User talk:Crau999

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

FoCuSandLeArN Thank you for the welcome, links and cookies! We created our first page and are editing it for review. We still have a long way to go but would you give us feedback once we have it more ready? Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Søren_Brier Thanks again, Crau999 (talk) 00:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you! Face-smile.svg

Welcome to Wikipedia, Crau999! Thank you for your contributions. I am FoCuSandLeArN and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:58, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Crau999, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Crau999! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Dear DGG, thanks for the feedback! We will continue to improve the article to submit it again. Best, Crau999

Cybernetics and Human Knowing[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cybernetics and Human Knowing, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.chkjournal.org/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Cybernetics and Human Knowing, with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Wtmitchell, thanks for the heads up! I received a message from CorenSearchBot flagging that the content was a copy of the website. Which it was, although it has not been updated in a while. That is why I deleted the content to start from scratch. Any suggestions? I will edit the summary next time Crau999 (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cybersemiotics, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phenomenology and Pragmatic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cybersemiotics[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cybersemiotics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://glossarium.bitrum.unileon.es/glossary/cybersemiotics. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear Justlettersandnumbers (talk), One hour after I received this message the entry on Cybersemiotics was deleted. I sent a message to the editor who actually did the deletion but received no response and I can't find a record of the article or the deletion in Wikipedia. I appreciate the efforts to maintain copyright rights but the content that was deleted is part of a disciplinary framework and the editor who added the content to Bitrum as well as Prof. Søren Brier were the ones who recommended that the same content be used. Nonetheless, I worked many hours making the entry specially for Wikipedia. I am not sure how to proceed right now. Unfortunately I do not have the latest edit of the Cybersemiotics entry and without the entry I can't ask for the scholars in the field to contribute to the article. Please advise! Thank you, Crau999 (talk) 13:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)crau999 (talk)

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Warning icon Hello Crau999, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Cybernetics and Human Knowing has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Content was apparently copied wholesale from http://www.chkjournal.org/. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:12, 27 June 2014 (UTC)