User talk:Disputed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Jiroemon Kimura great-great-grandchildren[edit]

OK, thanks for indicating a more recent reference source in your edit summary. It would have been nice if you could have done that from the start, and ideally included it in the article itself, but I'll add it shortly if you are not too familiar with how to add reference to articles. --DAJF (talk) 13:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Jiroemon Kimura and Misao Okawa[edit]

I was not vandalizing articles. I was trying to fix grammar and make those articles better. (talk) 19:12, 2 March 2014

Article vandalism[edit]

The difference between me vandalizing articles and helping articles can be seen here (talk) 03:12, 4 March 2014

List of Japanese supercentenarians[edit]

In response to the message you left on my talk page, I edit one name, sometimes two, at a time because I want to make sure I don't make any errors. If I edit the whole thing in one edit, I often mess up. Deaths in 2013 (talk) 02:06, 11 May 2014

This is abnormal. your edit is so annoying. Changing the page, please only once for one day.--Disputed (talk) 01:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

User page[edit]

Disputed, please use User:Disputed/Sandbox page to work on articles, they don't belong on your main user page. If not moved, the page could be nominated for deletion for having inappropriate content. Liz Read! Talk! 14:43, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Warning[edit]

You have already been told multiple times that there is no policy violation with User:Deaths in 2013 in how they edit, yet you continue to leave warnings on their talk page. I've tried being polite, I've tried being blunt, but you continue to warn. Those warnings are disruptive. If you continue to place unwarranted warnings on users talk pages for non-existing policy violations, you will be blocked. You have been warned enough, you should consider this your final warning. Dennis Brown |  | WER 01:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Also, please read Wikipedia:Vandalism. Labelling others' edits such as [1] as vandalism when they are clearly not is not productive either. Connormah (talk) 01:25, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Disputed[edit]

User:Disputed, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Disputed and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Disputed during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Connormah (talk) 06:25, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Formatting[edit]

Hi Disputed. I just restored User:TFBCT1's formatting on List of supercentenarians who died in the 1980s in case that was the basis of her/his dispute with me. Now I see from article histories that you and s/he have had a dispute over the formatting of these articles. I don't have a preference one way or the other. Is there a reason why you've been changing the formatting? Regards, Ground Zero | t 14:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

this version is difficult to distinguish pending and verified. In the case of this list, I think no need to change.--Disputed (talk) 14:09, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Hm. Actually I think it is quite easy to disctinguish between pending and verified. The former has "pending" beside it, and the latter has "yes" beside it. That is clear and unamibiguous. I think you should heed the advice below about not using colours. Adding colours makes the article harder to read for people with visual impairments, and so doing that is against Wikipedia policy. Less colour is easier to read. Ground Zero | t 16:33, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Issue templates[edit]

I am going to have to ask that you please stop removing the Accessibility and Layout issue templates from the various centenarian list articles. Also please do not rely heavily upon color to convey information as this is against the Accessibility guidelines and prevents blind, color blind, or otherwise visually impaired individual from accessing the same information that perfectly sighted people can. Please do not remove the issue templates until the layout and accessibility issues have been solved. Thank you. -- dsprc [talk] 14:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of German supercentenarians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blomberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Sakari Momoi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. DAJF (talk) 10:15, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Disputed/sandbox[edit]

User:Disputed/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Disputed/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Disputed/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)