User talk:Crisco 1492

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This user is willing to be contacted in Indonesian.
Worker icon.svg
User page Talk E-mail Contributions Created Images DYK? GA Featured

For me.


Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! / You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some helpful links:

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Who?¿? 08:40, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

Featured content[edit]


Consider nominating[edit]

To delist[edit]


Article TFA date Rationale
Departures c. 15 August 2015 Coinciding with the Bon Festival (thematic relevance)
Sorga Ka Toedjoe 30 October 2015 75th anniversary of Surabaya release
Amir Hamzah 20 March 2016 70th anniversary of death
Asmara Moerni 29 April 2016 75th anniversary of release

Useful links; future articles?[edit]

Java Industrial Film needs something.

Have a look please[edit]

Hi Cris, Greetings.... Finally I did it. I got a better photograph of a male Bharathanatyam performer. Have a look please, I would love to nominate it to FP. Expecting your suggestions regarding the same. Hope in case of correction, you will help me out.

A male Bharata Natyam performer DS.jpg


Bellus Delphina talk 19:37, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Uploaded. The noise looks much better. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

El Greco Adorations[edit]

Could you get and and ?

The first already has a page set up for it at File:El_Greco_(Domenikos_Theotokopoulos)_-_The_Adoration_of_the_Shepherds_(ca._1605–10)_-_Metropolitan_Museum_of_Art.jpg, the other two haven't been uploaded yet. Thanks! =)

Hafspajen: I got to El Greco first, so there. =P Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:33, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Alright, the laptop with which I get the full res versions is busy crunching scans, so that might have to wait until tomorrow. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:36, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Sure Adam, he is yours. But don't snatch Joachim Wtewael!! Hafspajen (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Actually, El Greco article is rather a crappy presentation of his work, I say. And I really dislike those long captions too, bad qualty scans too. How can this be a Featured article... don't know. Ah, an FA 2007. No gallery of course, old fashioned times. Hafspajen (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Adam, try this - Laocoön (El Greco). Hafspajen (talk) 16:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
First, will sort Christmas ou, then will sort out the abysmally bad naked old man quotient of the FPs. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
OH, he is just stressed a bit - by the way I want really something better on THIS: File:El Greco Virgin with Saints Agnes and Martina.jpg - a great absolute classic (is at the National Gallery! ) Hafspajen (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-12-03/Featured content[edit]

I would really appreciate if you would do the Balinese dance descriptions in this: I have a lot to do, and have to have it all done by Thursday morning. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:11, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

  • I had a feeling you'd go for those images in the lead. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:25, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Church of St. John[edit]

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-12-03/Featured content Have a read of the "Church of St. John at Kaneo". Is that funny or am I just desperate to get this into a state that I can trust others to finish it? =)

  • Possibly funny? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
    • And possibly a good suggestion? ;) Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
      • I chuckled. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:30, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

TFA coordinator[edit]

Dear Chris - well, I always thought you were a glutton for punishment and now there's further proof, with the news that you've agreed to be put forward here as part of a new TFA team. You, Brian and Dank will be a great combination, I'm sure. Good luck. BencherliteTalk 12:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Thanks, Bencherlite! Though I've always thought of myself as a plain glutton. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:28, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Panyembrama[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:07, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gilt-bronze Maitreya in Meditation (National Treasure No. 83)[edit]

Pensive Bodhisattva 02.jpg
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Pensive Bodhisattva 02.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 13:29, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sultan Ahmed Mosque[edit]

Blue Mosque Courtyard Dusk Wikimedia Commons.jpg
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Blue Mosque Courtyard Dusk Wikimedia Commons.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 13:29, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Self-portrait with a friend (Raphael)[edit]

Portrait de l'artiste avec un ami, by Raffaello Sanzio, from C2RMF retouched.jpg
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Portrait de l'artiste avec un ami, by Raffaello Sanzio, from C2RMF retouched.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 01:41, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Image license[edit]

I just wanted to make sure I did these correctly (reasoning that New Caledonia is a French territory)--Godot13 (talk) 03:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Why are you using two different "Self" templates? As for NC, I believe that's correct. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    • I would like to know why I'm using two different self templates... where?--Godot13 (talk) 03:50, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
      • Oh, I may know that... If I upload non-Smithsonian images then I don't mention the Smithsonian in the self template...--Godot13 (talk) 03:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
        • "Godot13 / Smithsonian Institution, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publishes it under the following license: (PD-EU)" and "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: (CC-BY-SA 3.0)". Conflicting licenses. If one is for the scan, it should be noted (example) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
          • I can't seem to find a facepalm image BIG ENOUGH to accurately sum up how I feel right now... If necessary, is there an automated way to remove the second license whenever two are present? (I need to randomly review a hundred or two Smithsonian images just to be certain the sequence is always the same)...--Godot13 (talk) 04:28, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
            • I found the right image...--Godot13 (talk) 04:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
              • Sorry I didn't catch it earlier. (Karaoke gap... oh my). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

International Airport GAC[edit]

I noticed your surprise that this article passed GAC. The review was actually performed by a user that has recently joined the wikiproject that collaborated to improve the article. The review was double checked as part of the GA Cup, however I do still have some reservations about the impartiality of the review. I think your concerns are well founded, and that perhaps it would be best to request a Wikipedia:Good article reassessment, to make sure it meets the GA criteria. --NickPenguin(contribs) 07:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


Well, not much I can do, if he doesn't respond on the question about the source considering Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Francis of Assisi in Ecstasy-Caravaggio (c.1595).jpg. He was editing on commons since I posted on his page - and must have seen my question - and yet he never responded - and he has an user-box where it is stated he can speak English. And I guess since the picture doesn't have a proper source it might be nominated for deletion to, maybe he will react than. Hafspajen (talk) 10:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Ouch. I do hope you track down the source. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:35, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

PD or CC[edit]

Hi, On my reviews, I don't mean to mix up licenses; I'm just looking for a quick way to say, "Image is free." Should I just write that? "Image is free-license"? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 11:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Image is freely licensed, or whatever. I may be a bit overly sensitive to that point, but I've had issues with companies like the ABC reusing my photographs as if they were public domain (i.e. not providing attribution) before. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • OK, thanks. Yoninah (talk) 13:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


A new account's first edit was to create this page. As it doesn't appear to be a Featured picture I have deleted it under CSD:G2 as a test page. If I'm wrong please feel free to reinstate. Nthep (talk) 13:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Good call, Nthep. That image is both not featured and (in its current version) would never be featured. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:34, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Works of John Betjeman promotion[edit]

Hi. Hope you're well. Could you add your signature to the promotion so it can be closed? Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Works of John Betjeman/archive1 Thanks. Cowlibob (talk) 14:30, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Done. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Just one thing[edit]

Wikistalking is not OK. Making two reviews on articles created by a user that you have an obvious issue with within a time span of 10 minutes at the moment is just very weird. I do agree with you on the reviews issues at hand but lets not take it to the level of Wikistalking. I am not shy of telling you what I think and I will take the issue futher if it should escalate. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Read WP:Wikistalking before you accuse me of doing so. This is an administrative matter, for which the following of edits is entirely appropriate, particularly as all are related to the same issue ("Correct use of an editor's history includes ... correcting related problems on multiple articles [or, in this case, pages]. In fact, such practices are recommended"). Your edits to DYK are consistently not up to standard, and thus a drain on community resources and a cause of both reviewer fatigue and backlog. I have requested that another editor attempt to mentor you, so that you can edit in a more constructive manner, and thus contribute in a way which is both enjoyable to you and not detrimental to the encyclopedia. If you wish to bring up the matter at an administrative board, I do recommend you read WP:BOOMERANG beforehand. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:28, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
I think you are absolutely ridiculous. And in fact you are more likely the one in need of mentoring concerning Reviews if your review of the Pettakare cave is anything to go after. That is my final comment. No more of this behaviour thanks. And I will certainly stop as well. This is a two way street.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:36, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Please ask a competent editor (Bluemoonset, Fram and EEng come to mind) to see if the review was against "GA criteria" or not (again, this is the version you wanted to run on the MP). If you think I need mentorship more than you do, then you do not understand DYK. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:44, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • (stalking) @BabbaQ: I'm not the most experienced DYKer but I know enough to be dangerous, and having worked with Crisco on getting Denmark Street and Dartford Crossing to good article status, (and you'll note both of those GA reviews were about a week apart, yet I never claimed Crisco was stalking me!) I'm confident enough to say he knows his stuff. At the end of the day, if you put articles up through the formal review procedures (which DYK is), you must expect constructive criticism, take it in good stride and see how said criticism does (or, sometimes does not, but that comes with experience) help improve the article - which is, after all, what we're all here for. Incidentally, I checked Daniel Paris - now, there's nothing wrong with writing about popular culture, but you have to respect the biographies of living people guideline, which is taken very seriously, and I would recommend the sentence "He also has been the victim of cyberbullying..." is removed, as it is insufficiently sourced in my view. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I do not have a problem with constructive criticism. That being "constructive criticism". I am not saying Crisco should not review. Basically I can not help that Crisco is feeling Butthurt about this situation. I have 40+ articles experience with DYKs and just right now I have articles with 40,000+ views on DYKSTATS. Crisco is being rude, am I better probably not. I will not apologize especially now that Crisco has taken it a step further with his latest antics at the DYK talk page. I am no wallflower when it comes to blatant attempts of discrediting me. If you give me obvious crap I will return the favour. Simple as that.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I certainly wouldn't claim you're not a productive editor and you have made positive contributions to this place, that can be easily seen from your contributions. Personally, I like people to give me a different angle on things, as the more points that can be brought up, the more likely the article is going to appear better to the average reader. I am sympathetic to the complaint that clearing an article through DYK has got harder particularly over the past year, and I realise it can seem frustrating to have the experience you have and suddenly hit a brick wall. However, I am convinced that nobody has it in for you and are simply concerned about maintaining an excellent standard of quality on the main page. Furthermore, since Google Books is getting better year on year, and the WMF have arranged free subscriptions to online source services (I've signed up to JSTOR and BNA and they're brilliant), there's no real excuse for not going with a higher quality of source than a typical website which runs all the risk of becoming a dead link and unverifiable in a year's time. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • But even you must admit that there are a difference between having opinions and suggestions about someone elses DYKs, not like Crisco is doing trying to point finger at me as an unproductve and not professional DYK creator. That is a blatant lie basically. I like that you responded with actual suggestions instead of attacks as both me and Crisco has been guilty of today. I have for the record never claimed to be a brilliant editor overall, but I am a great DYK contributor and my track record from 2010 until present time shows that my articles overall have been liked and enjoyed at the DYK. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Why do you keep referring to your track record? Does it mean you know better than someone with 626 DYKs since 2011, well over that in reviews, and whose top two hooks (four articles) had more than 50k hits. It's good to feel proud of your accomplishments, but recall that others may be just as accomplished (or even more so) than you.
I may have been a little harsher (I wouldn't even say "rude") than you like, but that does not change the fact that the article you nominated was woefully unprepared. I recommend listening to Ritchie here; if people find that you are responsive and willing to listen to feedback (no matter how it's phrased), they are likely to review your noms more quickly than if you withdraw everything immediately and accuse others of being "butthurt" and stalking you. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:57, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Some baklava for you![edit]

Baklava - Turkish special, 80-ply.JPEG Baklava is a rich, sweet pastry made of layers of filo pastry filled with chopped nuts and sweetened with syrup or honey. Just remembered what a wonderful help you are for us all on the project! Hafspajen (talk) 19:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Haffy! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Monkey photo[edit]

I added 2 cat's that can apply to the pic. I don't know if we can nominate for 2 at once but those were the most logical. talk→ WPPilot  02:36, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Barn owl falconry[edit]

Tyto alba - Cetrería - 01.jpg
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Tyto alba - Cetrería - 01.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 14:22, 27 November 2014 (UTC)


Crisco, it occurred to me that you might want to know about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakin' Dishes (2nd nomination), since you were the reviewer of its GAN back in 2011, and the fact that it is a GA is a factor in the discussions. Apologies for not letting you know sooner. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:14, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Saw the big list nom a while back, so... — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Bonus unnominable frog[edit]

For a magician - !
Hafspajen (talk) 18:09, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Love it. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:48, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

I want this woman[edit]

External video
François Boucher 032.jpg
Boucher's Venus Consoling Love at Smarthistory

Hafspajen (talk) 01:53, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Finally, a simple request! Face-wink.svg — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:56, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
What, isn't she adorable? Hafspajen (talk) 02:09, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Absolutely, yes. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:17, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Hey, that was fast..!!! Hafspajen (talk) 02:25, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

looks GOOD!!! Hafspajen (talk) 02:27, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Yeah, the National Gallery of Art has its full resolution files online, and free.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:30, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

oH, MY .... now I have to write an article, of course. Forgot about that part. Hafspajen (talk) 02:28, 28 November 2014 (UTC) Venus Console Love... arr. Hafspajen (talk) 02:33, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

.You mean wrong title... heheeey that's what I say... - Hafspajen (talk) 02:50, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Ok, I give it up for the moment. But it is a start. Leave it to you for now, it has refs-. For now. Co-nominate, eh, what do you say .. ? Face-smile.svgHafspajen (talk) 02:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I'll see what I can do today. Book launch and (if it doesn't rain) ketoprak performance this evening, and in about an hour and a half I have to teach. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Ah, I know what THAT means ... Hafspajen (talk) 03:09, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Hopefully, so long as the lighting is up to par. My 60D doesn't handle noise as well as Diliff's Canon EOS 5D Mark III; for File:Gunawan Maryanto reading his poetry, PKKH UGM, 2014-11-25.jpg, for instance, he could probably have gotten the same degree of sharpness with much less downsampling, or even without any (according to this, his camera gets the same amount of noise at ISO 1600 that I do at ISO 200... am really considering buying a Mark III for low light photography, or Mark IV if that's come out before I save the money... being able to go to ISO 3200 without that much noise would allow much better concert and dance shots). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:26, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Better than buying cars all the time. Prose size (text only): 1340 characters (241 words) "readable prose size". Hafspajen (talk) 03:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Not too much cheaper, though Cry.png — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Really? I heard folks talk about equipment's and stuff - but never realized that part. Hafspajen (talk) 04:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC).
  • Well, the 60D is almost $1000, and the 60D is almost twice that. The 5D mkIII is closer to $4000 than $3000... (actually, for my purposes the 6D may actually be better) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:18, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Oh, woew. Hafspajen (talk) 04:36, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Yeah, and that's before one gets to the lenses (a good lens for birding could easily cost more than the camera itself). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:38, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
More like this, actually... Hafspajen (talk) 15:57, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Yep, photography is a rewarding but not a cheap hobby, that's for sure... Where the rabbit hole goes, even I don't know. :-) Although Crisco, I think you're right that the 6D is probably better for your purposes if money is tight. Better to spend the difference on a good prime lens. The main differences are shooting speed and autofocus, neither of which are that important really. I'd have considered the 6D too if it were around at the time I bought my 5D Mk iii. Or, if you don't need the 6D's features, you could actually get a second hand 5D Mk ii which is almost as good as the Mk iii. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 08:56, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Oh, the geographic coordinates and whatnot would be useful. I'd definitely go with the 6D rather than a second-hand Mk II. As for the lens... well, 1.5k (the 5D mkIII is going for Rp. 35,000,000 right now) is a fair bit of wiggle room, though I'd probably end up getting a ring flash, the adapter, and a 50mm speed lens rather than just one lens. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:21, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Sadly, the place was too crowded for me to feel comfortable there with the equipment. No ketoprak yet. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Hmm, I noticed the header 'I want this woman' and, as I'm just soooo modest, immediately thought "Oh, that must be me", so trotted all the way over here ... ... only to find you are all discussing camera lenses! Dejectedly trudges all the way back out again ... SagaciousPhil - Chat 12:29, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Well, we started with paintings... — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
    Phil: yes, we need an other copy on this important artwork ... Crisco: no no, I have to run, I am busy ...
  • And a very fine painting it is too ... with a very nice little new article to go with it. SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:49, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Don't worry Phil, you are almost as charming like her, only on the brunette side... Hafspajen (talk) 15:55, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Lots and lots of sand ... maybe a place to build a new - Gravel Pit Chapel? - what can anyone say of this pic. - that was my desperate comment ... had no idea what to write. Hafspajen (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Glad to help. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Would be nice if you could look through the Fp content, looking for possible Swenglishisms - from about here onward. Hafspajen (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

id:Pah Wongso Pendekar Boediman[edit]

Crisco, mohon bantu donk untuk mengembangkan artikel id:Pah Wongso Pendekar Boediman agar serupa dengan yang ada di --What a joke (talk) 01:55, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Just a note[edit]

Hi Crisco, with this edit, you removed a nomination added by me a minute before. I wonder if you got any edit conflict ? --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 02:33, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Sorry, yeah that was an EC. Please feel free to readd the nomination (or I can do it for you). That's what I hate about editing the full T:TDYK. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:35, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I had already done it before posting here. :) . --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 04:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Crisco, you don't need to edit the whole T:TDYK when removing a date: just edit the date section, and strip out the contents including the header. I've never had a collision doing that. It's what I did a about an hour and a half ago when removing the "Articles created/expanded on September 19" section. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:37, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
  • That's what I did. I don't know why it collides, but it's not from a lack of caution. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Jill Stuart redux[edit]

Crisco, I was wondering whether you could revisit this and see whether the POV issues have been dealt with to your satisfaction. I know that some of the text that Panyd objected to still exists, but the phrasing has been revised here and there. I rather doubt "leading ladies" is appropriate, for example, but if that's an isolated incident it can be fixed. Thanks for checking. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:24, 28 November 2014 (UTC)


Ping. - Dank (push to talk) 15:59, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2014[edit]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Panyembrama[edit]

17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 48.jpg
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:17 Years of Sekar Jepun 2014-11-01 48.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 01:56, 29 November 2014 (UTC)