Deletion review for 2016 NHL Entry Draft
An editor has asked for a deletion review of 2016 NHL Entry Draft. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
I have been in wikipedia now for around 2 weeks and I think its time for the next step. All my edits are anti-vandal. I have wrongly been given a warning for vandalism. To be honest, Iam only 15 years old. I pride myself on my GK and English skills. I have 2 English First class awards too. I would greatly appreciate it if you could grant me rollbacker rights . I hope you agree with me in this matter .
Matheweditking (talk) 04:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Category:Arkansas articles needing references
Category:Arkansas articles needing references, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Launchballer 17:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Coffee--ouch, this reminds me I've only had one cup today. Need fix. Anyway, Candle is occasionally editing his talk page. My kneejerk reaction is to remove TPA, and I have more faith in your objectivity. I don't think he has a right to be engaging in content conversations, even if they're soliloquies. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 16:08, 20 August 2014 (UTC)