User talk:Der Golem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wikipedia:Babel
cs Mateřským jazykem tohoto uživatele je čeština.
de-5 Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch auf einem professionellen Niveau.
en-3 This user can contribute with an advanced level of English.
zh-1 該用戶能以基本中文進行交流。
该用户能以基本中文进行交流。
es-1 Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel básico de español.
Search user languages

Congratulations[edit]

I see Meshuggah is today's featured article...how exciting! You must be pleased after all the hard work you put into it. Best of luck with your studies. Take care, momoricks (make my day) 03:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

It's a good article!--Otterathome (talk) 16:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Ewa[edit]

Rádo se stalo. Polských administrátorů je tady pár, český jsem snad jen já, pokud se nemýlím a neprošvihl jsem něco. :) - Darwinek (talk) 18:39, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

The Bartered Bride[edit]

In view of the interest you showed in the Bedrich Smetana article at FAC, you may be interested to know that the Bride is getting a makeover, too. It's not ready yet, but I'm hopeful of bringing it to peer review next week. Any observations or suggestions would be most welcome. Brianboulton (talk) 10:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Update: the article is now at WP:Peer Review. Comments welcome. Brianboulton (talk) 21:50, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
It's now gone to FAC. Thanks for all your help. Brianboulton (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

This is a question concertning reflist text.[edit]

It also concerns the most recent edit you did to obzen. What was the reasoning for you adding "|2" to the reflist. What is the difference between {{reflist}} and {{reflist|2}}? BacktableSpeak to Meabout what I have done 19:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Cool, thank you for that information. BacktableSpeak to Meabout what I have done 03:06, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Litomyšl castle[edit]

I agree that your photograph is a better image of the castle for the Smetana article. Thanks. Brianboulton (talk) 21:03, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Choral symphony[edit]

Hi, I wondered whether you would have time to read and comment on this article, which is currently listed at FAC. I've read and been impressed with the comments you made on Bedřich Smetana and The Bartered Bride, so your imput would be welcome. Thanks. Jonyungk (talk) 12:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much. I look forward to your comments. Jonyungk (talk) 20:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Copy edits[edit]

I was glad to learn something about the bands. Take care. :) Fdssdf 15:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Meshuggah's timeline[edit]

Hi, you've probably noticed that an IP insists on adding a timeline in this article. Well, I already reverted once, because I felt it was poorly made and unnecessary. Now, keep it in the article or not is up to you. Face-devil-grin.svg--Cannibaloki 17:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm a little busy now, please remove the Slayer timeline for me. Exactly because the users of WikiProject alternative rock do not use this "fashion," I came here to express my opinion.--Cannibaloki 20:47, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings![edit]

Merry Christmas[edit]

Merry Christmas

Všechno nejlepší a krásné Vánoce přeji. / I wish you Merry and Blessed Christmas. Have a great, happy and peaceful time, my friend, and a successful 2010. - Darwinek (talk) 16:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

your opinion[edit]

Hello Lykantrop we need you to opine on the talk page of Led Zeppelin. The sources claim that Led Zeppelin is a rock band, but not the parents of the same. The history says the parents of hard rock are Jimi Hendrix, Cream, Jeff Beck. The same sources call Led Zeppelin the fathers of heavy metal. There is a POV about it that was imposed without consensus. The first paragraph stable as we knew it was amended by a partial view. Your opinion would be welcome. Have a nice day! Paulotanner (talk) 02:53, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Der Golem. You have new messages at F-22 Raptored's talk page.
Message added 18:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

F-22 RaptörAces High 18:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Possessed (demo)[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Possessed (demo). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Possessed (demo). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

oops. Thanks for fixing my error. Active Banana (talk) 22:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Revocation (band)[edit]

Can you help me (here)?--Cannibaloki 16:22, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Der Golem. You have new messages at Cannibaloki's talk page.
Message added 18:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cannibaloki 18:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage[edit]

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Job For A Cowboy Live Ruination.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Job For A Cowboy Live Ruination.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Soldier of Love[edit]

The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and In a studio album article, the chain (for most artists) should include only other studio albums, excluding live albums and compilations. Also, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:39, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

It wasn't a personal request, but a requirement at Wikipedia. You should've made this edit with citations before. You must be the dick for ignoring friendly information on how to be constructive. "source? you better add one yourself instead of being disruptive"? [1]. C'mon. Dan56 (talk) 21:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Not interested in Rolling Stones, probably will run into editors like yourself, who disregard guidelines and good advice. But you can delete it yourself. It'll be constructive. —8 Dan56 (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Then quit leaving message. Dan56 (talk) 11:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sade tour poster 2011.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sade tour poster 2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:42, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Sade Live[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edits you made to Sade Live, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Itsbydesign (talk) 15:21, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive; until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Itsbydesign (talk) 01:43, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Furthermore, there is no policy that will agree with you constantly favoring one image over another. Keep it up and your next stop is ANI! Itsbydesign (talk) 02:30, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sade tour poster 2011.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sade tour poster 2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Revisions[edit]

Der Golem - I would greatly appreciate it if you would stop removing the album reviews by Metalholic Magazine. Metalholic has been around since 2008 and we've interviewed hundreds of artists in the metal genre and reviewed some 2000+ metal CDs, all at the request of the labels and bands. As the owner of the magazine, I've personally been writing for metal magazines and websites, including Kerrang! for some 20+ years. Your assertion that these reviews are not credible is inaccurate and disrespectful. You've now removed the Black Dahlia 'Ritual" review twice, despite the fact that it is one the band has republished on their own pages. I have never had any of our reviews removed until you arbitrarily decided you are the lone voice of credibility. Metalholic Magazine is a reliable source. Simply because we do not have a Wikipedia page does not make that less so.

If you would like to discuss this further, feel free to contact me directly: rustyn@metalholic.com But I ask respectfully, again, do not remove these additions as they are viable, and label approved.

Rustyn Rose (talk) 06:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

I am absolutely respecting You and Your website, but what i see now is shameless self-promotion in order to increase the traffic of Your website, what is strictly forbidden by WP:NOTADVERTISING. I see no editorial overcheck information that would demonstrate a trace of reliablility of Your website, whose publications seem to border WP:SELFPUBLISH, as they are witten & published by You. It is not about me deciding to be the "lone voice of credibility", but about the fact that no one really cares about removing it. Credibility/Reliability of sources is not about "accuracy and respect", but criteria at Wikipedia:Reliable sources that must be proved by third party sources to make the reliability of a source evident. So called "label approvement" has no weight in this matter since labels make hundreds of non-reliable websites review their albums as it is common in the music industry promotion methods. If you would like to discuss this further, feel free to join Wikipedia as an editor and discuss at the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard.--Der Golem (talk) 07:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

"Shameless self promotion"? The redirects back to my site over the years from Wikipedia are minimal at best, and since I don't make a dime from the website, (which has over 20 other writers by the way)it's a nonsensical and moot argument. YOU "see no editorial overcheck (whatever that's supposed to mean since reviews are a matter of opinion not fact)is simply YOUR opinion, and who are YOU? Your opinion has no editorial value except to YOU. What "third party" sources have the esteemed value of judging my magazine, AllMusic or Blabbermouth or anyone else? I've seen thousands of other Professional reviews on Wikipedia by simple "bloggers". To me those have no value but they remain on the site.

You are in no way Respecting me, the magazine, the band's I review or interview. You are merely acting as the equivalent of an internet bully who believes he's superior in some way because he has access to do as he pleases. You make arbitrary decisions with no research to back it up?

Out of sheer curiosity, what in your mind gives a magazine credibility? You left the Blabbermouth review, but removed Metalholic's. Yet Blabbermouth frequently runs articles from Metalholic's site. Perhaps you should drop by and Search Metalholic and see how many hits come up on Blabbermouth alone. Are they not a Third Party who finds relevance in our Magazine, thus giving it credibility?

Your argument is that because I own the magazine and also write much of the content, I'm merely trying to gratify my ego, and my 20 some years of experience as a music journalist is meaningless and irrelevant (to YOU). Yet somehow YOU are the voice of authority on such matters even though I was interviewing and writing about music while you were still in diapers. That's sheer arrogance on your part.

Rustyn Rose (talk) 08:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Well, again, i do respect you and your website, but if what you are seeking here is respect then you're in a wrong place. This is a mainstream source of information where voluntary editors try to create informing encyclopedic articles. Trying to add material from your website is likely to be against Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
I have no idea what is going on with your ego and have never been pointing in that directon. There is nothing personal about what i'm arguing and what you say has never been my argument, so please stop being personal -it's not how discussions work here.
The reliability of Blabbermouth.net is established by open, transparent and clear statements by reliable third party sources: Blabbermouth.net, described by the London Free Press as a "reliable industry and fan site",[1] is widely recognized as an authority on heavy metal and hard rock. It has been cited as a source by the London Free Press,[1] New Musical Express,[2][3] MTV.com,[4][5] the Toronto Sun,[6][7] the Baltic News Service,[8] the St. Petersburg Times,[9] News.com.au,[10] and OC Weekly.[11]
If there is blogger review in a Wikipedia article then it is a poorly written article that does not meet the criteria of article quality (see WP:FACR). If such content stays there, it's simply because no voluntary editor cares about it. If one cares, it gets fixed.
If your website is reliable and notable according to Wikipedia's standards, there must be actual statements by third party sources that establish such condition. Your experience, stories about diapers and everything are nice; and i also like those reviews, but Wikipedia has exact standards and policies. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, but it's not a random encyclopedia.
If i have the voice of authority, it's only because i back it up by this site's policies. Simple. If you keep reverting those edits without a consensus, you might be reported at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring and blocked. Consider your actions please.--Der Golem (talk) 10:31, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Well, I won't waste anymore of my time furthering this discussion since all Blabbermouth does is post public relations announcements and links from sites like mine and many others. If they are an approved site, and they cite Metalholic, that should count as third party credibility. But there's a reason University and college students are not allowed to use Wikipedia as a reliable source. One of these days when I have a week of my life to waste I'll review all the Wikipedia policies. I appreciate that you liked the reviews, it's too bad others will be robbed of the option to be informed and enjoy them as well. This should make for an interesting topic when I interview Black Dahlia and Decapitated in July.

Best of luck in school.

Rustyn Rose (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Reflist
  1. ^ a b Reaney, James (April 15, 2008). "Motley Crue set to rock Sarnia, sources say." London Free Press.
  2. ^ "Killing Joke reform and tour." New Musical Express. March 3, 2008.
  3. ^ "Led Zeppelin singer hopeful 'grateful' for audition." New Musical Express. January 21, 2009.
  4. ^ O'Donnell, Jane (May 7, 2007). "A.M. Surf Report." MTV.com. Retrieved June 10, 2009.
  5. ^ Harris, Chris (April 1, 2008). "Scott Weiland Parts Ways With Velvet Revolver." MTV.com. Retrieved June 10, 2009.
  6. ^ "Nails Set Date." Toronto Sun. January 21, 2005.
  7. ^ "In case you were on Mars the past week ..." Toronto Sun. June 24, 2007.
  8. ^ "Ozzy Osbourne to come to Lithuania in summer." Baltic News Service. January 26, 2007.
  9. ^ "Loud & fast." St. Petersburg Times. March 20, 2009.
  10. ^ "AC/DC's new hit Black Ice No. 1 in 29 countries." News.com.au. October 29, 2008. Retrieved June 10, 2009.
  11. ^ Kane, Rich (December 26, 2002). "Steaming Malmsteen." OC Weekly. Retrieved June 10, 2009.

Orphaned non-free image File:The Red Chord - Clients deluxe.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Red Chord - Clients deluxe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Rollback use[edit]

Hello, as you should know, you should not use rollback for something that is not vandalismGunMetal Angel 16:47, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:Rollback says "rollback is used to undo problematic edits such as vandalism". You kept removing simple sourced data and added incorrect instead. Can you not distinguish such things? Why are you concerned about how i used my rollback when i was reverting your harmful edits? Mind your own business please, i know how not to misuse rollback; i use it carefully, don't worry--Der Golem (talk) 18:31, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Please take another look at the guideline, particularly the section titled "when to use rollback" and the clause "it is considered inappropriate to use it in situations where an explanatory edit summary would normally be expected." That would include reverting edits by experienced and obviously good-faith editors such as Gunmetal Angel—that's the kind of thing for which one would generally expect to see an edit summary. Thanks. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:11, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Allright man.thanks--Der Golem (talk) 12:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Trigger the Bloodshed Kingdom Come.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trigger the Bloodshed Kingdom Come.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kingdom Come (EP)[edit]

Hello, Der Golem, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Kingdom Come (EP), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! causa sui (talk) 19:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Merry Christmas![edit]

SantasOnSteps.jpg Happy new year!
we wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year! Pass a Method talk 20:22, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Nasum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inhale/Exhale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Navene Koperweis listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Navene Koperweis. Since you had some involvement with the Navene Koperweis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Λeternus (talk) 11:17, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

AfD and PROD notifications[edit]

Hi Der Golem,

Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchuk@wikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit summaries[edit]

Please restrict your use of edit summaries to summarising your edits, not making comments about other editors, like this. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Don't worry. i will.--Der Golem (talk) 04:26, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Not only was that offensive (along with other comments I've seen you make) but maybe you'd also want to learn how to spell the word "offense", especially if you're going to make an offensive comment and then try to pull the "no offense" idiom afterward. • GunMetal Angel 12:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Stop crying.--Der Golem (talk) 04:26, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Image use[edit]

Hi Golem, We would like to use your photograph: National Assembly of Bangladesh, Jatiyo Sangsad Bhaban, 2008 for an exhibition poster. It would be very kind if you could get in touch with me as we would like to request the image in high resolution as well as usage permission. Many thanks! JLipsky (talk) 13:39, 21 December 2012 (UTC) Hi Golem! Thanks so much for your prompt reply. We are showing a Louis Kahn retrospective in our museum and would like to use your wonderful shot (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:National_Assembly_of_Bangladesh,_Jatiyo_Sangsad_Bhaban,_2008,_9.JPG) for our exhibition poster. The image size on the poster is 55 x 55 cm. The resolution on Wikimedia Commons is unfortunately not high enough for printing this size. Have you got a similar image with a higher resolution? For more details about our project I would propose that you contact me via email, should be possible via my wikipedia account. Many thanks again and best regards JLipsky (talk) 18:17, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

derp golem[edit]

That's a better name for you, you were a sack of shit. good riddance, we're all glad you're gone.--69.225.134.67

Good day to you, sir! I feel slightly amused yet pitying to see the urge to invest your precious lifetime in attempting to conduct remote verbal World-Wide-Web-users pestering. In other words, i can warmly recommend you to get a life, sir! Thank you for consideration.--Der Golem (talk) 12:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Liongrande (talk) 17:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

How cute--Der Golem (talk) 04:26, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

New 3RR report about Czechs[edit]

See the AN3 noticeboard for the new outbreak of the Kafka dispute. The parties may be able to avoid sanctions if they will agree not to revert the article again until a talk page consensus has been found. So far there is nobody on talk who has spoken in your support. Don't use the bad behavior of others as an excuse. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:59, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions apply to Eastern Europe[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

The rules apply especially to any edit warring on nationalist topics, such as the definition of who is a Czech. EdJohnston (talk) 17:58, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Result of the AN3 complaint[edit]

Please see the result (permanent link) since it contains a warning for both you and Liongrande. EdJohnston (talk) 18:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Post[edit]

Please take a look at the Soraya Post article. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

ok, what for exactly?--Der Golem (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi There,

I'm Mark from TitanFile. It looks like you wiped us out during this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_file_hosting_services&diff=prev&oldid=605452630

Please let me know if you can restore the listing, or someone on my team can.

Thanks,

Mark. 208.72.125.2 (talk) 17:15, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi! Sorry, that was my mistake. I restored the content.--Der Golem (talk) 18:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


I have created a article about Skanska founder Rudolf Fredrik Berg. Take a look, as I know that you have made edits at Skanska in the past.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kontinental Hockey League may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • The league formed from the [[Russian Superleague]] (RSL, and the champion of the [[2007–08 Vysshaya Liga season|2007–08 season]] of the [[Russian Major

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Blood Mantra[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Blood Mantra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Upcoming album has no notability yet. See Wikipedia:Notability (music).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strnad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bunting. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Julian Assange[edit]

Hi there, as a recent editor of the page in question, you may wish to contribute to the discussions: ==Merge discussion for Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority ==

Merge-arrows.svg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. prat (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2014 (UTC) prat (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2014 (UTC)