User talk:D A R C 12345

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al Kharjah has been accepted

Al Kharjah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 01:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Precious

stars and Christianity

Thank you for quality articles about stars, monasteries and clerics, such as Gliese 282, Mogiła Abbey and Denis Jean-Marie Jachiet, for expanding Psalm 103 and others, for creating thousands of stubs and redirects on Hundreds, with mantra "cre8stub", - you star: you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:26, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1837 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wanaaring, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Automated editing

Hi there, are you running a bot, or assisted editing on this account? SQL^{Query me!} 23:34, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

I am not :D A R C 12345

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Andrzej Zaremba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Provost

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Carhaix-Plouguer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aqueduct

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

References in your article François de Surienne

Hello, @D A R C 12345: I came across this article while reviewing new articles, and I noticed that many of the references include "[archive]" a couple of times. I am not sure what this is intended to do - does it mean something to you? If so, please clarify it in the references so they are more useful for verification.--Gronk Oz (talk) 16:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isabella of Valois, Duchess of Bourbon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chamberlain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Muhammed Daoud Pashtunyar Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammed Daoud Pashtunyar Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammed Daoud Pashtunyar Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Heliotom (talk) 09:37, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Muhammed Nadir Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammed Nadir Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammed Nadir Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Heliotom (talk) 09:39, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toury-Lurcy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chamberlain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Graddle, New South Wales

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Graddle, New South Wales requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. L293D (☎ • ✎) 01:23, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Roman Catholic Diocese of Nevers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles IX

Toury-Lurcy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Alexander III

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Your article Abbey of Saint-Martin d'Autun

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Abbey of Saint-Martin d'Autun to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Berek (talk) 09:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Machine translation

Hello. I'm looking at the translation into English that you're creating at Abbey of Saint-Martin d'Autun. I appreciate your attempt to add information to English Wikipedia, but I can see that the English content you're adding is identical to the translation produced from the French article fr:Abbaye Saint-Martin d'Autun by Google Translate. Please see WP:MACHINETRANSLATION and do not use a machine translation. Automated translation is far from reliable, and can produce poor translations that can lead to misunderstandings or incomprehensible content.

In this case, for example, "The ancient abbey of the origins" at the start of the second paragraph is meaningless, and the following words "had to survive until 1740" are not what the French text says. The sentence from the French article, "L'antique abbatiale des origines a dû subsister jusqu'en 1740", would more properly be translated as "The original church must have survived until 1740." And that's just an example. Largoplazo (talk) 22:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Parish of Nocoleche, New South Wales and Nocoleche Nature Reserve you included material from a webpage that is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for these two articles. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:16, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cobham Lake Station

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Cobham Lake Station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zyc1174 _chat? ^{what I did} 06:25, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Unrelated comment: I would suggest that you archive your talkpage, as it is getting extremely long and unwieldy. Details can be found here. Thanks. Zyc1174 _chat? ^{what I did} 06:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mount King, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sturt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

If you have any query - try WP:archive

Please try archiving your talk page - see WP:ARCHIVE - talk pages are not designed to go this large - it is very hard for some to even to get to the bottom of your talk page to leave a message - thanks JarrahTree 10:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

I concur. I wonder if this user is even monitoring this talk page, as there seem to be little to zero activity here. If that's really the case, I wonder if an Admin can archive the talk page on his behalf? @D A R C 12345: Please archive your talk page, it is really getting very large. Thanks. Rob3512 _chat? ^{what I did} 08:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

To be part of the wikimedia community

It requires a certain level of being able to relate to other editors:

WP:TALKPAGE

WP:SIGN

WP:ARCHIVE

If you do not wish to relate to other editors over issues arising from your editing - you might find that some admins might not take kindly to such - and unless you actually prove that you dont speak english - it would be expected that you can relate to others.

best wishes - and do not hesitate to ask for help JarrahTree 09:04, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Napier Parish, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oakey Creek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of K77-11

The article K77-11 has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Loooke (talk) 22:05, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dick Barkinji (explorer)

The article Dick Barkinji (explorer) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wiki841 (talk) 01:49, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clarence Town, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Parishes

You might be interested in contributing to the discussion about organising parish and other cadastral division articles at WP:AWNB. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:21, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

François de Surienne

Please clean this article up and add the attrib to the talk page. Please do not place machine translations in mainspace. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:41, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lagnieu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Waverley Council Parish, New South Wales

A tag has been placed on Waverley Council Parish, New South Wales requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Implausible redirect (probably due to cut and paste error): there is no "Waverley Council" in this part of NSW, and none of the four parishes called "Waverley" are in Waverley Council. No one would ever search for this title looking for a place in far-western NSW.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Machine translations - please stop

Your enormous industry is admirable but please stop creating machine-translated articles from French Wikipedia: they are virtuslly useless as they stand and it is a huge amount of work to bring them up to standard, all the more so as the original French articles are often not up to our standards. (You have been asked this before). Instead of machine translations of these often highly overblown articles, would you consider creating very basic stubs instead? Eustachiusz (talk) 14:36, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Vienne IS NOT THE SAME AS Vienna

TIME TO STOP! Vienne in France is not the same as Vienna in Austria. If you can't get this straight then just stop creating srticles about the place, as I am tired of having to clean this up time after time.Eustachiusz (talk) 14:41, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rossmore, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Believe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Domnus of Stridon

Hi. I'm reading the article of Domnus of Stridon and according to Gelzer's Patrum Nicaenorum nomina there seems to be an error since there is no evidence that Domnus of Stridon as such has ever existed or appeared on the First Council of Nicaea. The index of council fathers lists only Budius of Stobi (probably missread as Stribon; see pages XLIV, 56 and 247) and Domnus of Pannonia, listed directly after him. --Janezdrilc (talk) 21:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Parish of Thurlow

A tag has been placed on Parish of Thurlow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Cut-and-paste mess - impossible to work out what, if anything actually relates to this or what was cut and pasted from a different parish

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:35, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

June

Hey, can you please create parish articles at "Parish of [Name]" in future, as was agreed when Australian editors discussed it at WP:AWNB? I've never seen such a colossal naming mess as there is with parishes, with something like fifteen different naming conventions being used completely at random. This gets extremely confusing. I've been trying to clean it up but it's very difficult if you're rolling out new articles at god-knows-how-many different titles as fast as I can sort the mess out.

Also - please don't redirect gazetted localities to different gazetted localities, like you did at South Lismore, New South Wales. That just creates another confusing mess for someone to have to untangle later on. The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Also, can you please stop claiming that cadastral parishes are localities unless they actually are? You've introduced hundreds of articles with incorrect information so far. The Drover's Wife (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Edits

Hi, thanks so much for your work. Please note that there are some easily avoidable issues, particularly overcapitalising and overlinking. Common terms, dates, years, well-known places, are not usually linked.

NSW might be followed by ", Australia", since many international readers won't be familiar with the state.

Here's an example. Tony (talk) 12:55, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Suggestions for improving Zephirium

Hi. I worked a bit on your article Zephirium improving references. Please use my edits as an example for book and web references. Good luck with your edits. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Kanyshbek, Tajikistan

Please continue.Xx236 (talk) 07:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kings Langley Public School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crestwood High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Breen (Star Trek)

Hi. Thank you for working to improve the Breen article with your recent edit, but I have reverted it, since it lacked a citation. As I'm sure you must know by now, since you've been editing Wikipedia for some time, Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, and I didn't notice a citation in your addition. If you wish to restore that material, please do so only if you can accompany it with the proper cite. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 13:39, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Pierre Guillemot

I'm sorry about this article: I was too hasty when I tagged it as a "rough translation". Now that I've taken the time to read it properly it is clearly better than that, and just needs a bit of polishing. I've taken the tag off again.Eustachiusz (talk) 10:21, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Planets of the Hainish Cycle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Clandestine and Agrarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Battle of Spichern

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Battle of Spichern. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Battle of Spicheren. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Battle of Spicheren. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:16, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Borrona Downs Station

The article Borrona Downs Station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

See Talk:Borrona Downs Station#PROD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aoziwe (talk) 11:54, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turold of Bayeaux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, D A R C 12345. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, D A R C 12345. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Guillaume Bonnet moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Guillaume Bonnet, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Guillaume Bertrand

The article Guillaume Bertrand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unverified. What is a "prelate" here? That's a broad range--no inherent notability, and no sourcing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 02:07, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert VIII Bertrand de Bricquebec

The article Robert VIII Bertrand de Bricquebec has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"References" are dead links; origin of article unclear. Not clear that there is anything inherently notable about this unreferenced character.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 02:08, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Church of Saint-Pierre de Caen

STOP importing material from the French Wikipedia without proper attribution please. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia--you may NOT simply import/translate material without giving proper credit to the authors. Drmies (talk) 02:17, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

It looks as if this is the same church as Church of Saint-Pierre, Caen. - As for attribution, make a note in the first entry, "based on", and use the template {{translate}} on the talk page, - that's all it takes to make a proper attribution. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:26, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

ps: both names are not good, it should be all French, or all English. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:28, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

• You were warned. This is an ongoing and serious violation--you are essentially taking other people's work and publishing it here as if it were your own ("cre8te stub"). I could have blocked you temporarily, but you chose not to respond to my warning or my edits in the first place, and so you show no indication of actually wanting to conform to our policies. Drmies (talk) 02:36, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

@Drmies: Not giving in-wiki attribution is not a very serious offence, in my experience. Where does it say that not giving such attribution is an indef block offence? Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia doesn't contain any warning that not following this editing guideline can lead to a block. D A R C 12345 should be following it, but TBH, if he is not, IMHO it is not a bannable offence, just an annoyance for us more experience editors. I'd ask you to reconsider your block; D A R C 12345 has created a lot valuable (if malformatted, etc.) content that is nonetheless useful. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

User:Piotrus, I appreciate your advocacy and I hope that the editor is reading this. They're not banned, they're just blocked, and as far as I'm concerned all they have to do is say "I won't do it again/I'll give proper attribution". And I think it is more than a little annoyance--first of all, it takes a bit of experience to figure out where they got the stuff from. Second, the page you linked says "If material is used without attribution, it violates the licensing terms under which it has been provided..." But besides that, I hope you know I don't go around just dropping a block for the hell of it, and of course this editor has done some good work. But if you look up the talk page you will see that this isn't the first time that the editor has been warned for related things, and they've never even responded, so we do have a kind of a pattern here. D A R C 12345, if you're listening, it really doesn't take much for you to get this block lifted, but you'll have to a. start communicating and b. follow the rules. Thank you Piotrus. Drmies (talk) 15:28, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

User:Drmies: I think it is fair enough to have them reply here with a comment or promise to be more careful. Let's hope they are indeed reading this.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:17, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Thankyou Piotrus :) I have left Wikipedia. but thank you for all the assistance you have given over the years — Preceding unsigned comment added by D A R C 12345 (talk • contribs) 06:46 27 April 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

There is nothing in the public record that this editor has been 'unblocked' - so how come articles are being created by this user name ??? JarrahTree 07:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Yao Si Ting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yao Si Ting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yao Si Ting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:04, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Matthew Talbot Hostel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Talbot Hostel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Talbot Hostel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 14:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Tottenham (NSW)railway station listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tottenham (NSW)railway station. Since you had some involvement with the Tottenham (NSW)railway station redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Triptothecottage (talk) 23:01, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Guillaume Bonnet concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Guillaume Bonnet, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Guillaume Bonnet

Hello, D A R C 12345. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guillaume Bonnet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 06:00, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guillaume Bonnet has been accepted

Guillaume Bonnet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:47, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	@Drmies: This was a great user who made it possible for me to know who Mashrab was, and I hope we free the user from this insane indefinite block one day. If the user makes the same mistakes again, just block the user again. Thanks for your work D A R C 12345. Geographyinitiative (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

D A R C 12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This user was productive and made it possible for me to learn about Mashrab, a Central Asian literary figure. I suggest relaxing the indefinite ban on this user- give the user one more chance. Geographyinitiative (talk) 14:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, unblock requests must come from the user themselves, not a third party. 331dot (talk) 14:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would like to encourage D A R C 12345 to make this request. Geographyinitiative (talk) 14:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Geographyinitiative You can certainly do so, but it's up to the user. Copying without attribution is a serious matter that potentially puts Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, which is why it needed to be dealt with in this manner. The user will need to convince an administrator that they understand why they are blocked and what steps they will take to avoid the problematic behavior. 331dot (talk) 14:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Geographyinitiative, I thought my comments above, in my attempt at communication with the user, were clear enough: the editor showed, unfortunately, no interest whatsoever in abiding by the most basic of rules. If they had, they would have been unblocked already and they would have been a great contributor, no doubt. Drmies (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

@Drmies: Indefinite block would be a good idea in theory if the human being was such that they could never change their behavior. But the fact is that we can all change and grow. This person was making useful additions to the enclyopedia, and I hope we can find a way to give this person another chance, now that the user has already been blocked for so long. Obviously the encylopedia can't include copyrighted content. But indefinite block is not wise in the case of a person making useful content. I would say temporary bans are definitely good, or the ban of a year's time or so would be more appropriate in this case. But an indefinite block on a useful editor is barbarism. Geographyinitiative (talk) 00:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Of course, the user can always be banned again if there is a relapse into unacceptable behavior. Geographyinitiative (talk) 00:18, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

No. The user isn't banned, they are blocked. They will not be unblocked and then blocked again unless they indicate, themselves, that they will at least make a shred of an effort to improve their behavior. And no, they were not making useful additions to the encyclopedia if these additions are copyright violations. And sorry, but I don't need you to tell me what's wise and what's unwise. Drmies (talk) 00:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Take note the last comment, and be very aware the editor was very disruptive across a range of basic wikipedian principles - and is not welcome to return in view of extensive disruptive creations in parts of wikipedia. JarrahTree 00:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mazabanis of Jerusalem

The article Mazabanis of Jerusalem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

very obscure figure, it seems - only sources are wikis, personal pages and the like

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (help!) 10:48, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Juan Frausto Pallares

The article Juan Frausto Pallares has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:03, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Magheracross Monastery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magheracross Monastery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magheracross Monastery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Al-Hadab for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al-Hadab is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Hadab until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:23, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Lumley Jones for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lumley Jones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lumley Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lettler^hello 20:56, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

"List of Planets in Alien Films" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of Planets in Alien Films. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 9#List of Planets in Alien Films until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 03:06, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jan Latalski (Indian historical figure)

The article Jan Latalski (Indian historical figure) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There's not a single reference to be found of this person except for wikimirrors; very likely a hoax.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lennart97 (talk) 13:58, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

"Nashdale railway station" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Nashdale railway station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 16 § Nashdale railway station until a consensus is reached. A7V2 (talk) 05:20, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

"Edgeroi , New South Wales" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Edgeroi , New South Wales has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 18 § Edgeroi , New South Wales until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 06:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Furrer v Snelling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Furrer v Snelling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furrer v Snelling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)