|Please do not reply here in response to comments I have made on other Talk pages. Conversations should remain on the page where they started.|
- 1 Thank you for revising and formatting the Akira Miyawaki article
- 2 Japanese Wikipedia
- 3 Re: Saijo, Ehime
- 4 American horror story coven
- 5 Hanyu
- 6 To buy or To buy up to
- 7 I'm sorry... 申し訳ありません
- 8 Mamoru Samuragochi
- 9 Please help with this article
- 10 Nippon Seinenkan
- 11 item "Kitaro"
- 12 Mayo Okawa
- 13 Rikako Sasaki
- 14 AKB48 and gojuon
- 15 Hashima Island
- 16 Misato Fukuen and Mitsuhiro Ichiki
- 17 Talkback
- 18 Mamoru Miyano
- 19 About Funassyi
- 20 Help me translate the Tokyo-Nagano Line article
- 21 Re: Disputed non-free use rationale for File:ToshinobuKubota.jpg
- 22 city photos
- 23 AKB48
- 24 "Unsourced" BLP
- 25 Re: April 2014
- 26 Takeda Castle
- 27 Kuji page
- 28 Eisai has a new CEO
- 29 Reliable sourcing
- 30 Sources
- 31 I LOVE YOUR JAPANESE WORK
- 32 Ryoko Shiraishi
- 33 Sukiyabashi Jiro
- 34 Help with a article
- 35 Help please
- 36 Voice actor edits
- 37 Hayabusa (train)
- 38 I was trying to fill out references using relinks tool
- 39 External links
- 40 203 series
- 41 Formations in PNR 203 Series
- 42 Help needed!!
- 43 Sukiyabashi_Jiro / Section Blanking
- 44 AIV
- 45 NILESHDYPKC
- 46 Priscilla20
Thank you for revising and formatting the Akira Miyawaki article
Thank you Dave for correcting my expansions of the Akira Miyawaki article and embellishing it with pictures. It really looks better after your contribution (Although I am conscious it is still widely perfectible, especially regarding referencing)
I noticed you suppressed this paragraph at the end of "First experiences":
"His actions were widely supported by insurance companies, industry, communities and many developers (protective or compensatory measures) and the State (Ministry of Transport in particular)."
I understand that the "widely" sounds too much, although there is no "peacockery" in that statement, it is just an information about Akira Miyawaki's financers - which I find useful .
I realise the right word in English should be: "broadly". Now I propose to formulate it this way, so that it sounds totally neutral:
"His actions were supported by insurance companies, industry, communities and landscape architects (for protective or compensatory measures) and the State (Ministry of Transport in particular)."
Does it sound ok to you?
Thank you for helping me clarifying the articles.
- If you can include a reliable reference source to back up that statement, then please feel free to add it to the article. --DAJF (talk) 23:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- No. Wiki-based websites are never considered reliable sources for Wikipedia articles. See WP:USERGENERATED. --DAJF (talk) 05:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Re: Saijo, Ehime
I had updated the figure to reflect the detailed Japanese wikipedia page for Saijo, but it looks like that number might be incorrect. I will add the correct population according to the city itself and cite a Japanese-language source. Thank you for being so diligent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 03:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- OK. Although I already added the latest population data as given on the city's official website. --DAJF (talk) 03:44, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry to bother you again, but for the "Notable People" section on the Saijo, Ehime page, I noticed that you removed Kaori Manabe (TV personality/model) a few months ago due to lack of corresponding article. Do you think it is acceptable to use a post from her official blog describing a visit to her hometown of Saijo as a source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbwsaijo (talk • contribs) 13:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. Don't forget to sign your comments using four tildes ("~~~~")! As for your question, I think a blog post like that would be borderline as a source, especially as "hometown" could refer to the place where she was born or the place where she was brought up. --23:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
American horror story coven
- If you have a reliable source (not a Wiki-based site), then please feel free to add it. Otherwise, you may well be blocked from editing if you continue to re-add unsourced dubious details about living persons. --DAJF (talk) 02:23, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- Actually the burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material to provide sources for verification. Please read through the guidelines at WP:PROVEIT if you have time. --DAJF (talk) 01:39, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
To buy or To buy up to
- Certainly. "Buy up" means to "buy up large shares (or all of) something that is available", which appears to be what is happening here. The wording "buy up to thousands of..." doesn't sound to me like English a native speaker would write. If it were "buy up to a thousand" or "buy up to ten thousand", then that would make some sense, but "buy up to thousands" leaves the reader thinking "so just how many did they buy?" Does that make more sense now? --DAJF (talk) 12:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- It is more correct to use "up to", because this is what is happening. People may buy dozens, hundreds, or thousand copies. To sum it up -> "up to thousands". Like "i am going to buy up to 100 tickets, depending on my income." This is exactly what the sentence should express. It's a gradient. 2. In my experience, to buy up sth is commonly not used with numbers. Its more like "i am buying up gold" = all that i can find. You wouldnt say "i am buying up 100 grams of gold." Just google "buying to" and count how often its used with numbers. It`s very awkward. Rka001 (talk) 12:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yup, i missed that. What about "buy up to several thousand copies"? See my recent talk contrib and the reasoning behind that. Its about expressing the gradient. Not that it matters that much. But i feel like this sentence currently just gives some tabloid outlier report. Thank you! Rka001 (talk) 13:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry... 申し訳ありません
- That's OK. I can see how it might appear a bit strange at first glance to a Japanese reader, but "savoury pancake" is indeed an accurate description for the Japanese okonomiyaki, since it is made with batter and cooked on a hotplate. A pie is made with pastry and cooked in an oven. Incidentally, okonomiyaki is also mentioned in the pancake article. Hope that clarifies the situation. --DAJF (talk) 14:36, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- I see! Thank you very much for explaining the difference between pancake and pie to me! By the way, what does savoury mean? I can't find this word in my English-Japanese dictionary.--積善錬錬 (talk) 03:25, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Mamoru Samuragochi has been exposed as a fraud, even you should be able to use Google and see all the articles exposing him as a fraud.
Seriously, use your brain sometime in the future.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-26039226 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 14:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- I am well aware of the news headlines, but as this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, I'm not convinced that emotive words like "fraud" really belong here. If the claims made by Niigaki that Samuragochi is not even deaf are proven to be true, then maybe the wording can be changed. --DAJF (talk) 14:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Please help with this article
- Please try and remember to sign your comments. I have reviewed the article, but have to wonder whether it is sufficiently notable to justify a self-standing Wikipedia article. I have tagged it as such, and hope you can add some third-party sourcing in the near future, or else it may have to be nominated for deletion. --DAJF (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
I used Google translator on the Japanese article of Nippon Seinenkan, and it said the hall has a capacity of 1,360. That is why I added it to the English article. What are your thoughts on expanding articles from other languages? Please respond soon. Evangp (talk) 05:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- I see. But other Wikipedia articles cannot be used as reliable reference sources, so you will need to wait until you can provide a reliable source for verification before it can be re-added. Using articles in other languages is fine as a starting point, but if you don't have reliable sources to actually back up the information, then you might run into trouble. --DAJF (talk) 05:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
I not understand because you have delete my neutral information about the existence of the group Italy for Kitaro and of the page Kitaro World. I not have publish the links, and, I believe, I simply furnish a neutral information, without promotional intents.Thank you in advance for your answer and have a nice evening.Ezio Chionio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezio chionio (talk • contribs) 16:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Has the fansite on Facebook received coverage in the media? If not, I'm afraid it is just unsourced trivia, and the intention appears to me to be more to promote the Facebook page rather than add encyclopedic content to this article. Sorry. --DAJF (talk) 01:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
I got the information regarding the article of Mayo Okawa including her family background, educational attainment, career, among others. It is also help to expand this article, using the following links from other websites:
I have been learned that Rikako Sasaki is a Japanese of Filipino descent.The evidence was through her Official Blog (http://ameblo.jp/sck-rikako/entry-11413116402.html) and from Kokoro Press as well (http://kokoropress.blogspot.jp/2012/01/blog-post_8185.html).It is also proved that she is the daughter of Estella and Toshisege Sasaki.However, it is my suggestion that is why it's up to you to look for another websites aside from two website links.Thank you!--RenRen070193 14:35, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[]--RenRen070193 14:35, 5 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RenRen070193 (talk • contribs)
- Please note that the burden is on you to find reliable sources, and blog articles are not acceptable. --15:27, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
AKB48 and gojuon
Another editor has discovered the articles and has attempted to institute the gojuon order based on new evidence he claims supports its use. As you participated in the original incarnation of this debate, I think it is in best interests for you to examine this new evidence. The discussion begins at Talk:AKB48#Section break.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 08:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- I've added a comment. Personally I can't understand this bizarre fixation on using the Japanese order, but I wish more people from WikiProject Japan would add input too. --DAJF (talk) 11:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Good morning! As you know I am contributing to Wikipedia mainly through Wiki Commons. I also added a link to my articles about Hashima Island since I think they really add value (in term of history, stories, photos) and I am pretty sure you know that otherwise you would have revert this change :) However, this link has been removed by the anonymous User:18.104.22.168. In the past, I have been criticized and attacked by somebody from Toronto a few times (an urban explorer who went on this island as well) so when this revert occurred, my first idea was to check this IP. It is indeed from Toronto. Of course there is no proof but I just wanted to mention it to you now in case anything related to this issue happen later. Thanks for your help as always Dave :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JordyMeow (talk • contribs) 02:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. OK, thanks for the heads-up. To be honest, I don't really think that links to personal blogs or websites are supposed to be added to Wikipedia articles (WP:LINKSTOAVOID), but I'll stay out of this dispute. --DAJF (talk) 04:58, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Understood. I just thought I should let you know about this. I also agree on the fact that the external links should be cleaned - there are many links with no value added at all or purely commercial. Maybe this section shouldn't even be there at all, I don't know. If my English was better I would definitely add information I have (available on my website) on the wiki. The link is more safe imho. Meanwhile I will not accept those strange reverts from the same anonymous person, mainly based from the fact that it feels more like a personal attack than anything else. However, I am open to discussion :) -- Jordy Meow (talk) 02:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
02:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC) Hello DJAF, thanks for correcting my edit re Raoul Silva, I got mixed up between the name of actor that the role was in the film, ie Javier Bardem was playing Raoul Silva in the film, and the actor named Raul Julia. Thanks for correcting. 02:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk)
Misato Fukuen and Mitsuhiro Ichiki
Why that reference source is poorly? That reference sources from own blog, not false infomation. I didn't understand that was unrefenrenced or poorly. I sawn that was in Japanese page. Tempest Tales (talk) 15:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Apart from the fact that it's trivia of a level that belongs on a fan page rather than a Wikipedia article, self-published sources such as blogs are not acceptable as sources for biographical information about other people, as is the case here. Please refer to the guidelines at WP:SELFSOURCE. --DAJF (talk) 15:11, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Blood type is listed in Japanese language of that pages. But English page isn't listed. Excluding this is acceptable?
Reference: "生年月日・血液型・職業が一緒で、かつて住んでいた住所、母親の名前も一致するという、奇跡的なまでの偶然の一致がある。なお、携帯電話の機種まで被ったこともある。2009年1月9日に、乙女企画クロジ☆のサプライズで初めて、一緒に誕生日を祝い合った。" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tempest Tales (talk • contribs) 15:26, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Blood type is listed in Japanese language of that pages. But English page isn't listed. Excluding this is acceptable?
- I understand why you're rejected add this information. I think problem that was questionable information or based on a blog. Thanking you. Tempest Tales (talk) 15:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi DAJF. I just removed a BLP sources tag you added to Mamoru Miyano, which had the edit summary "Tagging recent unsourced addition", even thought the article's a GA. Perhaps you were a bit trigger-happy there? If it was a mistake, no worries, I've removed the tag. Perhaps you should have instead removed the unsourced information? Happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:10, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. Not trigger-happy at all. The problematic addition should either have been sourced or removed. Just removing the maintenance tag reduces the sense of urgency and doesn't really help anyone improve the article. Anyway, I've removed the offending addition, so the problem is resolved for the moment. --DAJF (talk) 23:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, DAJF. I'm Akiko718atWiki. Thank you for your editing the article “Funassyi” and showing how to improve it. By the way, 1. “Kumamon” is titled “Kumamon(mascot)”. So I followed it. “Funassyi” has no disambiguation, but “Kumamon” has. Is that the reason of redirecting to “Funassyi”? 2. About “orphan” tag. I understood it, but did not understand what I should do. Today I linked from other articles (ex. Funabashi, Chiba Prefecture) to “Funassyi” page. Is that it? I have an only 9 day experience in Wikipedia. Sorry for bothering you.Akiko718atWiki (talk) 13:33, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have removed the "Orphan" tag now that it is linked to from other articles. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 23:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Help me translate the Tokyo-Nagano Line article
Can you help me translate the Tokyo-Nagano Line article?I'm translated the capture of those of pictures at that page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namphuong10 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. I'll have a look at it in more detail tomorrow, but just from a quick look, I'm not sure that that article is really even viable, and it might even have to go for deletion. --DAJF (talk) 15:08, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Re: Disputed non-free use rationale for File:ToshinobuKubota.jpg
Before nominating this file for deletion, did you stop to read the "fair use in.."? The explanation you are asking for has already been given and explained. There is nothing more to be done. Wangkyu (talk) 16:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- You still failed to explain why you nominated it for speedy deletion. It met the qualifications of the non-free content policy. If you believe it does not, please explain why. If you can not explain, I should be able revert your edits without any further problems. Wangkyu (talk) 01:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. The image has not actually been nominated for speedy deletion, but, as the wording says, it will have to be deleted within a week unless a convincing reason can be provided to justify keeping it. Anyway, I did actually include a reason why I disputed the validity of the fair-use criteria here (The subject is alive and active, so free images may feasibly be available.), but what this means is that, just because we on Wikipedia maybe do not have immediate access to a free image of the person, it is still technically possible for someone to go out tomorrow and photograph him at a concert, promotional event, or just in the street. That is why a lot of articles on Wikipedia about famous people have blurred or amateurish photos that people have taken at concerts or in the street, or just don't have images at all. I agree that it would certainly be nice to have photos of every famous person in their Wikipedia articles, but unfortunately that's not how Wikipedia or copyright works. If you look at the wording at the bottom of the license that you yourself added to the image, you will see that it also mentions how fair-use images are rarely acceptable for living people. I can understand that you might be a bit upset that a file you found and uploaded to Wikipedia is going to be deleted, but hopefully this clarifies the reasons why. Drop us a line again if you are still not convinced. --DAJF (talk) 08:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- I think you failed to read under "Fair Use". If you read one of the reasons, you will see "4. This image is used on various websites, so its use on Wikipedia does not make it significantly more accessible than it already is." It was used on his English website , Japan website , OMC Card , and Oricon Style's news section . Also, I "cropped" version of the photo appears in the profile on Oricon Style . Wangkyu (talk) 21:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- No, I didn't fail to read that. I have personally uploaded loads of free and fair-use images to Wikipedia over the years, so I like to think I am fairly familiar with the guidelines. For fair-use images to be allowable on Wikipedia, they have to satisfy all of the fair-use rationale, and one of these is "replaceability". As I indicated when I first tagged the image, and as I have tried to explain above, non-free images of people that are still alive and doing what they are famous for are rarely considered non-replaceable, which is why use of the image here is problematic. It's spelled out pretty clearly in the guidelines at Wikipedia:Non-free content, but if you really are still not convinced, then maybe you should ask for another opinion at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --DAJF (talk) 07:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your help on the Tokamachi page. Can you tell me, generally what are the best kinds of photos to provide for a city's article? (famous landmarks, city hall, that sort of thing, or something else, anything in particular?) DavidBoudreau (talk) 16:33, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. I think generally photos should be added that illustrate the places mentioned in the article text. That could be places such as the city hall, the railway station(s), parks, tourist attractions, major shopping malls, or anything like that. There are no particular restrictions, but it is usually better to be selective rather than adding a whole "gallery" of photos arbitrarily. Wikimedia Commons appears to have a large number of photos of Tokamachi available at Commons:Category:Tokamachi, Niigata, so that would be the best place to look first. And if you are based in the area, you can of course take up-to-date photos yourself and upload them for use in the article. Hope that helps! --DAJF (talk) 07:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Moscow Connection is unilaterally restoring the gojuon because he claims he has consensus. Would you mind wading in again because he's already attempted to instate it.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 13:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- OK, I've still got that page on my watchlist, so I'll keep an eye on it. --DAJF (talk) 01:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- That's right. Have a look through the relevant guidelines at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons if you have time. --DAJF (talk) 02:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, don't wanna cause trouble, sorry. Just wanted to add more info on Julie! This page is barren and somewhat innacurate!126.96.36.199 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- ...Was the problem that it might be trivia?188.8.131.52 (talk) 03:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- If you can provide a link to the particular edit you are talking about, I might be able to give you a more precise answer, but if your edit was reverted as a BLP violation, then the problem was presumably because it lacked a reference source to support what you were adding. And please remember to sign your comments by adding four tildes (~~~~) at the end. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 04:49, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Re: April 2014
As of April 1, 2014, the decision on whether to keep or delete File:ToshinobuKubota.jpg was decided. The photo was not deleted and therefore is an acceptable image to use on Wikipedia. Wangkyu (talk) 08:38, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- It should also be noted that you are only user that has a problem with this photo. Wangkyu (talk) 08:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation regarding that tsunami description. So if the tsunami was relatively major, can I put it back on the page? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 08:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. Don't forget to sign comments using four tildes (~~~~). But in answer to your question, if it caused damage or injuries, or was an incident specific to the city of Kuji, and received significant media coverage, then yes, it might be worth including in the article. As it stands, the tsunami resulting from the recent earthquake in Chile was smaller than that recorded along the Japanese coast after the 2010 Chile earthquake, so it's hard to see how this is at all noteworthy. --DAJF (talk) 09:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Eisai has a new CEO
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/eisai-inc-announces-retirement-of-president-and-ceo-249265621.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 01:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- OK, but it's probably best to wait until the company's official website has actually been updated to reflect that. --DAJF (talk) 02:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Certainly not. Wiki-based websites are never acceptable reliable sources. Have a look at WP:Reliable sources for more details. --DAJF (talk) 03:08, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. That's something that happens a lot on Wikipedia, but other details really need to be sourced too to comply with the core WP:Verifiability and WP:BLP guidelines. Unsourced material may be tagged and/or removed at any time, so if you have time, please try and track down some reliable sources (not ANN) to support the facts listed. Thanks in advance for your help! --DAJF (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
I LOVE YOUR JAPANESE WORK
- If you find it so necessary, then please take the time to find some reliable sources, as these are also very necessary. Unfortunately, other Wikipedia articles do not constitute reliable sources. Have you actually read WP:BLP yet? --DAJF (talk) 01:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Totally agree with your revert.
Certainly two presidents choosing a restaurant for a meal is both noteworthy and adds major credence to the entry in terms of notability.
Help with a article
Can You please have the article on the 151/181 series electric multiple unit of Japanese National Railways here on the english Wikipedia? I have plans for a book on the japanese express trains, and the missing link is the 151/181 series. I can not do the work self, so I must have help on that. And You is the expert on the japanese trains here in the english Wikipedia. Thank You if You can make the article in the near future. A friend from Norway. Varulv2468 (talk) 23:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. I agree that they are both articles that would be valuable on Wikipedia, and will be happy to start creating them in the not-too-distant future. In the meantime, you could perhaps have a look at the Japanese article which covers both the 151 and 181 series trains, and plug into Google Translate or something. --DAJF (talk) 23:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
- I can not, since I`m Norwegian and not good on the translate work from japanese to english. The Pediapress some make the books for me, will not use translated articles from italian or japanese to english with translate programs. I must use pediapress for the book making, have now books on Shinkansen and Skinkansen trainsets. All express train sets from Japan is in the english Wikipedia - only not the important historical 151/181 series trains. I can only take the articles without translation from the language wikipedias. That is a problem if You wanted book on italian trains and can not have that translated to english for Pediapress. I know not how. Varulv2468 (talk) 23:35, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Make money? I only wanted the printed books for my home, Pediapress will not have the private books on the market, You can make Your own books, that will only be for the customer - You. That is not Shinkansen books in the catalog of Pediapress. I make not money, I use the money. And, I had contributing much in the Norwegian Wikipedia, but the language zealots and scholastic wikipedians is a big problem for the usual wikipedians in Wikipedia.no. Many norwegians will not contributed in the Wikipedia.no, more here in Wikipedia.en on trains, trams and transport articles. That is more information in english on norwegian items as trains than in norwegian. The problem is old. Now must I wait on the last article before I can make a new book. Varulv2468 (talk) 03:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- It looks OK to me. I took the liberty of moving it to a position further down in the article, as I'm not sure it really belongs in the lead, but the wording seems OK. Thanks for adding it to the article. --DAJF (talk) 02:07, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Never mind, I wish to be helpful. Shouldn't we create articles on current criminal cases of Japan that are highlightable. For example, the Saitama male babysitter accused in the death of a toddler who has now been charged with child pornography possession?. Or the case of Yukio Nii, who kept the mummified corpse of his mother in Kobe? Link to the story. There's no further coverage on the story in English but maybe so in Japanese but I don't know to translate "Yukio Nii" into Japanese. Thank you for reading. --JJHk2000 (talk) 21:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi again. If the incidents or the persons involved are truly notable, then they might warrant Wikipedia articles. I suspect that the cases you mention above would be considered one-off events that didn't have longer-lasting repercussions, and are therefore unlikely to be sufficiently notable to justify self-standing Wikipedia articles. I suggest reading through the guidelines on cases such as these at WP:SINGLEEVENT. --DAJF (talk) 04:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Voice actor edits
Hi DAJF. I noticed that you've recently been reverting edits to a number of articles on Japanese voice actors and actresses. Specifically, the reverted edits were edits that added recent roles by the seiyuu in question. I understand that these articles are BLPs, but is it really necessary to cite every single role that the seiyuu has, even those where the role is so minor that the role is not listed on the anime's official website? Also, in these cases, it's probably enough that the articles on the anime do mention the roles that these seiyuu have, so at least they're verifiable. Thank you and happy editing.
- Hi. Yes, individual roles should ideally be sourced so that they can be verified, although I guess there might be more leeway if the corresponding film or anime articles do actually mention the role (and are sourced). Verifiability is a core policy of Wikipedia and is what distinguishes us from other fan-edited sites that happily list everything and anything with no means of verifying accuracy. In the case of the edits I reverted today, most, if not all of the claimed roles added were not even mentioned in the corresponding anime articles, which is why I removed them. Also, if the roles are so minor that they are not even mentioned on official websites, then I would say that they don't even belong in biographical articles at all. If anything, minor roles are going to need more stringent sourcing, as they are more likely to be contested and removed. --10:11, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I'm sorry for modifying the Hayabusa (train) page without explaining why!
On March 15, 2014, with the revised Tōhoku Shinkansen timetable, some Hayabusa services began to stop at intermediate stations between Sendai and Morioka and to be operated by 17-car E5+E6 series trainsets. Until March 14, 2014, services were only operated by 10-car E5 series trainsets, and no one stopped at intermediate stations between Sendai and Morioka (except for some services stopping at Ichinoseki until 2012 or 2013).
That's why I modified the page.
I'm sorry because I didn't explain why!
- No, don't worry, you didn't mess anything up with your recent edits, and filling out bare links like that is always appreciated, but on checking the source cited, I couldn't see where it referred to the Kosei Nenkin Kaikan at all, which is why I tagged it as "not in citation given". No rush, but it might be a good idea to try and track down another source if/when you have time. --DAJF (talk) 14:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Why are you plainly removing all my edits regardless of the pertinence ? I am adding relevant links, such as the link on Paul Jacoulet Seals used during his lifetime. This link is not a commercial link whatsoever, and I do not have any affiliation with any website at all. Maybe this is not pertinent to you, but it is valuable information to a lot of persons. I am simply adding relevant information where I found them, and removing dead links when I see them.
- Hi. I guess you are referring to this edit to the Paul Jacoulet article. I clicked on the external link you added, but it doesn't appear to offer any further information to supplement the article, and also links directly to the this retail site, which unfortunately means that not only does it not comply with the Wikipedia guidelines concerning external links, but that it also appears to be spam. Regardless of whether you have any affiliation with that website, I'm afraid it is not appropriate to link to it from Wikipedia. --DAJF (talk) 01:50, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I was referring to the link you removed once again. This page has relevant information for any collectors, because it gives a timeline as of when a print was printed, and for how long that seal was used. As you look forward to collect the prints from Paul Jacoulet, it is very valuable to be able to access this page, and instantly find out when was the printed created, what does the seal look like, what is the name of the seal used, etc... Where else could you find that information ? Isn't it the spirit of an encyclopedia to publish valuable information and have it accessible for all ?
- This page is from a website called flipsnack, and doesn't seems to have anything for sale, except maybe for their hosting service ?
- However, since you seem to be follow up attentively any commercial links, I am extremely surprised that on that very same page (Paul Jacoulet), the 1st and only reference, is linking directly to a COMMERCIAL website: Artelino.com. Yet, the link is still active have been approved I guess? I am confused. Are commercials links ok for some, and not ok for some other?
- Let me know. Cordially, Magicsteph123Magicsteph123 (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- The reference to the Artelino.com website is a citation to support the statement that a Jacoulet print sold for $25,000. I've re-read through the guidelines at Wikipedia:Verifiability, and it does not appear to be problematic, as it seems to be reliable enough. Unfortunately, the same could not be said about your flipsnack page, as that just appears to have been put together by a private individual, and so is no different from any other personal website or blog, which cannot be used as sources in Wikipedia articles. --DAJF (talk) 12:35, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply, but I still do not understand ! I am trying though :)
- So for a citation, it is ok to use a commercial website as reference, and send a direct link toward that website ? But not for an external link. Is that correct ?
- To verify and information about how much a specific print sold, wouldn't it be better to send the link directly to the result page from that specific auction, such as Christie's or Sotheby's ? Cordially, Magicsteph123Magicsteph123 (talk) 06:16, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, my understanding is that that is not a problem. Although if a webpage used as a source is splashed with prices and "Buy now!" buttons, you can probably expect it to be removed pretty quickly. In answer to the second part of your question, as per WP:PRIMARY it is usually considered better to use secondary or tertiary sources than primary sources. --DAJF (talk) 23:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. Thanks for your interest in the 203 series article. Unfortunately, Wikipedia articles have to be backed up by verifiable sources (see WP:Verifiability), so I have reverted the changes you made to the article, since they were based on a Facebook page, which is presumably personal observation. If you can lay your hands on a more up-to-date and reliable source, then that will be greatly appreciated, but be careful about adding unsourced data to articles in future. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 09:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Formations in PNR 203 Series
Please stop undoing my revisions in 203 series. Indonesian formations have no sources. Why don't you remove that? I have just put a  on my edit. Hiwilms (talk) 11:22, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- You replaced reliably sourced details with unsourced information (original research). Keep doing that and you can expect to lose your editing privileges. --DAJF (talk) 12:36, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- So where can I find info about this 203 series formation here in us? Even how hard we try to keep our hobby alive in the Philippines, many people still don't appreciate what we are doing. Guards don't allow us to capture pictures. We can't have publications about trains. You said it can't be a website like that. So does it mean that the hobby website of PRHS doesn't count as a source? That's the only reliable source I can have. Most of your sources you put are totally outdated. We are already running 8 EMU sets. Sets 1, 2, and 8 consist of 5 coaches. Hiwilms (talk) 12:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- I don't live in the US, so I've no idea, but I note that the Japanese railway magazine "Railway Pictorial" publishes a report on Japanese trains in the Philippines about once a year, so we might have to wait until the next one appears in early 2015, if you cannot locate any other more up-to-date sources locally. I understand you concerns, but Wikipedia is not a railfan blog, and has to be reliably sourced, so it might not always be up-to-date. That happens a lot. For example, I know that more than seven E7 series shinkansen trains have already been delivered, but until we have a reliable source, we cannot include that in the Wikipedia article. Does that make more sense now? --DAJF (talk) 12:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm glad you are also interested in the 203 series trains, but as I already explained to your friend above, Wikipedia articles are supposed to be encyclopedic, and should not be confused with railfan blogs. If you want to make your own personal website or Facebook page with the current 203 series formations running in the Philippines based on your personal observations, that's fine, but please remember that such information must be reliably sourced before it can be added to Wikipedia, otherwise that contravenes the policy prohibiting original research. Happy railfanning. --DAJF (talk) 14:17, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Sukiyabashi_Jiro / Section Blanking
1. I reverted a change on the page when another user blanked the section relating to the Chinese student.
2. You then subsequently reverted it back, again section blanking. Your explanation is that it is trivial. You then suggested that I (as the person who reverted section blanking) should justify why the section is valuable.
I think if you and the other user question the notability of the content, you might discuss first in the talk section Template:Section blanking it.
- Hi. As I indicated in my edit summary at the time, I removed the section because I considered (and still do consider) the incident to be extremely trivial, since it appears to be an instantly forgettable storm in a teacup that occurred in blogosphere. The other editor also indicated a similar view when he/she removed the same text. As per the recommended BOLD, revert, discuss cycle procedure, after two reversions by different editors, I suggest the onus is now on the editor that wishes to include the statement (i.e. yourself) to take it to the article's Talk page, explain and demonstrate why its inclusion improves the article, and gain consensus. I'll be happy to discuss it further there. Also, please note that there is no Wikipedia rule or guideline that somehow prohibits section blanking, and Template:Section blanking that you quoted here and on the other editor's Talk page actually states that section blanking requires justification - which was, in my opinion, adequately provided by both me and Wooddoo-eng. --DAJF (talk) 11:48, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
If the behavior continues, be sure to report back to AIV. I won't be active for much longer. -- John Reaves 02:41, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
- OK, thanks once again for putting in a word. Hopefully that's all that will be needed. --DAJF (talk) 02:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Can you please remove Multiple issues column in Ajeenkya Patil article. Also please change Biography category of the page. I am trying to upload more reliable references and content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nileshdypkc (talk • contribs) 10:47, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. I have removed some of the maintenance tags, as the article does now appear to be adequately sourced. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "Biography category", as the "Indian educationists" category seems accurate to me. What do you suggest? --DAJF (talk) 23:12, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Please remove remaining maintenance tags also. I am going to add new content with references. Please check and suggest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim ftp (talk • contribs) 11:21, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Are you the same person as User:Nileshdypkc above? Anyway, the text you added to the article is unfortunately overly promotional (stuff like "D Y Patil Knowledge City, Pune is an educational powerhouse"), so I have added the appropriate maintenance tag. It can be removed when the promotional tone has been removed. --DAJF (talk) 00:00, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Ajeenkya Patil :there is no "biographical head" and so no nothing like resume, also there are lot of reference given from Newspapers and outside link which are reliable. Also Pls may i know which head appears to be like an advertisement so it can be worked on. Pls help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Priscilla20 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC}
- Hi. I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "biographical head", but the Ajeenkya Patil article at present does look very much like a resume, simply listing his achievements and affiliations. The "Ajeenkya D Y Patil Group" section is almost entirely promotional blurb for the D Y Patil Knowledge City, with lots of unsourced peacock wording. Can you perhaps prune and clean this up first? Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 08:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- With regards to Ajeenkya Patil Hi , I have made the changes and then deleted the error, Pls have a look and let me know whether it is OK? . With Biographical Head- I mean there is no heading in existing and so removed it. Also check the content of D Y Patil Knowledge City, Hope it does not look like a promotional content. Pls suggest if it is appropriate.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Priscilla20 (talk • contribs) 06:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)