Will you please provide your implementation details (of the plotted equations) when you created the OGV animation related to Stokes wave with drift? I am trying to clarify a doubt: the drift velocity does not appear in the expression of the free surface elevation (to fix ideas, say a second-order approximation). However in the expressions for the particle trajectories we have an explicit term that corresponds to the drift velocity.
The confusing part is this: The free surface height obtained by solving the asymptotic sequence of the potential flow equations gradually separate (with the drift velocity) from the free surface tracked by the particle trajectories.
However, in the OGV animation you posted/created no such phase errors occur. Will you please share the equations that you plotted to create this OGV image? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadukandi (talk • contribs) 14:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Please see the description page of the animation at Commons, for the computational techniques used to obtain the flow associated with the wave motion. Best regards, Crowsnest (talk) 11:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:1931 - Frederick Lanchester.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:1931 - Frederick Lanchester.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).