Archive
|
Contents
- 1 Unblock Request - 9th November 2011
- 2 Page blanking
- 3 Block
- 4 The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
- 5 The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
- 6 The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
- 7 The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
- 8 The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
- 9 The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
- 10 The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
- 11 The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
- 12 The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
- 13 The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
- 14 The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
- 15
- 16 The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
- 17 The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
- 18 Military Historian of the Year
- 19 The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
- 20 The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
|
[edit] Unblock Request - 9th November 2011
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DAFMM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock)
Request reason:
Your reason here I have recently resumed my interest in Wikipedia editing, this time with a more decorous approach, and wish to begin re-using my old account. I have now started university, reading History and Greats (Classics), and would enjoy expanding further, with the help of my university studies, the articles which I, and I'm sure many other undergraduates, already use on a daily basis, when researching topics in the fields which concern me with my course. I would also particularly like to develop the article on entrepeuneur and steam enthusiast
Tony Marchington, whom I have recently researched in great detail, as he was an Honorary Fellow, until his death, at the college in which I now study, St. Edmund Hall, Oxford. I'm sure that as time goes on, there would be many other articles which I would happily wish to contribute to. Naturally, I understand the trust that you place in a user if he is to be unblocked, and I respect this, and so would accept any consequences of my actions, if they were to again become inappropiate. However, I would be grateful of any chance you offer me, and would be pleased to contribute much, both now and in the future, to the foundation. Thanks.
DAFMM (
talk)
Decline reason:
You concede, in your unblock request of late 2010, that this account is compromised. It cannot become less compromised with the passage of time and cannot be unblocked.--
Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:56, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you abuse this procedure by making too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page as long as you are blocked.
[edit] Page blanking
Please stop blanking articles it is vandalism and your editing privileges can be restricted. Off2riorob (talk) 17:11, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
You were also warned about the exact same thing yesterday here but you have removed the note from your taslkpage, please explain why you are blanking articles like this? Off2riorob (talk) 17:13, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
- I have not removed the warnign from my taskpage, just placed it in my Archive! I believed (and I'm sure BarrettBonden) that this exact matter was now finished and ealt with. I blank the articles out of interest really, I delete the text and then it is straight back (as I'm sure you can see). What inconvenience is there? I can't really see a problem! If you don't like this then I'm sure you can use your WikiPowers to stop me. 2/12/2010
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DAFMM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock)
Request reason:
Just two days into taking over my friends account I have been blocked. I do admit that I am by no means a perfect editor. However, I have had experience of Wikipedia before, with several other accounts, with which I have made many worthful contributions, and I do plan to carry on with this, using my knowledge and interest of both history in general and historic vehicles and hope to improve articles concerned on these topics. It is clearly very easy to block me, and most likely to deblock me and so please do deblock me and I agree to be happy with being blocked if I do commit acts of vandalism. I would agree to spend a quantity of edits over a certain period of time in proving that I do want to help WIkipedia. Another chance?
Decline reason:
You may
not use another person's account. Ever. Also, you should not be using more than one account, either. Which other accounts have you used?
/ƒETCHCOMMS/ 18:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you abuse this procedure by making too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page as long as you are blocked.
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DAFMM (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock)
Request reason:
Yes, but this account has been given to me by my brother as he considered it no longer of use to me. I do have his permission. How about I prove that I am interested in improving Wikipedia. You can watch my every move as I complete a certain amount of useful edits. A chance?
Decline reason:
Accounts may not be shared under any circumstance. By your admission, this account is compromised, and will never be unblocked. We also still need to know what other accounts you have used.
Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:05, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you abuse this procedure by making too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page as long as you are blocked.
-
- If you don't mind me asking, why would you want to use his account versus making a new account just for yourself? Syrthiss (talk) 18:15, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
-
-
- Mainly because of my brother's connection, who is now living abroad and the fact that he put over 4,000 edits on WIkipedia using this account. May I suggest having some kind of monitory system of you monitoring my edits? Just a chance that I am interested in helping the future growth of Wikipedia?
- No. Using another person's account, retired or not and related or not, is unacceptable. What accounts have you used in the past? /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 18:44, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- My previous account has been 'User: Kbmag' and before that I made several contributions on the I.P. Address of 82.7.17.14. Sorry for the delay, I've been of the computer. I also tried your suggestion of creating a new account to demonstrate my willingness to contribute to Wikipedia but found that this is also currently blocked!
-
-
-
-
-
- How can you claim that I am even sharing the account. As you can see there has been no activity of my brother for ages and he has given me the account! I own the account, not me brother, me. POSTED 6th DECEMBER 2010: Is anybody replying?
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:12, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
|
|
To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 20:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
|
|
[edit] The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:28, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:20, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
DAFMM 
'A rather eccentric editor'
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
 |
Your Military History Newsletter
|
|
[edit] Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
|
Your Military History Newsletter
|
|
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
|
Your Military History Newsletter
|
|
