Removal of sourced material
There's a lot of removal of sourced material on the Marlon Brando article by IP's going on, and I would very much like it to stop. Maybe a semi-protection would be helpful? Mythic Writerlord (talk) 09:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Demolished buildings and structures in the United States by state
The Category:Demolished buildings and structures in the United States by state currently has only 9 of the 50 states with their own categories. I was going to start creating some of the others, until I saw that they had already been created and deleted. Apparently it was part of a mass deletion of content added by a banned user. If so, would it be okay for me to go ahead and create those categories again? Thanks! Dafoeberezin3494 (talk) 17:24, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
“Dear Chet B. Long,
This message is with reference to deletion of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chhavi_leekha wiki page. On checking the deletion summary we found that this page has been deleted by you immediately and without discussion. We also noticed that this page has been considered under Orphaned articles category.
However, we tried to figure out the exact reason of It but couldn’t crack the complexity of the process. It would be really great if you can help us restore the page and guide us to make it more authenticated to avoid any further damage.
Looking forward to you support.”
I have reason to believe the user here is the same person as User:MalleusMaleficarum1486 who has already been banned from wikipedia by you. I am almost 100% percent certain of this based on location, edits, and an off-wiki source I sadly cannot disclose. Would you mind looking into this before he causes more disruption and edit warring, like he is doing right now? Thanks a lot in advance, and sorry to bother you again but I thought it would be best to bring this to your attention swiftly. Mythic Writerlord (talk) 19:24, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Mythic Writerlord has continued to remove the merged content without consensus. Mythic Writerlord's failure to respect consensus brings up another, rather unfortunate matter in all of this-- your block of MalleusMaleficarum1486. In trying to deal with these two editors (Malleus and Mythic), my experience with Malleus was that as soon as he understood the relevant Wikipedia policy, he refrained from the problematic matters. I was surprised that, as an admin involved in the AFD close, you blocked him several days after his last offense, and then that, as the blocking admin, you also refused his block review. It is my understanding (I could be wrong) that you should have enlisted a) another admin for the original block (which I disagreed with, as that editor was sincerely trying to learn and respect Wiki policies), and b) allowed an independent editor to review your block. At any rate, the current issue is that Mythic Writerlord-- who was curiously not blocked while engaging in worse behaviors-- continues to disrespect your close of the AFD and the merged content. So, there's a jolly mess there that I'm hoping you'll sort out. From the post above, it's apparent that Mythic has some sort of pony in this race ... SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:15, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
An additional curiosity just popped on my watchlist ... both Mythic Writerlord and Turris Davidica attempting to speedy delete Involuntary celibacy over the redirect.  Perhaps that page needs protection? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)