User talk:Dharmadhyaksha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Changing profile. So please avoid bringing following stuff to me.


Will you pl help with DYK? Mobile_Seva Yogesh Khandke (talk) 09:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Sorry! Can't help. No time. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Nevermind! Yogesh Khandke (talk) 17:15, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Dusari Goshta[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Consider watching the B. R. Ambedkar page.[edit]

Hello brother, Thanks for your edit on B. R. Ambedkar page. You can't Imagine how happy I am for I found you. Please also add the page to your watch-list so that it can be prevented from non-constructive edits done by some users. I am not a frequent user on Wikipedia. Many many hugs to you friend. With hugs, Siddheart (talk) 07:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Kedar Joshi[edit]

Hi Dharmadhyaksha, I today noticed your deletion request at That time we did not have any admin, so your request went un noticed. Just now, I have deleted that article. :) --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 00:28, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

@Vigyani: Hi! And sorry for late reply. It totally slipped my mind that you had posted on my talk page while I was away on break. Thanks for the deletion. And congrats for the new adminship. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks . --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 06:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)


Thankyou for your edits on B.R. Ambedkar page. Akhil Bharathan (talk) 12:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Kuru family tree[edit]

Hi Dharmadhyaksha. I have returned the Kuru family tree to the Mahabharata article but left it also in the Kuru kingdom article. The tree was devised specifically to clarify and illustrate the MB story so I feel it belongs in there. But I would also question its suitability without editing for the Kuru Kingdom article since that article is intended to be a historic article, and the claims of divine birth, Gandhari's hundred sons and so on are definitely not appropriate for such an article, while they do directly reflect the MB story. If the Kuru Kingdom article is put solely in the context of Indian mythology then of course it would be different, but I don't read it as such. Thanks, Imc (talk) 07:21, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


hi dharmadhyaksha — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 11:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Interesting work.[edit]

Hi, since you are bored, you might find reviewing this interesting. Thanks. Wishes.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  08:55, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Foreign policy of Narendra Modi has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at List of vegetables in Assam's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I replied on List of vegetables in Assam. (struckthrough the template as it isnt working the way i intend) (talk) 06:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your edit on ABISY.[edit]

Brownie transparent.png Appreciate your prompt review of the Article. AmritasyaPutra 12:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


I took a stab at correcting that section myself. If you're dissatisfied with it I quite understand, but would you mind waiting until I finish the CE (I'll remove the in use tag) and then tweak as you see fit? Else we'll be edit-conflicting all over the place, as we just did a minute ago (and which was why I reverted you.) Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Fine! Will wait till then. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Foreign policy of Narendra Modi[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Ravindra Prabhat's spamming on multiple wikis[edit]

Some editors have been using various Wikipedias to promote the author Ravindra Prabhat by creating numerous non-notable articles of books, periodicals, etc. written and/or edited by subject. Following is a track of deletion processes of them all. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Article Discussion Status Notes
Hindi हिन्दी ब्लॉगिंग का इतिहास here
ताकि बचा रहे लोकतन्त्र
प्रेम न हाट बिकाय ‎
धरती पकड़ निर्दलीय
स्मृति शेष
मत रोना रमज़ानी चाचा
समकालीन नेपाली साहित्य
हिन्दी ब्लॉगिंग : अभिव्यक्ति की नयी क्रान्ति
नया विहान
हमारी वाणी
परिकल्पना समय
परिकल्पना डॉट कॉम
परिकल्पना ब्लॉगोत्सव
रवीन्द्र प्रभात की कृतियाँ

Prabhat Books Afd[edit]

This is not directly of relevance to the running AfD, so I am posting here instead. Perhaps a month back, there was a big long discussion on Hindi Wikipedia Chaupal about all this. If I remember correctly, it was sufficiently proved that one main editor on these articles is directly related to the subject and the others also have some sort of connection. I will try to find the entire conversation and post the link here. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 12:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

hi:विकिपीडिया:चौपाल/पुरालेख 35 carries lot of discussion related to this matter.--Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 22:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Oh! Thanks. Will go through it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:04, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Cinemas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Little Help[edit]

Your user page depicts you belong to Maharashtra state. Can you give proper caption to image used in Attire section. I found a great file but giving a suitable caption seems very difficult. Please help.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  09:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:14, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, appreciate it.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  12:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello mate. I have reverted this. I was told by a very experienced user that we only use posters here, not DVD covers. Also image is not same, the current image is film poster while the previous one is DVD cover.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS  15:52, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Template:Hinduism and its other related topics[edit]

Sir,Since the Om symbol which was present before my edit and after you reverted to the same symbol does not represent the original symbol and my symbol is more suitable because of following reasons:-

  • My edited symbol show the saffror or 'kesariya' and 'bhagya' color which is used by most hindu temples,organizations etc whereas Red color of Om is not recognized by any hindu scriputures as well.
  • My Om symbol is surrounded by a circle which represents the dawn time of sun or 'suryodaya' to which is an daily excercise by normal hindu.

Kindly rechange the om symbol as soon as possible. Your sincerely, Pradyumna Singh, A true Hindu. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradyumnas741 (talkcontribs) 16:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

@Pradyumnas741: Your reasons are not quite rational. Just to contradict those there are reasons to use old symbol or create more new symbols too. Red is the colour of kumkum and traditionally and in routine kumkum is used to create Om or swastika symbols in Hinduism. Hence red can also be used. Your suryodaya logic is really farfetched. To contradict that I can also say that non-circled Om indicates more openness and freedom; it also indicates Akasha, which is one of the pancha mahabhootas. In addition, adding aesthetic aspect, when the whole template is saffron, the red om adds a contrast and looks even better. Am reverting you again. I suppose if you want it your way, you should propose at Wikipedia talk:Hinduism-related topics notice board or Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics and get WP:CONSENSUS there from other editors too. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Vermilion or Sindoor or Kumkum denotes that a woman is married in many Hindu communities not Hinduism whereas Tilak which is applied to us by pundits in temples is made up by mixing of kumkum with turmeric(haldi) and chandan or obtained by from saffron .

In Sanatan Dharma (Hinduism), the deep saffron color is associated with sacrifice, religious abstinence, quest for light and salvation. Saffron or "Bhagwa" is the most sacred color for the Hindus and is often worn by Sanyasis who have left their home in search of the ultimate truth.And coming to the encircle Om,Since Hinduism is only religion in world which depends on the perception and interpretation You can say that non-circled Om indicates more openness and freedom; it also indicates Akasha, which is one of the pancha mahabhootas but from my pint of view its the protection of Hinduism from evil spirits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pradyumnas741 (talkcontribs) 12:59, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

I can't beat your logic by being rational. So please choose one of the above suggested venues to open your discussion and get consensus from there. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 13:04, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Hindu Political parties[edit]

I'm curious as to why you removed that tag from a couple of places; it seems to me that if it applies anywhere, it applies to the BJP and BJS pages. Categorization is not something I spend much time doing, so I thought I'd ask you for an explanation. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Well, what do they even mean by that category? Are all members of these parties supposed to be Hindu? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 08:56, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
I admit it isn't the best, but I would imagine it means "parties which subscribe to Hindutva" which is a more specific set than just the "Hindutva" category. Vanamonde93 (talk) 14:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
Well, Hinduism and Hindutva are different. When referring it as "Hindu political parties‎", it more inclines to the common usage as Hinduism and not Hindutva. Apart from that minor name change error, do all the parties in that category really "subscribe" to any specific religion? Am not talking just about the Hindu one, but also others in Category:Religious political parties. And what is this subscription extent needed? These parties do have non-Hindu members in them and also include non-Hindu masses in their plans. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:53, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
That is a little simplistic, is it not? Sure, they have Muslim members, and Sikh members, and Christian members; but there are also literally hundreds of academic references that discuss the fact of their "exclusionary" or "chauvinistic" ideology, based on Hinduism being the "primary" Indian religion/identity. Now I agree that the name was not ideal; but there is a set of parties, and therefore Wikipedia articles, that consists essentially of the overlap between "Hindutva," "Religious political parties," and "Indian political parties," and it is a set with multiple members. To me, this makes it seem like there should be a category for such, but like I said, I have not worked too much with categories. Do you disagree? Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Wiki commons deletion[edit]

I was trying to find the deletion log on the two images of mine that you have deleted. I need to actually request a temporary undeletion for say a week. There is a discussion going on at Asansol Junction railway station where it is needed.

Superfast1111 (talk) 16:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Superfast1111! Do you know which image you are talking about? The three images you uploaded that were deleted are File:Bombay railnetwork.jpg , File:Station name - 1.jpg and File:Station name - 1.jpg. Which one are you talking about? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:21, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Superfast1111 (talk) 15:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your efforts on Ganga puja! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:36, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Doc! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


I just declined your speedy delete of Safdar. Looking back through the history the article was originally about a Village in Iran. I have reverted back to the article about the village. You should look to see if something like that happened before nominating an article for deletion, especially when the article is over 2 years old. GB fan 18:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks User:GB fan for the note. I hadn't noticed it. Will see for it next time. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:53, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Rucha Pujari[edit]

Dharmadhyaksha, the article is much closer to being ready for a full-fledged DYK review: there are a couple of tags that need taking care of. It looks like it was given a copyedit a few days ago, which helps, but the current issue now is finishing the remaining sourcing.

If you mean to return to the article, please let us know on the review; it's been a week since the comment noting those remaining sourcing issues. If no action is taken or response made, we'll have to close it fairly soon, which would be a shame given the work you've put in. Thanks for your help. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:44, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Help needed[edit]

Hey, If you are interested in formatting, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ashok Kumar filmography is lying at AfC for a long time. Now i edit from mobile so it is difficult to do formatting. You can request others too. Thank you -Nizil (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Dattatraya Parchure[edit]

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Finally!! - Vivvt (Talk) 08:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
@Vivvt: Oh yeah! Did it in 2014 itself. Should I nominate it for something else now and slumber more? Face-wink.svg §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 13:04, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


Kindly dont put box for references. Let other people do their work stop distrubing, I have created the article Bhishek (talk) 12:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Ah! WP:OWNing the article! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


single reference is enough for the article, if you are bored do some other work. You are anyways not bothered to contribute. If some other person takes pain and doing it, u come to disrupt, please look for other article. Bhishek (talk) 12:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

please dont disrupt the award box[edit]

reference section makes lot of mis alignments Bhishek (talk) 12:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Fine! Carry on. Three sections on my page were unnecessary! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:18, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

awards box[edit]

this awards box is not just awards and nominees. We have to include categories and special screenings. This is not an article like Indias submission for Academy articles. You canttt put separate line for each film, so dont give double burden. It took herculean effort by me to prepare this article. Bhishek (talk) 12:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

separate line[edit]

it is not possible to put separate lines for each film in this article so please Bhishek (talk) 12:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

When said "carry on" it meant elsewhere; not here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:24, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Image Rationale[edit]

it is the only film to win highest award at cannes till date, so there is rationale, please see article list of academy awards submission from India Bhishek (talk) 12:25, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at List of Indian film selections and winners at the Cannes Film Festival shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard Bhishek (talk) 12:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Hear, hear... Where's the source? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Non free use[edit]

If it is not acceptable to put image, admin will take care of it, why ru worried. why ru troubling other editors like this Bhishek (talk) 12:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Kettle-black-pot thing! Also read WP:DTR. And make up your mind and write all you want in one go. And do you really want Admin? We can invite some for sure. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Image Removed By me[edit]

Bhishek (talk) 12:35, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Hmm! Better late than never. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Ah! That's good! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jyotirlinga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pashupatinath. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

MH election[edit]

Can you change independents from white? not visible at all...maybe peach or something similarLihaas (talk) 14:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

@Lihaas: Hi! I tried changing the colour instant to peach shade. But turns out I don't have svg editor. Never mind, I can create a different file and upload it over the current one. But I faced another problem. We have same colours for some parties and hence I have opened a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Colour_of_politics. Do participate if you wish to. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Smart move at the indeps boss [1]Lihaas (talk) 14:10, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ganga puja[edit]

There is an outstanding problem with your nomination of this article at DYK, you may wish to revisit the template for your nomination. Please let me know on my talk page if you would like me to review the nomination again. Regards, Moonraker (talk) 03:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

I have withdrawn my objection, as I think this expansion has now overcome the minor copyvio problems which were there. I have also done some copy-editing myself, I do not think the article had quite grasped what was going on with the State of Tripura after August 1947, perhaps because the article on the former princely state was also confused. I have made some corrections to that, too. Moonraker (talk) 04:15, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 18:21, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Ganga puja[edit]

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Thanks for including my name.--Nvvchar. 14:45, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Maha election 2014[edit]

Hi. Hope you're well. I wondered if you knew how to change the infobox so it says BJP = 1st party rather than majority and likewise with Shiv Sena = 2nd party like how it was in the 2004 election article. It seemed strange to me to keep the majority and minority designation as they aren't in an alliance, campaigned independently and BJP is currently trying to make a minority government work. Cowlibob (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

New Year 2015 Greetings[edit]

Bali Omkara Red.png Wishing you a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello , New Year begins, let us pray that it will be a year with New Peace, New Happiness and abundance of new friends, God bless you through out the New Year.--Nvvchar. 02:41, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at User_talk:Titodutta/Adminship#Process_has_started.
Message added 11:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TitoDutta 11:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)