|This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.|
- 1 On user from IP address 220.127.116.11
- 2 Lisa Nowak
- 3 Emile Nelligan
- 4 Doc Hayward
- 5 weather is not spam
- 6 A Rule
- 7 Random Smile!
- 8 Thanks
- 9 Thanks For The Revert
- 10 Why did you undo all the stuff I added to the peanut page?
- 11 Ok. Thanks. I'll see if I can find that link
- 12 Thanks
- 13 samual L Jackson page
- 14 Samual L Jackson Post
- 15 Krisiun
- 16 Early life
- 17 So where should we add it to?
- 18 Thanks a lot for the revert
- 19 I do not understand why my changes have been reverted or removed?!?
- 20 Seriously.
- 21 RE: Thanks for Reverting
- 22 Thanks
- 23 October 2007
- 24 Patrican Borthers College
- 25 User scripts, TW, popups, et al.
- 26 Patrician Brothers College
- 27 Patrician Brothers College
- 28 Thanks for your help at beer pong!
- 29 Why have you removed true facts I enetered about Tommy Boyd?
- 30 I've received message
- 31 You look like an expert...
- 32 DIscospinster is a racist Jew Hater
- 33 Discospinster is an anti-semite
- 34 You are a liar and an Anti-Semite
- 35 AfD
- 36 If you are not what I claim you are
- 37 Campus fire safety
- 38 Thanks
- 39 Elmont Memorial High School
- 40 Thanks
- 41 admin
- 42 Queen template
- 43 James William Williams
- 44 Re: Teremoana (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log)
- 45 Accept my references as they are formatted or delete the article
- 46 Thanks
- 47 New YRF article text size of references
- 48 Hamilton School
- 49 David Willson
- 50 Santo Domingo
- 51 Vandalism reverts
- 52 Hannah montana list
- 53 Vandalism
- 54 Invite
On user from IP address 18.104.22.168
This user has a history of vandalism, and appears to be on a vandalism spree again (see: El Salvador and Isotopes of Sulfur. Since you had apparently banned the user before, thought you should be advised. Jkp1187 (talk) 19:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Why are you accusing me of vandalism? Please do not abuse your power. Everything is factual and can be supported. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 03:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
weather is not spam
Did you follow the link?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 03:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
For reverting vandalism on my userpage last night. Much appreciated! Sam Blacketer 16:44, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks For The Revert
Thank you for reverting on August 3 the criminal vandelism of my page. I see that the same IP address used for the original vandelism was used a month later and vandelized my page, again, and a few other people joined in. I am not fluent in the use of Wikipedia procedures, so I would appreciate any suggestions you might have. Pooua 03:06, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Why did you undo all the stuff I added to the peanut page?
- I had gone in to fix something, and when I tried to save it I got a message that there was a "blacklisted link" (http://www.healthadel.com) on the page. (See this list.) Since I couldn't locate the link I had to revert the entire addition. You must have unknowingly put it in there, so it might be easier for you to locate it and take it out. I don't know how it allowed you to save in the first place, but there you go. It wasn't the content that was the problem, it was that silly link. Hope this helps. ... discospinster talk 23:50, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
samual L Jackson page
you said i vandalized the Samual L Jackson Page? all i did was remove some of the bad language someone else put up? how is that vandalism what did i do wrong? UPDATE: I think i realized what happened I went and was editing out the bad words from the previous post and while I was doing that which took about 10 minutes you undid it and then i updated. I am not sure why you considered my post vandalism, unless I missed words. I don't think you should receive a warning though. if you looked at my post you would have seen it cleaned up the language. My guess is you didn't actually look at it. It kinda makes me upset that you would warn me. I feel like i can't do anything about it either which just makes me more frustrated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Datrixzero (talk • contribs) 02:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Samual L Jackson Post
I didn't add anything. I took the copy that had been vandalized went threw and removed bad language i saw and posted it. If i missed something I apologize. I don't understand why you can't see this. If you look you will see what i did. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Datrixzero (talk • contribs) 02:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
I changed the info on how Krisiun got their name because I've spoken to the band on numerous ocassions both in Brazil and in Texas. Max made it clear that the name comes from the Crisium crater on the Moon. I understand that you want the name to have some dark and demonic roots, but they don't. You shouldn't have erased my edit seeing as you're completely wrong and you're giving out wrong information to the public. You've never spoken to Krisiun about this and it's laughable that you would consider my edit misinformed. It comes straight from the band themselves. You should write to them personally and ask them about their history instead of creating it yourself.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk • contribs)
- I think you're responding to the wrong person, and you've never edited that article. ... discospinster talk 17:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
So where should we add it to?
Thanks a lot for the revert
- Me too --Rumping 02:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
I do not understand why my changes have been reverted or removed?!?
I provided an article with a neutral POV, with facts backed up by the 50-something resources I listed. This whole things is just crazy, all because I am not some big-time "Wikipedian" or a big-time editor, it does not mean that my work should not be at the very least considered. This goes against everything Wikipedia stands for and what it was created for, the free encyclopedia made by "the people." To not even HAVE my article considered is an OUTRAGE!!! If you want to review it again or check it for the mistakes you have made by removing please do, or I will report this activity and your behavior to your superiors.
[remove excessively long copy-and-paste]
If you now see your mistake and want to tell me to first consult other editors and/or moderators, please dont it will just be a hopeless, futile attempt that will waste my time. To get my point across the Turkish editors will be impossible that are so stubborn.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk • contribs)
- Copying and pasting unformatted blocks of text into several articles is the wrong way to add information to Wikipedia. Where did this article come from? There are copyright issues to consider. If you wrote it yourself then there will be a problem with original research. If there is information there that you feel should be there then you need to add it in a way that is consistent with the rest of the article. ... discospinster talk 15:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
I got permission from the authors of those articles and they enthusiastically enchouraged me to put there articles up on Wikipedia. I put the various articles together myself, and then I copy and pasted it onto Wikipedia, I don't see no reason for me not to, I am not going to waste my time rewriting the whole thing onto here.
And about your claim or original research, I posted the article up on this discussion board look and tell me if you see ONE error, because there are none, I revised the whole thing for grammatical errors, and historical errors.
First of all why did you put the word '"error free"' in quotes, and second if you don't take my word that I have already recieved permission from the origninal authors and etc., than do you want me to tell them to contact you in order for me to get my article approved.
What is with you and constantly reverting my edits on The Blind God? I'm going to suppose you eventually bothered to check the edit history, since you reverted back to my redirect finally, but why the edit war over a completely superfluous page? I had already asked the admin to delete it, and I was told "No." So I blanked it. Were you do obnoxiously blind as to fail at noticing that the content of the afore-mentioned page was already in the main article of Blade of Tyshalle (and covered better), hence my efforts at removing it? Now, it's a redirect to the main article, yet you go and revert it to the article text only to revert BACK to a redirect a minute later. What the hell is your problem? Gunning for adminship? Howa0082 17:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
That doesn't explain or justify you reverting my redirect. Howa0082 18:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
See WP:Be Bold I'm not going to sit around waiting for people to reach a concensus will will almost certainly be "yes, this page is crap, toss it". As well, WP:Ignore all rules I know the rules, and I know that ignoring them works pretty damn well most times. This isn't like debating merging Upper Canada with Canada West. This is turning a stub into a redirect to a more informative article that already covers the topic of the stub. Howa0082 18:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
RE: Thanks for Reverting
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 01:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
My apologies. You deleted so much text, that it seemed like you just deleted content. Sorry. Ilyushka88 19:03, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Patrican Borthers College
Hello i am aware that you believe my post are from a non-neutral point of view which indeed does violate the codes of wikipedia, i cam highly aware of this rule, but can confidently argue that these post are based of fact and hence facts and truth cannont contain biased. this is especially in realtion to Facilities by which a non-biased aproach has been taken. I am sure if u attended the college you would be able to recognise these writing as fact. i am aware that the line "DON’T SEND YOU SONS TO THIS SCHOOL!" are biased and have sinced removed them. due to the reason you do not attend the college i believe you cannot deem what is truth for biased writings and thus please avoid editing the page further,
User scripts, TW, popups, et al.
Hi I noticed you do alot of vandalism reverting with TW and popups. I had been doing it by hand and I am not familiar with those tools. Since you seem to use both can you share with me your basic strategy for using them? How can I get the best of both worlds from each? Thanks. -- Diletante 02:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Patrician Brothers College
i would like firstly to re-highlight the fact you do not attend the college and therefore how can you deem what is truth for biased writings. Therefore to continually remove editing to a page is rude and obnoxious. and thus please avoid editing the page further as your views are based on superstition and miss placed beliefs. For evidence/sources for the changes in relation to facilities, i would kindly like to ask you to obtain a map of the school which highlight the facts being produced, as i am unable to send anything over wikipedia. Furthermore i would like to highlight the fact as stated on the vandalism page "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism" thus any changes i have made cannot be deemed vandalism and hence your last comment is highly irrelevant. as for relation to the edit to the section history, evidence may be found within the catholic church values reproduced in the college as stated in the schools rosarian (official document). further evidence may be found within the school bully system or lack of bully system. further evidence if required may also be found within the happenings of the college in relation to art works and various evidents and thus i sincerely ask you to look at each of these documents before making any further edits.
kind regards PBCF, i would also ask in your reply you make the reasons for evident if further changes are made clear with specific quotes and valid reasons not by using your power to block as a means of providing reasoning or miss guided beliefs in relation to the college. similarly i would also like to ask you to provide sources which prove my comments as vandalism or bias, please use your power (hence think if the tables were turned) wisely it is the greatest temptation for evil and dominance and these are unwanted by society. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PBCF (talk • contribs) 11:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Patrician Brothers College
i would like to say i have removed all biased within the additions. if you believe something ot be from a non-neutral point of view please only remove that section not the entirety of text whihc has been added. i would like to refute your comment "It does not matter at all whether I attend the college" as seemingly without this experience you lack the in ability to differenciate fact from fiction. similarly if you believe a point to be from a non-neutral point of view, please provide suffficent evidence to support your claim as i have. you also stated "among others You are not providing reliable sources for your claims, which has also been pointed out to you" however a reliable source is "A reliable source is a published work regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. Evaluation of reliability will depend on the credibility of the author and the publication, along with consideration of the context." furthermore as history (please refer to jenkins on the situation or any post-modernist historian) you do not have the authority to deem a source non reliable when a clear relation may be associated to the context and information. therefore if you precisely check the occurances of the school as stated in every rosarian published (these are all legal published documents i would like you to note) i am well aware you will find all information to support my claims, and please use these in your deeming of my content as biased.
Thanks for your help at beer pong!
Why have you removed true facts I enetered about Tommy Boyd?
I recently updated Tommy Boyd's entry to include recent ANti-Semitic comments he had made. You seem to be interested in covering these up. I will be reporting you to WIkipedia for your Anti-Semitic bias! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 22:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I've received message
Hi, I got your warning, now please let me clean up my talk page. No rules say editers are required to keep messages on their talk. Thank you Elbowdrop 00:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Why did u revert me??? Redlink looks bad in main article. I try to help edit! Pic was a error. Elbowdrop 00:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- No no no rules say they have to stay! I know this. Elbowdrop 00:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
You look like an expert...
You've been almost-randomly selected to give us your opinions on a new proposal to identify Wikipedia's experts. Any comments would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! CanIBeFrank 05:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
DIscospinster is a racist Jew Hater
Discospinster repeatedly took out removal to Tommy Boyd's anti-semitic comments even though I pointed him towards the recording of them.
Discospinster is an anti-semite
You are a liar and an Anti-Semite
You made the following change: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tommy_Boyd&diff=prev&oldid=169620803:
removing a TRUE fact It is easly provable by the recording. the Oct 21 show www.playradiouk.com
Why do it if you are not a Holocaust denier and a racist trying to cover up for another Anti-Semite?
Here is the'offending' passage: Tommy Boyd's October 21st show featured a skype call from America who Boyd immediately made the victim of some Anti-Semitic bullying, forcing the caller to defend the Holocaust. Boyd himself insisted that the fact that people had survived Auschwitz meant that there was no Holocaust. He did not let the caller respond to his Anti-Semitic assertions, instead cutting to commercial.
Instead of calling me abusive, why not look at yourself?
Good call on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalan Edwin Decker. Bearian 19:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
If you are not what I claim you are
WHy do you continue to change my edits even after I responded to your first removal by making them much less rude?
I have listened to you, I understand that my first edit was rude, jokey and sarcastic. SO I have changed it to be serious, not at all rude, and represent the actual facts.
I have offered you proof.
I will change it back again, with no rude words, and I would greatly appreciate it if you let this comment stand. THERE WILL BE NO RUDE WORDS AND EVERYTHING IS TRUE. I am prefectly willing to believe you are not a racist or anti-semite, but if you remove this comment you will have proved yourself one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 19:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Campus fire safety
Campus fire safety has been tagged several time for Cleanup, once by you. The only editor of this article has removed the tags without discussion, but in fairness, he has not received any specific comments for changes. I don't have time to take this on right now, but thought you might want to reinforce your tag with a comment or two on the Talk page. Cheers. Fireproeng 03:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Elmont Memorial High School
I would like to know why the section 'Student Memories: Class of 1979' was removed? I am a member of the Class of 1979 and a reunion co-ordinator and we were planning to add our own person memories of going to Elmont Memorial in that space. We also planning to ask other classes to add their memories. I do not think there was anything wrong with alumni adding their personal memories.The Original Grunge 19:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
For fixing my sloppy edit! (Seenitall 03:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC))
- No problem, we all have done it at one point or another! ... discospinster talk 14:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey. You've clearly made many, many edits and are great on the anti-vandal front. I was wondering if you'd like to consider adminship. If you would like to at WP:RFA let me know, I'd nom you. If you do want to though, let me know about your article writing experience, that seems to be something they like to see of late. Wizardman 21:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
James William Williams
The majority of their edits seem to minor or copyediting in nature, that's a far cry from obvious vandalism. AIV is reserved for people who insert things like "LOLLERCAUST DICKS" into articles, not stuff that'll take me five minutes to figure out. If it's subtle vandalism, report it to WP:ANI, where an admin with time to burn can take a good look at it. By the way, blanking warnings is allowed, and should be interpreted as a sign that the user has read the warning. east.718 at 05:03, November 28, 2007
Accept my references as they are formatted or delete the article
You made a comment on my New York Radical Feminist page that I deleted so as not to be embarrassed as a screw up with my NYRF friends who might read the page. I also did so because the first Wikipedian, Razorflame, who read my article and welcomed me found no fault with it and my research and references.
If you said the article was not Wikipedian because I put references directly in the article but not as footnotes then do delete it. I detest footnotes that no one reads.
Now I see what you mean. You really improved my article in a way I did not know how to and did not change my intent for a section as did a previous editor. Still older people who cannot read small print as well as younger ones may have preferred the way I put in references in standard print within parenthesis in the article. That will be the trouble with Wikipedia, older people who have later acquired technical skills will find this all too much and will not share their knowledge.Ldsnh2 03:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
New YRF article text size of references
Hi No it's OK. The font size of the footnotes is nearly the same size as the text. Other articles have the text small for footnotes that is hard to read. I just so much prefer references in parentheses within the text rather than have to spend more time searching them out also as to vision thing as an older person with me vision coordination. But this will work for me and my friends.
You will see how I took your really nice foundation and built the article up more. I appreciate it and if I was at all upset it was due to a previous editor who really bothered me with her comments and edit. I know that's the chance we take and my NYRF friends would do what they would with the article, but I did not know of people who just go about commenting and editing articles to pass the time Ldsnh2 23:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I just created a stub for a high school here in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada but I made a minor error with the school name. Instead of reading "Sir John A. MacDonald Secondary School (Hamilton)" it should read instead: Sir John A. Macdonald Secondary School (Hamilton)"....small "d" in the "Macdonald". Is there anyway that I can correct this? Thanks. Nhl4hamilton 04:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm most grateful, Discospinster, for your reverting the latest deletion of the photo of the vaulted ceiling from the Santo Domingo article . I fear it will soon be gone again. User:BigGabriel555 appears to be engaged in a long-term edit war against anyone replacing that photo, stating only "does not look good on the page" when pressed for a reason, and refuses to discuss what can be done in terms of size or placement to satisfy his vision of the page. I don't know how to stop him. Tim Ross·talk 12:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
I dont understand why you are sending me messages???
Greetings and thanks for your prompt revert of vandalism to Bailey bridge. I wish to offer a small suggestion. While too late now in this case, when reverting within a few minutes of the offense I think it is a good idea to issue the following to the user talk page:
re.: [[<article title>]]
(this is "Thanks for experimenting...), or if minor nonsense edit, also the test2 template, "Please do not add nonsense..."
This in the interest indicating to the experimenter that he/she is being watched. I have noticed that major offenses often are an escalation of a series of small tests.
I see that you perform extensive vandal chasing, and I thank you very much.