User talk:Conny

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I looove you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.48.17.192 (talk) 18:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


July 2007[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Feral cat, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Douglasmtaylor T/C 22:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about this, that was a mistake. Conny 00:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC).

Your VandalProof Application[edit]

Dear Conny,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.

Scrub that, per this. Daniel 10:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Conny! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Daniel 10:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

summary language[edit]

Just an FYI that all your edit summaries (I think they're VP ones) are in German. It's probably not worth switching everytime you change between DEWP and ENWP (it's easy to figure out what they mean), but I figured I'd drop you a line in case it is easy to switch the language. Thanks for your counter-vandalism efforts on both wikis. Cheers!--Chaser - T 18:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Oh, oha :) . Thats because I'm VPing two languages at the same time. Sorry, normally it works for me, using VP on one project. Thank you for the advice :) . Conny 18:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC).
I think it's a monobook in german, maybe I can check for anonther language. The some Reverts in english are maden with lupins. Conny 19:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC).

User talk:Jaranda[edit]

Will you stop it, please? Do you even know why you're actually reverting? --Deskana (talk) 17:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, because the user is not the owner of the page and cleared it. Conny 17:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC).
The contributions do not suggest that. The blanking was not disruptive. Please do not revert again. --Deskana (talk) 17:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
How do you know, what IP a user uses? Conny 17:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC).
I don't know for certain, but it's likely that that is Jaranda. --Deskana (talk) 17:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Ok :) - but don't be so hard, I can't feel this way... Greetings from Dessau, Conny 17:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC).

Request For Rollback[edit]

Hi I've granted your request for rollback. Please review WP:RBK or ask me if you need any help. Remember to take it steady, as poor use will result it the tool being removed. Pedro :  Chat  14:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, I'm happy. Greetings, Conny (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC).

About My Supposed Vandalism[edit]

Yeah, but you know its true. 68.196.82.106 (talk) 16:02, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but if, maybe it's no content for an encyclopedia. Greetings, Conny (talk) 16:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC).

Reliable source?[edit]

Thanks for the admonition and suggestion, but all I did was update an "as of" date. I did not in any way lessen reliability, as there was no previous citation. I did not "add content", I updated content while maintaining its original verifiability. Though I did not INCREASE verifiability, my edit was a positive one, so instead of criticizing it (automatic/Huggle or not), perhaps you should instead focus on fixing it up to your standards. In the time it took you to send me that boilerplate admonition, you could have added a citation yourself. I suppose you're too busy policing, though. --66.83.172.251 (talk) 18:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

The previous edit on this textpart was done by a logged in user - the chance that he gives an wrong input is not so high, as when there comes an anonymous edit. My standards are, so I hope ok, please give a source, or log in, when you change content. Greetings, Conny (talk) 10:29, 8 July 2008 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of Chrismon (magazine)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chrismon (magazine), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 04:21, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for information. Conny (talk) 07:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC).

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:32, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Do you...[edit]

... consider [1] this to be constructive revert? Please take care when using that 'Q'-key. -- O.Koslowski (talk) 15:09, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey :) ,
seems a Huggle bug. Sorry, Conny (talk) 15:10, 29 May 2012 (UTC).

We'll always have Bremen...[edit]

Thanks for the welcome in Bremen and the meal Conny. Hopefully we can get the project moving. Contacting me via the wiki is fine Victuallers (talk) 10:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

We need your help testing latest huggle[edit]

Hello,

I am sending you this message because you listed yourself on meta:Huggle/Members as a beta tester. We desperately need attention of testers, because since we resolved all release blockers, we are ready to release first official version of huggle 3! Before that happens, it would be nice if you could test it so that we can make sure there are no issues with it. You can download it packaged for your operating system (see Wikipedia:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta) or you can of course build it yourself, see https://github.com/huggle/huggle3-qt-lx for that. Don't forget to use always latest version, there is no auto-update message for beta versions!

Should you find any issue, please report it to wikimedia bugzilla, that is a central place for huggle bugs, where we look at them. That is i mportant, if you find a bug and won't report it, we can't fix it. Thank you for your work on this, if you have any questions, please send me a message on my talk page, I won't be looking for responses here. Thanks, Petrb (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

New huggle 3.1 is going to be released soon[edit]

Hi Conny, we are to release a new major version of huggle, but we did receive almost no feedback from our beta testing team, which you are a part of (see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members). It would be of a great help if you could download it (if you have windows, all you need to do is getting http://tools.wmflabs.org/huggle/files/huggle3.1.0beta.exe and putting it to a folder where you have installed huggle) and test it. You can always get a help with making it @ #huggle connect!

Major changes:

  • Multisite support - you can now log in to unlimited number of wikis in 1 huggle session and get a huge queue of all edits made to these wikis. This is good for smaller projects which gets overlooked often.
  • Ranged diffs - you can select multiple revisions and get a huge diff that display all changes done to them.
  • Fixes of most of bug reports we had so far

In case you found a bug, please report it to bugzilla: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?product=Huggle&list_id=147663 thank you! Petrb (talk) 10:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much Petrb, I'll try... Conny (talk) 11:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Holomex[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Holomex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Banner talk 23:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)