User talk:Da5id403

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search



Hello, Da5id403, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Sodabottle (talk) 04:37, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

December 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Elephant, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 01:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Request for Comment on Afd: Robert Fry (Serial killer)[edit]

Because of recent contributions, you may have specialized knowledge or interest to comment on whether WP:NOT applies to a convicted serial killer. SteveAarons(talk) 5 January 2013 (UTC)

22:00 Mongol Standard Time?[edit]

Somebody wrote that a battle that took place 1000 years ago began at "22:00" without further specifying whether this is Greenwich mean time, Pacific standard Time, Mongol standard Time, etc. In point of fact, there is no citation and there can be no citation because nobody can know at what hour something happened before people had universally recognized time zones, clocks, or even calendars. It is ridiculous and petty to revert my deletion of some contributors/owner's belief that something took place at a specific time of the day hundreds of years ago. It just makes Wikipedia look stupid.Da5id403 (talk) 21:54, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

I have added reference showing plagiarism[edit]

See fn 1

Executive order[edit]

Hi, I was just wondering why you undid my revision on the page Executive order in order to add the text: "Pursuant to" at the very top of the page? It doesn't look like it should be there, hovering above the "For other uses" text. -- Kndimov (talk) 02:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)