 |
Dinosaur puppy is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. If you have an urgent matter, it may be best to use email. I am really tired (not due to wiki) and have gotten a little bored here so I will probably be less active now. Not leaving completely. |
Please leave new messages at the bottom. Thank you. T Rex | talk
|
Contents
- 1 Replaceable fair use Image:Himalayabear.jpg
- 2 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)
- 3 WPV newsletter
- 4 My recent RfA
- 5 FL Main page proposal
- 6 Basque coat of arms
- 7 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 8 Request for Admin.
- 9 Re: T-Rock
- 10 Peer Review requested
- 11 Virginia Newsletter October 2007
- 12 Wikipedia has a second Carlos admin
- 13 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Virginiaplate.jpg
- 14 T-Rock DRV
- 15 Re: Rock Solid/4:20
- 16 My (KWSN's) RFA
- 17 WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for November 2007
- 18 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)
- 19 Rememberance Day
- 20 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mysticstylez.jpg
- 21 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lordofterror.jpg
- 22 Thanks for the offer
- 23 Aviation
- 24 RfA
- 25 LOTD proposal
- 26 Thank you
- 27 Himalayan Red Bear/Brown Bear image
- 28 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 29 Featured List of the Day Experiment
- 30 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UndergroundVol1.jpg
- 31 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Undergroundvol2.jpg
- 32 Adoption
- 33 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)
- 34 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Valogo.gif
- 35 WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for December 2007
- 36 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 37 The Wessex Children
- 38 Triple crown
- 39 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Neighborhoods.jpg
- 40 WikiProject Good Articles January Newsletter
- 41 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)
- 42 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 43 Military history WikiProject coordinator election
- 44 WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter
- 45 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)
- 46 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:In the world.jpg
- 47 GA Sweeps update
- 48 WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter
- 49 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)
- 50 WikiProject Ice Hockey March 2008 Newsletter
- 51 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 52 The "Prince/ss X of Wales" Issue
- 53 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)
- 54 April GA Newsletter
- 55 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 56 Is there anybody out there?
- 57 WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter
- 58 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
- 59 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lordofterror.jpg)
- 60 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
- 61 WikiProject Good articles newsletter
- 62 WikiProject Good articles newsletter
- 63 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 64 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)
- 65 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)
- 66 WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter
- 67 Excessive use of "the District of Columbia WikiProject" template with former/current Washington D.C. athletes
- 68 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)
- 69 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 70 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)
- 71 Time for resolution
- 72 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)
- 73 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 74 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
- 75 Proposed deletion of Ted Ruth
- 76 AfD nomination of Ted Ruth
- 77 RfD nomination of Culpeper Star Exponent
- 78 Proposed deletion of List of international ice hockey competitions featuring NHL players
- 79 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
- 80 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
- 81 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 82 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
- 83 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 84 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
- 85 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
- 86 GA Sweeps update
- 87 GA Sweeps June update
- 88 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
- 89 GA Sweeps July update
- 90 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)
- 91 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
- 92 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 93 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 94 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
- 95 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
- 96 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 97 Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!
- 98 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)
- 99 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLV (November 2009)
- 100 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
- 101 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 102 Unreferenced BLPs
- 103 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
- 104 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
- 105 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 106 April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive
- 107 A sincere thank you from Wikiproject Good Articles
- 108 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
- 109 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
- 110 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
- 111 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 112 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
- 113 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 114 The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
- 115 Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
- 116 The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
- 117 The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
- 118 Invitation to join WikiProject United States
- 119 Replaceable fair use File:Himalayabear.jpg
- 120 The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
- 121 The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
- 122 The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
- 123 The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
- 124 The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
- 125 The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
- 126 The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
- 127 The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
- 128 Military Historian of the Year
- 129 You're invited: Smithsonian Institution Women in Science Edit-a-Thon!
|
[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Himalayabear.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Himalayabear.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XIX (September 2007)
|
- Project news
- The Taiwanese military history and War films task forces have been created.
- The contest department has completed its sixth month of competition. The leader for this month, with 57 points, is JKBrooks85; Kyriakos is in second place, with 16 points, and Blnguyen and Woodym555 are tied for third place, with 10 points each. The overall results for the past six months show JKBrooks85 in first place, with 92 points, followed by Carom, with 45 points, and Blnguyen, with 38 points. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries.
- A stress hotline is now available for project members' use.
- The bulk of the project's guidelines have been moved to a separate subpage.
- New guidelines for flag icon use have been adopted.
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Andrew Cunningham, 1st Viscount Cunningham of Hyndhope
- Battle for Henderson Field
- Battle of Greece
- Battle of Ramillies
- Egbert of Wessex
- Frederick Russell Burnham
- Freedom Monument (Riga)
- Issy Smith
- Military of the Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Omaha Beach
- Victoria Cross (Canada)
- Winfield Scott Hancock
New A-Class articles:
- Barton S. Alexander
- Battle of Barrosa
- Byzantine-Arab Wars
- Cleomenean War
- Fort Bayard (Washington, D.C.)
- Fort Corcoran
- Fort Runyon
- George Jones (RAAF officer)
- Jean de Carrouges
- Operation Passage to Freedom
- Smolensk War
New Featured lists:
- Army Groups of the National Revolutionary Army
- Puerto Ricans Missing in Action in the Korean War
New Featured topics:
- Victoria Cross
|
- Current proposals and discussions
- A proposal to formalize the project's style guide as part of Wikipedia's Manual of Style has been made and is being discussed; comments and suggestions would be very appreciated!
|
- Awards and honors
- SandyGeorgia was awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of the instrumental role she plays in the featured article process, both by checking the project's featured article candidates to ensure that citations are formatted correctly, and by helping clear out the backlog of featured articles that no longer meet the criteria. Sandy is the first non-member of the project to receive this award.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
Delivered by grafikbot 13:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WPV newsletter
I know your time is being split all over the place, but I wonder if you would help me with a WPV newsletter? I'm having a bit of trouble figuring out how the outreach structure works.--Kubigula (talk) 03:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. You don't mess around!--Kubigula (talk) 03:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey Rex - care to take a look at what I've got so far? Any thoughts/additions welcome...--Kubigula (talk) 02:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's been a while, so I'd like to get one out this month. Hopefully it will be less than six months before the next issue, though monthly is probably unrealistic.--Kubigula (talk) 03:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My recent RfA
I am sorry you felt it necessary to oppose my recent RfA, which did not succeed. I will attempt to get more experience in the main namespace and the Wikipedia namespace and will try again for RfA in two month's time. I hope I will have satisfied your concerns by then, but if not, please comment as you feel you should. Just a side note: You seem to play down vandal fighting, isn't that one of an administrator's duties? Thanks for participating in my RfA. -- Cobi(t|c|b|cn) 07:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] FL Main page proposal
You either nominated a WP:FLC or closed such a nomination recently. As such, you are the type of editor whose opinion I am soliciting. We now have over 400 featured lists and seem to be promoting in excess of 30 per month of late (41 in August and 42 in September). When Today's featured article (TFA) started (2004-02-22), they only had about 200 featured articles and were barely promoting 20 new ones per month. I think the quality of featured lists is at least as good as the quality of featured articles was when they started appearing on the main page. Thus, I am ready to open debate on a proposal to institute a List of the Day on the main page with nominations starting November 1 2007, voting starting December 1 2007 and main page appearances starting January 1 2008. For brevity, the proposal page does not discuss the details of eventual main page content, but since the work has already been done, you should consider this proposal assuming the eventual content will resemble the current content at the featured content page. Such output would probably start at the bottom of the main page. The proposal page does not debate whether starting with weekly list main page entries would be better than daily entries. However, I suspect persons in favor of weekly lists are really voicing opinions against lists on the main page since neither TFA nor Picture of the day started as weekly endeavors, to the best of my knowledge. See the List of the Day proposal and comment at WP:LOTDP and its talk page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Many thanks for your comments. I think I have dealt with the concerns you brought up, so it should be better now. Nevertheless, feel free to let me know of anything you think worth changing. Best wishes, -- Chris B • talk 15:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you! -- Chris B • talk 06:09, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Request for Admin.
Thanks for your comment in my RfA. You seem to have lead the group to believe that I am not ready to become an admin. I do appreciate your comment though, and look forward to working on my contributions, and coming back to RfA, perhaps in a few months. - Rjd0060 13:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: T-Rock
Apologies for quick tagging. I would not have tagged them if I knew T-Rock was on deletion review. I was about to add a comment on the T-Rock talk page, but the article was deleted before I could start the message! When I saw it deleted, I just thought his albums may be too. I've tagged dozens of songs and albums of deleted artists for speedy in the past so I didn't think it was controversial. But this is a difference case. Since it's on DRV, I think they'll be kept for the meantime. Spellcast 02:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
I withdrew the speedy tags pending the review. But I don't think the mixtapes (Da Clean Up Project, Slang & Serve, and On da Grind: Rock Solid Edition) should be kept even if T-Rock is kept. They're not notable and they have no potential to expand. You can remove the prods if you disagree. Spellcast 02:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Ok I've removed the prod. About a month ago, Wikipedia had over 200 articles on mixtapes in Category:Mixtape albums. Now there's only 30. When you prod and AfD many of them, they all start to look the same after a while. But since you're pretty established here, I've removed it. That's not to say I could take it to AfD in the future! In general, most tapes were still deleted despite being produced by notable people. Spellcast 02:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you had given the article a review in August 2007 and kept it as a WP:GA, so I wanted to give you the chance to provide some input. Curt Wilhelm VonSavage 09:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Virginia Newsletter October 2007
The October 2007 issue of the Virginia WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.--Kubigula (talk) 02:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia has a second Carlos admin
Click there to open your card! → → →
My dear Wikipedian Dinosaur puppy,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 29 supports, 1 opposed, and 3 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, or even if you just stopped by to make a comment, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. Since I am a new admin, if you have any suggestions or concerns, feel free to inform me of them. Special thanks to Carlossuarez46 for encourage me and nomination. Thank you and good day.
Carlosguitar
[edit] Credits
This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor, who in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunately this is not entirely my own design.
This end the usual RFA thanks spam. You may return to your regular editing now.
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Virginiaplate.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Virginiaplate.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:06, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] T-Rock DRV
Hi T Rex. No matter how often an article is deleted or how much salt is poured on the topic, reliable source material is the key to having the article restored. The best way to do this is to have the article userfied to your user space, the create a draft article in your user space using reliable source material and then present that at WP:DRV. I recall trying to search for information on T-Rock, but the name "T-Rock" is so generic that it brings up everything. I didn't search out his AKAs, so there may be some info on that. If you are interested in creating a draft article in your user space, I would be happy to userfy the deleted article to your user space and work with you to create a draft article. Also, if I put a little more effort into the matter, I might be able to come up with some reliable source material. -- Jreferee t/c 02:50, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Rock Solid/4:20
No problem. It was first tagged by User:Spellcast, but he withdrew the db after your hangon. It was later tagged again by User:Sceptre with the reasoning, "album of a non-notable artist".--Kubigula (talk) 03:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Well that answer that question! I was also curious as to how it got deleted. I looked back at my contribs and I realised my edit summaries weren't there. Anyway, I don't think the DRV has the absolute final word. If you can find sources beyond a MySpace, it can probably be allowed an article again. Spellcast 01:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My (KWSN's) RFA
Thank you for commenting my recent (and successful!) RfA. It passed at at 55/17/6. I'll try to make some changes based on your comments. Kwsn (Ni!) 01:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
The November 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the December 2007 issue. Dr. Cash 01:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XX (October 2007)
|
- Project news
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Arrest and assassination of Ngô Đình Diệm
- BAE Systems
- Battle of Barrosa
- Prince Louis of Battenberg
- Second Ostend Raid
- Thomas C. Hindman
New A-Class articles:
- Alexandru Averescu
- Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081)
- Fort Jackson (Virginia)
- Richard Williams (RAAF officer)
- Tet Offensive
- Wallachian Revolution of 1848
|
- Current proposals and discussions
|
- Awards and honors
- JKBrooks85 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his diligent efforts to improve our coverage of fortifications in the American Civil War, and, in particular, his creation of a substantial number of A-Class articles.
- Tony the Marine has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his considerable efforts in raising Puerto Rican- and Hispanic-related military history articles to featured status.
|
|
What is Tag & Assess MMVII? We'd better explain. A month or so back, we ran a script to list all the articles in categories related to military history. This gave us about 165,000 articles. Some of these are already tagged and assessed as military history; some are military history but not yet tagged and assessed; some are not military history articles at all. This huge project — working thorough 165,000 articles — is called Tag & Assess 2007. To make it manageable, the list has been broken down into 330 ranges each of 500 articles. This is where you can help.
Just... adopt-a-range from the available worklists then keep track of your tally on participants' list. The tagging is easy, just follow the simple instructions. Afterwards, as our way of thanking you, you'll be presented with service awards and barnstars based on the number of articles you process. Remember... the ranges are broken down into sub-sections of ten articles, so you work through them at twenty or thirty articles a day if you wish. To make Tag & Assess 2007 a success, we need your help. Please sign up now. Thanks.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
Delivered by grafikbot 15:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rememberance Day
OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mysticstylez.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mysticstylez.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lordofterror.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lordofterror.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the offer
Hello, thanks for the offer to join WP:AVIATION. I'm a member of WP:AIR, so I'll join that too. Thanks! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 04:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Aviation
I'll think about whether to join WikiProject Aviation. NHRHS2010 talk 04:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support at my RfA, which I have withdrawn. The result is at (7/8/2). Have a great day. NHRHS2010 talk 04:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] LOTD proposal
You have nominated a recently successful WP:FL. There have been two recent proposals to begin a List of the Day feature on the main page, which have both received majorities but have not been approved as overwhelming support sufficient to change the main page. WP:LOTDP is a new proposal to try to get the ball rolling based on the original proposal. You can voice your thoughts on its talk page. Basically, what the proposal entails is attempting to run an official trial, and then vote after the trial run on whether to change the main page. Support to run a trial requires much less consensus than support to change the main page. Should we succeed at eventually getting such a feature on the main page it would tentatively look like this. Whether or not you support an experimental trial or not you should come discuss the matter at WP:LOTDP's talk page. I apologize if you have either already voiced your opinion on this matter or already tired of hearing about it.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 21:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
Click there to open your card! → → →
Dearest T-Rex,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 137 supports, 22 opposes, and 5 neutrals. Your support is very much appreciated and I look forward to proving you right. I would like to give special thanks to The_undertow and Phoenix-wiki for their co-nominations. Thank you again and best regards.
Lara❤Love 19:47, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Credits: This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor's RFA thanks which was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks.
[edit] Himalayan Red Bear/Brown Bear image
These two articles have the same image, Image:HimalayaBear.jpg. This is confusing, since they are (supposedly) different subspecies. It also confuses a fair use rationale, since it is not clear that the image contributes significantly to the article in which it is not the right variety. Which is pictured in the photograph, and why do both pages link to it? Actually, now I see you have never edited the Red Bear article, and those two have the same scientific name, which is a bit confusing. Do you know what is going on? Rigadoun (talk) 00:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 11:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Featured List of the Day Experiment
There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 01:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UndergroundVol1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:UndergroundVol1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Undergroundvol2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Undergroundvol2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:38, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Adoption
Can You please adopt me?
I've had a rough start to wikipedia, I just finished a block, but that was not because I was trying to be deliberately disruptive, but because i wanted to help and made a mistake
I am quite desperate,
Please adopt me
Thank-you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeseth1992 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXI (November 2007)
|
- Project news
- The military history style guide has been integrated into Wikipedia's Manual of Style.
- The contest department has completed its eight month of competition. The leader for this month, with a massive 92 points, is Blnguyen; Woodym555 is in second place, with 32 points, and Cla68 and TomStar81 are tied for third place, with 15 points each. Overall, Blnguyen is now in first place, with 140 points, followed by JKBrooks85, with 120 points, and by Woodym555, with 63 points. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries.
- The American Revolutionary War and Baltic states military history task forces have been created.
- Tag & Assess 2007—the project's first major article tagging and assessment drive—is continuing; all project members—and anyone else who's interested—are invited to assist with this effort.
- The number of articles tagged as being within our scope has now exceeded 50,000.
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Battle of Red Cliffs
- James II of England
- Lawrence Sullivan Ross
- Pre-dreadnought battleship
- Thomas C. Hindman
- USS Kentucky (BB-66)
New featured lists:
- List of Australian Victoria Cross recipients
- List of Canadian Victoria Cross recipients
New featured portals:
- Military of Greece
New A-Class articles:
- 2007 United States Air Force nuclear weapons incident
- Battle of the Gebora
- Battle of Vaslui
- Le Quang Tung
- Morotai Mutiny
- Phan Dinh Phung
- Truong Dinh
- USS Illinois (BB-65)
- Viet Nam Quoc Dan Dang
- Yen Bai mutiny
|
- Current proposals and discussions
|
- Awards and honors
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 03:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Valogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Valogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
The December 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the January 2008 issue. Dr. Cash 00:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Wessex Children
Dear Sir, you are cordially invited to join a discussion on this matter at WikiProject British Royalty. Yours in anticipation, † DBD 16:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Triple crown
Your Majesty, thank you for helping to build a better encyclopedia and happy holidays.
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Neighborhoods.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Neighborhoods.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 03:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter |
|
|
- Project News
- There are now 3,301 Good Articles listed at WP:GA. With 1,789 current featured articles, that brings the total of good and featured articles to 5,090!
- The most recently promoted articles are: Hurricane Daniel (2006), Tarbosaurus, The Murders in the Rue Morgue, Wicca, Seth MacFarlane, Stanley Internment Camp, Hurricane Karen (2007), Interstate 155 (Illinois), Tropical Storm Ingrid (2007), Brian Sings and Swings, Winston Churchill, Mzoli's, John Kefalas, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton.
- The backlog at Good Article Nominations has recently exploded to 236 unreviewed articles! Out of 264 total nominations, 17 are on hold, 10 are under review, and one is seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!
-
- The oldest unreviewed articles are: Attachment disorder, Byzantium under the Palaiologoi, Byzantium under the Angeloi, Wowowee, Tyrone Wheatley, Mina (singer), Jon Burge, Mercury Hayes, William Lowndes Yancey, and Toni Preckwinkle.
-
- The top five categories with the largest backlogs are: Sports and recreation (47 articles), Film and cinema (25 articles), Television and journalism (16 articles), Art and architecture (15 articles), and Politics and government (14 articles).
-
- The backlog at Good Article Reassessment currently stands at 17 articles up for re-review.
-
- If every participant of WikiProject Good Articles could review just one article in the next week, the backlog would be almost eliminated!
- Reviewer of the Month
Dihydrogen Monoxide is the GAN Reviewer of the Month of December, based on the assessments made by Epbr123 of the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Dihydrogen Monoxide hails from Brisbane (which, incidentally, is almost a GA, kids ;)) and has been editing Wikipedia since August 2006. He mostly likes to review articles relating to music, Australia, or anything else that takes his fancy! He also has two articles waiting, and notes that there's still a huge backlog,... so get cracking!
Other outstanding reviewers recognized during the month of December include:
- Member News
There are now 166 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 7 new members that joined during the month of December:
This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!
|
- GAReview Template
Lots of you that frequent WP:GAN have undoubtedly seen the articles under review, marked with "Review - I am reviewing this article. ...". The articles have been marked as being under review by an editor using the {{GAReview}} template. The purpose of this template is essentially to prevent two editors from reviewing the same article at the same time, so it's essentially a common courtesy notice to other editors so that they don't pass or fail an article while you're in the midst of collecting and writing comments. However, just because an article is marked, shouldn't preclude another editor from contributing to the review. If you'd like to review it, go ahead; simply collect your comments and write them down on the article's talk page – but don't pass or fail the article – leave that to the other reviewer.
To use this template yourself, simply write "#:{{GAReview}} ~~~~" on the line immediately following the article's nomination at WP:GAN. You can even leave additional comments as well (e.g. "#:{{GAReview}} I will finish my review in the next 24 hours. ~~~~"). Reviewers marking articles with this template should also observe some common etiquette; please don't mark more than 1-3 articles as being under review at a time, and please try and finish your review within 3-5 days of marking the article.
- GA Sweeps
After openly requesting the community for more participants into the Sweeps, we have 3 more members on the board. They are (in no particular order) Canadian Paul, VanTucky, and Masem. Canadian Paul will be sweeping "Middle East and the World" articles. VanTucky will be sweeping "Religion, mysticism, and mythology" and "Literature" articles. Masem will be sweeping "Television episodes". We're still looking for more reviewers. Interested individuals should contact OhanaUnited for details.
At this moment, participation in the sweeps project is by invitation only, as we desire experienced reviewers who have a thorough and extensive knowledge of the criteria. This is to ensure that articles that have "fallen through the cracks" would be found and removed, and that additional articles don't fall through the cracks during the sweep.
Currently, there are 16 members working on the project, and we have reviewed 74 articles in December 2007. Of those that are swept, 275 articles are kept as GA, 126 articles are delisted, and 5 promoted to FA.
- Did You Know,...
- ... that the total number of good and featured articles is now over 5000?
- ... that GA was formed on October 11, 2005 and was formerly called "Half-decent articles"?
- ... that there is a bot (StatisticianBot) that gives a daily report on GAN?
- ... that many discussions were made over the years on whether GA should have a symbol placed on the main article space, yet at the end always removed?
- ... that there was a proposal to change the GA symbol to a green featured star?
- From the Editors
Happy New Year, everyone! I'm just filling in for Dr. Cash as he's busy (or away) in real life. This explains why I wasn't prepared for a full-length article on GA process, and instead I resort to a tiny DYK for GA.
Happy New Year as well! I'm still here, and haven't totally disappeared. I had to cut back on editing and reviewing during the month of December as I made the transition from Flagstaff, Arizona to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. But I should be about settled in the Keystone State, so I'll be contributing more to Wikipedia again in the new year. Thanks to OhanaUnited for putting together much of the content for this newsletter! He's been working hard with the Sweeps, and the 'Did You Know' section is also a great idea, so I think that will become a regular feature now! I also figured out how to have a collapsible newsletter, so that will change our delivery options a bit. Cheers!
- Contributors to this Issue
|
|
Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005!
|
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXII (December 2007)
|
- Project news
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Battle of Albuera
- Battle of Dyrrhachium (1081)
- Battle of the Gebora
- Constantine II of Scotland
- Francis Harvey
- Vasa (ship)
- Wulfhere of Mercia
New A-Class articles:
- 1962 South Vietnamese Presidential Palace bombing
- Evacuation of East Prussia
|
- Current proposals and discussions
|
- Awards and honors
- Blnguyen has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his efforts in improving the quality of articles related to Vietnamese military history, including the creation of numerous A-Class articles.
- Woodym555 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding work on topics related to the Victoria Cross, notably including the creation of featured articles, featured lists, and a featured topic.
- For their outstanding efforts as part of Tag & Assess 2007, Bedford, TomStar81, and Parsival74 have been awarded the gold, silver, and bronze Wikis, respectively.
|
- Tag & Assess 2007
Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows:
- 1. Bedford — 7,600
- 2. TomStar81 — 5,500
- 3. Parsival74 — 5,200
- 4. FayssalF — 3,500
- 5. Roger Davies — 3,000
- 6. Ouro — 2600
- 7. Kateshortforbob — 2250
- 8. Cromdog — 2,200
- 9. BrokenSphere — 2000
- 9. Jacksinterweb — 2,000
- 9. Maralia — 2,000
- 12. MBK004 — 1,340
- 13. JKBrooks85 — 1,250
- 14. Sniperz11 — 1100
- 15. Burzmali — 1000
- 15. Cplakidas — 1000
- 15. Gimme danger — 1000
- 15. Raoulduke471000
- 15. TicketMan — 1000
- 15. Welsh — 1000
- 15. Blnguyen — 1000
Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes.
We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-particpants alike are very welcome and appreciated.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, we weren't able to suggest any articles for you. Something is probably wrong on our end.
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! TomStar81 (Talk) 02:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The February 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 05:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter |
|
|
- Project News
- There are now 3,485 Good Articles listed at WP:GA.
- The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 206 unreviewed articles. Out of 251 total nominations, 37 are on hold, 7 are under review, and 1 is seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!
-
- The oldest unreviewed articles are: Johan Derksen, Trafford, J. Michael Bailey, Greg Skrepenak, Paleolithic-style diet, Alan Dershowitz, Natalee Holloway, Slovenian presidential election, 2007, San Francisco Municipal Railway, and Marcela Agoncillo.
-
- The top five categories with the largest backlogs are: Sports and recreation (57 articles), Theatre film and drama (34 articles), Music (19 articles), Transport (17 articles), Politics and government (16 articles), World history (13 articles), and Meteorology and atmospheric sciences (13 articles).
-
- The backlog at Good Article Reassessment currently stands at 8 articles up for re-review.
-
- If every participant of WikiProject Good Articles could review just one article in the next week, the backlog would be almost eliminated!
- GA Sweeps Update
During January, 57 Good Articles were reviewed. Including those articles that were under GAR or on hold, 35 were kept as GA, 20 delisted, 9 currently on hold or at GAR, and 3 were exempted as they are now Featured Articles.
- Reviewer of the Month
Ealdgyth is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for January, based on the assessments made by Epbr123 on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Ealdgyth, known in real life as Victoria Short, hails from Central Illinois, and has been editing Wikipedia since May 26, 2007. In this short time, she has made significant contributions to 9 Good Articles, including Baldwin of Exeter and Hubert Walter. Her interests in editing are in the areas of the Middle Ages, History, and horses. Outside of Wikipedia, she is starting her own photography business, and owns three horses. She likes to read science fiction, history, and geneology books. Congratulations to our GAN Reviewer of the Month for January!
Other outstanding reviewers recognized during the month of January include:
- Member News
There are now 176 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 15 new members that joined during the month of January:
This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!
|
- On Hold versus Failing an Article
This month, I thought I'd focus on a less technical and more of a procedural issue at WP:GAN – determining what the appropriate course of action to take when reviewing an article. Currently, there are four options to decide what to do with an article:
- Passing – it meets all six of the good article criteria; add it to WP:GA and add {{ArticleHistory}} or {{GA}} to the article's talk page.
- Failing it – it does not meet the criteria; remove the article's listing from WP:GAN and add {{ArticleHistory}} or {{failedGA}} to the article's talk page.
- On Hold – The article meets most of the criteria, but might fall short in a few areas; keep it listed at WP:GAN, add #: {{GAOnHold|ArticleName}} ~~~~ below the listing and add {{GAonhold}} to the article's talk page.
- Second Opinion – Similar to the on hold option, except an editor is either inexperienced or not knowledgeable enough about a given topic and asks another reviewer to offer another opinion before passing or failing; add #: {{GA2ndopinion|ArticleName}} ~~~~ to WP:GAN below the article's listing and add {{GA2ndoptalk}} to the article's talk page.
So how to you know when an article fails outright, or fails initially, but meets "enough" of the criteria to be placed on hold? The answer to this question probably varies by about the same amount as there are reviewers of Good Articles! Everybody treats this slightly differently. The most important thing to consider is that articles should not be on hold for longer than about one week. Although there is no hard and fast time limit for this, most editors would probably agree that five to seven days is enough time to address any GA-related issues with the article to get it to pass. Some editors have extended this a few days in the past, due to other extenuating circumstances, such as an article's primary editor being very busy with school or work, so they have asked for extra time. But as a general rule, a GA nominee that is placed on hold should meet enough of the criteria to be able to be passed within five to seven days. Some examples of articles that might be placed on hold would be:
- the article is mostly complete, but might be missing one topic (subcategory).
- minor copyediting is required (needs a few minor manual of style, spelling, or grammatical fixes.
- mostly well sourced, but missing maybe a handful of references.
- a couple of images need to be tagged with appropriate copyright tags.
On the other hand, an article should be failed if it:
- is missing several topic categories, or there are several sections which are very short (1-3 sentences per section).
- contains numerous sections which are just lists of information, as opposed to written out as prose.
- there's entire sections of text that have no references, or there are a lot of {{cn}} or {{unreferenced}} tags.
- has evidence of an active edit war in the article history.
- has major neutrality issues.
- has any {{cleanup}} or other warning tags in various places.
- Did You Know...
- ... that on July 19, 2007, 1,548 good articles that have not been categorized at all were categorized in 15 days?
- ... that in Chinese Wikipedia, articles need to have at least six net support votes before they are promoted to GA?
- ... that the English Wikipedia has the most Good Articles, the German Wikipedia has the second most (at over 2000), followed by the Spanish Wikipedia (at over 800), the Chinese Wikipedia (at over 400), and the French Wikipedia (at over 200)?
- ... that Simple English Wikipedia has zero Good Articles?
- ... that "Sport and games people" category has the most Good Articles?
- ... that Virginia Tech massacre (which is now a featured article) was promoted to GA just only about one month after the shooting incident, but took more than seven months to reach FA status?
- From the Editors
Originally, I wasn't planning to do "Did you know" other than as a fill-in for Dr. Cash. However, I decided to continue writing this section until I ran out of ideas.
Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here.
- Contributors to this Issue
|
|
Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005!
|
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXIII (January 2008)
|
- Project news
- The project coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14!
- The contest department has completed its tenth month of competition, which saw an unprecedented 44 entries. The top scorer this month is Dreamafter, with 95 points, followed by Cla68, with 42 points, and Ed! and Woody, with 21 points each. Blnguyen remains the overall leader, with 182 points in total. All project members are encouraged to submit the articles they're working on as entries.
- A new auxiliary infobox, {{operational plan}}, is now available.
- A new page for military history essays has been created; project members are encouraged to post their own advice and opinions on matters within the project's purview.
- New guidelines concerning precision and ship pronouns have been added to the style guide.
- Featured picture candidates and picture peer reviews are now accessible through the project's review department.
- An effort to convert deprecated infoboxes has begun; any assistance is welcome!
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- 1994 Black Hawk shootdown incident
- Battle of Musa Qala
- George Jones (RAAF officer)
- Italian War of 1542–1546
- Jim Bowie
- Józef Piłsudski
- Matanikau Offensive
- Offa of Mercia
- Suleiman the Magnificent
- USS Illinois (BB-65)
New featured lists:
- List of Knight's Cross recipients
- Order of battle at the Glorious First of June
New A-Class articles:
- 1960 South Vietnamese coup attempt
- Cold War
- Hans-Joachim Marseille
- Krulak Mendenhall mission
|
- Current proposals and discussions
|
- Awards and honors
- Bwmoll3 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his superior contributions to a variety of articles about the United States Air Force, including a great number of those dealing with wings and installations.
- Bedford has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of the outstanding contribution he has made to the project's organization by going above and beyond the call of duty in tagging, assessing, and classifying a massive number of articles during the 2007 assessment drive.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:In the world.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:In the world.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] GA Sweeps update
This is a form message being sent out to all of the GA sweeps reviewers. Thank you for all of your dedicated work in the difficult and time-consuming task of ensuring the quality of articles within the GA project. Many reviewers have taken time out of reviewing articles at WP:GAN (this may be one factor in the expansion of the backlog), writing articles, and probably getting some sleep! I have sent this message out to update you on our current progress and to remind you to please keep up with completing your reviews and updating GARs/holds. As of March 1, 2008, we have swept 20% of the 2,808 GAs we started with. At our current progress, all of the articles will be assessed in just under three years (based on when we started). If we want to complete the sweeps sooner, we need to continue reviewing at a higher rate (consider doing one or two more reviews a week or whatever you feel comfortable with) and inviting new, experienced reviewers. If you are taking a break, focusing on GAN, writing your own GAs, or are already reviewing articles like crazy, I still want to thank you for all of your hard work and hope you are pleased about our current progress. Keep up the good work and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 05:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter |
|
|
- Project News
- There are currently 3,647 Good Articles listed at WP:GA.
- The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 185 unreviewed articles. Out of 237 total nominations, 42 are on hold, and 10 are under review. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!
-
- The oldest unreviewed articles are: Ian Browne (cyclist), Tony Marchant, Reginald fitz Jocelin, Annie Russell, Brodie Croyle, and Jimmy Moore.
-
- The top five categories with the largest backlogs are: Sports and recreation (39 articles), Theatre, film, and drama (34 articles), Transport (23 articles), Music (21 articles), Politics and government (18 articles), Culture and society (13 articles), Places (13 articles), and World history (12 articles).
-
- The backlog at Good Article Reassessment currently stands at 13 articles up for re-review.
-
- If every participant of WikiProject Good Articles could review just one article in the next week, the backlog would be almost eliminated!
- GA Sweeps Update
Two members joined the sweeps team this month. They are Jwanders and jackyd101. Jwanders swept Physics sub-category quickly and is now sweeping "Astronomy and astrophysics". Meanwhile, jackyd101 is sweeping "Armies, military units and legal issues".
During February, 66 Good Articles were reviewed. Including those articles that were under GAR or on hold, 33 were kept as GA, 21 delisted, 17 currently on hold or at GAR, and 1 was exempted as they are now Featured Articles.
- Reviewer of the Month
Blnguyen is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for February, based on the assessments made by Epbr123 on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Blnguyen is from South Australia and has been editing Wikipedia since 2005. He was also the reviewer for the month of December 2007, so this marks the second time that he has been GAN's Top Reviewer for the Month. Congratulations to our GAN Reviewer of the Month for February!
Other outstanding reviewers recognized during the month of January include:
- Member News
There are now 185 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 9 new members that joined during the month of February:
- Did You Know...
- ...that the shortest timespan for a GA to be listed and subsequently delisted is 8 minutes? (The article is Project Chanology and currently listed on WP:GAR)
- ...that the current nominations system started on March 10, 2006?
- ...that in May 2006, number of GA surpassed number of FA? This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!
|
- One GA Requirement - The Lead Section
In this issue, we will focus on one of the requirements for good articles: a good article article should follow Wikipedia's guideline on lead sections. So what does this guideline say, why does it say what it does, and how can good article reviewers help?
The lead section is particularly important, because for many readers, it is the only part of the article which they will read. For instance, they may have come to the article by following a wikilink in another article simply to obtain a quick overview before they continue reading the original article. They may only read the first paragraph, or even the first sentence. On the other hand, one of the joys of Wikipedia is the way that it embodies the endlessly branching tree of knowledge; if a lead is well written, it may encourage even such a reader to read on and learn something new.
This is reflected in the terminology: "lead" is a word taken from journalism, where it recognized that many readers will only read the beginning of a newspaper article, and so it is important to convey the key points first, before going into detail. Note that "lead", in this sense, is pronounced as in "leading question" and is sometimes spelled as "lede" by journalists to distinguish it from lead, the metal, which was once very important in typesetting. Wikipedia supports both spellings.
Wikipedia:Lead section is written with all this in mind, and describes two different roles for the lead: first, it should introduce the topic; second it should summarize the article. This is not always as easy as it seems; indeed, it is almost impossible to write a good lead if the article itself does not cover the topic well. It has a side benefit that an article which satisfies this guideline is probably also broad: if the lead is both a good introduction and a summary, then the article probably covers the main points.
The good article process is often the first place in which an article is judged against this criterion, yet many current good articles may not meet it. A common fault is that the lead is purely an introduction, while the rest of the article contains other information, which should be summarized in the lead, but isn't.
So, how can reviewers help to improve this? One approach is to read the rest of the article, and not the lead, first. Make a note of the significant points discussed in the article. There is usually at least one important issue in each section. Then, go back to the lead and ask the following questions:
- Does the first sentence of the lead define the topic, as described in the article?
- Is the most important information mentioned in the first paragraph?
- Is the lead a suitable length for the article? The lead guideline recommends 2–4 paragraphs depending on the article length, but judgment is more important than counting.
- Are each of the significant topics that you noted mentioned in the lead?
If the answer to each of these questions is "yes", then the article probably meets the guideline. If not, you may be able to fix it yourself by summarizing the article. If you can't, then it suggests that there are not only problems with the lead, but also the rest of the article. That is the beauty of Wikipedia:Lead section.
Finally, there isn't universal agreement on whether the lead should contain inline citations. As long as the material in the lead is developed and cited elsewhere in the article, then inline citation is not required. There are exceptions, the most significant being quotations and controversial material about living persons.
Good luck helping more articles meet this important criterion!
- From the Editors
Well, this is somewhat GA-related but at the same time not totally GA-related. However, I think this is important. Thanks to everyone who supported me at my 2nd RfA. It passed unanimously at 79 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral. As many are impressed by my work in Good Articles processes, I want to take this opportunity to thank everyone giving me a very enjoyable time at GA. There are 2 people that I want to explicitly say thank you to. They are Nehrams2020 and Epbr123. They patiently taught me how to do GA reviews properly in summer 2007. I couldn't achieve better without them. Now that I have the mop and the bucket, some of my time will be working on reducing Commons image backlog. Nevertheless, you will still see me once in a while in matters related to GA.
Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here.
- Contributors to this Issue
|
|
Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005!
|
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXIV (February 2008)
|
- Project news
- The fifth project coordinator election has now concluded. Roger Davies has been elected to serve as the project's Lead Coordinator, and Blnguyen, Eurocopter tigre, Kyriakos, LordAmeth, Nick Dowling, TomStar81, Wandalstouring, and Woody will occupy the eight Assistant Coordinator positions. Congratulations to the winners, and thank you to everyone who participated!
- In the simultaneous referendum on project organization, you voted almost unanimously for a primus inter pares structure. As a tangible reflection of this, Assistant Coordinators are now known as Coordinators.
- The contest department has completed its eleventh month of competition, which saw 10 entries. The top scorer this month is Dreamafter, with 28 points, followed by Smsarmad, with 13 points, with Blnguyen, Ed! and jwillbur also fielding entries. Blnguyen remains the overall leader, with 188 points in total. You are encouraged to submit articles you're working on as entries.
- The National militaries task force has been created.
- A new automatically-generated clean-up list is available to track articles that have various clean-up tags applied to them.
- A new logistics department has been created. The aim is to provide a pool of useful article creation skills that anyone can draw on. These include copy-editing, photograph retouching, and reference material sourcing. If you can contribute, please do so.
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- 2007 United States Air Force nuclear weapons incident
- Carlson's patrol
- Coenwulf of Mercia
- Glorious First of June
- Koli Point action
- Operation Camargue
New featured lists:
- List of Victoria Cross recipients by nationality
New A-Class articles:
- 51st Army (Soviet Union)
- Indonesian occupation of East Timor (1975-1999)
- Le Paradis massacre
- Military of East Timor
- USS Bridgeport (AD-10)
|
- Breaking news
- A new B-Class Assessment Drive ("BCAD") will go operational no later than 11 March. Of great interest to experienced wiki-gnomes, it is small in scope, about 4,500 articles, and will be supported by the usual awards, including a golden wiki. To keep up to date with developments, and to get off to a flying start when it opens, add WP:MHA-BCAD now to your watchlist.
|
- Awards and honors
- Kirill Lokshin has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding organizational work, his painstaking maintenance work, and his unstinting advice, throughout his two years of project leadership.
- MBK004 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding effort to improve our compliment of naval ships by updating infoboxes, replacing deprecated infoboxes, and locating sources for ships in the employment of their respective countries' navies.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Ice Hockey March 2008 Newsletter
WikiProject Ice Hockey Newsletter
Dear Dinosaur puppy! You are receiving as you are a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey There's been many more new things going on at WP:HOCKEY, and I think this will help you to stay informed. Since the last newsletter sent out in October, there have been many new changes. I'm hoping to make this newsletter a bit more regular; Kaiser matias and Skudrafan1 asked for a new issue a week ago, but sadly, I've been a bit lazy and committed to other things hence this other delay. --Maxim(talk)
By Maxim
There has been numerous new recognized content, so much that it's too time-consuming to sift through the "trophy cases" on WP:HOCKEY. Some interesting achievements:
By Maxim
There was a new taskforce created within the WikiProject to deal with topics related to the Boston Bruins. It was originally founded as a separate WikiProject, but was quickly turned into a taskforce within WikiProject Ice Hockey. The list of participants is located here. Located at WP:BRUINS, the taskforce's goals are to make Boston Bruins and Bobby Orr featured articles. Good luck!
By Maxim
Since October, there have been three new admins promoted within the project:
A previously admin-only feature has been made available for all users. The rollback feature allows a user to quickly revert vandalism with one click. If you wish to have rollback, contact an active admin or post a request to WP:RFR.
|
Note: You have received this because your name is on Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter/List. If you no longer wish to receive this message, remove your name. MonoBot (talk) 18:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The "Prince/ss X of Wales" Issue
Just thought I'd let you know that there's a discussion about the above at the WikiProject, and I'm inviting all of the members to join in † DBD 13:37, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXV (March 2008)
|
- Project news
- The Crusades task force has been created.
- The main project talk page is now automatically archived; MiszaBot II will archive any sections that have had no comments for 21 days.
- The contest department has completed its twelth month of competition, which saw 13 entries. The top scorer this month is Woody, with 22 points, followed by Dreamafter with 13 points, with Ed!, jwillbur, Redmarkviolinist and Borg Sphere also fielding entries. Blnguyen remains the overall leader, with 188 points in total. You are encouraged to submit articles you're working on as entries.
- A Sources section has been added to the Logistics department, for help tracing and locating JSTOR articles and other source material.
- A Linguistics section has been added to the Logistics department, for help with non-English language sources and translation of snippets. It supports 19 languages so far.
- An Administrators section has been added to the Logistics department, for help with admin related tasks. Administrators willing to help out are cordially asked to list their names in the section.
- Reminder: Editors are always needed to review various military history articles at all levels.
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Æthelred of Mercia
- Cannon
- HMAS Melbourne (R21)
- Huldrych Zwingli
- Timor Leste Defence Force
- USS Bridgeport (AD-10)
New featured lists:
- List of countries without armed forces
- List of foreign recipients of the Knight's Cross
- List of Medal of Honor recipients for the Battle of Iwo Jima
- List of Victoria Cross recipients of the Royal Navy
New featured topics:
- Atlantic campaign of May 1794
New A-Class articles:
- Armia Krajowa
- Heuschrecke 10
- USS Siboney (ID-2999)
- William Stacy
|
- Awards and honors
- Kirill Lokshin has been appointed coordinator emeritus to reflect his on-going involvement in the project. The appointment ends concurrently with the other coordinators' terms in September 2008.
- The following editors have been awarded the Content Review Medal for their work on reviews at various levels of military history articles: Carom, Cam, Blnguyen, Howard C. Berkowitz, Kevin Myers, Maralia, MrPrada, SoLando, and Wandalstouring. Similar awards were made last December to: Buckshot06, Cla68, Eurocopter tigre, Hawkeye7, Ian Rose, Jackyd101, JKBrooks85, Kyriakos, LordAmeth, Nick Dowling, Roger Davies, The Land, TomStar81 and Woody, most of whom are still active reviewers.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] April GA Newsletter
The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 03:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter |
|
|
- Project News
- There are currently 3,868 Good Articles listed at WP:GA.
- The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 195 unreviewed articles. Out of 267 total nominations, 57 are on hold, 13 are under review, and 2 are seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!
-
- The oldest unreviewed articles are: A4232 road, New York State Route 63, Great American Boycott, First Great Western, Duck Soup, Sanja Matsuri, Code of Conduct (affiliate marketing), Prospect Mountain Veterans Memorial Highway, Aliens (film), and Roanoke Regional Airport.
-
- The categories with the largest backlogs are: Theatre, film and drama (27 articles), Sports and recreation (25 articles), Transport (24 articles), Music (19 articles), War and military (19 articles), Politics and government (18 articles), Religion, mysticism and mythology (16 articles), Literature (14 articles), World history (14 articles), and Video and computer games (14 articles).
-
- The backlog at Good Article Reassessment currently stands at 12 articles up for re-review.
- GA Sweeps Update
The GA Sweeps process is progressing nicely! During the month of March, a total of 92 articles were reviewed. Of that total, 74 were found to continue to meet the GA criteria, and 18 were delisted. There are currently 14 articles that are still on hold in this process, awaiting revisions. Congratulations to Nehrams2020 (talk · contribs), who sweeped a whopping 51 articles during the month! Jackyd101 (talk · contribs) also deserves congrats for sweeping a total of 26 articles!
- Reviewer of the Month
Dihydrogen monoxide is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for March, based on the assessments made by Dr. Cash on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Dihydrogen monoxide hails from Brisbane in Queensland, Australia, and has been editing Wikipedia since April 6, 2007. He has contributed to 8 Featured articles and is an avid reviewer and contributor to the Good articles program. Other reviewers should check out his Noob's Guide to GA Reviewing. Congratulations to Dihydrogen monoxide!
Other outstanding reviewers during the month of March include:
- Member News
There are now 195 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 13 new members that joined during the month of March:
This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!
|
- To delist or not to delist, that is the question
So you’ve found an article that, on the face of it, does not merit its good article status. What next? Especially where there are many glaring issues that need addressing, it’s tempting to just revoke its GA status and remove it from the list, but although we are encouraged as editors to be bold, this approach (known to some as "bold delisting") is not recommended good practice. There are many reasons why a listed article might not meet the assessment criteria—it’s always possible that it never did, and was passed in error, but more likely the criteria have changed or the article quality has degraded since its original assessment. Either way, we should treat its reassessment with no less tact and patience than we would a fresh nomination.
This, in fact, provides a good starting point for the delisting process. Approach the article as though it has been nominated for GA review. Read it and the GA criteria carefully, and provide a full reassessment on the article talk page. Explain where and why the article no longer meets the criteria, and suggest remedies.
Having explained why the article no longer meets current GA criteria, allow its editors time to fix it! In keeping with the above approach, it may help to treat the article as on hold. There is no need to tag it as such, but give editors a reasonable deadline, and consider helping out with the repair work. Bear in mind that more flexibility may be required than for a normal hold—the editors did not request or expect your reassessment and will probably have other projects taking up their time. They may not have worked on the article for months or even years, and at worst the article may have been abandoned and its authors no longer active. As always, communication is the key. It sometimes helps to post messages to relevant WikiProjects (found at the top of the article talk page), or to contact editors directly (this tool is useful for identifying active editors for any given article).
Only once the above process has run its course, and sufficient improvement has not been forthcoming, is it time to think about delisting the article. Communicate your final decision on the article talk page, even if there was no response to your reassessment and hold, and take the time to fill in the various edit summaries on the article talk and GA list pages to ensure the delisting is transparent and trackable. If you have any doubts about your final decision, you can list the article at Good article reassessment or contact one of the GA mentors, who will be happy to advise.
Article reassessment is perhaps the single most controversial function of our WikiProject, and the one with the most potential to upset and alienate editors. Yet it is one of the most necessary too, since without the ability to revoke an article’s status we would be unable to maintain quality within the project. However, if we approach reassessment sensitively and with the goal of improving articles to the point where sanctions are unnecessary, we will ensure that delisting is the last resort, not the first.
- From the Editors
As we near the 4,000 Good Articles milestone, the project continues to grow and to gain respect in the Wikipedia community. Nevertheless, we continue to have a large backlog. If every member of WikiProject Good Articles would review just one article each day during the month of April, the backlog would be eliminated!
Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here.
- Contributors to this Issue
|
|
Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005!
|
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:15, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Is there anybody out there?
Hey... Since you've been inactive for over two months, I removed your entry from the Adopter's page. I do hope you come back, however, so I left your entry in a hidden comment within this message. I hope life is treating you well! xenocidic (talk) 01:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter |
|
|
- Project News
- There are currently 4,050 Good Articles listed at WP:GA.
- The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 195 unreviewed articles. Out of 227 total nominations, 16 are on hold, 14 are under review, and two are seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!
-
- The oldest unreviewed articles are: Fighting Tommy Riley, Brock Lesnar, Cluj-Napoca, Wolf's Rain, Brian Kendrick, and North and South (TV serial).
-
- The categories with the largest backlogs are: Theatre, film and drama (45), Sports and recreation (34), Music (18), Transport (15), World history (14), Politics and government (13), and Places (12).
-
- The backlog at Good Article Reassessment currently stands at 17 articles up for re-review.
- GAN Reviewer of the Month
Noble Story (talk · contribs) is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for April, based on the assessments made by Dr. Cash on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Noble Story joined Wikipedia on May 16, 2007. He is a big fan of the Houston Rockets, and edits many related articles, as well as articles on basketball in general. Congratulations to Noble Story (talk · contribs) on being April's GAN Reviewer of the Month!
Other outstanding reviewers during the month of April include:
- Member News
There are now 212 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 17 new members that joined during the month of April:
This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!
|
- GA Topic
Do you know what a GA topic is? If you are not nodding your head, or don't know what I'm talking about, then you should pay attention to this article.
There are ten GA top-level topics (but you will spot the eleventh as this article goes along). These topics are: Arts, Language and literature, Philosophy and religion, Everyday life, Social sciences and society, Geography and places, History, Engineering and technology, Mathematics, and Natural sciences. Each of these topics are further narrowed down to more specific topics. For example, Arts can be narrowed down to Art and architecture, Music, and Theatre, film and drama. But let's not get into sub-topics in this article because of its depth.
Now you will probably ask, "I already knew this, so what is your point?" What I want to illustrate is that some people often forget a step when they promote an article to GA. After they have posted their review in the article talk page, added the article name to the corresponding topic in the good article page, increased the GA count by 1, and added the {{GA}} to article talk page, many reviewers tend to forget to add the topic parameter in {{GA}} or {{ArticleHistory}}. You can browse the topic parameter abbreviations at on this page as well as what each top-level GA topic means, because sometimes it can be chaotic and confusing to pick a topic. For example, should On the Origin of Species be placed under the Natural Science topic (because it's related to evolution), or under the Language and Literature topic (because it is a book)? The correct answer is to place it under Language and literature topic, because its categorization as a proper title supercedes other categories.
Let's go back to the page that shows GA topics; does anyone spot the eleventh topic? Yes, Category:Uncategorized good articles is the 11th topic, only it shouldn't be there. Articles that do not have a topic parameter in either {{GA}} or {{ArticleHistory}} will be placed in this category. The topic "Uncategorized" is not very informative, is it? So if you have time, you can consider cleaning up the articles that are left in this category and move them to the appropriate category by adding a topic parameter.
That's it for this month, I hope you learned a little from it.
- GA Sweeps Update
The GA Sweeps process is progressing nicely! During the month of April, a total of 26 articles were reviewed. Of that total, 15 were found to continue to meet the GA criteria, and two were delisted. There are currently six articles that are still on hold in this process, awaiting revisions. One article was exempted from review because it was promoted to FA. Two articles were exempted from review because they were already delisted by another member in the community.
We are once again recruiting new sweeps participants. Candidates should be very strong and comfortable in reviewing GA and familiar with the GA processes and criteria. If you are interested, please contact OhanaUnited for details.
- Did You Know...
- ...that there are slightly less than twice as many Good Articles as Featured Articles?
- ...that the total number of Good Articles and Featured Articles combined is 6,085?
- ...that different languages have different symbols representing GA? (Alemannic uses
, Bavarian uses , Czech and French use , Estonian, Icelandic, and Swedish use , Esperanto and German use , Polish, Spanish, and Turkish use , Portuguese uses , Russian uses , Ukrainian uses )
Note: Lithuanian and Serbian have their own symbol but only uploaded locally. Other languages not listed above either have the same symbol as english or they don't have GA process.
- From the Editors
There is currently a debate on adding a small green dot to the top right corner of all Good Articles that pass the criteria, similar to the small bronze star that is added to the top right corner of Featured Articles. Members of WikiProject Good Articles are encouraged to participate in the debate on this page.
Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here.
- Contributors to this Issue
- Dr. Cash (Lead Editor, Distributor)
- OhanaUnited (Article, GA Sweeps and Did You Know correspondent)
|
|
Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005!
|
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXVI (April 2008)
|
- Project news
- Tag & Assess 2008 launched on 24 April and will run until 4 July. We have around 60,000 articles to check, so all assistance is very welcome. As usual, there are barnstars galore and service awards for contributing editors.
- The project scope has been amended to include specific reference to historically accurate video games. Songs and music with long military associations are also now included.
- The Contest department has completed its thirteenth month of competition, which saw 27 entries. The top scorer this month is Ed! with 37 points, followed by Cam with 22 points. Woody, Howard C. Berkowitz, Redmarkviolinist, Nousernamesleft and Outdawg also fielded entries. Blnguyen remains the overall leader, with 188 points in total. You are encouraged to submit articles you're working on as entries.
- The coordinators have "adopted" task forces to act as prime point of contact. A list of which coordinators have adopted which task forces is here.
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- 1960 South Vietnamese coup attempt
- 1962 South Vietnamese Independence Palace bombing
- Lazare Ponticelli
- Maximian
- Peterloo Massacre
- The Third of May 1808
- USS Orizaba (ID-1536)
- USS Siboney (ID-2999)
New featured lists:
- List of Irish Victoria Cross recipients
- Order of battle at the Battle of Tory Island
New featured portals:
- Portal:American Civil War
New A-Class articles:
- 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team (United States)
- Battle of Bonchurch
- Battle of Tassafaronga
- Early thermal weapons
- HMS Cardiff (D108)
- USS Comfort (AH-3)
- USS Orizaba (ID-1536)
|
- Current proposals and discussions
- An interesting proposal to set up teams to deal with specific tasks, like taking the Top Ten most frequently read military history articles to featured articles status is here.
- The coordinators are exploring ways of developing and improving our fifty or so task forces. More information is here.
- All editors are invited to contribute to a discussion about the naming of military operations in an endeavor to reach consensus.
|
- Awards and honors
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lordofterror.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lordofterror.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXVII (May 2008)
|
- Project news
- Editors needed for Tag & Assess 2008. To coincide with the summer holidays, it will be gearing up from 15 June. As usual, barnstars galore!
- Partner peer reviews: for a thirty-day trial period, we'll be running joint peer reviews with Wikiproject Video Games. The idea is simple: we help with their reviews; they help with ours. This way both wikiprojects benefit from new reviewers and new ideas!
- We're notable: A new book, Simon Fowler's 2007 Guide to Military History on the Internet (UK:Pen & Sword, ISBN 9781844156061) rates Wikipedia as "the best general resource" for military research (p. 7). Of the military pages, he says: "The results are largely accurate and generally free of bias" (he also suggests people join the wikiproject). When rating WP as the No. 1 military site (p. 201) he says "Wikipedia is often criticised for its inaccuracy and bias, but in my experience the military history articles are spot on."
- A-Class reviews: the usual four-day review period may now be extended by up to three days (ie seven days in total) in the following circumstances:
- the article has no opposes but has insufficient support for promotion or
- the article's nominator requests more time to resolve matters arising during the review.
- The full text is here.
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Battle of Tassafaronga
- Funerary Monument to Sir John Hawkwood
- HMS Cardiff (D108)
- Krulak Mendenhall mission
- Le Quang Tung
- Operation Passage to Freedom
- Paul Nobuo Tatsuguchi
New featured lists:
- List of Texan survivors of the Battle of the Alamo
- List of Victoria Cross recipients of the Royal Navy
- List of Victoria Cross recipients of the Indian Army
New A-Class articles:
- Battle of the Kalka River
- Battle of Verrières Ridge
- Brian Horrocks
- Byzantine navy
- Erich Hartmann
- Montana class battleship
|
- Current proposals and discussions
- A discussion has been opened into the structuring of top level operational categories, starting with Category:World War II. All interested editors are invited to help establish a consensus.
|
- Awards and honors
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Good articles newsletter
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter |
|
|
- Project News
- There are currently 4,266 Good Articles listed at WP:GA.
- The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 157 unreviewed articles. Out of 215 total nominations, 44 are on hold, 13 are under review, and one is seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!
-
- The oldest unreviewed articles are: Choctaw, One Night Stand (2007), Justin Tuck, Tristan Tzara, The Stake Out (Seinfeld episode), Impalement arts, Backlash (2007), Adelaide Rams, and Sam Cowan.
-
- The categories with the largest backlogs are: Theatre, film and drama (31), Sports and recreation (31), Transport (24), Music (13), and Art and architecture (11)
-
- The backlog at Good Article Reassessment currently stands at 4 articles up for re-review.
- GA Sweeps Update
The GA Sweeps process is progressing nicely! During the month of May, a total of 82 articles were reviewed. Of that total, 71 were found to continue to meet the GA criteria, and 11 were delisted. There are currently 15 articles that are still on hold in this process, awaiting revisions.
We are once again recruiting new sweeps participants. Candidates should be very strong and comfortable in reviewing GA and familiar with the GA processes and criteria. If you are interested, please contact OhanaUnited for details.
- GAN Reviewer of the Month
Giggy (talk · contribs) (a.k.a. Dihydrogen Monoxide (talk · contribs)) is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for May, based on the assessments made by Dr. Cash on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Giggy had a whopping 45 reviews during the month of May! Congratulations to Giggy (talk · contribs) on being May's GAN Reviewer of the Month!
Other outstanding reviewers during the month of May include:
Also, with 19 nominations, Mitchazenia (talk · contribs) is the nominator of the month, followed by TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) with 8 nominations submitted.
- Member News
There are now 216 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 6 new members that joined during the month of April:
This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!
|
- New GA Review Process - Review Subpages
In case you haven't noticed, we initiated a new process for GA Reviews at the end of last month. The {{GA nominee}} template was modified to direct new reviews initiated on an article to begin on a subpage of article talkspace (e.g. [[Talk:Article/GA#]], where '#' is the current number of GA reviews conducted for the article, incremented automatically, starting with 1). The primary reason for this change is to address some concerns made by several Wikipedians that previous GA reviews are not easily accessible in archives, the way that featured article reviews and peer reviews are, since the review is conducted on the article's talkspace, instead of in a subpage of the featured article space or peer review space. The reason we opted to move GA reviews to article talkspace (instead of GA space) is to better maintain the personal relationship between editor(s) and reviewer(s) by keeping reviews done in an area where editors can easily access it. Nonetheless, we still desired to have better archiving and maintenance of past reviews, so that GA ultimately becomes more accountable.
When an article is nominated, the nominator adds the template using a substitution, by adding {{subst:GAN|subtopic=<name of subtopic for article at GAN>}}, as well as lists the article (as usual) at WP:GAN in the appropriate category.
When a reviewer initiates a review of an article, all that needs to be done is to read the template on the article's {{GA nominee}} template on its talk page, and click on the link to start the review. When the reviewer clicks on that link, they will also see some instructions on how to start a review of a GAN. For new reviewers, there's also a link to the Good Article criteria, as well as to the Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles page and the mentors list. Once an article is reviewed, the GA review page should be transcluded onto the main article talk page, by adding {{Talk:Article/GA#}} to the bottom of the talk page. This is to ensure maintain the transparency of the GA process, as well as to make editors of the article in question aware that the review is taking place. When an article is either passed or failed, there's really nothing different to do in the process, although reviewers are encouraged to utilize the {{ArticleHistory}} template, linking to the GA review subpage with the 'action#link' parameter.
- Did You Know...
- ... that there are slightly more than twice as many Good Articles (4,266) as there are Featured Articles?
- ... that Giggy has some really neat and useful tools to assist reviewers in conducting their reviews?
- ... that there are ten experienced reviewers listed on the GA mentors list that can offer assistance or a second opinion in reviewing articles?
- From the Editors
A GA working party has initiated discussion on ways to improve the Good Article project and processes. The goal of the working party is to come up with suggestions for improvement based on recent issues and concerns raised in the past, primarily in the wake of the Great Green Dot Debate of May 2008. The discussion can be found here. Members of the working party include: Dank55 (talk · contribs), Derek.cashman (talk · contribs), EyeSerene (talk · contribs), Giggy (talk · contribs), Gwinva (talk · contribs), LaraLove (talk · contribs), Nehrams2020 (talk · contribs), and OhanaUnited (talk · contribs).
Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here.
- Contributors to this Issue
|
|
Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005!
|
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 01:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Good articles newsletter
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter |
|
|
- Project News
- There are currently 4,266 Good Articles listed at WP:GA.
- The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 157 unreviewed articles. Out of 215 total nominations, 44 are on hold, 13 are under review, and one is seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!
-
- The oldest unreviewed articles are: Choctaw, One Night Stand (2007), Justin Tuck, Tristan Tzara, The Stake Out (Seinfeld episode), Impalement arts, Backlash (2007), Adelaide Rams, and Sam Cowan.
-
- The categories with the largest backlogs are: Theatre, film and drama (31), Sports and recreation (31), Transport (24), Music (13), and Art and architecture (11)
-
- The backlog at Good Article Reassessment currently stands at 4 articles up for re-review.
- GA Sweeps Update
The GA Sweeps process is progressing nicely! During the month of May, a total of 82 articles were reviewed. Of that total, 71 were found to continue to meet the GA criteria, and 11 were delisted. There are currently 15 articles that are still on hold in this process, awaiting revisions.
We are once again recruiting new sweeps participants. Candidates should be very strong and comfortable in reviewing GA and familiar with the GA processes and criteria. If you are interested, please contact OhanaUnited for details.
- GAN Reviewer of the Month
Giggy (talk · contribs) (a.k.a. Dihydrogen Monoxide (talk · contribs)) is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for May, based on the assessments made by Dr. Cash on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Giggy had a whopping 45 reviews during the month of May! Congratulations to Giggy (talk · contribs) on being May's GAN Reviewer of the Month!
Other outstanding reviewers during the month of May include:
Also, with 19 nominations, Mitchazenia (talk · contribs) is the nominator of the month, followed by TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) with 8 nominations submitted.
- Member News
There are now 216 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 6 new members that joined during the month of April:
This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!
|
- New GA Review Process - Review Subpages
In case you haven't noticed, we initiated a new process for GA Reviews at the end of last month. The {{GA nominee}} template was modified to direct new reviews initiated on an article to begin on a subpage of article talkspace (e.g. [[Talk:Article/GA#]], where '#' is the current number of GA reviews conducted for the article, incremented automatically, starting with 1). The primary reason for this change is to address some concerns made by several Wikipedians that previous GA reviews are not easily accessible in archives, the way that featured article reviews and peer reviews are, since the review is conducted on the article's talkspace, instead of in a subpage of the featured article space or peer review space. The reason we opted to move GA reviews to article talkspace (instead of GA space) is to better maintain the personal relationship between editor(s) and reviewer(s) by keeping reviews done in an area where editors can easily access it. Nonetheless, we still desired to have better archiving and maintenance of past reviews, so that GA ultimately becomes more accountable.
When an article is nominated, the nominator adds the template using a substitution, by adding {{subst:GAN|subtopic=<name of subtopic for article at GAN>}}, as well as lists the article (as usual) at WP:GAN in the appropriate category.
When a reviewer initiates a review of an article, all that needs to be done is to read the template on the article's {{GA nominee}} template on its talk page, and click on the link to start the review. When the reviewer clicks on that link, they will also see some instructions on how to start a review of a GAN. For new reviewers, there's also a link to the Good Article criteria, as well as to the Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles page and the mentors list. Once an article is reviewed, the GA review page should be transcluded onto the main article talk page, by adding {{Talk:Article/GA#}} to the bottom of the talk page. This is to ensure maintain the transparency of the GA process, as well as to make editors of the article in question aware that the review is taking place. When an article is either passed or failed, there's really nothing different to do in the process, although reviewers are encouraged to utilize the {{ArticleHistory}} template, linking to the GA review subpage with the 'action#link' parameter.
- Did You Know...
- ... that there are slightly more than twice as many Good Articles (4,266) as there are Featured Articles?
- ... that Giggy has some really neat and useful tools to assist reviewers in conducting their reviews?
- ... that there are ten experienced reviewers listed on the GA mentors list that can offer assistance or a second opinion in reviewing articles?
- From the Editors
A GA working party has initiated discussion on ways to improve the Good Article project and processes. The goal of the working party is to come up with suggestions for improvement based on recent issues and concerns raised in the past, primarily in the wake of the Great Green Dot Debate of May 2008. The discussion can be found here. Members of the working party include: Dank55 (talk · contribs), Derek.cashman (talk · contribs), EyeSerene (talk · contribs), Giggy (talk · contribs), Gwinva (talk · contribs), LaraLove (talk · contribs), Nehrams2020 (talk · contribs), and OhanaUnited (talk · contribs).
Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here.
- Contributors to this Issue
|
|
Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005!
|
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 01:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXVIII (June 2008)
|
- Project news
- With the holiday season upon us, we're very short of reviewers at A-Class Reviews and are likely to remain so for the next month or so. If just five new reviewers each reviewed one article a week, the problem would be solved! To keep track of Milhist articles for peer and A-Class reviews, simply paste the code –
{{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} – onto your talk page.
- Similarly, copy-editors are currently in short supply. If you can help out at the Copy-editing section of the Logistics Dept, it would be much appreciated. If you can help with A-Class Reviews and Featured Article Candidates so much the better! To keep up to date with Milhist articles needing copy input, just paste –
{{WPMILHIST Copy-editing alerts}} onto your talk page.
- The debate on whether Milhist should adopt the new C-Class has been closed, with a strong and clear consensus against adopting. The archived discussion is here.
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Battle of Lissa (1811)
- Battle of Verrières Ridge
- Benjamin Franklin Tilley
- Brian Horrocks
- Lince (tank)
- Montana class battleship
- Saint-Sylvestre coup d’état
- Verdeja (tank)
- Viet Nam Quoc Dan Dang
New featured lists:
- List of Crimean War Victoria Cross recipients
- List of German World War II jet aces (promoted in May)
New A-Class articles:
- Battle of Mount Austen, the Galloping Horse, and the Sea Horse
- Battle of Strasbourg
- Operation Brevity
- Operation Tractable
- Operation Varsity
- Roman-Persian Wars
- SS Kroonland
|
- Current proposals and discussions
- The Milhist review structure is itself being reviewed. The idea is to see how it can be improved, or whether it needs changing or updating.
- The month-long trial of partner peer reviews with Video games is being discussed. All feedback welcome!
|
- Awards and honors
- Congratulations to Buckshot06, who has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his consistently excellent edits and his continued commitment and tireless efforts towards improving the quality of articles pertaining to military history.
- Congratulations to Piotrus, who has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding contributions to Polish military history, including the creation of numerous Featured Articles, A-Class articles, and Good Articles on the subject.
- Reviewers: Many thanks go to Kirill, TomStar81, Eurocopter tigre, Nick Dowling, Ryan4314, Woody, Wandalstouring, Jon Catalán, Kyriakos, Maralia and Oberiko for their work on A-Class Reviews and Peer Reviews, during the quarter March-May 2008. They have all been awarded the Content Review Medals.
- The Contest department has completed its fifteenth month of competition, which saw 15 entries. The top scorer this month is JonCatalan with 32 points, followed by Cam with 20 points. Ed!, David Underdown, CyclonicWhirlwind, and Blnguyen also fielded entries. Blnguyen remains the overall leader, with 193 points in total. The Chevrons go to JonCatalan and Cam gets the Writer's Barnstar. The May 2008 winners, Cam and Redmarkviolinist have been belatedly awarded the Chevrons and Writer's Barnstar for coming first and second respectively. You are encouraged to submit any articles you are working on as entries.
- Tag & Assess '08 has now closed, with approximately 10,000 articles successfully tagged. Many thanks to all those who participated. The top three scorers were Jim Sweeney (Gold Wiki), Dashiellx (Silver Wiki) and Ejosse1 (Bronze Wiki).
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:31, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXIX (July 2008)
|
- Project news
- The criteria for Military history A-Class reviews have been overhauled. The new standard is deliberately set higher than before, and is much closer to featured article quality. The new criteria are:
-
- A1. The article is consistently referenced with an appropriate citation style, and all claims are verifiable against reputable sources, accurately represent the relevant body of published knowledge, and are supported with specific evidence and external citations as appropriate.
- A2. The article is comprehensive, factually accurate, neutral and focused on the main topic; it neglects no major facts or details, presents views fairly and without bias, and does not go into unnecessary detail.
- A3. The article has an appropriate structure of hierarchical headings, including a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections, and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents.
- A4. The article is written in concise and articulate English; its prose is clear, is in line with style guidelines, and does not require substantial copy-editing to be fully MoS-compliant.
- A5. The article contains supporting visual materials, such as images or diagrams with succinct captions, and other media, where appropriate.
- The timescale for A-Class articles has also been changed to give more editors an opportunity to participate.
- The six-monthly Coordinators' election has been moved back a month to avoid clashes with the holiday period. The sign-up period will run from 1–15 September and the elections themselves from 16–30 September.
- The military land vehicles task force has been created.
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Battle of Concepción
- Battle of Mount Austen, the Galloping Horse, and the Sea Horse
- Battle of Tory Island
- Early life and military career of John McCain
- Grass Fight
- Leopard 2E
- Operation Varsity
- Roman–Persian Wars
- Uriel Sebree
- USS Princess Matoika (ID-2290)
New featured portals:
- Portal:World War II
New A-Class articles:
- 11th Airborne Division (United States)
- 2007–2008 Ethiopian crackdown in Ogaden
- 2008 invasion of Anjouan
- Auxiliaries (Roman military)
- Citadel of Saigon
- HMS Ark Royal (91)
|
- Current proposals and discussions
|
- Awards and honors
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter
Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 20:30, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
| The The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter |
|
|
- Project News
- There are currently 4,675 Good Articles listed at WP:GA.
- The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 141 unreviewed articles. Out of 186 total nominations, 28 are on hold, 14 are under review, and 3 are seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance!
-
- The oldest unreviewed articles are: Juggernaut (wrestler), Dark Angel (wrestler), Irrigation in Peru, Tropical cyclone rainfall forecasting, Coltrane for Lovers, Bayshore Freeway, Jon Cryer, Heather Mills, New York State Route 273, and Tsugaru clan.
-
- The categories with the largest backlogs are: Theatre, film, and drama (28 articles), Sports and recreation (27 articles), Music (22 articles), Transport (18 articles), and War and military (13 articles).
-
- There are currently 4 articles up for re-review at Good Article Reassessment. Congratulations! There really is no "backlog" here! :-)
- GA Sweeps is Recruiting Reviewers
We are once again recruiting new sweeps participants. Candidates should be very strong and comfortable in reviewing GA and familiar with the GA processes and criteria. If you are interested, please contact OhanaUnited for details.
- GAN Reviewer of the Month
ThinkBlue (talk · contribs) is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for July, based on the assessments made by Dr. Cash on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. ThinkBlue had a whopping 49 reviews during the month of July! ThinkBlue was also one of our two reviewers of the month from June, and has been editing Wikipedia since December 1, 2006, and is interested in articles dealing with Friends, Will and Grace, CSI:Miami, Monday Night Raw, Coldplay.
Congratulations to Giggy (talk · contribs) on being May's GAN Reviewer of the Month!
Other outstanding reviewers during the month of July include:
Also, with 17 nominations, Mr.crabby (talk · contribs) is the nominator of the month.
- Member News
There are now 223 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 7 new members that joined during the month of July:
This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!
|
- GA Sweeps Process
The GA Sweeps process has recently reached its first year anniversary. If you are unaware of what GA Sweeps is, it is a process put in place to help ensure the integrity of the ever-growing number of GAs, by determining if the articles still meet the GA criteria. Experienced reviewers check each article, improving articles as they review them, and delisting those that no longer meet the criteria. Reviewers work on a specific category of GAs, and there are still many categories that need to be swept. In order to properly keep track of reviews, a set date was used to determine what articles needed to be reviewed (since any future GAs would be passed according to the most recent GA criteria).
The number of GAs that were to be reviewed totals 2,808. Since the beginning of Sweeps, the progress has reviewed 981 by the end of July 2008 (or exempted them). For a table and chart breakdown of the current progress, see here.
With more than twenty editors reviewing the articles, progress is currently a third of the way done. At this rate, it will take another two years to complete the Sweeps, and active involvement is imperative to completing on time. We are always looking for new reviewers, and if you are interested in helping in speeding up the Sweeps process and improving your reviewing skills, please contact OhanaUnited.
- Did You Know...
- ... that the goal of GA Sweeps is to reviewed all articles listed before 26 August 2007?
- ... that the entire category of, "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" has been swept?
- ... that of all subcategories, "Recordings, compositions and performances" in the Music category has the most articles (240 articles in total)?
- ... that the GA project was recently mentioned in a Wall Street Journal article entitled, "Wikipedians Leave Cyberspace, Meet in Egypt," on Wikipedia on August 8, 2008?
- From the Editor
Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here.
- Contributors to this Issue
|
|
Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005!
|
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
[edit] Excessive use of "the District of Columbia WikiProject" template with former/current Washington D.C. athletes
Greetings sir,
I've recently started a talk discussion on the Wikipedia:WikiProject_District_of_Columbia page regarding excessive use of the D.C. WikiProject template. I've noticed that the template was used on the talk pages of nearly all past and present basketball players who played with the Washington Bullets/Wizards. Many of the players have only played just a handful of seasons and lack a noteworthy contribution to the history of the team. Of course if the players were either born, raised or lived in the D.C. Metro area it would be appropriate, however this is rarely the case. I feel this excessively broadens the scope of the D.C. WikiProject beyond its appropriate coverage and I therefore have been removing the template from many of the players.
Feel free to share your thoughts/opinions on the D.C. WikiProject page. I'd eventually like to only keep the template for players that have a significant contribution to the history of the Bullets/Wizards. Thank you for your contributions on Wikipedia and am looking forward to hearing back from you. Cheers! --Djrun (talk) 03:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXX (August 2008)
|
- Project news
- The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is underway, to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 14 September! Voting starts at 00:01 (UTC) on 15 September and runs until 23:59 (UTC) on 30 September.
- A new barnstar specifically encouraging and recognizing excellence in Milhist article creation and development has been introduced. Any editor who has made a significant contribution to three or more Milhist A-Class articles promoted since 1 August 2008 under the new A-Class criteria is eligible. Nominations for the medal should be made here; should list the three A-Class articles for which the medal is sought; and must be subsequently supported by three or more project coordinators, who will be responsible for making the award. Editors may nominate themselves or any other qualifying editor.
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Domitian
- HMS Ark Royal (91)
- John McCain
- Operation Ke
- Panzer I
- Warwick Castle
New featured lists:
- List of Korean War Medal of Honor recipients
- List of USAF Test Pilot School alumni
New A-Class articles:
- Harry Murray
- Horses in warfare
- Kaunas Fortress
- Kiev Expedition (1018)
- Napoleon I of France
- Operation Ke
- Panzer IV
- SS Dakotan
- SS Pennsylvanian
- TAM (tank)
- United States Naval Gunfire Support Debate
- USS Mercy (AH-4)
|
- Current proposals and discussions
- A new discussion about whether Milhist should adopt C-Class is underway. All comments are welcome.
- The 2008 Tag & Assess Workshop is still open, seeking input on ways to improve the efficiency, user-friendliness and organization of future Milhist drives. All comment is welcome, especially from people who didn't participate in the drive!
|
- Awards and honors
- Durova has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of her exemplary work on military history featured pictures, sounds, and articles.
- JonCatalán has been awarded the new Milhist A-Class medal for his work on three newly-promoted tank-related articles: Panzer I, TAM and AMX-30E.
- The new Milhist A-Class medal also goes to Bellhalla for his three ship-related articles: USS Mercy (AH-4), SS Pennsylvanian and SS Dakotan.
- The Contest department has completed its seventeenth month of competition, which saw an unprecedented 54 entries. The top scorer this month is Bellhalla with a record 120 points, followed by JonCatalan with 56 points. Abraham, B.S., Cam, Ed!, Woody, David Underdown, Gaia Octavia Agrippa and Kyriakos also fielded entries. Blnguyen remains the overall leader, with 226 points in total. The Chevrons go to Bellhalla and JonCatalan gets the Writer's Barnstar. You are encouraged to submit any articles you are working on as entries.
- Thanks go to Abraham, B.S., Bedford, Benedict of Constantinople, Borg Sphere, Canglesea, Climie.ca, Dashiellx, Ejosse1, El Greco, Fusionmix, Geoff Plourde, Jim Sweeney, Judgesurreal777, MBK004, Mifter, Parsecboy, Red4tribe, Rosiestep, Suyogaerospace, and TomStar81 for their help with the 2008 Tag & Assess Workshop.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:19, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:23, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXXI (September 2008)
|
- Project news
- The sixth project coordinator election has now concluded. The following editors have been elected to serve as project coordinators until 31 March 2009: Bedford, Cam, Eurocopter, JonCatalán, MBK004, Nick Dowling, Roger Davies (lead), TomStar81, and Woody. Kirill Lokshin has been appointed coordinator emeritus for as long he wants the position. Congratulations to those elected, and thanks to everyone who participated!
- Following a successful RfA, Buckshot06 has been promoted to administrator. We wish him every success in his new role!
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- AMX-30E
- Battle of Goliad
- Guadalcanal Campaign
- Harry Murray
- Morotai Mutiny
- Phan Xich Long
New featured lists:
- List of Indian Mutiny Victoria Cross recipients
- List of Zulu War Victoria Cross recipients
New featured topics:
- Guadalcanal Campaign
New A-Class articles:
- 2nd Canadian Infantry Division
- Air Combat Group RAAF
- Battle of Berlin
- Blair Anderson Wark
- Late Roman army
- Operation Lüttich
- SMS Von der Tann
- SS Minnesotan
- SS Montanan
- SS Ohioan (1914)
- SS Panaman
- SS Washingtonian
- USS Iowa (BB-61)
- USS West Bridge (ID-2888)
|
- Current proposals and discussions
- The W1.0 Editorial Team have selected 1133 Military history articles for inclusion in the W0.7 test release. For convenience, these are broken by task force and you'll find a list on each task force headed "Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for [task force name]" on the task force talk page. You may nominate extra articles for inclusion or existing ones for removal. If you can improve any of the articles on the list, by adding references, or copy-editing, or cleaning up generally, please do so.
- A new discussion has started about naming articles on Soviet WWII operations. All contributions are welcome as we hope to resolve this longstanding issue once and for all.
- The debate over whether Milhist should adopt C-Class is continuing. All comments and suggestions are welcome.
|
- Awards and honors
- Bellhalla has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his exemplary work on military history articles and DYK entries.
- For their work improving articles through the Military history review process, Borg Sphere, Cla68, Eurocopter, Nick Dowling, TomStar81, Woody, JonCatalán, Brad and Cam, have been awarded the Content Review Medal.
- The Contest department has completed its eighteenth month of competition, which saw 45 entries. The top scorer this month is Bellhalla with a record 151 points, followed by Abraham, B.S. with 27 points. Woody, Cam, YellowMonkey, Piotrus, David Underdown, Borg Sphere, Tartarus, Ed!, and Out also fielded entries. Bellhalla is now the overall leader, with 300 points in total. The Chevrons go to Bellhalla and Abraham, B.S. gets the Writer's Barnstar. You are encouraged to submit any articles you are working on as entries.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Time for resolution
Hiya. For several months now, the article naming for 18th Century British royals has been ever-which-where — all over the shop. In an attempt to solve this, I have prepared a page for discussion: here. Please, please, please come and discuss, even contribute to the Poll. Cheers! DBD 15:30, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXXII (October 2008)
|
- Project news
- Following a lengthy discussion, three new coordinators – EyeSerene, Maralia and the_ed17 - have been coopted. The purpose of the appointments is partly to fill the place left by the retirement of TomStar81 and partly to provide increased/improved coordinator capacity to cover existing coordinator absences and to help with upcoming major projects. As a reminder, coordinators are merely editors who have committed to go the extra mile for the project and that there are very few processes that require coordinator input. Specifically these are closing A-Class reviews, and endorsing two project award nominations. Any editors who wish to help with the nitty-gritty of this busy project (cross-posting A-Class review, peer review and featured article candidate alerts; responding to member questions and queries, helping with drives) are positively encouraged to do so.
- A workshop has been set up to redesign and improve the newsletter. In our recent competition, a new name was chosen – The Bugle. All editors are welcome to participate, especially those with graphic and design skills!
- Administrator and Milhist coordinator, Nick Dowling, has changed his user name to Nick-D.
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Albert Speer
- Anglo-Zanzibar War
- Operation Epsom
- Operation Tractable
- SMS Von der Tann
- TAM
- USS Nevada (BB-36)
New featured lists:
- List of Knight's Cross recipients of the U-boat service
- List of New Zealand Land Wars Victoria Cross recipients
- List of Second Afghan War Victoria Cross recipients
New A-Class articles:
- Admiralty Islands campaign
- Battle of Fort Donelson
- Battle of Fort Henry
- Battle of Vigo Bay
- Clarence Smith Jeffries
- Frederick III, German Emperor
- Gilbert du Motier, marquis de Lafayette
- MS West Honaker
- Percy Herbert Cherry
- Joseph Maxwell
- SS Iowan
- Third Battle of Kharkov
- USS Constitution
|
- Current proposals and discussions
- Adoption of C-class remains firmly on the Milhist agenda with discussions approaching their fourth month of debate. More views are sought on this.
|
- Awards and honors
- Kyriakos has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his long and distingushed service as a Coordinator of the Military history WikiProject from February 2007 to September 2008.
- LordAmeth has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his long and distingushed service as a Coordinator of the Military history WikiProject from August 2006 to September 2008.
- EyeSerene has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his diligent and excellent copyediting of vast quantities of Military History articles—notably his work on multiple Featured Article Candidates.
- TomStar81 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of both his long and distinguished service as a coordinator of this project from August 2007 to October 2008, and of his exemplary contributions to articles on the vessels of the U.S. Navy.
- Bellhalla has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal twice for his six ship-related articles: SS Montanan, SS Ohioan (1914), SS Panaman, MS West Honaker, SS Iowan, and USS West Bridge (ID-2888).
- Abraham, B.S. has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for his three biographies on Australian First World War Victoria Cross recipients: Percy Herbert Cherry, Blair Anderson Wark, and Joseph Maxwell.
- The Contest department has completed its nineteenth month of competition, which saw 35 entries. The top scorer this month is the_ed17 with 39 points, followed by Bellhalla with 38 points. David Underdown, Abraham, B.S., Woody, Piotrus, Rosiestep, Tartarus, Gaia Octavia Agrippa and Harland1 also fielded entries. Bellhalla is now the overall leader, with 338 points in total. The Chevrons go to the_ed17 and Bellhalla gets the Writer's Barnstar. You are encouraged to submit any articles you are working on as entries.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:11, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: The Bugle
Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
|
- Project news
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Battle of Lipantitlán
- Battle of Khafji
- Richard Williams (RAAF officer)
- Tom Crean
- Third Battle of Kharkov
- SS Mauna Loa
- SS Montanan
- SS Ohioan (1914)
- USS Constitution
New featured lists:
- List of Knight's Cross recipients of the Schnellboot service
New A-Class articles:
- 13th Airborne Division (United States)
- Alaska class battlecruiser
- Edmund Herring
- Revolt of the Comuneros
- Rheinmetall 120 mm gun
- SS Black Osprey
- Stanley Goble
- Tanks in the Spanish Army
|
- Current proposals and discussions
- Adoption of C-class remains firmly on the Milhist agenda with discussions approaching their fifth month of debate. More views are sought on this.
- What is a Pyrrhic victory? There's an interesting and lively discussion on this here. (And the short answer is: follow what the sources say.)
- Can you design logos? We're looking for a snappy new logo to go with the new title of the newsletter. See the ideas so far at the newsletter workshop.
|
- Awards and honors
- The Contest department has completed its twentieth month of competition, which saw a record 78 entries. The top scorer this month is Bellhalla with 143 points, followed by Catalan with 42 points. Georgejdorner, Ian Rose, Abraham, B.S., the_ed17, Skinny87, Rosiestep, ERcheck, David Underdown and Gaia Octavia Agrippa also fielded entries. Bellhalla remains the overall leader with 481 points in total. The Chevrons go to Bellhalla and Catalan gets the Writer's Barnstar. You are encouraged to submit any articles you are working on as entries.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Ted Ruth
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ted Ruth, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Article fails WP:N, WP:ATHLETE, and WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. – Nurmsook! talk... 08:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Ted Ruth
An article that you have been involved in editing, Ted Ruth, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Ruth. Thank you. – Nurmsook! talk... 19:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Culpeper Star Exponent (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 19:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of List of international ice hockey competitions featuring NHL players
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of international ice hockey competitions featuring NHL players, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Low quality, biased (NHL focus instead of professional players), almost all sections suggested to be merged with their main articles, information available elsewhere
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Lejman (talk) 16:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: The Bugle
Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
|
- Project news
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- 13th Airborne Division (United States)
- 2nd Canadian Infantry Division
- Action of 13 January 1797
- Akutan Zero
- AMX-30
- Arena Active Protection System
- Blair Anderson Wark
- British Empire
- Frederick III, German Emperor
- Phan Dinh Phung
- Rheinmetall 120 mm gun
- SS Dakotan
- SS Washingtonian
- Tanks in the Spanish Army
New featured lists:
- Timeline of the Adriatic campaign, 1807–1814
New featured topics:
- Spanish Tanks
New A-Class articles:
- Battle of Salamis
- Bruce Kingsbury
- Four Freedoms (Norman Rockwell)
- George Ingram
- Jagdgeschwader 1 (World War II)
- John Whittle
- Lexington class battlecruiser
- Maryland and Virginia Rifle Regiment
- SM U-5 (Austria-Hungary)
- Tetrarch (tank)
- USS Iowa turret explosion
- Zanzibar Revolution
|
- Current proposals and discussions
- Design competition Editors with design skills urgently needed to design an eyecatching logo for this newsletter. The logo needs to incorporate a bugle motif as well as the newsletter's title, "The Bugle". Fame and honour (a barnstar) guaranteed for the successful design. Submit entries here please.
- Who will be the three "2008 Military historians of the Year"? There are 13 candidates so far and the number is rising rapidly. The winning editors will receive the Gold, Silver and Bronze Wikis; and all other nominees the WikiProject barnstar. To nominate editors you admire, or to cast your votes, please visit here!
- A new drive has been started to identify the core topics of World War I with the aim of improving their quality before the centenary of the start of World War I in 2014.
- A discussion is underway regarding flag icons and whether to rewrite the current guidelines to reflect the Manual of Style.
|
- Awards and honors
- Bellhalla has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for three ship-related articles: SS Black Osprey, SS Mauna Loa, and SM U-5 (Austria-Hungary).
- JonCatalán has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Battle of Khafji, Rheinmetall 120 mm gun, and AMX-30.
- The Contest department has completed its twenty first month of competition, which saw 58 entries. The top scorer this month is Bellhalla with 113 points followed by Abraham, B.S. with 32 points. Ed!, Chamal_N, JonCatalan, Skinny87, Rosiestep, the_ed17, David Underdown, Maralia and Terrakyte also fielded entries. Bellhalla remains the overall leader with 594 points in total. The Chevrons go to Bellhalla and Abraham, B.S. gets the Writer's Barnstar. You are encouraged to submit any articles you are working on as entries.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
|
|
- Project news
- Don't forget the six-monthly Coordinator elections will take place in March for the April-September term. If you want to become more involved in the project, now's the time to start thinking about it!
- Upon the improvement of World War I and Alexander the Great to Featured Article, Lead Coordinator Roger Davies has pledged to donate US$250 per article to the Wikimedia Foundation. This pledge is listed at the bounty board and will expire on 31 December 2009. The two articles are both listed at the Special Projects Department as the second and ninth most frequently-read MILHIST articles.
- Following extensive discussion, the structure of the A-Class Medal System has been changed to include three new medals: The A-Class Medal with Oak Leaves, the A-Class Medal with Oakleaves and Swords, and the A-Class Medal with Oakleaves, Swords, and Diamonds, each of which is respectfully awarded after 5, 10, and 20 groups of three A-Class Articles.
- The number of our A-Class articles grew by more than 25% during this month, compared to the total number of A-Class articles existent at the end of December.
- Following a successful RfA, Cam has been promoted to administrator.
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Alaska class cruiser
- Bruce Kingsbury
- Fred Moosally
- Isaac Shelby
- Maryland and Virginia Rifle Regiment
- Operation Brevity
- Operation Uranus
- SS Minnesotan
- Stanley Goble
- Tetrarch (tank)
- USS Iowa (BB-61)
- USS Iowa turret explosion
- Woodes Rogers
New featured lists:
- List of Second Boer War Victoria Cross recipients
New featured topics:
- Adriatic campaign of 1807-1814
New A-Class articles:
- Battle of Aachen
- Battle of Grand Port
- Battle of Kaiapit
- Bob Chappuis
- Dreadnought
- Elmer Gedeon
- George Alan Vasey
- George Julian Howell
- Heinrich Bär
- James Newland
- John S. McCain, Jr.
- Landing at Saidor
- List of tanks in the Spanish Civil War
- M249 squad automatic weapon
- Military history of Australia during World War II
- Neil Hamilton Fairley
- North Yemen Civil War
- Operation Cobra
- Operation Winter Storm
- Operation Totalize
- Percy Statton
- Port Chicago disaster
- SM U-14 (Austria-Hungary)
- SS Timothy Bloodworth
- Tom Derrick
- U-1 class submarine (Austria-Hungary)
- U-3 class submarine (Austria-Hungary)
- William Bostock
- Willie Gillis
- Yamato class battleship
|
- Current proposals and discussions
- A drive is underway to identify the core topics of World War I with the aim of improving their quality before the centenary of the start of World War I in 2014.
- A Survey is currently underway to determine how MilHist's processes, logistics, and management can be improved.
|
- Awards and honors
- "Military historian of the Year": the winners of the gold, silver and bronze wikis are: in first place, JonCatalán; in second place, Cla68; and in joint third place, TomStar81 and Skinny87. The runners-up in alphabetical, who each receive the WikiProject Barnstar, are: Abraham, B.S., Bellhalla, Dreamafter, Durova, Ian Rose, Nick-D, Saberwyn, Woody, YellowMonkey and Ynhockey.
- For their work improving articles through the Military history review process during the fourth quarter of 2008, Joe N, JonCatalán, Skinny87, The_ed17, YellowMonkey, Abraham, B.S., Cam, Woody, Roger Davies, Redmarkviolinist, Jim Sweeney, and Nick-D, have been awarded the Content Review Medal.
- Abraham, B.S. has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his many valuable contributions to the project as an active reviewer, a thoughtful contributor to military history discussions, a fine content contributor, and a gentleman.
- Bellhalla has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal with Oakleaves for three ship articles: SS Washingtonian, SS Minnesotan and SS Timothy Bloodworth. He is the first editor to receive the Oakleaves.
- Abraham, B.S. has also been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal twice for Clarence Smith Jeffries, George Ingram, John Whittle, Harry Murray, James Newland and George Julian Howell.
- Cam has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for 2nd Canadian Infantry Division, Operation Lüttich, and Yamato class battleship.
- JonCatalán has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal twice for Panzer IV, Third Battle of Kharkov, Tanks in the Spanish Army, Arena Active Protection System, Operation Winter Storm and List of tanks in the Spanish Civil War.
- Cla68 has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Operation Ke, Guadalcanal Campaign and USS Iowa turret explosion.
- Eurocopter has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Operation Epsom, Operation Cobra and Battle of Berlin.
- Hawkeye7 has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal twice for Neil Hamilton Fairley, Edmund Herring, Admiralty Islands campaign, Battle of Kaiapit, Landing at Saidor and George Alan Vasey.
- The_ed17 has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for USS Nevada (BB-36), Alaska class cruiser and Lexington class battlecruiser.
- TonyTheTiger has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Four Freedoms (Norman Rockwell), Bob Chappuis and Elmer Gedeon.
- The Contest department has completed its twenty second month of competition, which saw 62 entries. The top scorer this month is Bellhalla with 93 points followed by Abraham, B.S. with 52 points. Cam, Georgejdorner and 11 other editors also fielded entries. Bellhalla remains the overall leader with 687 points in total. The Chevrons go to Bellhalla and Abraham, B.S. gets the Writer's Barnstar. You are encouraged to submit any articles you are working on as entries.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
|
|
- From the Coordinators
- This month has been interesting for MILHIST, as we reorganized a few departments. The Outreach Department has been replaced by the tabs at the top of our totally redesigned project page; thanks to Kirill for the design and Bellhalla for the logo. We also created the Academy, a hub for practical advice about creating, editing, and reviewing quality content. All project members are cordially invited to fill in some of the red links, and new ideas are always welcome.
- As you can see on the right, our A-class and featured content is growing quite rapidly; these numbers have now gone up by 45 for the second straight month! Great work! In addition, thanks go out to those who recently helped in reducing the A-class nominations backlog. Reviewers are still needed; if you feel up to it, please stop by and leave comments on an article—every review helps!
- Lastly, the contest results for the month: Bellhalla took the cake again with 77 points and gets the Chevrons, while Ian Rose gets the Writer's Barnstar for his 60 points. Other participants included Bryce (49 points), Cam (25), David Underdown (11), Kirk (5), Parsecboy (20), Piotrus (?), Rosiestep (3), the_ed17 (27), Wild Wolf (6), and YellowMonkey (35). 51 total articles were improved as part of this.
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Dreadnought
- Edmund Herring
- John Whittle
- Murray Maxwell
- SS Kroonland
- United States Military Academy
- USS Connecticut (BB-18)
- William Bostock
New featured lists:
- List of Australian George Cross recipients
- List of Knight's Cross recipients of the Kriegsmarine
New featured pictures:
- 1917 surrender of Jerusalem
- WWI Canadian war bond poster (french)
- WWI Canadian war bond poster (english)
- Lexington class battlecruiser
- Battle of Ticonderoga attack plan, 1759
- Military College of Chapultepec, c. 1847
- Machine gun corps, Tell el Sheria Gaza line, 1917
- First Battle of Manassas map
- Aftermath of Wounded Knee, January 1891
- Ottoman camel corps at Beersheba, WWI
- Japanese archer with targets, 1878
New featured topics:
- Iowa class battleships
New A-Class articles:
- Battle of Sio
- Battles of the Kinarot Valley
- Capture of Fort Ticonderoga
- Clare Stevenson
- Edgar Towner
- Falaise pocket
- Frank Hubert McNamara
- Japanese battleship Musashi
- Japanese battleship Yamato
- Joe Hewitt (RAAF officer)
- Keith Miller
- Lee-Enfield
- Military career of Keith Miller
- Operation Mole Cricket 19
- Powder Alarm
- SMS Moltke (1910)
- SM U-66
- SM U-68
- Sydney Rowell
- U-5 class submarine (Austria-Hungary)
- U-20 class submarine
- USS Texas (BB-35)
- Walter Nowotny
|
- Project news
- On 22 February, four military history articles—all of them on battleships—appeared on the Main Page: USS Connecticut (BB-18) was the day's featured article, Japanese battleship Haruna and Brazilian battleship Minas Gerais appeared as part of the DYK section, and French battleship Danton (1909) was one of the in the news items.
- Six articles in our scope appeared on the main page this month: Woodes Rogers (1 February), Action of 13 January 1797 (6 February), 300 (film) (13 February), Theramenes (17 February), Third Battle of Kharkov (19 February), and USS Connecticut (BB-18) (22 February).
- The main project page has been redesigned.
- Article alerts are now available both for the entire project (on the status page) and for each task force (on the task force page).
- The Military history coordinator elections, to appoint coordinators for the period April–October 2009, take place this month. If you are thinking of standing as a candidate, the schedule is as follows:
- Nomination period: 00:01 Sat 7 March - 23:59 Fri 13 March
- Voting period: 00:01 Sat 14 March - 23:59 Sat 29 March
|
- Awards and honors
- Ian Rose has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his outstanding contributions to Australian military history articles (including four Featured Articles, an A-Class article, and four Good Articles), his highly civil and collaborative editing, and his willingness to provide advice and assistance to other editors.
- MisterBee1966 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his contributions to seven featured lists on German military awards during the Second World War, and for contributing to four good articles and being instrumental in promoting three of them to A-Class status.
- Raul654 has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his contributions to six current Military History Featured Articles, his flexibility in managing the "Today's featured article" list to accommodate relevant main-page appearances, and his generosity in providing many images for our visual library.
- The Land has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his significant contributions to the area of maritime warfare, as he has authored six of the seven articles in the "history of the battleship" series, with four of them now being featured.
- Bellhalla has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal with Oak Leaves twice for six ship articles: U-1 class submarine (Austria-Hungary), U-3 class submarine (Austria-Hungary), SM U-14 (Austria-Hungary), U-5 class submarine (Austria-Hungary), U-20 class submarine, and SM U-68.
- Abraham, B.S. has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Percy Statton, Tom Derrick and List of Australian George Cross recipients.
- Cam has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Operation Totalize, Japanese battleship Yamato and Japanese battleship Musashi.
- Ian Rose has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Stanley Goble, William Bostock and Frank Hubert McNamara.
- Nudve has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for North Yemen Civil War, Battles of the Kinarot Valley, and Operation Mole Cricket 19.
- TomStar81 has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for United States Naval Gunfire Support debate, USS Iowa (BB-61) and USS Texas (BB-35).
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
|
|
- From the coordinators
The big news of course was the seventh project coordinator election covering the period ending 30 September. The quality of the candidates was extremely high, with some of the project's top content builders running alongside highly experienced backroom people. Of the eighteen candidates, sixteen were finally appointed, giving us probably the most rounded coordination team so far.
Those elected were: Abraham, B.S., Bellhalla, Cam, Eurocopter, EyeSerene, Ian Rose, Jackyd101, Joe N, Lordoliver, Maralia, MBK004, Nick-D, Roger Davies (lead), Skinny87, The ed17 and TomStar81. Kirill Lokshin continues in his role as coordinator emeritus. Thanks must go to the departing coordinators – Bedford, JonCatalán and Woody – for helping make the project what it is today
The C-class referendum, held at the same time, produced a slight majority of votes for introduction, but was insufficient to demonstrate a clear consensus. So, for the time being at least, therefore, the project will continue without C-class. Otherwise, focus is likely be on the Academy and the development of courses to develop reviewing, copy-editing and article-building skills. Some review of our task forces is also probable, perhaps consolidating some of the smaller, quieter, ones. As ever, input from everyone is not only welcomed but positively encouraged.
The coordinators' gratitude goes not only to those who participated in the election and referenda but also to everyone who works quietly and conscientiously away to make participation in this project rewarding, successful and productive. Milhist is very fortunate in its membership! Thank you all, Roger Davies talk 16:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Byzantine navy
- Falaise Pocket
- Frank Hubert McNamara
- Heinrich Bär
- Juan Davis Bradburn
- Operation Cobra
- Port Chicago disaster
- SM U-66
- SMS Moltke (1910)
- Surrender of Japan
- Tom Derrick
- William Henry Harrison
New featured lists:
- List of United States Naval Academy alumni
- List of United States Naval Academy alumni (astronauts)
- List of United States Naval Academy alumni (Chiefs of Naval Operations)
- List of United States Naval Academy alumni (legislators)
New featured pictures:
- USS Texas (1892)
New A-Class articles:
- 1964 Brinks Hotel bombing
- Ba Cut
- Battle of Artemisium
- Battle of Fort Washington
- Battle of Morotai
- Battle of Tippecanoe
- Battle of Vimy Ridge
- Battle of Wau
- Design 1047 battlecruiser
- Fountain of Time
- Frank Horton Berryman
- Gia Long
- Henry Wells (general)
- Hill 262
- Hue chemical attacks
- Japanese battleship Haruna
- Jon Burge
- Nassau class battleship
- Operation Freshman
- SM UB-43
- SM UB-45
- Stanley Savige
- Xa Loi Pagoda raids
|
- Project news
- With 12 entrants working on 63 articles, March was another good month for our article improvement contest, entering in April its third year of operation. The coveted Chevrons go to Bellhalla for his outstanding 127 points, with YellowMonkey bagging the Writer's Barnstar for his highly commendable 65 points. Lordoliver came third with a very respectable 57 points. Our thanks go to our other stalwart article builders: Abraham, B.S. (34), Parsecboy (31), Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus (17), Cam (15), Ian Rose (12), David Underdown (12), the ed17 (10), Backslash Forwardslash (6), and Wild Wolf (1).
- Three articles in the project's scope appeared on the Main Page as today's featured article this month: Lazare Ponticelli (12 March), 1960 South Vietnamese coup attempt (17 March) and Operation Varsity (24 March).
|
- Awards and honors
- Bellhalla has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal with Oak Leaves for three ship articles: SM U-66, SM UB-45, and SM UB-43.
- Hawkeye7 has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Battle of Sio, Sydney Rowell, and Battle of Wau.
- Parsecboy has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for SMS Von der Tann, SMS Moltke (1910) and Nassau class battleship.
- Skinny87 has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for 13th Airborne Division (United States), Tetrarch (tank), and Operation Freshman.
- TonyTheTiger has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Willie Gillis, Jon Burge, and Fountain of Time.
- YellowMonkey has been awarded two Milhist A-Class medals this month; the first for Military career of Keith Miller, Keith Miller, and 1964 Brinks Hotel bombing; the second for Hue chemical attacks, Ba Cut and Xa Loi Pagoda raids.
- The following editors received the WikiProject Barnstar for their help coordinating the project during the past six months: Bedford, Cam, Eurocopter, EyeSerene, JonCatalán, Kirill Lokshin, Maralia, MBK004, Nick-D, Roger Davies, the_ed17 and Woody.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
|
|
- From the coordinators
Once again, this month, we have a bumper crop of featured and A-class content, and our heartfelt thanks go to editors who have worked so hard to write these. But with our growth in quality content comes increased demand for reviewers. Which is where you can help.
Reviewing is easy and rewarding. You don't need any prior experience and you don't need to write a full review. Any input is helpful so you initially can just comment on what you're comfortable with. Most reviewers start off by focusing one or two things – say, the historical context, or the text, or the references, or the layout, or the images – and as they gain experience, they broaden the scope of the review. You can easily keep up to date with which articles need review, by copying this text – {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} – to your userpage or talkpage. Thanks in anticipation, Roger Davies
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- 1964 Brinks Hotel bombing
- Battle of Tippecanoe
- Capture of Fort Ticonderoga
- Design 1047 battlecruiser
- Hue chemical attacks
- M249 squad automatic weapon
- Nassau class battleship
- Raymond Brownell
- Take Ichi convoy
- Zanzibar Revolution
New featured lists:
- List of United States Air Force Academy alumni
- List of United States Military Academy alumni (astronauts)
- List of United States Military Academy alumni (non-graduates)
- List of United States Naval Academy alumni (Medal of Honor)
New featured topics:
- Lists of United States Naval Academy alumni
New featured pictures:
- Richmond after the American Civil War
- Charles P. Stone
- Idi Amin caricature
- Joan of Arc WWI lithograph
- M777 Light Towed Howitzer
- Robert McGee, scalped as a child by Sioux Chief Little Turtle
New A-Class articles:
- Adrian Cole (RAAF officer)
- Amagi class battlecruiser
- Arthur Henry Cobby
- Battle of Barnet
- Battle of Ticonderoga (1759)
- Brazilian battleship Minas Geraes
- First Battle of Târgu Frumos
- Fort Ticonderoga
- Hastings Ismay, 1st Baron Ismay
- John Northcott
- Keith Johnson (cricket administrator)
- Landing at Nadzab
- Landing on Emirau
- Moltke class battlecruiser
- Moro River Campaign
- Operation Charnwood
- Operation Deny Flight
- Otto Becher
- Polish culture during World War II
- Roman–Parthian War of 58–63
- Samuel Burston
- SMS Seydlitz
- SM UB-10
- Ton That Dinh
- Wolfgang Lüth
|
- Project news
- Our top Peer and A-Class reviewers over the last quarter are Joe N (55), The_ed17 (49), Cla68 (38), TomStar81 (37), Nick-D (34), Abraham, B.S., Wandalstouring, YellowMonkey, Cam, Ian Rose and Woody: who each receive the WikiChevrons. The following editors received the Content Review Medal of Merit for their help: Catalan, Skinny87, Bellhalla, Jim Sweeney, Jackyd101, Patar knight, Hawkeye7, EyeSerene, Harlsbottom, MBK004, The Land, Piotrus, Binksternet, GraemeLeggett, IceUnshattered, Lazulilasher and Parsecboy. Thanks also go to: Eurocopter, Hlj, Lawrencema, MisterBee1966, Nudve, Patton123, Tpbradbury, AdjustShift, Amore Mio, AshLin, Bachcell, Buckshot06, Ceedjee, Cool3, Dapi89, EnigmaMcmxc, Fnlayson, Giordaano, John Smith's, Kevin Myers, Kyriakos, LinguistAtLarge, Maralia, Mjroots, Nigel Ish, NuclearWarfare, Perseus71, Piotr Mikołajski, Randomran, Redmarkviolinist, Saberwyn, Stepshep, Shimgray, Sniperz11, Tartarus and Una Smith.
- The Contest department has completed its twenty-fifth month of competition, with 78 articles entered. The top scorer this month is Bellhalla with 103 points followed by Sturmvogel 66 with 95 points. They receive the Chevrons and the Writer's Barnstar respectively. Cool3 commendably came third with 33 points, with honorable mentions going to Abraham, B.S. (32); Ian Rose (26); the_ed17 (25); YellowMonkey (25); Cam (20); Parsecboy (20); Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus (17); and David Underdown (12). Thanks also go to Wild Wolf, Belissarius, Kirk, and Lordoliver, who also fielded entries.
|
- Awards and honors
- JonCatalán has been awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his distinguished service as a coordinator of this project, his thorough article reviews, and his exemplary contributions to 14 featured articles, one featured topic, and many A-Class and good articles.
- Abraham, B.S. has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal with Oakleaves for Edgar Towner, Henry Wells (general) and Raymond Brownell.
- Hawkeye7 has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal with Oakleaves for Landing at Nadzab, John Northcott and Landing on Emirau.
- Cam has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Japanese battleship Haruna, Moro River Campaign and Operation Charnwood.
- Eurocopter has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Falaise pocket, Hill 262 and First Battle of Târgu Frumos.
- Hawkeye7 has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Frank Horton Berryman, Stanley Savige and Samuel Burston.
- Ian Rose has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Clare Stevenson, Joe Hewitt (RAAF officer) and Adrian Cole (RAAF officer).
- Magicpiano has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Capture of Fort Ticonderoga, Powder Alarm and Fort Ticonderoga.
- MisterBee1966 has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Heinrich Bär, Walter Nowotny and Wolfgang Lüth.
- Nick-D has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Military history of Australia during World War II, Battle of Morotai and Australian light destroyer project.
- Parsecboy as been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Moltke class battlecruiser, Amagi class battlecruiser and SMS Seydlitz.
- The_ed17 has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Design 1047 battlecruiser, Amagi class battlecruiser and Brazilian battleship Minas Geraes.
- YellowMonkey has been awarded the Milhist A-Class medal for Gia Long, Keith Johnson (cricket administrator) and Ton That Dinh.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] GA Sweeps update
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am contacting you because you have contributed or expressed interest in the GA sweeps process. Last month, only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process with 163 articles reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.
All exempt articles that have reached FA status have now been moved to a separate section at the end of the running total page. I went through all of the members' running totals and updated the results to reflect the move. As a result your reviewed article total may have decreased a bit. After removing duplicate articles and these FAs, the running total leaves us at ~1,400 out of 2,808 articles reviewed.
If you currently have any articles on hold or at GAR, please consider concluding those reviews and updating your results. I'm hoping that this new list and increased efforts can help us to increase the number of reviews. We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you know of anybody that can assist please direct them to the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, will get an award when they reach that mark. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] GA Sweeps June update
Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 396 articles were swept in May! That more than doubles our most successful month of 163 swept articles in September 2007 (and the 2 articles swept in April)! I plan to be sending out updates at the beginning of each month detailing any changes, updates, or other news until Sweeps are completed. So if you get sick of me, keep reviewing articles so we can be done (and then maybe you'll just occasionally bump into me). We are currently over 60% done with Sweeps, with just over a 1,000 articles left to review. With over 40 members, that averages out to about 24 articles per person. If each member reviews an article a day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. I know that may be asking for a lot, but it would allow us to complete Sweeps and allow you to spend more time writing GAs, reviewing GANs, or focusing on other GARs (or whatever else it is you do to improve Wikipedia) as well as finish ahead of the two-year mark coming up in August. I recognize that this can be a difficult process at times and appreciate your tenacity in spending time in ensuring the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 17:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
|
|
- From the coordinators
- With end of year exams beckoning for many members, this has been a quiet month on the talk pages for Milhist. (If you are facing exams yourself, we all wish you the very best of luck!) During this quieter period, some of our most active reviewers are busy revising so it would be really appreciated if you can help with peer reviews or A-Class reviews. You can easily track articles needing review, by copying {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your userpage.
- This month sees our first newsletter editorial. The idea is to provide regular tips and hints to help editors get up to speed with our large (and sometimes complicated) project. This month's piece, by EyeSerene, explains the workings of the project's main template, which is at the core of the project's tagging and assessing activities. Roger Davies talk 20:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- 1968 Thule Air Base B-52 crash
- Arthur Henry Cobby
- Battle of Barnet
- Fort Ticonderoga
- Fountain of Time
- Neil Hamilton Fairley
- Operation Perch
- SMS Seydlitz
- SS Pennsylvanian
New featured lists:
- List of United States Military Academy alumni (Medal of Honor)
- List of United States Military Academy alumni (Superintendents)
New featured topics:
New featured pictures:
- The Battle of Schevening
- USS West Virginia (BB-48)
New A-Class articles:
- Albert Kesselring
- Frank Bladin
- Henry Burrell (RAN officer)
- List of Knight's Cross recipients of the Kriegsmarine
- List of Knight's Cross recipients of the Schnellboot service
- List of Knight's Cross recipients of the U-boat service
- Midshipman
- SM UB-14
- SM UB-16
- SS American (1900)
- Teddy Sheean
- Tucker class destroyer
- Yorktown class gunboat
|
- Project news
- The Contest department has completed its twenty-sixth month of competition, with 83 articles entered by 15 editors. This month's top scorer is Bellhalla with 123 points followed by Sturmvogel 66 with 101 points. They receive the Chevrons and the Writer's Barnstar respectively. Parsecboy commendably came third with 47 points, with honorable mentions going to Ian Rose (38), Ed (28), Abraham, B.S. (15), the_ed17 (12), Amore Mio (11) and Kirk (11). Thanks also go to Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus, DPdH, Lordoliver, Belissarius, Wild Wolf, Gaia Octavia Agrippa and mynameinc, who also fielded entries.
- In a welcome addition to a long under-represented area, this month saw the creation of the Pakistani military history task force, which hits the ground running with 11 participants.
- In another task force development, please help recruit members for some of our smallest and quietest task forces. If you know anyone who may be interested, or are interested yourself, please see the drive discussion. The affected task forces are (with numbers of particpants in brackets): Taiwanese military history (2); Polish military history (4); Dutch military history (6); Military historiography (6); New Zealand military history (7); Baltic states military history (8); National militaries (8); Southeast Asian military history (8); War films (8); Early Muslim military history (9); Intelligence (9); Lebanese military history (9); South American military history (9); and Spanish military history (9).
|
- Awards and honours
|
- Editorial: "How to use the Milhist template"
Welcome to a new occasional feature of The Bugle, where over coming issues we'll be exploring some of the roles, tasks, and technical functions that go into creating what archivist and researcher Simon Fowler has described as the best general resource for military history on the internet.† As a project we can rightly be proud of that accolade, and we gratefully acknowledge the debt we owe to those dedicated editors from across Wikipedia that have helped to make the Military history WikiProject what it is today.
Many editors' first inkling of milhist's existence is when they spot our project banner on an article talk page. The banner can be easily added to appropriate articles by any editor, by typing {{WPMILHIST}} at (or near) the top of the talk page on a new line, and saving the page with an appropriate edit summary. This short form of the template will add the article to our project, and also flag the article as needing assessment and assignment to a task force by automatically adding it to the unassessed articles and articles with no associated task force categories.
As with many templates in use on Wikipedia, additional parameters can be specified. Possibly the most useful to include is the class parameter, because this will help out any editors who come along later to assess the article. To add the class parameter, edit the template markup to look like {{WPMILHIST|class=}}... and if you wish, have a read through the assessment guidance on milhists's quality scale and assign a rating from Stub- to B-Class yourself. A banner template with, for example, a Stub-Class article rating will look like {{WPMILHIST|class=stub}}. Because B-Class is assessed against a checklist it has some additional parameters, so when adding the project banner to an article talk-page, even if you don't intend to assess the article yourself it can be a real help to subsequent editors to include these too. This version of the template can be entered as {{WPMILHIST|class=|B1=|B2=|B3=|B4=|B5=}}. For detailed guidance on exactly what the five B-Class criteria are, see the B-class checklist.
Finally, when adding the milhist banner it's useful to assign the article to one (or more) of our task forces. This will help to bring it to the attention of those editors most likely to be interested in, and knowledgeable about, the subject. As with assessment, task force assignment is accomplished by adding a parameter to the template—in this case, simply the name of the task force followed by =yes (or =y). For example, to assign a Start-Class article to the Second World War and Canadian task forces, the template should read {{WPMILHIST|class=start|B1=|B2=|B3=|B4=|B5=|WWII=yes|Canadian=yes}}.
For a full list of all the banner template parameters and more detailed usage instructions, see Template:WPMILHIST; if you are unsure as to whether or not an article belongs with milhist or what task force(s) might be appropriate, or if you have any other questions, you are welcome to ask at our main project talk page. Happy templating! EyeSerenetalk
†Simon Fowler, Guide to Military History on the Internet, UK:Pen & Sword 2007, ISBN 9781844156061, p. 7
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] GA Sweeps July update
Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 290 articles were swept in June! Last month was our second most successful month in reviewing articles (after May). We are currently over 70% done with Sweeps, with just under 800 articles left to review. With nearly 50 members, that averages out to about 15 articles per person. If each member reviews an article every other day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. This may sound difficult, but if everyone completes their reviews, Sweeps would be completed in less than two years when we first started (with only four members!). With the conclusion of Sweeps, each editor could spend more time writing GAs, reviewing at the backlogged GAN, or focusing on other GARs. Again, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 17:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)
|
|
- From the coordinators
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Battle of the Coral Sea
- Battle of Vimy Ridge
- Brazilian battleship Minas Geraes
- Hastings Ismay, 1st Baron Ismay
- Military history of Australia during World War II
- Otto Becher
- Moltke class battlecruiser
- Yamato class battleship
New featured lists:
- List of Medal of Honor recipients (Veracruz)
- List of Philippine–American War Medal of Honor recipients
- List of United States Military Academy alumni (athletic figures)
- List of United States Military Academy alumni (engineers)
New featured pictures:
- Governor Davey's [sic] Proclamation to the Aborigines
- Test Baker, Operation Crossroads
- Tuskegee airmen
New A-Class articles:
- Army of the Tennessee
- Battle of Bosworth Field
- Battle of Corydon
- Battle of the Coral Sea
- Battle of Ticonderoga (1777)
- Helgoland class battleship
- Operation Sky Monitor
- Rupert Downes
- Sd.Kfz. 10
- Werner Mölders
|
- Project news
|
- The Academy content drive
- Introduced in February, The Academy is an online school for new members. This month, we're launching a drive to increase the breadth and depth of its content. If you can help, by writing four to six paragraph articles, please do so! Barnstars galore to be won!
|
- Awards and honours
- Our top Peer and A-Class reviewers over the last quarter are: Joe N (38), The ed17 (38), YellowMonkey (24), Cla68 (22), Jim Sweeney (22), AustralianRupert (21), Nick-D (19), TomStar81 (19), Abraham, B.S. (15) and Ian Rose (12) who each receive the WikiChevrons. The following editors received the Content Review Medal of Merit for their help: Patar knight (9), Piotrus (7), Patton123 (6), Sturmvogel 66 (6), Bellhalla (5), Skinny87 (5), Ed! (4), Magicpiano (4), Maralia (4), Wandalstouring (4), Cool3 (3), Hawkeye7 (3), IceUnshattered (3), Jackyd101 (3), MBK004 (3), Simon Harley (3), and Vantine84 (3). Thanks also go to: EnigmaMcmxc, Kyriakos, Saberwyn, Brad101, Dhatfield, Kirill Lokshin, Kirk, Mm40, Admiral Norton, Askari Mark, Benea, Binksternet, Brianboulton, Btphelps, Cam, Cuprum17, Geoff Plourde, Guyinblack25, Hartfelt, HLGallon, Juliancolton, La Pianista, Nosedown, Ost316, Parsecboy, Redtigerxyz, Rosiestep, Ruhrfisch, Socrates2008, Sumanch, TechOutsider and Xatsmann.
|
- Editorial: How to prepare an A-Class Review
Perhaps the most important—and, indeed, most respected—aspect of the Military History project is our rigorous A-Class Review (ACR) system, which puts articles through the most robust review outside of WP:FAC. Although reviewing might seem daunting to newcomers, this article will give you an outline of three popular reviewing methods so you can actually start contributing yourself.
- General nit-pick - this is one of the easiest - and one of the most common - reviewing styles seen throughout Wikipedia. It is a similar approach to that you would see in proofreading and classroom marking. Basically, it is a general overview of the article, not getting too specific on aspects of the prose. The most common statements include This article could benefit from a light copyedit before going to FAC or You might want to check the endash and emdash placement in the article. It's a style that is incredibly easy to manage, and one that requires little-to-no experience in previous reviewing.
- Specialization - it often is the case that those who have been reviewing articles for a long time will move away from the general review towards more specific areas of articles. As an example, Tony usually stays within the realm of prose and copyediting while reviewing Featured Article Candidates, Tom used to focus almost entirely on external links and disambiguations, while others specialize their focus exclusively on copyediting, reference formatting, dashes, punctuation and flow, image licensing, and a host of other areas. This is a review method that is not nearly as time-consuming as other methods, as it allows you to quickly scan an article, spot the things that you work on, and how they need to be fixed.
- Sectional - My preferred style of reviewing, this is one of the most informative styles. Unfortunately, it is also one of the most time-consuming and exhaustive styles. Essentially, it involves going through the entire article, section by section, and pointing out every major (and often many of the minor) flaws present within each section. Everything from prose to reference formatting to content. It is a reviewing style that is exhausting, and often takes two or three goes through the article to get everything (sometimes even more), but it gives the article's main contributors two benefits. First, everything is well organized, mostly under section headers like this one, and it often makes finding individual sentences or refs much easier, as they are within that section. Secondly, it points out a lot of the problems from a lot of the areas.
Best of luck, and happy Reviewing! Cam (Chat)
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:09, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
|
|
- From the coordinators
- The voting phase of the eighth coordinator elections, for the October–March term, started on 13 September and will run until 23:59 Sat 26 September.
Each candidate garnering twenty or more endorsements will be appointed, to a maximum of fifteen. This election has a strong field of sixteen candidates running, offering many skills and representing all aspects of the project.
- The Contest Department is going from strength to strength and drew a massive number of entries in August (see the results below). If you haven't fielded any entries yet, please think about doing so. It's great fun! Roger Davies talk 14:02, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Convoy GP55
- George Koval
- HMS Endeavour
- James Newland
- John Lerew
- Kaiser class battleship
- Keith Johnson (cricket administrator)
- König class battleship
- Siward, Earl of Northumbria
- Unification of Germany
- Victoria Cross for Australia
New featured lists:
- List of Second World War Victoria Cross recipients
- List of Victoria Cross recipients by campaign
- Marine Corps Brevet Medal
- Order of battle at the Battle of San Domingo
New featured pictures:
- "Students Going to Man the Fortifications"
- "Our New 'First Lord' at Sea"
New A-Class articles:
- 24th Infantry Division (United States)
- Bayern class battleship
- Derfflinger class battlecruiser
- Egmont Prinz zur Lippe-Weißenfeld
- Ellis Wackett
- No. 3 Commando
- Operation Pleshet
- SMS König
- SMS Hindenburg
|
- Project news
- People with an interest in clearly presenting battle information, and First World War buffs, will find the discussion about a new campaign box for the Battle of the Somme interesting.
- With the recent increase in enthusiasm, Wikipedia-wide, for creating "outline" articles, there's an ongoing discussion here. The idea is to produce guidelines for overview articles for Milhist editors and reviewers.
- Proposals have been made to introduce a new self-scoring "honour" system for Contest Department entries. Contributions, especially from regular nominees, are welcome.
|
- Contest Department
- The Contest department has completed its twenty-ninth month of competition, with 145 articles entered by 13 editors. Sturmvogel 66 was placed first again this month with an amazing 101 points, closely followed by Georgejdorner at 98 points. They receive the Chevrons and the Writer's Barnstar respectively. Parsecboy commendably came third with 88 points, with honorable mentions going to AustralianRupert (68), Kumioko (66), Ed! (32), Ian Rose (26) and radek (11). Our thanks go to AM, David Underdown, Work permit, Yellow Monkey and Wild Wolf, who also fielded entries.
|
- Awards and honours
|
- Editorial: Getting to FAC via A-Class - some interesting new facts
Well, it’s official. Milhist articles have a much better than average chance of success as featured article candidates. MBK004 has done some useful number-crunching following the fortunes of the 97 Milhist featured article candidates submitted between January and July this year. The research shows that 70% of Milhist articles were promoted against an overall average of 51%.
Looking behind the figures, some other interesting facts emerge. First, 84% of our promoted articles had successfully passed a Milhist A-Class Review before going on to FAC. Second, of the 29 Milhist articles that failed, less than half (41%) had had an A-Class Review. Third, the 97 Milhist articles accounted for 16% of all FACs submitted between January and July of this year.
The clear lesson is that if you want a string of featured articles to your credit, you may find Milhist's A-class Review process to be of benefit to you! Roger Davies talk
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
|
|
- From the coordinators
Greetings to all members of the Military history WikiProject, and to those outside the project who receive this news letter as well! My name is TomStar81, and it with a great sense of pride that I assume the position of lead coordinator for the project. On behalf of all the coordinators, both new and returning, we wish to thank those of you who participated in the September elections, and we look forward to working to advance the goals of the project for the next six months.
With the elections concluded, there are two changes. First, Roger Davies has been appointed a coordinator emeritus, joining our first coordinator emeritus Kirill Lokshin. Secondly, for the first time ever, the lead coordinator for the Military history WikiProject will be taking a lengthy wikibreak. For those who were unaware of this, I am an undergraduate student, and will be taking a leave of absence, effective end September, to focus on graduating in December. However, with fourteen coordinators, and two coordinators emeritus, I am confident the needs of the project will be well taken care of. For the VIII coordinator tranche, TomStar81 (Talk)
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Battle of Grand Port
- Derfflinger class battlecruiser
- Fredonian Rebellion
- Hermann Detzner
- Henry Wells (general)
- Joe Hewitt (RAAF officer)
- Simon Bolivar Buckner
- SMS Hindenburg
- Werner Mölders
New featured lists:
- List of Medal of Honor recipients for World War I
New featured topics:
- Derfflinger class battlecruisers
- Lists of Victoria Cross recipients by campaign
New featured pictures:
- Beijing Castle in the Boxer Rebellion
- Fort Baker at San Francisco Bay
- RAN Squirrel helicopter
New A-Class articles:
- 1982 British Army Gazelle friendly fire incident
- Brazilian cruiser Bahia
- I Corps (United States)
- North Carolina class battleship
- Siege of Kimberley
- SMS Derfflinger
- SMS Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm
- SMS Lützow
|
- Project news
|
- Contest Department
- This month witnessed an all new and improved scoring system and process established in the Contest Department, which has run both smoothly and successfully. A total of 54 articles were entered this month by 11 editors. Parsecboy placed first with an astonishing 143 points, followed by Sturmvogel 66 on 105 points. They receive the Chevrons and the Writer's Barnstar respectively. Honorable mentions go to the_ed17 (41), Auntieruth55 (38), AustralianRupert (17), Radeksz (12) and Ian Rose (11), with our thanks going to Piotrus, Abraham, B.S., Skinny87 and David Underdown, who also fielded entries. All interested editors are encouraged to submit entries for next month's contest; it can be a rather exciting experience!
|
- Awards and honours
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:49, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:10, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.
If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)
|
|
- From the coordinators
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- 1982 British Army Gazelle friendly fire incident
- Amagi class battlecruiser
- Battle of the Alamo
- Brazilian cruiser Bahia
- Ellis Wackett
- Inner German border
New featured lists:
- List of Knight's Cross recipients of the Waffen-SS
- Order of battle in the Atlantic campaign of 1806
New featured portals:
- United States Air Force
New featured pictures:
- A synagogue in New York City remained on D-Day
- Battle of Kennesaw Mountain
- Journée du Poilu. 25 et 26 décembre 1915
- Siege of Sevastopol, 1855
- The burning of Columbia, South Carolina, February 17, 1865
New A-Class articles:
- AH-56 Cheyenne
- John Lloyd Waddy
- Lewis McGee
- M22 Locust
- Operation Coburg
- Operation Teardrop
- SMS Nassau
- Tosa class battleship
- USS Congress (1799)
- USS President (1800)
- Winter War
|
- Project news
|
- Contest department
- The contest department has completed its thirty-first month of competition; its second month under the new and improved scoring system. A total of 53 articles were entered by nine editors. Sturmvogel 66 came in first with 96 points, followed by Auntieruth55 on 80 points. They are presented the Chevrons and Writer's Barnstar respectively. Honorable mentions go to Ian Rose (38), Abraham, B.S. (33) and Parsecboy (10). Our thanks go to Cuprum17, Ed!, The ed17 and Piotrus, who also fielded entries. All editors are encouraged to submit any articles that are working on for next month's contest.
|
- Awards and honours
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLV (November 2009)
|
|
- Project news
- The Academy Content Drive concluded on 31 October. The first place Golden Wiki went to TomStar81 for 13 entries; the Silver Wiki was awarded to YellowMonkey for 11 entries, and Patar knight was presented with the Bronze Wiki for 3 entries. All other entrants were awarded the WikiChevrons or a barnstar for their contributions. Thank you to everyone who fielded an entry! All editors are encouraged to check out the newly expanded Academy.
- A discussion about the notability of military people has resulted in an update to our in-house style guide. Prompted by some recent "articles for deletion" discussions, members felt that we should provide clearer guidance on the types of person that are most likely to meet Wikipedia's biographical notability criteria. The resulting advice, which you can see here, should be very helpful in both future deletion discussions and in deciding where best to focus article-writing efforts.
- Our Task Force housekeeping discussion is now coming to a close. In October a number of proposals were made for rationalising our extensive list of Task forces. Although a few areas remain to be decided, project members have approved the changes summarised here. These will be enacted shortly, so if you haven't yet had your say, now's the time!
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Cologne War
- Nikita Khrushchev
- Operation Teardrop
- SMS Derfflinger
- SMS Lützow
- John Lloyd Waddy
- Ton That Dinh
New featured pictures:
- Turkish heliograph at Huj
New A-Class articles:
- Arrow (missile)
- Battle of Bardia
- Canadian National Vimy Memorial
- Collins class submarine
- Frederick Scherger
- Iven Giffard Mackay
- List of Knight's Cross with Oak Leaves, Swords or Diamonds recipients of the Waffen-SS
- USS Chesapeake (1799)
- Walter Peeler
|
- Contest Department
- The contest department has completed its thirty-second month of competition; its third month under the new scoring system. A total of 52 articles were entered by seven editors. Sturmvogel 66 came first with 168 points, followed by Ian Rose on 51 points. They are presented the Chevrons and Writer's Barnstar respectively. Honorable mentions go to Auntieruth55 (31), Ed! (26), Abraham, B.S. (26), The ed17 (17) and Piotrus (7). All editors are encouraged to submit any articles that are working on for next month's contest.
|
- Awards and honours
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
|
|
- From the coordinators
Happy New Year to all! I shall take this opportunity to reflect upon the past year. In 2009 our project grew impressively, adding nearly 100 new featured articles and doubling the total number of featured lists. Overall the total number of articles within our scope surpassed 95,000 in 2009, and if these numbers hold steady we will surpass 100,000 articles in 2010. Thank you all for your outstanding efforts.
We are currently working on several proposals to improve the project for 2010. These include bringing the Milhist Academy up to full operational status, as well as spicing up and streamlining the task force structure. Also, any help you can offer to clear the current backlog of Military History good article nominations would be appreciated.
For the Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 11:10, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Battle of Morotai
- Castle
- North Carolina class battleship
- Xa Loi Pagoda raids
New featured lists:
- List of Brigade of Gurkhas recipients of the Victoria Cross
- List of World War I aces credited with more than 20 victories
New featured pictures:
- After the War a Medal and Maybe a Job
- Lincoln assassination conspirators execution
- National Fund for the Welsh Troops
- USS Annapolis in the Arctic
- Yiddish World War I poster
New A-Class articles:
- Battle of Bita Paka
- Battle of Ostrach
- Charles Eaton (RAAF officer)
- Design A-150 battleship
- Dutch 1913 battleship proposal
- Helmut Lent
- Henry Wrigley
- James Harold Cannan
- James Whiteside McCay
- Lebaudy Patrie
- Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-3
- Thomas Baker (aviator)
|
- Project news
- The Henry Allingham World War I contest has entered its second phase with the following users qualifing: Abraham, B.S., Backslash Forwardslash,Carcharoth, Dana boomer, Durova, Eurocopter, Hawkeye7, Ian Rose, Labattblueboy, Redmarkviolinist, Sturmvogel 66 and XavierGreen.
- Coordinator Emeritus Kirill Lokshin has been re-elected to the Arbitration Committee for a two-year term in the 2009 elections. Kirill is one of four present or former coordinators of the project to be appointed to the Arbitration Committee; he was originally elected to a three-year term in 2007. The others are YellowMonkey (2007 – 2008), FayssalF (2008 – 2010), and Roger Davies (2009 – 2011).
- The Contest Department has completed its thirty-second month of competition; and its fourth month under the new scoring system. A total of 45 articles were entered by seven editors. Sturmvogel 66 came first with 82 points, followed by Auntieruth55 with 74 points. They receive the Chevrons and Writer's Barnstar respectively. Honorable mentions go to Ian Rose (51), Abraham, B.S. (21) and Parsecboy (16). Ed! and Binksternet also fielded entries. Please submit any articles you are working on for the January contest.
|
- Awards and honours
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:29, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:51, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Dinosaur puppy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 509 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Beverly Randolph - Find sources: "Beverly Randolph" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
|
|
- From the coordinators
- It's only a month into the New Year, and we've already made changes to the project's infrastructure, merging and improving several task forces (see below). Much content within the project's scope has also been improved: eleven new featured articles, two featured lists, two featured pictures, a featured sound, and seventeen A-class articles. Thanks and congratulations to all editors who contributed and/or nominated these items.
- In other news, the elections for new project coordinators are coming up in March. Think about whether you would like to run or not, and self-nominations will be coming up at the beginning of next month.
- Lastly, our project's A-class review process is desperately in need of new reviewers. Please consider looking at least one and leaving comments, no matter how small or trivial. It will be greatly appreciated by the article's nominator(s).
- For the coordinators, —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 03:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Battle of the Nile
- Bodiam Castle
- Charles Eaton (RAAF officer)
- Frederick Scherger
- Helmut Lent
- James Whiteside McCay
- Johann von Klenau
- Peter Heywood
- The Battle of Alexander at Issus
- Thomas Baker (aviator)
- Walter Peeler
New featured lists:
- List of Asian American Medal of Honor recipients
- Order of battle at the Battle of the Nile
New featured pictures:
- Return of the Great White Fleet
- SMS Moltke (1910)
New featured sounds:
- It's a Long Way to Tipperary
New A-Class articles:
- Alexander Pentland
- Battle of Osan
- Battle of Winterthur (1799)
- Cedric Howell
- CFM International CFM56
- Florida class battleship
- Friedrich Freiherr von Hotze
- HMS Lion (1910)
- List of battlecruisers of Germany
- List of Knight's Cross with Oak Leaves recipients: 1940–1941
- Max-Hellmuth Ostermann
- Operation Windsor
- Petlyakov Pe-8
- Robert Peverell Hichens
- Smedley Butler
- USS Hawaii (CB-3)
- Vernon Sturdee
|
- Project news
- Congratulations go to Abraham, B.S., Nick-D, and Durova, who placed 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, respectively, in our annual Military Historian of the Year contest! Thanks to all who voted, and congratulations to our runners up: Auntieruth55, BilCat, Hawkeye7, Ian Rose, MBK004, MinisterForBadTimes, Parsecboy, Sturmvogel 66, and The ed17.
|
- Contest department
|
- Awards and honours
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:55, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
|
|
- From the coordinators
March, as you know, is an election month for our project, when we pick the coordinators for the next six months. We are seeking motivated individuals willing to devote some of their time and energy to the project so it continues to grow and prosper.
Also, I am making a personal appeal to each of you, the members of this project, to come out and vote for the candidates that run. These users will be responsible for managing the assessment process, answering questions, and making sure that the project's other needs are met. We have approximately 1,000 users who identify as being a part of our project, yet on average only about one-tenth of that number participate in elections. Moreover, as we typically hold referendums on major issues affecting the project along with these election, those who do not vote miss the opportunity to give their opinion on matters affecting the project as a whole. Remember, one vote always makes a difference. For the coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 23:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Admiralty Islands campaign
- Alexander Pentland
- Anthony Roll
- Battle of Winterthur (1799)
- Cedric Howell
- HMS Calliope (1884)
- The Disasters of War
New featured lists:
- List of battlecruisers of Germany
- List of National Treasures of Japan (castles)
New featured pictures:
- Australian military encampment, 1918
- Injured Arriving by Boat at Balaklava
- USS New Jersey, 1918
New A-Class articles:
- Battle of Taejon
- Bombardment of Papeete
- First Battle of Maryang San
- Henry George Chauvel
- List of Knight's Cross with Oak Leaves recipients: 1942
- Michael J. Daly
- Nguyen Van Nhung
- No. 1 Wing RAAF
- Oswald Watt
- Red Tail Project
- Siege of Godesberg (1583)
- SMS Goeben
- Yermolayev Yer-2
|
- Project news
- A discussion has begun concerning our military history manual of style's guideline recommending preemptive disambiguation on the naming of military units. As the outcome of the discussion will likely effect a number of pages within our scope we are seeking input from the community on whether the guideline should be changed.
- Late last year, several largely inactive task forces were merged. However, the mergers of the Australia and New Zealand task forces did not take place as there was no consensus for a new name. To resolve this, a discussion has begun and all editors are encouraged to participate.
|
- Contest department
|
- Awards and honours
|
- Editorial: Reliable sources in military history
Across Wikipedia, guidelines have been set up so that editors can vet sources for themselves. Links to some of these and a guide for checking if a source is reliable can be found in an excellent Signpost dispatch written by Ealdgyth (talk · contribs). However, for the majority of military history-related topics, we strive for more than just a basic reliable source. Specifically, we aim for peer-reviewed articles and books over, for example, most websites.[N 1] Contemporary news articles or accounts can and should be mixed in (if possible) to give a picture of the general view point of the time—were they calm, afraid, unsure of what was going on?
Another major tenet is neutrality. If an editor rewrote the article Dieppe Raid using only the official Canadian history,[N 2] we would have a problem; while it does contain a thorough and in-depth overview, a point-of-view can still be read. For one, it gives an undue amount of focus to Canada's input in the planning of the landing, and it would probably give an undue focus to their troops if a majority of the landing forces hadn't been Canadian. Granted, this is a book written to document that country's role in the Second World War, so you would hope it focuses on them, but this same reason makes it unusable as the primary basis for an article.
In this case, you would like to utilize a few recent, peer-reviewed books and journals, the official British, Canadian and German histories, possibly a few books written by historians from the aforementioned countries, and newspapers from that time period.[N 3] Obviously this is ideal, but you need to represent all three sides in this (the United States would be a fourth, but they played only a minor role in the planning and invading). This neutrality aspect applies especially for battles and to a lesser degree biographies, but it can be utilized in virtually every article in our scope. For example, it could be beneficial to obtain Japanese accounts of B-29 Superfortress bombing raids or non-Puerto Rican peer-reviewed sources for that insular area's role in the Second World War. —Ed (talk • majestic titan)
- Notes
- ^ It should be noted that certain sites like Combined Fleet or Navweaps, which are authored by recognized or published experts in the field, are not "most websites."
- ^ Stacey, Colonel C.P. Six Years of War: The Army in Canada, Britain and the Pacific. 1, Official History of the Canadian Army in the Second World War. Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1955.
- ^ For example, some of the Canadian newspaper articles written about the raid are listed on their War Museum's website here, while a London Gazette supplement written after the war can be seen on their website. Anyone with access to the archives of The New York Times can view the stories printed by that paper on the raid by searching their archives, and the Google News archive lists many newspapers, some of which were scanned by Google and are available at no charge; most of the non-free material requires a subscription to ProQuest.
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
[edit] April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive
| WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April. |
|
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
[edit] A sincere thank you from Wikiproject Good Articles
On behalf of Wikiproject Good Articles, I would like to express our gratitude to you for your contributions to the Sweeps process, for which you completed 28 reviews. Completion of this monstrous task has proven to be a significant accomplishment not only for our project, but for Wikipedia. As a token of our sincere appreciation, please accept this ribbon. Lara 14:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
|
|
- From the coordinators
I am pleased to report that the March coordinator elections have concluded, and that 15 members have been selected to serve as coordinators from April to September. Special congratulations go to AustralianRupert, Dank, MisterBee1966, NativeForeigner, Patar knight, and Ranger Steve, all of whom are newly elected coordinators. As we start this new tranche we welcome all returning coordinators, and wish those who decided not to stand for reelection luck as they move on to new things.
In other election news, a motion made to extend the coordinator tranche from its current six-month term to one full year gained consensus from the election participants. This will take effect in September, during the next election cycle. For the IX Coordinator Tranche, TomStar81 (Talk) 05:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- 21st Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry
- Battle of Osan
- Bayern class battleship
- Dutch 1913 battleship proposal
- Karl Aloys zu Fürstenberg
- Mary Rose
- No. 1 Wing RAAF
- USS Congress (1799)
New featured lists:
- List of Medal of Honor recipients for the Boxer Rebellion
- List of Medal of Honor recipients for the Vietnam War
- List of United States Military Academy alumni (Confederate States Army)
New featured topics:
- Battlecruisers of Germany
New featured pictures:
- Cavalry At Balaklava
New A-Class articles:
- Allan Walters
- Army of the Danube
- Battle of Dürenstein
- Byzantine-Sassanid War of 602–628
- HMAS Sydney (R17)
- Horses in World War I
- Lê Văn Duyệt
- Michael P. Murphy
- Roderic Dallas
- USS Triton (SSRN-586)
|
- Project news
- Operation Normandy
In May 2008 a small group of editors, operating from a page in Cam's userspace, began work on improving Wikipedia's articles relating to the pivotal Second World War Battle of Normandy that took place in northern France between 6 June and the end of August 1944. Milhist has now adopted this collaboration as our third special project. The aim of Operation Normandy is to bring all core topics—official operations, battles, and the invasion beaches—to featured status by the 70th anniversary of D-Day on 6 June 2014. More information can be found on the project page; any interested editors are most welcome to sign up and help us meet this challenging goal!
- Henry Allingham World War I Contest
Our Henry Allingham World War I Contest ended on 11 March with the following results: in first place was Sturmvogel 66; in second place was Ian Rose; in third place was Dana boomer; and the finalists were Abraham, B.S., Carcharoth, and XavierGreen. The contest produced an incredible 238 recognised article improvements, of which 6 were Featured articles, 13 were A-Class articles and 22 were Good articles. In addition 43 newly created or expanded articles were successfully submitted for the 'Did you know' section on Wikipedia's main page. Our warmest congratulations go to the medallists and finalists, and our grateful thanks go to all participants and particularly to Eurocopter for organizing the contest.
- Would you like to get more involved in the project? There are many open tasks that could use your help. The project's review department is always in need of input at peer reviews, A-class reviews, FACs and FARs; these can be found here. Also, the project maintains a list of deletion debates for military-related articles that have been nominated for deletion; project members are encouraged to provide their opinions in this forum so that consensus can be established. Finally, if content creation is more what you are looking for, each of the project's 48 task forces maintains a list of requested articles.
- Your comments are invited in the following ongoing project discussions:
|
- Contest department
|
- Awards and honours
- The WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves has been awarded to:
- Nick-D in recognition of his long and distinguished service as a coordinator of this project from February 2008 to March 2010; sterling efforts on "big picture" subjects, including ten featured articles; and his tireless participation in discussion and review.
- Sturmvogel 66 in recognition of his distinguished service as a coordinator of this project, extraordinary performance within the Henry Allingham World War I Contest and other extremely valuable contributions to the project.
- The A-Class medal has been awarded to:
- The A-Class medal with Oak Leaves has been awarded to:
|
- Editorial: Translating article writing to real life
I (Ed) am a college student in the United States, and as part of attaining my desired degree, I chose to take a course in Arab-Islamic history. We began in the early 600s and spent some time on the origins of the Islamic conquering of the Sassanid Empire and partial takeover of the Byzantine Empire (c. 634–750). From there, we have moved through the various ages of history, and the class recently began discussing the Ottoman Empire and other Islamic regions of more recent times.
As we began discussing the Ottoman Empire's role in the First World War, our professor mentioned that they were blockading the Bosphorus, using it as a chokepoint to cut off needed supplies traveling to Russia's only warm-water port, Sevastopol. An astute classmate, realizing this meant the use of warships, wondered what naval technology was like during this time. The professor turned and asked me to answer the question, as he knew I had been studying naval history and believed that I knew more about the subject.
The point of this anecdote is not to boast, but to provoke some thought. By virtue of the research Wikipedia writers must do to write complete, referenced articles, many of us are acquiring knowledge in specialized topics that can surpass even learned scholars. Wikipedia might even provoke some of us into becoming learned scholars through the subjects we find here. To profile one such case, take a look at Parsecboy.
Beginning in May 2007, he came across a few essentially empty stubs on German battleship classes. Nearly 3 years later, he's written or collaborated on more than forty articles rated as good or higher, including over a dozen featured articles and a featured list; the majority relate to German warships. The work Parsecboy has done for Wikipedia has had a tremendous impact on his academic career: to complete his undergraduate degree, Parsecboy is currently writing an Honors Thesis that will analyze the British and German battlecruiser squadrons during the First World War. Parsecboy plans to attend graduate school and continue his research in the area, culminating in a dissertation. He comments that "without a doubt, I would not have had nearly as much knowledge and interest in the topic, nor would I have known where to begin researching if I had not become so involved with the topic here on Wikipedia."
The knowledge you acquire through writing Wikipedia articles will remain with you for the rest of your life. Try to find a way to use it to your advantage.
—Ed (talk • majestic titan) and Parsecboy (talk)
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
|
|
- From the coordinators
It's been a month since the end of the coordinator elections, and I am proud to inform the project that the IX coordinator tranche is doing well. Our new coordinators are rapidly learning the ropes, and the last of the task forces under consideration for merging have been consolidated into a new task force which should increase productivity and improve quality article output.
At the moment the coordinators are discussing preliminary plans for an improved version of The Bugle, and are working with editors from the American Civil War task force who are in the process of organizing a new special project relating to that conflict. It is our hope to see these changes implemented in the upcoming month. Lastly, as many of our members are also in school, we extend our best wishes to all who will be taking final exams both this month and next. For the IX coordinator tranche, TomStar81 (Talk) 22:36, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Battle of Dürenstein
- Battle of Pulo Aura
- Battle of Taejon
- Battle of The Cedars
- Brougham Castle
- Cleomenean War
- Harry Chauvel
- Japanese battleship Yamato
- Lester Brain
- Myles Standish
- Roderic Dallas
- USS President (1800)
- War of the Bavarian Succession
New featured lists:
- Order of battle at the Battle of Camperdown
New featured topics:
- Yamato class battleships
New featured portals:
- Biological warfare
New A-Class articles:
- 22nd Regiment Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry
- Battle of Chochiwon
- Battle of Chonan
- Battle of Naktong Bulge
- Battle of Pyongtaek
- Battle of Slater's Knoll
- Battle of The Cedars
- Battle of Valcour Island
- Brian Eaton
- Douglas MacArthur
- Heinrich Prinz zu Sayn-Wittgenstein
- HMAS Australia (1911)
- Kongō class battlecruiser
- List of battleships of Germany
- Massachusetts in the American Civil War
- Operation Sandblast
- Order of Saint Hubert (Bavarian)
- Ordnance QF 25-pounder Short
- Petlyakov Pe-3
- SMS Helgoland
- Sovetsky Soyuz class battleship
|
- Project news
|
- Contest department
|
- Awards and honours
|
- Editorial: Milhist's special projects
This month we're taking a look at the Military history WikiProject's special projects. At present we have three—Operation Great War Centennial, Operation Majestic Titan, and Operation Normandy—with, as Tom mentions in his introduction, a fourth coming on line as this newsletter goes out.
- Operation Great War Centennial
Officially the longest running of our special projects, this started in December 2008 with the ambitious goal of improving our core articles relating to the First World War by June 2014. As it states on the project's page, "the centenary of the start of World War I ... will doubtless be a mammoth commemoration of one of the most significant wars in history, attracting vast interest from schools, universities, veterans groups and the media. It offers us the chance to showcase what a brilliant resource Wikipedia is". With World War I receiving well over 20,000 page views per day on most days, the truth of these words is evident and the opportunity too good to miss. Operation Great War Centennial has compiled a list of over 300 articles covering topics such as battles, geographical areas, people, armaments, and technology; while some have achieved featured or good status, the majority are at B-Class or below, so there is plenty there for willing editors to get their teeth into.
- Operation Majestic Titan
The home of our much-respected and admired "Battleship Cabal", Operation Majestic Titan started in June 2009 with the aim of creating the "single largest featured topic on Wikipedia, centered around the battleships considered, planned, built, operated, canceled, or otherwise recorded." At time of writing the prolific Majestic Titan team has produced an impressive 33 featured articles, 19 A-Class, 60 good articles, three featured topics and six good topics. According to the project's working list, there are only 427 more articles to go...
- Operation Normandy
Although it first appeared in Milhist's pages in March 2010, this project had been formerly operating out of Cam's userspace as the "Normandy Team" since May 2008, making it a contender for our longest-running unofficial special project. Operation Normandy is aiming to create a Featured Topic on the Second World War Battle of Normandy by the 70th Anniversary of D-Day on 6 June 2014. With nine featured articles so far and 29 more to go, progress has been steady. More help, however, is always welcome.
- Our fourth special project, American Civil War Sesquicentennial, is in the process of organising and at present lacks a name (see this discussion if you have any suggestions). The project will be looking to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the American Civil War by its sesquicentennial anniversary in 2011. The beginning of a drive is always an exciting time to get involved, so interested editors are strongly encouraged to drop by and sign up.
Special projects are a great way of organising a long-term collaboration with a specific end-point in mind, and tend to be more goal-oriented and focused than the general task forces or informal working groups. Joining a special project is also a fantastic way to work alongside like-minded editors with whom you'll undoubtedly develop close working relationships; by your third or fourth FA submission you'll hopefully be operating as part of a well-oiled team. Editor roles are many and varied: content writers, source material providers, image- and map-makers, copy editors, reviewers, MoS gurus, wikignomes, specialists and generalists... you're sure to find a job that suits you and benefits the team. If you have an idea for a special project or are already undertaking a collaboration that you think fits in with the ethos of those above, and you'd like to benefit from Milhist's support and infrastructure, consider dropping the coordinators a note. Personally I've found the synergy and teamwork of contributing to a special project (Operation Normandy in my case) to be one of the most rewarding and enjoyable aspects of my time here. I hope you will too. EyeSerenetalk 14:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
|
|
- From the coordinators
With Eurocopter's resignation (see editorial below), this month marks the end of his tenure as a project coordinator. Eurocopter has been with the team for almost three years now and will be sorely missed, but he has taken the tough decision that his real life commitments have unfortunately made it too hard for him to focus on his coordinator duties. We wish him good luck in the future, both in real life and on-wiki.
Efforts to redesign The Bugle are moving forward and it is our intention to roll out a new format, based on the Signpost, for next month's issue. We hope that this will allow us to provide better coverage of the project's news by allowing more room to expand on the stories we bring to you. If you have any comments or suggestions on what we can do to improve coverage, please let us know.
—your IX Coordinator Tranche, May 2010
|
- Articles of note
New featured articles:
- Action of 1 August 1801
- Battle of Villers-Bocage
- Brian Eaton
- HMAS Australia (1911)
- HMS Lion (1910)
- Japanese battleship Tosa
New featured lists:
- List of battleships of Germany
New A-Class articles:
- 102nd Intelligence Wing
- Battle of Quebec (1775)
- Bombing of Yawata (June 1944)
- Deutschland class battleship
- Indiana class battleship
- Russian battleship Slava
- SMS Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand
- SMS Hannover
- William Ellis Newton
|
- Project news
- With consensus reached on a name the American Civil War task force has officially opened our newest special project. Codenamed Brothers at War, its goal will be "...to improve [US Civil War] related Wikipedia articles to featured status, and to see as many of these as possible appear on the main page on their respective 150th anniversaries."
- The straw poll concerning preemptive disambiguation of military units as outlined by our Manual of Style has been closed, with near unanimous consensus that the current practice of preemptive disambiguation be retained. Thanks to everyone who participated in either the discussion or the straw poll.
- Members of Operation Majestic Titan have adopted a three-tiered award system to show appreciation to those who have done work on battleship or battlecruiser articles. Formally known as the Titan's Cross, the award has been issued to Parsecboy, Climie.ca, The ed17, and MBK004.
- The project's official IRC channel (#wikipedia-en-milhist) has been restarted. Project members and anyone interested in military history are encouraged to join us for substantive discussions, social discourse and a few laughs. Instructions on how to get on IRC are available here.
|
- Contest department
|
- Awards and honours
|
- Editorial: Project coordination and constructive editing
For those of you who might not know me, I'm Eurocopter. I served as a coordinator of the Military history WikiProject from August 2007 until few days ago, when I decided to resign due to real life issues making it impossible for me to continue to perform project duties on a regular basis. Reflecting on my experience and activities within the project, I decided to write this editorial to set out a few thoughts and offer some advice to interested members.
First of all, what does project coordination mean and how does it help the Military history WikiProject? Although the coordinators do not have any real executive powers, they play an important role in project management. To make editing contributions easier for our members we establish guidelines, manage Peer and A-Class reviews, and consult and assist when needed. The primary goal of the coordination team has always been to stimulate the development of quality articles and, once they have been developed, to facilitate maintaining them at a high standard for as long as possible. This has been carried out through the organization of a considerable number of assessment drives, contests and special projects. However, there is still much to be done to make the project one of the best and most active wiki-communities. Coordinator involvement in trying to achieve this, as the central promoters of any activity undertaken within the project, is more than important; the coordination team should stand as an example of civilised and constructive cooperation. Perhaps the most annoying issue—unfortunately quite widespread through the pages of Wikipedia—is POV-dominated conflict. While such a phenomenon might seem inevitable in a community within which hundreds of members of different nationalities with different historical and political views interact, it doesn’t mean we should accept it. The ability to neutrally mediate such conflicts is an important and desirable coordinator function.
Secondly, but most importantly in my opinion, is the question of how the project enables editors to contribute effectively. Perhaps you already know how difficult it is to take an article to the highest quality levels such as A-Class or featured status. It is even harder to do this working alone. I believe the best thing the Military history WikiProject has done is to bring together groups of editors with similar interests. As there are very few editors skilled in all the diverse article development areas, you might feel the need for help from editors more experienced in, for example, advanced copy editing, image editing etc. To this end the project provides task forces and special projects where members should always feel encouraged to ask questions, discuss, debate and give advice. Such cooperation is the best way to create properly balanced articles and to establish a neutral point of view. Our Style guide and Academy are also useful in guiding you along the path of writing an article. A final, but vital, part of the collaborative article writing process is editor behaviour when interacting with other editors who are contributing to the same article. Even on those occasions where an editor upsets you or allows their personal opinions to influence their editing, always remain calm, civil and try to reach an agreement. Contributing to Wikipedia is something most of us do as a hobby; time spent in useless conflicts is precious editing time wasted.
All in all, the Military history WikiProject is a good meeting point for milhist-interested editors, both beginners and advanced, with someone always there to give help and advice when needed. I wish to thank all my fellow coordinators and project members who keep this beautiful community running. I will certainly miss it!
Best regards and happy wiki-editing! Eurocopter (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
|
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:44, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Invitation to join WikiProject United States
|
|
Hello, Dinosaur puppy! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!
|
--Kumioko (talk) 04:17, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Replaceable fair use File:Himalayabear.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Himalayabear.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
|
|
To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 20:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
|
|
[edit] The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:47, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:51, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.
[edit] You're invited: Smithsonian Institution Women in Science Edit-a-Thon!
...of course if you don't live in the area, my apologies! Sarah (talk) 00:52, 8 March 2012 (UTC)