User talk:Danmuz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Danmuz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 09:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks![edit]

Hej Danmuz, Thanks for assessing the Dizzy and Mads Langer articles from WikiProject Denmark! I appreciate it :-) --Eddyspeeder (talk) 11:41, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

You're very welcome :) Danmuz (talk) 11:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Pipe Organ "revival"[edit]

What did you have in mind? Are there any pages in particular you'd like to see fleshed out? Cheers! W0lfie (talk) 18:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Good question! I will post my thoughts on what I think should be done on the project discussion page right away. Cheers, Danmuz (talk) 10:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for inviting me to help revive the project. Real life really gets in the way of this sort of thing! But I would love to help out as I have time. For several years I've dreamed of bumping Pipe organ to FA status; perhaps a goal that is too far-fetched for the time being. We might have more luck with other articles: Organ pipe might not be too difficult, for example. —Cor anglais 16 01:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
You're welcome and thanks for helping! It would be great to get Pipe Organ to FA, but I'm not sure what it would take to get there? What need to be improved? Good idea about Organ Pipe, a good place to start with that article is adding references to the article. I think that alone could make it a B-class article. Danmuz (talk) 09:55, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for reminding about WikiProject Pipe Organ! I try to do here something, when I have a time.--Jyriorgan1 (talk) 04:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you also for reminding me. As with the previous user I can try to do something when I have time, but it will have to be something small and specific. Best wishes for reviving this project! RGB2 (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for responding, Jyriorgan1 and RGB2! We can of course all only do so much as we have time to, but everything helps, and I think it is worthwhile to keep the project alive. Kind regards, Danmuz (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Reviving WikiProject PipeOrgan[edit]

Danmuz,

I would like to help revive this project.

a) I made a recommendation to include a list of notable organists.

b) We should merge "Pipe organ" with "Organ pipe"

c) the world's largest pipe organs should be a list on the main page "Pipe organ"

d) Need lots more links to video and music and photos

bewporteous — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bewporteous (talkcontribs) 21:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Bewporteous,

Thanks for contributing to the project with ideas! Starting backwards I agree it's a good idea with more multimedia content.

  • I'm not sure whether a list of the largest organs should go into the pipe organ article itself, but a link to the current list should definitely be easier to find in the article - and speaking of that list, it could use improvement!
  • Merging Pipe Organ with Organ Pipe would probably make the Pipe Organ article too extensive, I think
  • How would your list of notable organists differ from the current List of organists?

Kind regards, Danmuz (talk) 16:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Rollback[edit]

I saw no concerns in your rollback request so I've gone ahead and gave you the rollback right. Please keep in mind our policies about its use, specifically never use it in a content dispute, stick to using it for vandalism :) And when in doubt, assume good faith, always :) Feel free to direct any questions you might have to me or any other admin. Cheers, Snowolf How can I help? 07:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, I will do my best to use the tool wisely and live up the trust! Cheers, Danmuz (talk) 07:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello there[edit]

Hi Danmuz, as you might have guessed, I'm relatively new to editing Wikipedia, so would like to understand more about why you're assisting Saddhiyama in promulgating misinformation about the true origins of what we now know as Lego blocks. I only have an interest in the correct information, and my goal isn't to vandalise anything or cause anyone disrespect. However, the version that Saddhiyama keeps on reverting to has the "development" of Lego blocks in Denmark, when it is clearly in England (origin). I would very much appreciate your suggestion as to how we can have this error corrected other than me being continually accused of vandalism (which, again, is not m intent). thanks, Robin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.212.234 (talk) 09:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello Robin, I will answer you here. First of all, thanks for the civil and constructive message. My goal was (and is) not to assist Saddhiyama or any particular editor, but an edit-war has erupted over the edits you are proposing at the article Lego. Since the edits you wish to make are a serious change to the (until now) established consensus regarding the article, hence it is your edits that has been reverted. The way to go from here is to take the discussion on the Lego Talk page, where you can state your case backed up by reliable sources (Wikipedia itself cannot be used as a source), and if your sources are good enough possibly a new consensus will be established. That is the way it works on Wikipedia. It may seem cumbersome but it is necessary for Wikipedia to function. Kind regards, Danmuz (talk) 11:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
(PS: I see now that you have already started a discussion on the Talk Page today, which is the right course of action. Regards, Danmuz (talk) 11:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC))

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

A small cup of coffee.JPG Thanks. There's a lot of vandalism on wikipedia relating to the trivia contest in Stevens Point, Wisconsin. Jwend392 (talk) 08:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the coffee! --Danmuz (talk) 08:55, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Revert[edit]

I talked to User:Milonica and told him/her that the issue has been resolved, they went to tell me that it was okay to blank my page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.132.67.105 (talk) 13:24, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Wiki content being re-published elsewhere?[edit]

Danmuz are you aware of this?: http://www.doctorsmedicalopinion.com/wiki/User_talk:DanmuzPohutukawa (talk) 21:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Pohutukawa, I hadn't seen that particular site before, but there are many similar sites that scrapes content from Wikipedia in order to "trick" people into visiting the site when using search engines. I find it annoying, but apparently they are not doing anything illegal since Wikipedia content is released under a creative commons licence. --Danmuz (talk) 08:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Frederik Magle[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Precious[edit]

Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg Danish music
Thank you for sharing your knowledge on Danish composers such as Frederik Magle, for good gnome work and for your effort to revive project PipeOrgan, - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very, very much, Gerda! I appreciate a lot - not least coming from a truly awesome Wikipedian like you! --Danmuz (talk) 14:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 251st recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Organ Club - AfD discussion[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organ Club.  —Waldhorn (talk) 05:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Icthus[edit]

Christianity newsletter: New format, new focus[edit]

IchtusWikiproject.JPG

Hello,

I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 20:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library![edit]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
WorldDigitalLibraryLogo2.png
Hi Danmuz! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 19:36, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Seeking assessment of St. Wilfrid Club article (NYC-area organists)[edit]

Hi Danmuz, I see you're one of the more-active participants in WikiProject Pipe Organ -- much appreciated! I recently tagged St. Wilfrid Club for inclusion in the project, since it's a notable club of organists in the Greater New York area -- and (as a non-member) I've done a bit of work on the article. I doubt it'll ever rise above "Low" importance (primarily for specialists), and I'm sure there are still some Wikipedia "style" issues -- but I think by now the content might be sufficient to raise the article from Stub to "B" quality rating. Is there a standard procedure for assessment? Please feel free to take a look (at your convenience), and see what you think. Thank you kindly for your consideration. Patrug (talk) 11:15, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Patrug! Great work you have done on that article. Yes, you are right, it will likely not rise above "low" on the project importance scale, but that of course does not mean the topic is not worthwhile, just that it is, as you say, primarily of interest for specialists. Regarding the Quality scale you can see a general description of the levels here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikipedia/Assessment#Quality_scale. After your expansion and other improvements the article is certainly no longer a "stub", and in fact it is very close to "C" class, but mainly because it currently relies on a single source I have assessed it as "start" class. It still have some way to go before reaching B, but "C" should be within reach with just a few improvements (especially more references). Regards, --Danmuz (talk) 20:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Danmuz, thanks very much. While the article is fully referenced for its notable past members, unfortunately there's just one known reference describing the St. Wilfrid Club itself (since it's a private organization). Sorry if this keeps the article in "Start" class and leaves "C" class out of reach. -Patrug (talk) 21:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome, Patrug. I'm sorry I could not assess it higher at this point, but don't lose hope. It is a problem that their is only a single source. The sources about the individual members are unfortunately irrelevant in regard to the St Wilfrid Club itself, unless it is specifically mentioned. Speaking of the individual members, the list should probably also conform with the norm for embedded lists in order for the article to reach a C class assessment. See: WP:EMBED. internal links (even if the article is not yet written) would also be preferred instead of the external links. Back to the issue of the single source; are you sure that no additional sources can be found? The club has been in existence since 1908, and even if it is a private club something must have been written. --Danmuz (talk) 12:29, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Danmuz -- now the links for club members are better. After months of searching online & offline, neither I nor the club officers have been able to find another published reference source describing the club. If we eventually do, it looks like the article already satisfies the other guidelines for "B" quality (criteria 2 through 6). If we can't expand beyond the single source, it looks like we'll have permanent "Start" quality. -Patrug (talk) 08:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

IPA forespørgsel[edit]

Goddag Danmuz! Så er der anført en IPA-udtale på Frederik Magle som ønsketHøst (talk) 17:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC).

Tak for det, Høst! Det er en stor hjælp. --Danmuz (talk) 08:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frederik Magle[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frederik Magle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Frederik Magle[edit]

I've begun a GA review. I found a few issues, but they're of the "this is going to pass, just not immediately" sort; I'd be shocked if this doesn't get to GA. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

And it's passed now. As I thought. Great work, and good luck pushing it to featured article! Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, Adam! For reviewing and passing it, and for the encouragement to take it to FA! I will certainly look into that in the future. --Danmuz (talk) 14:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Frederik Magle[edit]

The article Frederik Magle you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Frederik Magle for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposal[edit]

There is currently a discussion, you might be interested in, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Inclusion_of_Amazon.2C_Spotify.2C_iTunes.2C_Beatport_under_digital_charts Thanks. prokaryotes (talk) 18:07, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Precious again[edit]

Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg

Danish music
Thank you for sharing your knowledge on Danish composers such as Frederik Magle, for good gnome work and for your effort to revive project PipeOrgan, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Two years ago, you were the 251st recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:38, 23 September 2014 (UTC)