I take that back. I am nominating my article for speedy deletion. Thanks! PrairieKid (talk) 23:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Samsung Galaxy S5 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samsung Galaxy S5 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsung Galaxy S5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:12, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Samsung Galaxy S5 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samsung Galaxy S5 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsung Galaxy S5 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JialeAven9erEX Talk:(JialeAven9erEX) 10:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


2024 in the United States listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2024 in the United States. Since you had some involvement with the 2024 in the United States redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Natg 19 (talk) 20:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Questionable redirects[edit]

Hi Coekon,
Creating articles like "2065 in Australia" and then making them Wikipedia:Redirects like 2015 in Australia is probably not a good idea. Is there a good reason why you are doing this sort of thing?
Kindest regards, Peter in Australia aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Microsoft Office 2016 listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Microsoft Office 2016. Since you had some involvement with the Microsoft Office 2016 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Sonic4321 (Talk) 16:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)