User talk:Cwmhiraeth/Archive 12

Crocodilian

closed discussion

I know this year's WikiCup is coming to an end but would you like to work on Crocodilia with me? Maybe we can get it done for January. LittleJerry (talk) 01:39, 27 September 2013 (UTC) I'd be delighted to work on Crocodilia with you, but not until after the end of October. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC) So when you said "end of October" where you saying that just in case sea went on too long? LittleJerry (talk) 18:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC) The WikiCup ends at the end of October so I will have more time then for other things. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Let me know when you're ready. Could you work on Taxonomy and evolution (maybe by sandbox)? I could send/refer you some papers. I prefer we mostly re-write the article from scratch. LittleJerry (talk) 19:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC) OK. I know little about crocodilians and will be learning as we go along. Any useful sources you have would be helpful. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:49, 12 October 2013 (UTC) Do you have books on reptiles and amphibians? I would recommend The Firefly Encyclopedia of Reptiles and Amphibians or Crocodile: Evolution's Greatest Survivor. LittleJerry (talk) 19:49, 12 October 2013 (UTC) I have a very good book on amphibians. I'll see what the library has on reptiles. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:53, 12 October 2013 (UTC) Could you write in US English? LittleJerry (talk) 03:06, 13 October 2013 (UTC) I can try. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:59, 13 October 2013 (UTC) Things now having eased off with regards to the WikiCup, I have made a start on the Taxonomy and evolution section(s) in my userspace. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC) Okay them, I'll PM you some papers. Here's one that's free access [1]. LittleJerry (talk) 20:33, 18 October 2013 (UTC) This article provides a clade tree for the modern species (expect for one). LittleJerry (talk) 18:14, 19 October 2013 (UTC) Great job on evolution and locomotion, could you maybe expand a little more on skins and scales? LittleJerry (talk) 22:18, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Sure. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC) I intend to start working on thermoregulation as my book has a useful section. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:02, 25 October 2013 (UTC) Does the book contain more information on metabolism (which is related to cold-bloodedness) and sexual organs? LittleJerry (talk) 18:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Its got 15 pages on "Food and feeding habits", 6 pages on "Mortality and predators", 10 on "Social behaviour", 15 on "Reproduction" and 20 on "Habitats". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Wow! Well feel free to join in on "Ecology and life history". I started on Feeding and was planning on "Reproduction and parenting" "Growth and mortality" and "Communication" subsections" Which of these would you be able to do? LittleJerry (talk) 19:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Shall I work on "Social behaviour" which would include "Communication"? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Okay. Although I already put in some information on that. LittleJerry (talk) 20:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC) Oh and when it comes to books that are edited and have multiple authors, each one should be credited. See Elephant for formatting. LittleJerry (talk) 23:43, 26 October 2013 (UTC) I'll start working on reproduction and parenting. Should I get into courtship and such? That involves lots of communication. LittleJerry (talk) 17:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC) Yes, carry on. As you may have noticed, I got sidetracked into Osmoregulation. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC) I think it would be better if communication had its own section and I think reproductive behavior can include information on dominance hierarchies. I've included information on social spacing in the lead of "Ecology and behavior". You can expand it if you want. Could you also add more on habitats? LittleJerry (talk) 19:09, 27 October 2013 (UTC) Please fix the rest of the rest of the Ross citations. You can't cite the same thing twice. LittleJerry (talk) 21:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Yes I was thinking that would be a good idea but inertia ruled the day! What about the Griggs reference? The pdf link does not work, but also, the source is used multiple times and could be treated like a book as it has page numbers. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC) The pdf link works for me. Also for Grigg we are only citing one page range/section. Not multiple throughout the book. LittleJerry (talk) 21:14, 29 October 2013 (UTC) Grigg has 4 chapters on Crocodilians, so we might want to cite him as a book and then refer either to chapters or to specific page ranges. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:03, 31 October 2013 (UTC) I think that is a good idea. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:09, 31 October 2013 (UTC) I disagree, we are only citing one chapter/page range. LittleJerry (talk) 19:32, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

I'll probably spilt "respiration, circulation and digestion" into separate sections. I'll work on expanding the former two, could you do the latter? Maybe include excretion? LittleJerry (talk) 22:28, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

I will work on Digestion, but I think Excretion is sufficiently covered in the Osmoregulation section. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:09, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

It seems my Wyle book won't arrive until December. Does your book talk about crocodilians in popular culture? (I was thinking specifically of Wally Gator and the alligators from Fantasia) LittleJerry (talk) 23:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I have returned my book to the library but could get it out again if required. I regard the culture section of the article as a necessary but bothersome section and my book is twenty years old. I will glance through it next time I am in town and will see if it has anything relevant. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Okay then. Do you know how to copyedit? LittleJerry (talk) 14:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and does the book state the length and weight of the smallest crocodilians? (I could only find length). LittleJerry (talk) 14:31, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

It only had the length I think. I propose to leave copyediting to someone competent in American English spelling and phraseology. Instead, I will go through the references and try to iron out any inconsistencies. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:09, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

I just got my book. Unfortunately it doesn't mention the above examples, maybe yours will. LittleJerry (talk) 00:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Neither of the croc books I now have do so either. However, the article is now (surely) easily ready for GA, and anything the reviewer suggests will probably be useful for further progress, so why don't we just go for it? Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:12, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I will soon. LittleJerry (talk) 19:40, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Far be it from me, but perhaps we should work the Kleggs in somehow. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:10, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

GA review has begun. LittleJerry (talk) 21:12, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Need you for GA review. LittleJerry (talk) 21:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Does your book mention crocodilians eating amphibians? I wishing I could add them to this sentence ".....generalised diets and opportunistically feed on invertebrates, fish, snakes, turtles, birds, and mammals." my source does mention them. LittleJerry (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes it does. Crocodilia is now nominated for DYK. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Okay, well please add the source and amphibian to the sentence. I think its ready for FAC after that. LittleJerry (talk) 02:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

For your information, I will be away from home and my computer until Thursday 5th December but you are welcome to carry on anyway. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

I'll probably nominate it when you return, so you can take credit as a nominator. LittleJerry (talk) 00:46, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Would you be able to nominate it and put all three of our things in? LittleJerry (talk) 03:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

OK Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

What should be done with the "Ecological role" subsection? Should it be removed? LittleJerry (talk) 18:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

I will do some work on it. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

I need your help at FAC. LittleJerry (talk) 16:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

I didn't write the "Respiration" section and I don't know much about the subject. My book deals with respiration in a single paragraph. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Does your book discuss how deep they dive? LittleJerry (talk) 20:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Not as far as I can see. Most of them cruise around on the surface don't they?

Nevermind, problem solved. LittleJerry (talk) 20:37, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Need you for FAC. LittleJerry (talk) 16:10, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

I think I may have answered the two queries on osmoregulation with a new ref; Kelly p. 68 did not support the odd claim about absorption through that thick scaly skin (always struck me as unlikely...); I suspect the phrase arose from something like 'absorption must be through the skin or other membranes [... and we don't imagine it's the skin, folks]'. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Tomorrow is the end of the Stub Contest and after that I will return to my usual routine and pay some attention to the FAC. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Okay, because we really need you now. LittleJerry (talk) 14:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 October newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our champion, for the second year running, is Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Our final nine were as follows:

1. Cwmhiraeth (submissions)
2. Hawkeye7 (submissions)
3. Sasata (submissions)
4. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions)
5. Casliber (submissions)
6. Adam Cuerden (submissions)
7. Miyagawa (submissions)
8. Piotrus (submissions)
9. Ealdgyth (submissions)

All those who reached the final win prizes, and prizes will also be going to the following participants:

• Casliber (submissions) wins the FA prize, for four featured articles in round 4, worth 400 points.
• Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) wins the GA prize, for 20 good articles in round 3, worth 600 points.
• Another Believer (submissions) wins the FL prize, for four featured lists in round 2, worth 180 points.
• Adam Cuerden (submissions) wins the FP prize, for 23 featured pictures in round 5, worth 805 point.
• Sven Manguard (submissions) wins the FPo prize, for 2 featured portals in round 3, worth 70 points.
• Hawkeye7 (submissions) wins the topic prize, for a 23-article featured topic in round 5, worth 230 points.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 79 did you know articles in round 5, worth 570 points.
• ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 23 in the news articles in round 4, worth 270 points.
• Ed! (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 24 good article reviews in round 1, worth 96 points.
• The judges are awarding the Oddball Barnstar to The C of E (submissions), for some curious contributions in earlier rounds.
• Finally, the judges are awarding Cwmhiraeth (submissions) the Geography Barnstar for her work on sea, now a featured article. This top-importance article was the highest-scoring this year; when it was promoted to FA status, Cwmhiraeth could claim 720 points.

Prizes will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. While it has been an excellent year, errors have opened up the judges' eyes to the need for a third judge, and it is with pleasure that we announce that experienced WikiCup participant Miyagawa will be acting as a judge from now on. We hope you will all join us in welcoming him to the team.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. Brainstorming and discussion remains open for how next year's competition will work, and straw polls will be opened by the judges soon. Those interested in friendly competition may also like to keep an eye on the stub contest, being organised by Casliber. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 01:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

• Congratulations, champion! :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

• Congratulations from me as well! I stand in awe of the elite content creators such as yourself. Thanks so much for all you do on Wikipedia! – Quadell ^(talk) 13:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

• Congratulations on your win. I tried my hardest, but the better editor won. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
• Hurray, congrats! -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:48, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks folks! As it happens Sea is today's featured article. It has stood me in such good stead during the competition both at DYK and GA, and then at FA in the final round. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

• Congratulations! (starts hunting for high-profile chemical articles to save myself next year...uhhhh...iron? thorium? halogen?) Double sharp (talk) 09:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
• I also wanted to say congrats and thanks for all the contributions that went along with winning the 2013 WikiCup. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Chinchillidae

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Southern viscacha

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Northern viscacha

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Edits to Sea

Hi, I've just seen that an editor is starting to delete paragraphs from Sea ... perhaps we can get this stopped at least until after the front page appearance. I've pinged him ... feel free to help. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

I think we should put the page back to what it was before WolfmanSF made his changes. Sea is meant to be on the front page tomorrow. When Common toad appeared as today's featured article it had a torrid day! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Actually I think it very bad that any editor should make such sweeping changes to a Featured Article without prior consultation. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it was unthinking; to be charitable, I expect it was just ill-informed. I suggest you put it back now with a note that we're happy to discuss after tomorrow. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:58, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Actually, looking more carefully at what has been done, I am not unhappy at the alterations that were made. The smaller edits are reasonable while the big addition of new material was then removed. Let's hope the editor concerned leaves the article alone until after tomorrow. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:36, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

All right. I think it a pity that we've now got a level 3 heading to interrupt the pattern, but that's a minor aesthetic detail. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:22, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

I've changed it to a level 2 heading. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Crocodilia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Plasma

Natterer's bat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vision

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

article you created appreciated, tact you showed in a horridly frustrating situation *much* appreciated

Well, looking over your practically-bare talkpage, I can tell that you almost never get complimented for a job well done. Sorry about that, we wikipedians are a prickly bunch, loners mostly, concentrating on improving articles and such. So I figured you might need a pat on the back. Consider it done. I ran across some page about a marine species, which you created, and then brought to good article status, single-handedly. That in itself deserves the congratulations of all right-thinking wikipedians, so you have my thanks. Then, somebody combatitive swooped in, made wild accusations, template-spammed your article, did some pretty drastic but clearly pointless reworking, and then stormed off again, honking their horn. Did you lose your cool? Did you lash out? Did you call in a hundred admins? Not that I can tell. You stuck with pillar four, in a very difficult pickle, which was absolutely positively no fault of yours. Everything you did was not just right, it was unassailably right... and when somebody saw fit to assail you anyhoo, you resisted the urge to stoop to their level. They have since been banned, per wp:boomerang, when on some unrelated matter *they* attempted to bring in a hundred admins to enforce *their* will on other editors. The wheels of wikiJustice sometimes grind exceedingly slow, but they grind fine, and they grind fair. You, madam, are a pearl in the sea of wikipedians. For sticking firm to pillar four, I award you my heartfelt gratitude. Smooth sailing. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 14:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

That's quite a complement, I think ;-) Thanks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cuvier's dwarf caiman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incubation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review!

Just thought I'd thank you for reviewing and recommending St. Clair Drake for DYK earlier this week -- it's much appreciated! :-) Jwrosenzweig (talk) 01:44, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup awards

Awarded to Cwmhiraeth, WikiCup 2013 champion! J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 11:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Awarded to Cwmhiraeth for the strongest contribution of did you knows in the 2013 WikiCup. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 11:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Awarded to Cwmhiraeth in recognition of sea, the highest-scoring article in the 2013 WikiCup. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 11:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Cuvier's dwarf caiman

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Desert elephant

The DYK project (nominate) 09:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Crocodylus novaeguineae

The DYK project (nominate) 06:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Poraniopsis redirected to Echinasteridae

Dear Cwmhiraeth,

Poraniopsis is redirected to Echinasteridae. There might be a mistake. FYI only. Best Regards --Hanberke (talk) 04:30, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

I know, and it is very unsatisfactory. The trouble is that Echinasteridae is placed in the order Spinulosida and ITIS, the source used for that page states that Poraniopsis is included in Echinasteridae. WoRMS on the other hand includes Poraniopsis in Poraniidae in the order Valvatida. These are fundamental differences. WikiProject Marine life does not stipulate which source to use but I believe WoRMS is more authoratative. I could BOLDLY try to sort it out or I could do nothing. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Rail and Speckled trout

Ptilometra australis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Clarence River

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Asterina gibbosa

The DYK project (nominate) 09:34, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Asterina phylactica

The DYK project (nominate) 09:34, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Salt -- "Anglicizing spelling"

Why did you anglicize the spelling of the article on salt? Samuel Webster (talk) 18:01, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) - it seems correct: the first version of the article was written by a Slovenian who used the form "iodised", which could represent something not far off an English spelling approach. There seems no particular reason in this article to go for an American or other spelling instead, in the absence of a Slovenian English style guide (attempt at humour). Let's not worry too much about it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:17, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

I did a lot of work on the article back in March 2013, that was 8 months ago. Nobody was concerned about whether it was British English or American English back then and I don't really see why they are so bothered now. You will find lots of discussion on the article talk page but I am steering clear of the argument. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:34, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Cwmhiraeth- Nor did I see why you were concerned about it -- enough to change the spelling. Chiswick Chap, the first stable(ish) version has a mixture of styles, but it looks to be mostly Commonwealth spelling, I see now! Samuel Webster (talk) 07:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you: Samuel Merrill Woodbridge now an FA

I just wanted to express my appreciation and thank you for your time and efforts in helping me get Samuel Merrill Woodbridge to featured article status with your insightful comments and focused critique through both the GA and FA process. --ColonelHenry (talk) 18:37, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

My pleasure, but I didn't help much at FA. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:44, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

• Perhaps, but your comprehensive GA review whipped it into pretty good shape and laid the path for a rather easy FAC.--ColonelHenry (talk) 20:05, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

It is "penitent" so your correction was right--thanks for catching that. You'd think a former seminarian would've caught that. --ColonelHenry (talk) 14:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Mithraculus sculptus

Orlady (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Polistes carnifex

The DYK project (nominate) 00:18, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/A Katy or a Gaga

Cwmhiraeth, as you can see from my response, I have strong objections to using the original hook, as it conveys the impression that Lambert sang "Applause" in the episode, when he (in fact) did not: early reports from supposedly reliable sources that he would turned out to be not the case, so to run the original hook feels, to me, like lying.

I've proposed an ALT1a, rewording from ALT1 which wasn't to your taste. If this still is not, I'm happy to try other ALT hooks. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:28, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

I have suggested an ALT2. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

With regard to the Greater Poland Civil War nomination, you quoted the rule "You're not allowed to approve your own hook or article." In that case my proposed hook was only a rephrasing of hooks already discussed and I think your interpretation of the rule is incorrect. I think the rule is actually referring to the article nominator rather than the article reviewer. If the nominator agrees to a minor rewording of a hook suggested by the reviewer, the reviewer should be able to approve the nomination. If you accepted my ALT2 for your article mentioned above, I think it would be ridiculous to require a third party to validate it. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

• I've just done an edit-by-edit look through the Greater Poland nom—apologies if I don't quite track this right, but this is my final edit before a too-long-delayed bedtime (Katy can wait until later): as far as I can tell, Sp33dyphil's proposed hook, which is the one you modified, was never reviewed separately. Piotrus, the nominator, said he liked it, but that doesn't count. So you approved your own version of Sp33dyphil's hook, but with some new information added to it—not merely rephrasing—the words "which terminated after the accession of ten-year old Jadwiga of Poland". This is new: previous hooks just say the war led to Jadwiga's succession, but yours specifies that the accession came first, then the war's end. This is exactly the sort of thing that needs to be checked against the article and sources to be sure it's accurate, which is why another reviewer needs to get involved. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

OK. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Phrynarachne decipiens

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Slave-making ant DYK + ant task force

Hello Cwmhiraeth! I randomly found your Polyergus rufescens draft while searching for incomings links to the recently created Slave-making ant article.

If you are interested in a co-nominated slave-making ant DYK, I can contribute with an article about the slave-making genus Rossomyrmex. The article was expanded yesterday and was supposed to be used in conjunction with the SMA article + Trophobiosis article + an article about an aphid-"farming" ant species. But all those links made the hook look awkward and we decided to only include the slavery and "farming" articles in the DYK. It is not very important to me that the Rossomyrmex article is used in a DYK, but feel free to use it in any way you see fit if it's possible to include it in the same hook as your Polyergus rufescens article.

Also, you are very much invited to the ant task force. Cheers, jonkerz ♠talk 04:15, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

I will move my draft article into main space and work further on it there. Slave-making ants are a fascinating subject and if you would like to contribute to the article it could be a joint DYK nomination. Alternatively, we could jointly nominate the two articles with a single hook and then adjust the credits to be given for each article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Great :) Writing one article each and jointly nominating them with a single hook is what I had in mind. Any ideas for a catchy hook? I'll try to figure something out. We still have a couple of days to come up with a good hook. jonkerz ♠talk 06:36, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Good. Do you have access to any useful source on description or distribution for Polyergus rufescens? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

"Global revision of the dulotic ant genus Polyergus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae, Formicinae, Formicini)" by Trager (2013) was published in Zootaxa less than a month ago, but it's behind a paywall and I've no access to it. The author recently created a WP account (James C. Trager), if we're lucky, he may be kind and email you the article if you ask him. Other than that, I think I have a couple of older articles from Psyche (http://www.hindawi.com/) somewhere on my computer, but you probably have to manually look through those because they are not OCR:ed. I'll see what I can find and get back to you ASAP (probably tomorrow or the day after tomorrow). jonkerz ♠talk 07:08, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Polyergus rufescens now exists. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:18, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

I looked through all the articles in my not-very-organized SMA folder without finding anything useful. Actually, the only non-trivial mention was a brief paragraph about their obligatory slave-making behavior, but I see that you've already covered that. Regarding the hook, here are a few suggestions:

Did you known ...

1. ... that ants in the genera Polyergus (e.g. Polyergus rufescens) and Rossomyrmex are the only obligatory slave-makers in the subfamily Formicinae?
2. ... that the slave-making ant Polyergus rufescens enslaves Formica species, while ants of the genus Rossomyrmex enslave only Proformica ants?
3. ... that slave-making behavior has evolved independently in the two ant genera Polyergus (e.g. Polyergus rufescens) and Rossomyrmex?
4. ... that the slave-making ants Polyergus rufescens and Rossomyrmex species R. minuchae are both known from Spain?
5. ... that the slave-making ants Polyergus (e.g. Polyergus rufescens) and Rossomyrmex are closely related, but both are more closely related to the genera they parasitize (Formica and Proformica)?

jonkerz ♠talk 00:30, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

• ... that the slave-making ants Polyergus (e.g. Polyergus rufescens) and Rossomyrmex are more closely related to the genera they parasitize (Formica and Proformica) than they are to each other?

Of these possible hooks, I like the third one best. Do you have a source that states this fact that I could add to my article? In fact most of these hooks are not borne out by my article as it stands. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Do you think this is a reliable source? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

More closely related to their hosts than they are to each other, yes. #3 and #5 are both from this PLoSONE article (open access / cc-by). The source text reads "A molecular phylogeny of closely related Formicine species by Hasegawa et al. [24] showed that slave-making behavior has evolved independently in two closely related genera, Polyergus and Rossomyrmex. Both genera are more closely related to the genera they parasitize (Formica and Proformica, respectively) than to each other." I have refs for the other hooks as well, but they have not been added to any of the articles yet.

myrmecofourmis.fr is probably more reliable than what it looks like, but here are some better refs:

Raids

• Orientation of Polyergus rufescens (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) during slave-making raids. (1997)
• Integration raids in the Amazon ant Polyergus rufescens (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) (2005)
• Homing Behaviour in Polyergus rufescens Latr. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) (1996)

Mating behaviour & description

• Chemical communication in mating behaviour of the slave-making ant Polyergus rufescens (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) (2008)
• The Formicidae (Hymenoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. (1979) (contains a description of the castes, last two pages)

I'll expand the Rossomyrmex article with the fact from hook #3, but it can be mentioned briefly in the P. rufescens article as well. jonkerz ♠talk 11:22, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

I have added the fact for #3 to the P. rufescens article and it is ready for DYK. Do you want to do the nomination or shall I? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:18, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Great :) That would be appreciated, I'll review another DYK and add it to the nomination page once it's up. jonkerz ♠talk 15:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

I've made the nomination for November 12th. The hook is "... that slave-making behavior has evolved independently in the two ant genera Polyergus (e.g. Polyergus rufescens) and Rossomyrmex? Perhaps you should add the information to support the hook to your article.

By the way, your other hook for November 12th has an image accompanying it but does to mention (pictured) in the hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

 Done and  Done! jonkerz ♠talk 04:42, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

A general thanks

Like nearly everyone here, I am very impressed with your quality contributions. I'm also impressed with how well you sidestep drama and ignore the less important aspects which can often be a distraction for content creators. (I hope to emulate that.) If you need a hand with anything – such as an article that needs a review, or formatting help needed to fulfill a reviewer's request – please feel free to ask. All the best, – Quadell ^(talk) 13:21, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Our dear blogger friend however is not very impressed with my efforts! Up till the end of October I was concentrating on writing and improving articles that scored the maximum number of points for the WikiCup. It is quite pleasant now to traipse around where my whimsy takes me, doing just what I like. At the moment, bringing articles to GA and FA seems an unnecessary effort when there are so many hundreds of thousands of species lacking articles or just represented by stubs. I will bear in mind your offer of a review or help with formatting for the future however.Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:53, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Dear Cwmhiraeth, as a fan of your contributions (actually creating new articles) on lots of otherwise ignored species, I was really disappointed with your GA and FA efforts. Now you are welcome back to creating new articles and bringing a great number of species into light again. Best wishes --Hanberke (talk) 06:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Wow. I guess that just goes to show that even if you get two major articles promoted to FA status and 13 to GA status in just two short months... even if you win the WikiCup, and are lauded as demonstrably the best recent GA and FA contributor on Wikipedia... there will always be someone there to say he is "disappointed with your GA and FA efforts". – Quadell ^(talk) 15:05, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Lobophora variegata

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lobophora (alga) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sori

Lobophora variegata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sori

Polistes carnifex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Xenos

Polyergus rufescens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cocoon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Rockefeller Wildlife Refuge

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Morula

OK. I heard back from my friend Harry Lee, who said this:

"It appears that Ricinula ferruginosa Reeve (1846): sp. 50 http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/41734#page/464/mode/1up

http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/41734#page/466/mode/1up

is NOT that species of authors including Keen, and so maybe Trachypollia nodulosa (C.B. Adams, 1845) is a senior synonym, as some people are saying. As Myra Keen 1971 doesn't list a synonym for the Panamic taxon, maybe someone needs to coin a replacement name."

As for what we should do about all this, I don't know!

Best, Invertzoo (talk) 19:17, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll leave my starfish article as it is. WoRMS is not always helpful with older synonyms. Nor is their distribution always complete. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

You are right about that; WoRMS is not complete and exhaustive. Invertzoo (talk) 21:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Polyergus mexicanus

Gatoclass (talk) 08:13, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Ammophila urnaria

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Lily Neo

Cwmhiraeth, I was wondering whether you could take a quick look at ALT2, which I've just proposed. It gets rid of the dubious Thailand claim, and rephrases the Ireland medicine part of the hook. It's also more interesting than the original hook, so it would be nice if it could be chosen. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Formica incerta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Petiole

Nembrotha lineolata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Type locality

Polyergus mexicanus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chihuahua

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Polyergus lucidus

Gatoclass (talk) 17:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Formica incerta

Gatoclass (talk) 17:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Heliaster kubiniji

Gatoclass (talk) 01:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Starfish wasting disease

Gatoclass (talk) 01:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Smooth-fronted caiman

The DYK project (nominate) 00:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Diadema savignyi

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Cliona viridis

{{DYKbotdo 07:34, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK

Hi ‎Cwmhiraeth, apologies for the inconveniences with the Rossomyrmex DYK, I didn't expect it to be a problem. Splitting the nom was the right thing to do; your article should not suffer from my mistakes. Anyways, nice work on all the new Polyergus- and Formica-related articles (and I have a lot of work to do adding attribution templates to a bunch of articles). jonkerz ♠talk 15:15, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dendropoma corallinaceum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Operculum

Ralfsia verrucosa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mutualism

Scutellastra longicosta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mutualism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much

Thank you for using my picture of [2] [Pavona cactus] from Wikicommons in your article, Pavona cactus. Bruinfan12 (talk) 10:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

It's a nice picture. Thank you for uploading it to Commons! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Nembrotha lineolata

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To unsubscribe remove your username from this list. EdwardsBot (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Crocodilia

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Polyergus rufescens

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:03, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Acropyga epedana

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Epsom General Hospital

Cwmhiraeth, I was hoping you could please revisit your review here and decide whether Launchballer's QPQ was an adequate effort that satisfies the requirement, despite an obvious misapprehension regarding hook content. (The picture that accompanied the nomination appears to have been deleted from here and from the article.) Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

QPQ attempted anyway and time is moving on so I approved the hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Scutellastra longicosta

The DYK project (nominate) 08:48, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Ralfsia verrucosa

The DYK project (nominate) 08:48, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Trachea and Decapod

Alishan salamander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Yushan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Formica pallidefulva

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:18, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Corsican or Tyrrhenian

Hi Cwmhiraeth, In Tyrrhenian painted frog, at Distribution and habitat section, The Corsican painted frog is written at the very beginning. IMHO, it is to be fixed. Cheers --Hanberke (talk) 14:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

You are quite right and I have corrected it. Another anomaly is the disagreement between the two AmphibiaWeb references I use on the page. They both describe how to tell the difference between the two species but they contradict each other. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

I can recommend Reptiles and Amphibians of Britain and Europe (Collins Field Guide) by Nicholas Arnold and Denys Ovenden (7 Oct 2002) which covers all the European species and many variants and subspecies. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

This was another book that I borrowed from the library at one time. But mostly, I think AmphibiaWeb is very good. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Stub_Contest/Entries#Cwmhiraeth

Nice work on expanding stubs - just before you add a swathe more, a few (~4-5?) of the ones you've added still have stub tags at the bottom. Cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:32, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

I thought I was removing all the tags but I obviously wasn't. I'll check. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Scutellastra cochlear

Gatoclass (talk) 16:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Spongites yendoi

Gatoclass (talk) 16:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Little golden-mantled flying fox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Balut, Negros and Tablas

Leonurus cardiaca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Calyx and Corolla

Small flying fox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Pawpaw and Fig

Thymus pulegioides (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Calyx and Corolla

Thymus serpyllum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Calyx and Corolla

Lamium galeobdolon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Calyx

Mentha suaveolens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Clone

Saunders's Gull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Incubation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pacific lamprey may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Pacific lamprey grow to about {{convert|80|cm}}) as adults. They are [[anadromous]] and [[semelparous]]. They have slender, elongate bodies with

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:41, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Common goby may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• one eight to eleven soft rays. The pelvic fins are fused. There are 39 to 51 scales along the [[lateral line and these scales are slightly larger than those of the [[sand goby]] (''Pomatoschistus

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:44, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Black scorpionfish may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Blenny|blennies]] and [[Goby|gobies]], [[crustacean]]s and other bottom-dwelling [[invertebrate]]]s. Little is known about its reproduction.<ref name=MSIP/>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Grey-bellied Comet may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the already small portion of land the bird inhabits. The [[IUCN]] has listed the bird as being "{{Endangered species|Endangered]]".<ref name=IUCN/>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Translation from French ?

Hello, I've seen that you translated - very well - the article Astropyga radiata I wrote in French. If you are used to this, I am currently writing plenty of echinoderms articles in French, including all the extant and extinct classes (see fr:Echinodermata as a beginning). If you need any help about the translation, you can ask me ! Congrats and best regards, FredD (talk) 16:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

I am not sure whether I did translate the article but I rather doubt it, especially as I see I nominated it for DYK. If I had, then I should have tagged it as such. For the future, I might use some of the articles you are writing, especially when they are as well referenced as Astropyga radiata is. Often foreign language Wikipedia articles seem to be largely unsourced and then I don't like to use them except perhaps for some general information. For example, some species may have papers published on their larval development or the secondary metabolites they contain without giving the basic description of the organism that I want to include in my article. Cheers! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 16:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Boloria chariclea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cascades

Brown rockfish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Category

Gobio gobio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Barbel

Oriental Plover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Migration

Shortspine thornyhead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Category

Subantarctic Snipe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Maori

Vimba vimba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Asp

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Luzon Hawk-Owl

• To let you know that the talk page to Luzon Hawk-Owl was a redirect to "Talk:Philippine Hawk-Owl", so you have edited the Luzon Hawk-Owl and updated the class to Start on the Philippine Hawk-Owl talk page. The Luzon H-O talk page did not have a WP banner and so it was not rated as a Stub at the start of the competition, so you probably can not claim 10 points for expanding it, but the judges will clarify this point. I think that you also can not claim one point for upgrading it from a Stub to a Start. I created a talk page for the Luzon H-O from a redirect today. You might like to put in "class=start" and complete the rating and ask the judges to adjudicate. I have changed the WP banner on the Philippine H-O back to a Stub class. Snowman (talk) 17:37, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
• Also, my interpretation of the IUCN page is that the taxon is not recognised by IUCN, which use the pre-split form of the complex as one species; see the taxoboxes for the other owls in the group. I have amended the IUCN status. Note that on the IUCN website the binomial name matches the Wiki, but the common name does not, which would need an explanation before you assume that the taxon used on the Wiki and the IUCN are the same. Snowman (talk) 17:37, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
• Note that the new version of IUCN is Version 2013.2. Snowman (talk) 17:51, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

I did notice that the talk page had the wrong title and considered what I should do about it. I came to the conclusion that I would leave it to someone more competent than me. I will ask on the competition page whether I can claim 10 points for expanding it. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Similar issue with Mantanani Scops Owl. Snowman (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Of course, when you click on a redirect you go to the target page, and after doing that you can go to the actual redirect by clicking on the little blue link at the top of the target page. The little blue link only appears if you are sent to a page via a redirect. The redirect page will be shown and you will be able to edit it in the normal way. If there is a double redirect, then I think that you do this for each redirected step. There are others ways of getting to a redirect, but that is seems to me to be the simplest. Snowman (talk) 11:13, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Caesio xanthonota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Arabian Gulf

Fearful Owl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bougainville

Parapterois heterura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Natal

Phantasmal poison frog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bolívar Province

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

FAC for Eliot's A Song for Simeon

I nominated A Song for Simeon for FAC, located here Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/A Song for Simeon/archive1. I would be grateful if you had some time to stop by and offer some comments and suggestions for its improvement. I hope the holidays went well. Best wishes for a healthy and prosperous 2014!--ColonelHenry (talk) 00:04, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup!

Hello Cwmhiraeth, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition began on 1 January. There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 15:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cape galaxias, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to African chameleon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• The African chameleon is usually found on the lower branches of trees, on shrubs and on reeds {''[[Phragmites]]''). It grasps its support with its four-toed feet, a pair of toes on either side of the branch, and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:38, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Culcita schmideliana may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ]'', and the living tissues and polyps of the stony corals ''[[Galaxea]]'' and ''[[Goniopora]]'') and the soft coral ''[[Xenia (genus)|Xenia]]''. In grazing in this way on corals it resembles the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Longhorn crazy ant

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Crocodilia FA

Crocodilia has been promoted! Thanks for your help. I couldn't have gotten it through this quick without you guy's help. LittleJerry (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Well, that's good news. I am afraid I was not as much help as I should have been. During December I did almost nothing except expand stubs to start class articles!

Do you have anything else in mind for the future? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Not really. I'm semi-retiring from Wiki, at least for a while. I'm burnt out on major projects and have personal things focus on. Thanks for your participation in Manta, Starfish and Croc and good luck on any future FACs. (I'm assuming you'll work on salamander) I may attempt another FAC (likely a single species) if I have the time and energy. But that won't be for quite a while. LittleJerry (talk) 18:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Well, all the best for your personal things. Meanwhile, Cwmhiraeth, shall we attempt to put Crocodilia on the front page? It won't take much to condense the lead into a summary. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:34, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Indeed, Wikipedia has benefited from your FAC efforts over a range of important animal groups LittleJerry, and you will be missed. Meanwhile, we might as well go for Crocodilia at TFA. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

He's just been awarded a well-deserved Natural History Shield.

Here's a first draft of the TFA blurb (maybe it needs pruning a little further): Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Crocodilia is an order of large, predatory, semi-aquatic reptiles. They appeared 83.5 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous period. The order includes the true crocodiles (family Crocodylidae), the alligators and caimans (family Alligatoridae), and the gharial and false gharial (family Gavialidae). Large, solidly built, lizard-like reptiles, crocodilians have long flattened snouts, eyes, ears, and nostrils at the top of the head and laterally compressed tails. Their skin is thick and covered in non-overlapping scales; they have conical teeth and a powerful bite. They swim well and can move quite rapidly on land. Crocodilians are found mainly in lowlands in the tropics, but alligators are also found in the USA and China. They are largely carnivorous, some specialising on fish while others have generalised diets. Crocodilians are typically solitary and territorial. During breeding, dominant males try to monopolise available females. The eggs are laid in holes or on mounds and in some species, females care for their young. Eight species of crocodilians have attacked humans, the largest number of attacks being by the Nile crocodile. Humans are the greatest threat to crocodilian populations through hunting and habitat destruction, but farming has greatly reduced unlawful trading in wild skins. Crocodilians have appeared in art and literature since at least Ancient Egypt. The story that crocodiles weep for their victims dates back to the 9th century; it was put forward by Sir John Mandeville in 1400 and mentioned again by William Shakespeare.

I have edited the blurb a little. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Great. Shall we go for it at once or is there any particular day to consider (Steve Irwin day, Nov. 15 is a vague possibility, I guess)? Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

I should have thought at once, before it weathers too much! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

I've put it there. So far only ColonelHenry has visited. I see that Salamander is making progress - would you like me to have a go at the myths and legends? It mentions fire already, but there should be some good quotes available, I think. Another article which could do with the treatment is Whale, though it might be a bit of a 'large' topic! Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:44, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Good. I started on Salamander last year but didn't complete work on it. Your help with the myths and legends, or any other section, would be welcome. I have decided that I will try to bring some large article on an order, or similar taxon, to GA each month in 2014. I was thinking more about invertebrates such as Mysida (which I see has a splendid section called "mysid culture") but Whale would be quite possible. The trouble is, I view everything from a Wikicup point of view, and Whale is a high-scoring article while Mysida is a fairly low scoring one. This means doing Mysida early in the competition and Whale later when points are more urgently needed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:28, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

OK, Salamander it is. I think the Mysid culture is in an aquarium! Happy to go alone with Wikicupping, it seemed to work well last year, and it sounds as if Whale might happen later. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

I think whale might be difficult since "whale" is not monotypic but refer to several species that are not all closely related (sperm whales, killer whales and pilot whales are more related to dolphins than other "whales"). Cetacea may be better. LittleJerry (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

You are probably right. We will have to think about that. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

If and when I do return for one more FA project, it will probably be narwhal. Throwing that out there. LittleJerry (talk) 04:36, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

I'll be happy to cooperate with narwhal if you would like some help. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Out of curiosity, what are your other future FA projects? LittleJerry (talk) 01:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

I plan to do Camel and Ostrich, for both of which I have good books and both would score large numbers of points for the WikiCup if successful. That would be in the summer. I will probably take Salamander on to FAC as well for similar reasons. That has just become a GA and should not need much further work. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

That sounds cool. Emu was demoted a couple years among and Ostrich would make a great replacement. Any invertebrates? LittleJerry (talk) 14:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Some invertebrate groups to GA anyway but I hadn't really thought about FA. I'm open to suggestions. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

You mentioned Jellyfish a while back. LittleJerry (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

My Invertebrate Zoology textbook has a whole chapter on Cnidaria from which the jellyfish-related part would have to be extracted. My preference would be for Sea anemone, which I think would be easier. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:43, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Love the uncited one-liner 'The internal anatomy of anemones is quite complex.', sounds like a floundering exam answer... would be an interesting article to work on. Plenty to say on symbiosis, too. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I see what you mean. Would you start sea anemone as a GA? LittleJerry (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Perhaps we may see Canada Goose at FA at some time? – Connormah (talk) 01:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

@LittleJerry, yes.

@Connormah, I haven't thought about editing Canada Goose and doubt I have enough interest in it to take it to FA. However I see it is included in my incomplete set of British Birds by Witherby (3 out of 5 volumes found in a charity shop), and might consider taking it to GA if you wished to collaborate. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

What invertebrate GA projects do you have in mind? LittleJerry (talk) 14:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• How about we have a go at sea anemone after Easter? Would that suit? As for other GA invertebrate projects, I plan to work on various obscure phyla/classes/orders, such as Mysida and Ostracod, with articles that are currently not too long but where I have good basic information from my "Invertebrate Zoology". Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Unforunately, I don't have much info on anemone and "Invertebrate Zoology" is too expansive for me. LittleJerry (talk) 21:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Its okay. Keep doing what you're doing. I was just curious. I'll probably return sometime for atleast one more FAC. LittleJerry (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for the later reply re:Canada Goose - I'll definitely keep that offer in mind! – Connormah (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

I was thinking of maybe bringing Tiger to GA. Would you be interested? Maybe Chip can help again. LittleJerry (talk) 19:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

It is a very long article but then again it looks pretty well-referenced so there might not be too much work involved. I wouldn't want to take it to FAC but might join you working towards GAN. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

That what I was thinking; doing see fixing up and maybe add in a little more info. I have no intention of bringing it to FA. LittleJerry (talk) 20:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

IUCN

IUCN3.1 refers to version 3.1, which has not changed since 2001. It says what Least Concern, Vulnerable, Critical and so on mean. Some of these have a suffix of letters and numbers, which are also defined in the criteria version 3.1. For example for the Hyacinth Macaw, the criteria are Endangered A2cd, see IUCN website species page. Snowman (talk) 20:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Pocillopora inflata in Pocillopora damicornis taxobox

Hi Cwmhiraeth,

Pocillopora inflata is written in Pocillopora damicornis taxobox. I'm not sure to change that. Cheers/ --Hanberke (talk) 07:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing that. When writing an article it is much easier to copy another article's taxobox and then make the necessary alterations than it is to start from scratch. In this instance, I missed one change I should have made. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Lilford's Wall Lizard

Harrias ^talk 08:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Scorpaenopsis diabolus

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Cyrtopodion kotschyi

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

[Stub Contest] 2nd place and the >1200 winner

2nd place and the hard-earned >1200 winner

Congratulations. With a final score of 3,055 points, you earned 2nd place in the Stub Contest and by expanding Mouth, you earned the award for >1200 on the Wikipedia Release Tool. You were declared the winner at at the contest talk page. There you can find the info to receiver your €50 and €25 vouchers for Amazon.com. You did an excellent job, expanding 300 stubs is hard hard work and earned it. Mitch32^{(The man who renounces himself, comes to himself.)} 05:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. I got more efficient at de-stubbing as I went along, but the contest about took over my December! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Western Three-toed Skink

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chalcides bedriagai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ocellated skink

Oneirophanta mutabilis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Papilla

Porcupine Abyssal Plain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Knoll

Stegastes albifasciatus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Reunion

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Review of Lepiota cristata

Hi Cwmhiraeth, and thanks for your review of an article I've been working on at DYK. The original hook fact has now been removed from the article so I've added a new ALT hook, so I'd be very grateful if you could have another look at it. Thanks, Acather96 (click here to contact me) 14:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

I see that Sasata is expanding the article. I will leave it for a couple of days for things to settle in case there is more expansion. I think your ALT1 hook has too many uses of the word "potentially", and the proposed hook fact is a bit complex for DYK. You could instead have a hook referring to the smell of the fungus. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Pocillopora verrucosa

The DYK project (nominate) 01:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Pocillopora damicornis

The DYK project (nominate) 01:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Salamander

I've done a little on the culture, but since there are 2 existing articles am not sure any more is advisable. What do you think? And do you need any help on any other section? Otherwise all I've done is a few minor tweaks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:57, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

The culture looks fine to me. I'm polishing the article a bit before nominating it and need to read it through carefully - it is some time since I did the main work on it. Are you good at American spelling? I would prefer to change it all into British English but think it is inadvisable, especially as we only have a few species of newt in this country while they have hundreds of species of salamander over there. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. We shouldn't change the ENGVAR without good reason, and I don't think there is one here. I can look for the obvious defence/defense and colour/color type spellings. We could perhaps include a Salamander etymology but it's pretty dull stuff (unknown prob. Eastern origin). Oh, and we should probably move the refs out of the lead. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

OK. I plan to concentrate on it tomorrow morning. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

I've checked the whole text, changed a few spellings, and added some commas. I notice that autotomy and tail regeneration are mentioned in 2 places, haven't fixed it. G'night. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:14, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

I have now nominated it for GA, but I daresay nobody will take up the review for a while. It since strikes me that it should have an evolution section, which I will work on, and it would be nice to hide the cladograms as in Frog. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:32, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Main Page appearance: Crocodilia

This is a note to let the main editors of Crocodilia know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on January 27, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 27, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Crocodilia is an order of large, predatory, semi-aquatic reptiles. They appeared in the Late Cretaceous, and include true crocodiles, alligators, caimans, and gharials. Solidly built animals, they have long flattened snouts, eyes, ears, and nostrils at the top of the head and laterally compressed tails. Their skin is thick and covered in scales; they have conical teeth and a powerful bite. They swim well and can move quite rapidly on land. They are found mainly in lowlands in the tropics, but alligators are also found in the United States (American alligator pictured) and China. They are largely carnivorous; some specialise on fish while others have generalised diets. They are typically solitary and territorial. In some species, females care for their young. Eight species have attacked humans, the largest number of attacks being by the Nile crocodile. Humans threaten crocodilian populations through hunting and habitat destruction, but farming has reduced unlawful trading in wild skins. They have appeared in art since at least Ancient Egypt. Tales of crocodile tears date to the 9th century, repeated by Sir John Mandeville in 1400 and William Shakespeare. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Porcupine Abyssal Plain

Orlady (talk) 16:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Oneirophanta mutabilis

Orlady (talk) 16:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Psychropotes longicauda

Orlady (talk) 16:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Amperima rosea

Orlady (talk) 16:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Archegozetes longisetosus

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Amperima rosea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Spawn

Archegozetes longisetosus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Life cycle

Okenia zoobotryon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Juvenile

Salamander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Life cycle

Sars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to ROV

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Zoobotryon verticillatum at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Potamocorbula amurensis

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Starlet sea anemone

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Herennia multipuncta

Hello! Your submission of Herennia multipuncta at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mindmatrix 20:44, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Aphaenogaster cockerelli

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Herennia multipuncta

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:12, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aphaenogaster cockerelli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chihuahua

Brachymeles bonitae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dactyli

Starlet sea anemone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Protocol

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gastrotrich

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gastrotrich you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 19:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Phyllodiscus

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mysidae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marsupium

Petalophthalmidae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Marsupium

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Brachymeles bonitae

Orlady (talk) 16:04, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Staffordshire County League (South)

Cwmhiraeth, could you please check to see whether Chris the Dude addressed the issues you raised, and continue with the review? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:24, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 January newsletter

The 2014 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with, at time of writing, 138 participants. The is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2010. If you are yet to join the competition, don't worry- the judges have agreed to keep the signups open for a few more days. By a wide margin, our current leader is newcomer Godot13 (submissions), whose set of 14 featured pictures, the first FPs of the competition, was worth 490 points. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

• 12george1 (submissions) and TropicalAnalystwx13 (submissions) were the first people to score, for the good article Tropical Storm Bret (1981) and its good article review respectively. 12george1 was also the first person to score in 2012 and 2013.
• Sven Manguard (submissions) scored the first ITN points for 2014 North American polar vortex.
• WonderBoy1998 (submissions) scored points for an early good topic, finishing off Wikipedia:Featured topics/She Wolf.
• TheAustinMan (submissions) scored the first bonus points of the competition, for his work on Typhoon Vera.
• Igordebraga (submissions) has scored the highest number of bonus points for a single article, for the high-importance Jurassic Park (film).

Featured articles, featured lists, featured topics and featured portals are yet to play a part in the competition. The judges have removed a number of submissions which were deemed ineligible. Typically, we aim to see work on a project, followed by a nomination, followed by promotion, this year. We apologise for any disappointment caused by our strict enforcement this year; we're aiming to keep the competition as fair as possible.

Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may be interested to take part in The Core Contest; unlike the WikiCup, The Core Contest is not about audited content, but, like the WikiCup, it is about article improvement; specifically, The Core Contest is about contribution to some of Wikipedia's most important article. Of course, any work done for The Core Contest, if it leads to a DYK, GA or FA, can earn WikiCup points.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 19:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week, for unbelievable quantity and quality of content creation and development. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Worm That Turned submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I'd like to nominate Cwmhiraeth for this prestigious award. I nominated Chiswick Chap for his hard work on the Sea article, but there were two hard working editors on that article, and they both deserve credit. I've been holding off as long as I could so that it'd come as a surprise. Cwmhiraeth is a fantastic editor who's talents go far beyond that one article. He's written over 500 DYK articles, and many articles besides. His writing talent is sufficient to bring many articles to featured and good quality. If you think you've heard his name before, it's because he won last year's Wikicup! I'm proud to nominate him as Editor of the Week.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

A Fiddler Beetle

Cwmhiraeth

Editor of the Week for the week beginning February 2, 2014

Extensive article creator on marine life, insects, plants and other interesting topics. The 2012 winner of the WikiCup.

Recognized for

over 500 DYK's

Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts!
I would like to apologize to both you and Worm That Turned that I did not get this out yesterday; I was busy, and then I forgot, however my delay was in no way meant to delay recognizing you for your fantastic work writing an encyclopedia. Congratulations! Go Phightins! 15:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

This is a great honour and comes completely unexpectedly. I much enjoy playing my small part in this great encyclopaedic project. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:22, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

• :-} Congratulations! Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
• Your efforts to build the Encyclopedia are appreciated. ```Buster Seven Talk 16:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Hypotermes makhamensis

Allen3 ^talk 01:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Termitotrox cupido

Allen3 ^talk 01:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/St. Charles Medical Center - Madras

Hi, thanks for the review. Which hook are you approving? Yoninah (talk) 13:20, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply! Yoninah (talk) 13:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gastrotrich

The article Gastrotrich you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gastrotrich for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 00:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Maeotias

Mentoz (talk) 11:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Zoobotryon verticillatum

Hello! Your submission of Zoobotryon verticillatum at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Green Giant (talk) 01:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Amitermes meridionalis

Materialscientist (talk) 04:11, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Lyman Hakes Howe

Why didn't you include the image when promoting? --Jakob (talk) 13:13, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

About 50% of DYK nominations are accompanied by images but only one image is used with each batch of hooks. This means that some inevitably don't make it to the front page. Another consideration is the wish to vary the type of image used to include portraits, buildings, geographical locations etc, so I am afraid some people are bound to be disappointed. In fact I merely reviewed your article, it was Ohconfucius who promoted it. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Zoobotryon verticillatum

The DYK project (nominate) 20:18, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Okenia zoobotryon

The DYK project (nominate) 20:18, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Perophora japonica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hydroid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Black wildebeest

Hi! I think I have enough time now to put the article forward for GAN. Thanks for all the useful efforts you put to improve the article! Do you vote for GAN now? I hope you are not busy and may be free to help with the GAN (you can co-nominate with me), else I can wait. Please let me know. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 11:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

I'll do a little polishing on the "Diseases and parasites" section as at the moment it reads like a list of factoids. Then I should think the article would be ready and I will be happy to help at GAN. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:47, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Salamander

The article Salamander you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Salamander for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tezero -- Tezero (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Have arranged a couple of images; if any help is needed, just ask! Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. According to the talk page it is now a GA, but for some reason the review is not transcluded (if that's the right word) on the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments! Glad it's reached GA, happy to help further on FA, and indeed on Camel etc when the time comes. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm always glad to have your help. You seem happy dealing with parts of subjects that either don't appeal to me, like culture sections, or in which I have no expertise, like cladograms. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Lauridromia intermedia

Orlady (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Nemanthus annamensis

Orlady (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Lauridromia and Lauridromia intermedia

The multiple issues in the Lauridromia article is basically the fact that it's only a very short lead and despirately needs expanding with reliable sources. The Lauridromia intermedia article has more than enough to justify an article. I don't know if this article meets any specific notability policy. But there is enough to justify an article if it does. All it really needs is some extra references right now. Kingjeff (talk) 07:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

I just like to see a lot of sources. There could be more sources in the description section and for "Crabs in the family Dromiidae are often known as "sponge crabs" due to their habit of carrying bits of sponge on their carapace." Kingjeff (talk) 07:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Anything unreferenced can be deleted. So, it's better to have a reference. Kingjeff (talk) 10:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Main Page appearance: Starfish

This is a note to let the main editors of Starfish know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on February 28, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 28, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

There are about 1,500 living species of starfish to be found on the seabed in all the world's oceans, from the tropics to subzero polar waters and from the intertidal zone down to abyssal depths, 6,000 m (20,000 ft) below the surface. Starfish are among the most familiar of marine invertebrates. They typically have a central disc and five arms. The upper surface may be smooth, granular or spiny, and is covered with overlapping plates. Many species are brightly coloured in shades of red or orange, while others are blue, grey or brown. Starfish have tube feet operated by a hydraulic system and a mouth at the centre of the lower surface. They have complex life cycles and can reproduce both sexually and asexually. Most can regenerate damaged parts or lost arms and they can shed arms as a means of defence. Starfish such as the ochre sea star and the reef sea star have become widely known as examples of the keystone species concept in ecology. With their appealing symmetrical shape, starfish are found in literature, legend and popular culture. They are sometimes collected as curios, used in design or as logos, and in some cultures, despite possible toxicity, they are eaten. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Didemnum molle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of ''Didemnum molle'' is composed of a number of linked [[zooid]]s adhering to the [[Substrate (biology|substrate]]. Each individual zooid has a plump, urn-shape body with a diameter of up to {{

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Atriolum robustum may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• contains a red pigment but this may be masked by yellowish-green [[cyanobacteria]] (''Prochloron]]'' sp.) which line the cavity. This sea squirt is sometimes confused with ''[[Didemnum molle]]''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Black wildebeest

Hi! Seeing that you had done what was necessary for the article, I have nominated it for GAN. I believe we don't have any flaws in it to worry about now. Let's be ready for the review. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 10:02, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Good. I'll keep an eye on how it goes and help if necessary. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

A Quarter Million Award for you!

		The Quarter Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Salamander (estimated annual readership: 444,460) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Bobnorwal (talk) 15:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Great job! Bobnorwal (talk) 15:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Talairach coordinates

Hey, you were the reviewer for this DYK so I thought you should know. The main image for the article appears to be a copyvio - there is no indication that the file was made available at any time under a free use license. The deletion discussion is now here. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Pteria sterna

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks so much Cwmhiraeth for the lovely articles on pearl oysters! Very much appreciated! Invertzoo (talk) 01:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

		The Malacology Barnstar
		Awarded to recognize great devotion in the creation and maintenance of high quality articles related to members of the phylum Mollusca. Thank you!

Well, thank you for the barnstar. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:25, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Aphaenogaster praerelicta

Cwmhiraeth, did you do the check for close paraphrasing that seems to have been skipped by the original reviewer? You didn't say, so I need to inquire, since if you didn't do it then it hasn't been done and a tick is premature. Please let me know. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:31, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

I was unable to check for close paraphrasing because the main paper by De Andrade was not available online. Anyway, if you care to read such published scientific papers you will find they are so full of technical terms as to be virtually incomprehensible to the uninitiated. Since this article is mostly comprehensible, it is unlikely to suffer from close paraphrasing. If it copied the original too closely it would be unlikely to have the grammatical and other errors which it contains. It mentions "anatomizing ridges" for example which I would have thought needed an extra "s" to give "anastomizing ridges", but I wouldn't like to make that alteration because I might be wrong. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Didemnum molle

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Atriolum robustum

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thecadactylus oskrobapreinorum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specific name (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Sheepshead minnow

The DYK project (nominate) 00:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Cwmhiraeth. You have new messages at Faizan's talk page.
Message added 06:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Faizan 06:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Nassarius fossatus

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Pinctada fucata

The DYK project (nominate) 17:47, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Pteria penguin

The DYK project (nominate) 17:48, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

I was looking for a kindly editor to review my DYK submissions quickly, and despite there being no reason for you to do, you did just that - just wanted to stop by and say thanks :) Acather96 (click here to contact me) 20:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

My pleasure. Chocolate chip cookies are my favourite biscuits! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Blue wildebeest

Hello! I have completed expanding the article. Could you please have a look at it and give your suggestions before it goes in for GAN? And congrats for the success of Black wildebeest - it wouldn't have been possible without you! Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 08:59, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Right, I'll have a look at it, and with both that and Black Wildebeest done, I'll do some more work on Wildebeest. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:36, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Grey triggerfish

Hello! I reviewed your submission of Grey triggerfish at the Did You Know nominations page. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 16:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Kevlar. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Grey triggerfish

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:12, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

E.Coli

Hi Cwmhiraeth,
I saw your name in here so I am asking for your help. I have nominated E.coli for the good article but I would be very much glad if you can put some light on phylogeny chart issue mentioned in Talk:Escherichia coli/GA1. Thanks RRD13 (talk) 08:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, RRD13. I am surprised to see that I included my name among the WikiProject Microbiology members because my knowledge on the subject is pretty limited and I'm sure you know more about Microbiology than I do. The question about phylogeny raised in the GA review is beyond my capabilities I am afraid. Sorry! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Cyclone Alan (1998)

The DYK project (nominate) 21:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Suggestions of plagiarism

Thanks for pointing out potential problems. I have fixed the sections of Poultry and Common Fisheries Policy you refer to. Roundtheworld (talk) 09:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poultry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hybrid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Starfish

It is nice to see "Starfish" on the main page. Again, thank you for all your editing. Axl ¤ [Talk] 14:57, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Indeed. Thanks for your help in licking it into shape. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Myosorex varius

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 February newsletter

And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:

1. Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
2. Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
3. WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).

Other competitors of note include:

• Hahc21 (submissions), who helped take Thirty Flights of Loving through good article candidates and featured article candidates, claiming the first first featured article of the competition.
• Prism (submissions), who claimed the first featured list of the competition with Natalia Kills discography.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions), who takes the title of the contributor awarded the highest bonus point multiplier (resulting in the highest scoring article) of the competition so far. Her high-importance salamander, now a good article, scored 108 points.

After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Osedax japonicus

Thank you from the DYK project and me Victuallers (talk) 16:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mysida

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mysida you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 13:00, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Kendallina

Hi, this is to enable your full argumentation about the DYK nomination for Kendallina. The one source it is based upon (Moore, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O., 1959) has the following text for the family:

"Family PARABOLINOIDIDAE Lochman, 1956. Exoskeleton opisthoparian, subisopygous. Glabella tapering to truncate-tapering, with 3 pairs of distinct to obsolete lateral furrows; frontal area 0.25 to 0.3 of length of cranidium, with distinct to obsolete anterior border furrow; eye ridges distinct or faint, eyes small to medium in size; fixigenae variable in width and position, with posterior areas triangular to straplike; librigenae rectangular, with genal spines or rounded angles. Pygidium transverse to subtriangular, with convex axis tapered nearly full length to broadly rounded end; border furrow usually obsolete; border narrow, poorly defined; pleurae may end in 1 to 4 pairs of marginal spines or margin smooth. Surface finely granulose or smooth. U.Cam.".

The information in this text, and a few from still higher taxa, and information deducted form the illustration provided, I have used to supplement the generic description:

"Kendallina BERG, nom. subsl. herein [pro Kendallia BERG, 1953 (non EVERMANN & SHAW 1927)] [·Conocephaliles eryon' HALL, 1863]: Glabella moderately convex, truncate-tapering, axial furrows shallow, may have pair of anterior pits, I or 2 pairs of very faint lateral furrows; frontal area 0.25 of length of cranidium, narrow (Ir.), anterior border furrow straight, very faint, anterior border narrow (sag.), anterior margin bluntly pointed; eyes small, opposite anterior third of glabella; fixigenae horizontal or slightly upsloping, with palpebral areas 0.25 of glabellar width, posterior areas triangular, of medium width (exsag.), almost same in length (11'.) as occipital ring; librigenae with medium-length genal spines. Pygidium narrowly transverse; axis same in width as pleural fields, with 3 axial rings and terminal; 4 pleurae with obsolete interpleural grooves and shallow pleural furrows; posterior margin smooth. U.Cam.( Francon.), C.USA.--FIG. 202,1. ·K. eryon (HALL), Wis.; 1a,b, ceph., pyg., X3 (376)."

I checked all the elements of the description against the illustration, the wikicommons file of my own specimen and other (copywrited) photos on the web. I deleted characters that were never visible or that were contradicted by these photos and the illustration in the Treatise. I hope you'll be able to fully evaluate the article now. I'm told a publication on the species found at the location of the figured specimen is in preparation. I'll check all information against that article as soon as I get a hold of it. Dwergenpaartje (talk) 21:13, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Dwergenpaartje, I appreciate how difficult it is to write a technical description of a species from a limited amount of published information and you did well. I approved the article at DYK and it appeared on the main page and that finishes my involvement with the article. Keep up the good work, - there are plenty more extinct species without current Wikipedia articles! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Segar Bastard

I've responded to your comments at Template:Did you know nominations/Segar Bastard. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

I have a tool, "Page size", on the left of my screen that gives page sizes and I believe this is the tool used in DYK for assessing sizes. I forget how I got the tool, maybe through the preferences tab at the top of the screen? If you asked BlueMoonset, he would tell you. Anyway, with regard to this article, your expansion is approximately x 4.5 at the moment and only needs a few more sentences to become fivefold (4275 B --> 4805 B). And while you are about it, it would not be difficult to expand it a little further to 5000 B which would earn you bonus points in the WikiCup. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Neomysis integer

Hello! Your submission of Neomysis integer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cloudchased (talk) 19:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Cwmhiraeth. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

I've got Birds of East Asia, just a field guide, but I'll check if there is anything not in HBW. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:33, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome. The recommended formatting is

Hoyo, Josep del; Elliott, Andrew; Sargatal, Jordi; Christie, David A (eds.). "Rufous-tailed Robin". Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions. Retrieved 5 March 2014. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) (subscription required) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Done that. Thanks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Neomysis integer

I'd like to thank you for supporting the DYK project. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mysida

The article Mysida you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mysida for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 09:41, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue wildebeest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sleeping sickness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Eumenes fraternus

Allen3 ^talk 02:14, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Edith Marion Patch

Materialscientist (talk) 02:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)