User talk:Djmastr11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I have not committed any vandalism so if thats why you are writing me you should double check what your accusing me of.

June 2012[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tonywalton Talk 00:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Enough[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours. You need to review the following during the period of your block:

  • Wikipedia is not a platform for furthering your own arguments. See WP:SOAP and WP:NPOV.
  • Edits made to articles must be verifiable in reliable sources. Edits which are not will be challenged and may be removed. This is not "vandalism", please review WP:V for what vandalism is.
  • Do not change an editor's userpage unless to revert obvious vandalism. See WP:NOBAN. Doing so is vandalism.
  • Read WP:5P to see what this project is about. It is not for you (or anyone else) to further their own agenda.
  • Read WP:CIV and WP:AGF regarding civility and the assumption of good faith. Editors reverting your edits (which are classed as vandalism, by the way) have been doing so to maintain Wikipedia standards. Your assumption that anyone disagreeing with you is in the pay of Full Sail University (of which I have never heard) is against the Wikipedia guideline on assuming good faith at best and paranoia at worst.

Please take the time of your block to review what Wikipedia is, and is not, about. If following this period you are happy to continue as a productive editor you will be welcome. Tonywalton Talk 00:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tonywalton Talk 00:13, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for repeat of your prior POV pushing after your block expired, as you did at Full Sail University. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tonywalton Talk 22:45, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Your last chance. The next time you add an unsourced comment pushing your own point of view to Full Sail University or to any other Wikipedia article you will probably be blocked indefinitely from editing as your account will be considered as one used only for vandalism. See WP:VOA. For the record (and all edits here are recorded) I have no connection with Full Sail University. I am not in the pay of Full Sail University. I have never heard of Full Sail University and my personal view is that "Full Sail University" is amongst the most ridiculous names ever given to an institute of learning (unless to a sailing school). This opinion however, thankfully, is irrelevant and should never appear on the article's Wikipedia page; the same applies to yours. Learn the difference between your point of view and Wikipedia standards. Tonywalton Talk 23:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:11, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Djmastr11 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I did not vandalize and actually did edit full sails wiki even though there was no source posted it is the truth and after being blocked but immediately undid the changes less than 1 minute later. Djmastr11 (talk) 19:03, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You've had enough warnings and blocks to help you understand that you must stop screwing up that article, period. Since it appears to be the only point of interest on Wikipedia for you, unblocking you will not help building the encycopedia in any way. Max Semenik (talk) 19:23, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page for as long as you are blocked.