The consensus on the main Talk page of Led Zeppelin was to move the allegations to the individual song articles. It was discussed sometime ago so, it would be buried in the talk archives if you do a search. MegX (talk) 01:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
If you can leave out that section, you have my 100% qualified support and backing for GA status. MegX (talk) 01:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Anyway nice to meet you. MegX (talk) 02:33, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thanks. That's where I sourced most of the accolades from. The links there usually goes back to either the acclaimed forum or rocklists website. I'm wary though of adding too many. When article in the past have been nominated for FA, they tend to cut back on excessive trivial lists. MegX (talk) 23:35, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for all the work you did in making We're New Here a certified "Good Article"! Your work is much appreciated.
In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to review one of the Good Article nominees that someone else nominated, as there is currently a backlog, and any help is appreciated. All the best, – Quadell(talk)
I, IrishLad1916 (talk), award the Hip Hop Award to Dan56 for the amount of work you put into articles concerning Eminem, and want to let you know I appreciate it. Here this Barnstar is for you! IrishLad1916 (talk) 21:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the info regarding the Wikipedia style manual. I was using the AP Stylebook regarding punctuation and quotations. I stand corrected and will follow your advice. TopDog5450 (talk) 21:12, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey Dan, sorry for eavesdropping but the article you're writing for the album is awesome! Just wanted to let you know, because it's coming up in my google searches lol. Nice writing! – ツTeammm(talk · email) 02:22, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For you edits to life is good. ObtundTalk 03:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article ATLiens in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
Wow! I award you this, original barnstar, for your AMAZING work at getting Aaliyah (album) to FA status! It happened oh so fast! I remember looking at the article a few months ago and it was a piece of shit! Great job man! Keep up the great work! — Statυs (talk, contribs) 04:00, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
The Surreal Barnstar
For your new FA and all the good work on Wikipedia! Keep it up... — Tomíca(T2ME) 21:22, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, thank you, thank you... for the third time with your magic touch on my [edited] articles. "Diamonds" is a FA, and I appreciate your help there. New request coming soon hehe ;) ! — Tomíca(T2ME) 16:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for helping to fight vandalism by helping to stop unsourced and poorly sourced material being introduced into music articles, which unfortunately can be a big problem on Wikipedia. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 16:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Too Much Too Soon (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2(talk) 12:21, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
For your contributions to bring Too Much Too Soon (album) to Good Article status. Keep up the good work--I'm always happy to see more of your stuff in the queue. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Dan56 - many thanks for the message re Agharta, but it's not me making the changes whilst logged out! I'm only making changes when logged in as Bill E Bailey. The other changes are being made by the author Paul Tingen himself who wishes to point out:
I've just been scanning Szwed's book, and can't find any reference in it to Miles Beyond or to Ernico with regards to how he arrived at the titles for the different sections of Agharta (and all the other electric Miles live albums). Enrico's titling method is explained in my book on page 285 (note 14) and by Enrico himself on page 303. Many of these titles are not titles Miles or Columbia used. Until Miles Beyond no-one had a clue as to what was going on with the live albums (hence "Wednesday Miles" or "Interlude" or "Call it Anythin'"etc), and Ernico was the first one to identify and map the different segments and give them appropriate titles with a clear, verifiable logic. Bob Belden tried to do the same, but always made mistakes. He told me that he always feared the letter or e-mail from Enrico after the release of archived live Miles material, correcting him. Why he or Columbia didn't take the logical step of hiring Enrico as an consultant, I never understood. And relevant to this situation, the fact that Szwed's simply copies these titles and states them as fact, without acknowledging where they came from, is one of the things that really annoys.
Hope you can understand our reasoning behind the changes we are trying to make in respect of the ownership of the song titles? Please let me know if this isn't appropriate or if a compromise can be reached. Bill E Bailey (talk) 20:20, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello. As you know, I am the editor who has added the genres of noise rock and minimalism to the genres section of the article for Human After All. I am concerned and confused about your reversion to my edits. As the prose states, the members of Daft Punk applied elements of minimalism and rock to their music and went on a noisier, more robotic route with the music on the album. Why did my edits get reverted? --Dankyhashpants (talk) 20:14 CST, 7 March 2014 — Preceding undated comment added 02:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)